Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Jim
 
Posts: n/a
Default ( OT ) Clarke's story holds

The Washington Post on Sunday ran an analysis of Richard
Clarke's claims that the White House moved slowly to address
the al Qaeda threat before 9/11, and found that despite the
Bush administration's attempts to tear Clarke and his story
down, it has been bolstered.

" … The broad outline of Clarke's criticism has been
corroborated by a number of other former officials,
congressional and commission investigators, and by Bush's
admission in the 2003 Bob Woodward book 'Bush at War' that
he 'didn't feel that sense of urgency' about Osama bin Laden
before the attacks occurred. In addition, a review of dozens
of declassified citations from Clarke's 2002 testimony
provides no evidence of contradiction, and White House
officials familiar with the testimony agree that any
differences are matters of emphasis, not fact. Indeed, the
declassified 838-page report of the 2002 congressional
inquiry includes many passages that appear to bolster the
arguments Clarke has made.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...-2004Apr5.html

Requires FREE registration

  #2   Report Post  
John H
 
Posts: n/a
Default ( OT ) Clarke's story holds

On Mon, 05 Apr 2004 11:33:34 -0400, Jim wrote:

The Washington Post on Sunday ran an analysis of Richard
Clarke's claims that the White House moved slowly to address
the al Qaeda threat before 9/11, and found that despite the
Bush administration's attempts to tear Clarke and his story
down, it has been bolstered.

" … The broad outline of Clarke's criticism has been
corroborated by a number of other former officials,
congressional and commission investigators, and by Bush's
admission in the 2003 Bob Woodward book 'Bush at War' that
he 'didn't feel that sense of urgency' about Osama bin Laden
before the attacks occurred. In addition, a review of dozens
of declassified citations from Clarke's 2002 testimony
provides no evidence of contradiction, and White House
officials familiar with the testimony agree that any
differences are matters of emphasis, not fact. Indeed, the
declassified 838-page report of the 2002 congressional
inquiry includes many passages that appear to bolster the
arguments Clarke has made.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...-2004Apr5.html

Requires FREE registration


To which story are you referring? He's told several, admitted same, and blamed
it on a desire to do what's best for America.

Right.

John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
OT--Not again! More Chinese money buying our politicians. NOYB General 23 February 6th 04 04:01 PM
Incredible MOB survival story! Gould 0738 General 22 October 15th 03 02:40 PM
Story about a historic schooner Gould 0738 General 4 August 22nd 03 01:03 AM
OT - Where is the lie? (especially for jcs) jps General 33 July 28th 03 12:56 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:44 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017