On Sat, 03 Apr 2004 22:56:20 GMT, Joe Parsons
wrote:

On Sat, 3 Apr 2004 17:28:09 -0500, " Tuuk" wrote:

Come on there Harry,, Your changing the goal posts again to your liking. Not
too smart are ya.

Yes Harry, the average educated individual does work for 8 different
employers during their careers. Not like you old timers or retirees who
worked for only one employer their entire careers. Especially you union
types. Harry, I made you a bet before, I will do it again, if you wish to
compare say incomes, I will put a thousand U.S.dollars down that my taxable
incomes are higher than yours there smarty. For a thousand, I will drive
down to where ever you live, real friendly like, prove to you that my last
10 years taxable income was more than yours was in any given year. Dont
knock my employments there Harry, I have never belonged to a union, never
had the need. While you morons fight for your greedy incomes, mine is
earned. Wanna put some money where your mouth is? Back to you Harry, what
say you?

Why don't you just compare the size of your genitalia?

It would be about as meaningful.

Joe Parsons

Will you stop encouraging them? This is no place for binaries.

John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

" Tuuk" wrote in message
...
Ya, its probably a long drive anyway. I gots better things to do.
Since your talking about dicks, I'll pass there, I'm bettin your a bigger
dick.


LMAO!!!

See ya...

*ploink*

--
-Netsock

"It's just about going fast...that's all..."
http://home.insight.rr.com/cgreen/
"jim--" wrote in message
...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
Thanks. It's been fun watching you try to rationalize the amazingly
strong
employment numbers.



Amazingly strong? Bull****.

You are correct Harry. In fact they are amazingly *good* (not strong)
considering what we have gone through, including 9-11, the war on
terrorists
and a worldwide recession.

And considering the average unemployment rates in the 1970s', the 1980's
and
the 1990's 5.7% is quite good.

Thanks for the correction Harry.. ;-)