What the Internet has done for me.
 

The Internet has been invaluable in that it has demonstrated how the vast
majority of the world consists of fools, idiots and ignorant people who
don't know how to think, what to think or why to think.

One can no longer ignore the huge majority of inferior intellects that
pretend to be anything but. It's especially alarming that the people
one reads on the newsgroups at least can operate a computer. What does
their appalling stupidity say about those too dull to use a computer?

It gives the term 'dumb and dumberer' even greater meaning.

CN

Capt. Neal=AE wrote:
The Internet has been invaluable in that it has demonstrated how the
vast
majority of the world consists of fools, idiots and ignorant people
who
don't know how to think, what to think or why to think.

One can no longer ignore the huge majority of inferior intellects
that
pretend to be anything but. It's especially alarming that the people
one reads on the newsgroups at least can operate a computer. What
does
their appalling stupidity say about those too dull to use a computer?

It gives the term 'dumb and dumberer' even greater meaning.

..=2E.you can't judge the whole of the UK by one thread on one newsgroup.

..=2E.and given you're the only one to see it I don't really give a ****
how we look to the world!

Capt. Neal=AE wrote:
The Internet has been invaluable in that it has demonstrated how the
vast
majority of the world consists of fools, idiots and ignorant people
who
don't know how to think, what to think or why to think.

But thats a plus Capt. Just look at my bitch punk rusty redcloud. He
did not have a life until I came along and gave him a reason to exist.
He was a lost soul until I allowed him to call himself redcloud and
that gave him a smidgion of hope. Now I get my boots licked clean daily
by him. He such a brown nose punk and loves to worship the water I sail
on. Without the internet and me he would be nothing.

Joe



One can no longer ignore the huge majority of inferior intellects
that
pretend to be anything but. It's especially alarming that the people
one reads on the newsgroups at least can operate a computer. What
does
their appalling stupidity say about those too dull to use a computer?

It gives the term 'dumb and dumberer' even greater meaning.
=20
CN

Capt. Neal® wrote:
: The Internet has been invaluable in that it has demonstrated how the
: vast majority of the world consists of fools, idiots and ignorant
: people who don't know how to think, what to think or why to think.

the internet merely reflects society as a whole.
:
: One can no longer ignore the huge majority of inferior intellects that
: pretend to be anything but. It's especially alarming that the people
: one reads on the newsgroups at least can operate a computer. What does
: their appalling stupidity say about those too dull to use a computer?

90% of internet users are unaware that usenet even exists. those that do
find their way here are usually slighty more aware than most.
:
: It gives the term 'dumb and dumberer' even greater meaning.
:
: CN

--
Steve Leyland
mhm32x16 Smeeter#24 WSD#41
flower: three 6 four 9 five 8 eight 9
em ess en: my 1st name at purgatory dot org
Alcatroll Labs Inc (bongwater maintenance dept)
http://www.insurgent.org/~alcatroll/
http://www.radioxanadu.tk

=^MEOW MEOW ARMY^=

They say a picture is worth a thousand words, yet the guy at the
gallery wouldn't trade me that painting for my newspaper.
================================================== ====================
"My suggestion is to completely ignore idiots like Leland. They are the
lowest form of pond scum. People like him have tried unsuccessfully in
the past to disrupt the newsgroup. The best medicine is to completely
ignore them. As I'm sure you'll see, they're most intelligent response
is to yell nasty names. Other than that, they have nothing."

JG, netKKKop, alt.sailing.asa
================================================== ====================
"Warning to all:
Steve Leyland is a trolling **** of the highest order. Killfile the
muppet now and move on. Even the briefest of searches on his past
UseNet posts will reveal the truth. You have been warned. *plonk*"

Bear, netKKKop, uk.rec.motorcycles
================================================== ====================
"I didn't delete any part of your meaningless, pointless, worthless
post in order to clearly demonstrate that you are the nemesis of
Usenet: the crossposting, non-editing, diagram-creating worthless,
dickless, brainless, gutless, mindless, ball-less, spineless, flaccid,
obese, fish-belly pale, ugly, VD-ridden, moronic, bald, hunch-backed,
flat-footed, odoriferous, obnoxious, fecal-smelling, buck-toothed,
physically handicapped, fungus-infected, HIV positive, mud-packing,
masturbating, whining, simpering, self-important, arrogant, egomaniacal
POS that takes up more bandwidth than a despicable binary-poster, and
for no apparent reason beyond seeing his own defecatory vomitus
slithering down the screen in vile green rivulets."

Admiral Halsey, alt.sailing.asa
================================================== ====================
"I went to the Garden of Love,
And saw what I never had seen;
A Chapel was built in the midst,
Where I used to play on the green.

And the gates of this Chapel were shut
And "Thou shalt not," writ over the door;
So I turned to the Garden of Love
That so many sweet flowers bore.

And I saw it was filled with graves,
And tombstones where flowers should be;
And priests in black gowns were walking their rounds,
And binding with briars my joys and desires."

William Blake.
================================================== ====================
"When the Earth has been ravaged and the animals are dying, a tribe of
people from all races, creeds and colours shall put their faith in
deeds, not words, and make the land green again. They shall be known as
Warriors of the Rainbow, protectors of the environment."

Native American prophecy


|\ _.-'~~""'~`'~)
/, ~-,__,,,.'~ ,-;;--''
|,4) ./ ' ; ;/'
'-~~;'@ ( ; ;
_.--'' _.-_..' .;.'
(,_..----''' (,..--''

Meow

Capt. Neal=AE wrote:
The Internet has been invaluable in that it has demonstrated how the
vast
majority of the world consists of fools, idiots and ignorant people
who
don't know how to think, what to think or why to think.

One can no longer ignore the huge majority of inferior intellects
that
pretend to be anything but. It's especially alarming that the people
one reads on the newsgroups at least can operate a computer. What
does
their appalling stupidity say about those too dull to use a computer?

It gives the term 'dumb and dumberer' even greater meaning.

CN

What gets me is the amount of truly narrow minded people that frequent
usenet. Their are people here who simply can not see anything other
than their white bread, missionary style only, mundane life. Anything
that is even a tick out of their norm is perceived as evil, bad, or
stupid. Oh, and to think that you've got a good sample of people to be
able to make the above comments IS narrow minded. I'd say to you that
MAYBE 5% or so of the computer literate people in the world frequent
usenet.

On 24 May 2005 05:17:02 -0700, wrote:


Capt. Neal® wrote:
The Internet has been invaluable in that it has demonstrated how the
vast
majority of the world consists of fools, idiots and ignorant people
who
don't know how to think, what to think or why to think.

One can no longer ignore the huge majority of inferior intellects
that
pretend to be anything but. It's especially alarming that the people
one reads on the newsgroups at least can operate a computer. What
does
their appalling stupidity say about those too dull to use a computer?

It gives the term 'dumb and dumberer' even greater meaning.

CN

What gets me is the amount of truly narrow minded people that frequent
usenet. Their are people here who simply can not see anything other
than their white bread, missionary style only, mundane life. Anything
that is even a tick out of their norm is perceived as evil, bad, or
stupid. Oh, and to think that you've got a good sample of people to be
able to make the above comments IS narrow minded. I'd say to you that
MAYBE 5% or so of the computer literate people in the world frequent
usenet.

'There'

Like, "There are people here who are simply stupid."

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes (A true binary thinker!)

John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 05:17:02 -0700, wrote:


Capt. Neal=AE wrote:
The Internet has been invaluable in that it has demonstrated how
the
vast
majority of the world consists of fools, idiots and ignorant
people
who
don't know how to think, what to think or why to think.

One can no longer ignore the huge majority of inferior intellects
that
pretend to be anything but. It's especially alarming that the
people
one reads on the newsgroups at least can operate a computer. What
does
their appalling stupidity say about those too dull to use a
computer?

It gives the term 'dumb and dumberer' even greater meaning.

CN

What gets me is the amount of truly narrow minded people that
frequent
usenet. Their are people here who simply can not see anything other
than their white bread, missionary style only, mundane life.
Anything
that is even a tick out of their norm is perceived as evil, bad, or
stupid. Oh, and to think that you've got a good sample of people to
be
able to make the above comments IS narrow minded. I'd say to you
that
MAYBE 5% or so of the computer literate people in the world frequent
usenet.

'There'

Like, "There are people here who are simply stupid."

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD


John, do YOU ever make a grammatical mistake? Want me to show one of
yours? If I do, will you then call YOURSELF stupid?

On 24 May 2005 06:20:59 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 05:17:02 -0700, wrote:


Capt. Neal® wrote:
The Internet has been invaluable in that it has demonstrated how
the
vast
majority of the world consists of fools, idiots and ignorant
people
who
don't know how to think, what to think or why to think.

One can no longer ignore the huge majority of inferior intellects
that
pretend to be anything but. It's especially alarming that the
people
one reads on the newsgroups at least can operate a computer. What
does
their appalling stupidity say about those too dull to use a
computer?

It gives the term 'dumb and dumberer' even greater meaning.

CN

What gets me is the amount of truly narrow minded people that
frequent
usenet. Their are people here who simply can not see anything other
than their white bread, missionary style only, mundane life.
Anything
that is even a tick out of their norm is perceived as evil, bad, or
stupid. Oh, and to think that you've got a good sample of people to
be
able to make the above comments IS narrow minded. I'd say to you
that
MAYBE 5% or so of the computer literate people in the world frequent
usenet.

'There'

Like, "There are people here who are simply stupid."

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD


John, do YOU ever make a grammatical mistake? Want me to show one of
yours? If I do, will you then call YOURSELF stupid?

I try to be especially careful with my grammar when I am discussing the
stupidity of my fellow man.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes (A true binary thinker!)

In article ,
Capt. Neal® wrote:

The Internet has been invaluable in that it has demonstrated how the vast
majority of the world consists of fools, idiots and ignorant people who
don't know how to think, what to think or why to think.

One can no longer ignore the huge majority of inferior intellects that
pretend to be anything but. It's especially alarming that the people
one reads on the newsgroups at least can operate a computer. What does
their appalling stupidity say about those too dull to use a computer?

It gives the term 'dumb and dumberer' even greater meaning.

CN

Have you ever noted that people see in others what they hate in
themselves.

Thanks for getting me to finally make the effort to figure out how to
kill file someone. I guess since I put up with your inanities and
insults for so long and did not know immediately how to dispense with
them, I have proved your point.

h

--
To respond, obviously drop the "nospan"?

"John H" wrote in message
...
On 24 May 2005 06:20:59 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 05:17:02 -0700, wrote:


Capt. Neal® wrote:
The Internet has been invaluable in that it has demonstrated how
the
vast
majority of the world consists of fools, idiots and ignorant
people
who
don't know how to think, what to think or why to think.

One can no longer ignore the huge majority of inferior intellects
that
pretend to be anything but. It's especially alarming that the
people
one reads on the newsgroups at least can operate a computer. What
does
their appalling stupidity say about those too dull to use a
computer?

It gives the term 'dumb and dumberer' even greater meaning.

CN

What gets me is the amount of truly narrow minded people that
frequent
usenet. Their are people here who simply can not see anything other
than their white bread, missionary style only, mundane life.
Anything
that is even a tick out of their norm is perceived as evil, bad, or
stupid. Oh, and to think that you've got a good sample of people to
be
able to make the above comments IS narrow minded. I'd say to you
that
MAYBE 5% or so of the computer literate people in the world frequent
usenet.

'There'

Like, "There are people here who are simply stupid."

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD


John, do YOU ever make a grammatical mistake? Want me to show one of
yours? If I do, will you then call YOURSELF stupid?

I try to be especially careful with my grammar when I am discussing the
stupidity of my fellow man.

Poor kevin.........still suffering from the side effects of the bitch
slapping he took over 'slander'

I wonder if he will ever learn the difference between "your" and "you're"
It might make his alternate personalities easier to hide.


--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to
resolve it."
Rene Descartes (A true binary thinker!)

John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 06:20:59 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 05:17:02 -0700, wrote:


Capt. Neal=AE wrote:
The Internet has been invaluable in that it has demonstrated
how
the
vast
majority of the world consists of fools, idiots and ignorant
people
who
don't know how to think, what to think or why to think.

One can no longer ignore the huge majority of inferior
intellects
that
pretend to be anything but. It's especially alarming that the
people
one reads on the newsgroups at least can operate a computer.
What
does
their appalling stupidity say about those too dull to use a
computer?

It gives the term 'dumb and dumberer' even greater meaning.

CN

What gets me is the amount of truly narrow minded people that
frequent
usenet. Their are people here who simply can not see anything
other
than their white bread, missionary style only, mundane life.
Anything
that is even a tick out of their norm is perceived as evil, bad,
or
stupid. Oh, and to think that you've got a good sample of people
to
be
able to make the above comments IS narrow minded. I'd say to you
that
MAYBE 5% or so of the computer literate people in the world
frequent
usenet.

'There'

Like, "There are people here who are simply stupid."

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD


John, do YOU ever make a grammatical mistake? Want me to show one of
yours? If I do, will you then call YOURSELF stupid?

I try to be especially careful with my grammar when I am discussing
the
stupidity of my fellow man.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Then answer the question. You always do the same thing, in that
something just doesn't hit your brain. You see a question, then ATTEMPT
to answer it, but.....don't. Care to try again? The question I asked
you was Do you want me to show one of YOUR grammatical errors?

P=2EFritz wrote:
"John H" wrote in message
...
On 24 May 2005 06:20:59 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 05:17:02 -0700, wrote:


Capt. Neal=AE wrote:
The Internet has been invaluable in that it has demonstrated
how
the
vast
majority of the world consists of fools, idiots and ignorant
people
who
don't know how to think, what to think or why to think.

One can no longer ignore the huge majority of inferior
intellects
that
pretend to be anything but. It's especially alarming that the
people
one reads on the newsgroups at least can operate a computer.
What
does
their appalling stupidity say about those too dull to use a
computer?

It gives the term 'dumb and dumberer' even greater meaning.

CN

What gets me is the amount of truly narrow minded people that
frequent
usenet. Their are people here who simply can not see anything
other
than their white bread, missionary style only, mundane life.
Anything
that is even a tick out of their norm is perceived as evil, bad,
or
stupid. Oh, and to think that you've got a good sample of people
to
be
able to make the above comments IS narrow minded. I'd say to you
that
MAYBE 5% or so of the computer literate people in the world
frequent
usenet.

'There'

Like, "There are people here who are simply stupid."

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD


John, do YOU ever make a grammatical mistake? Want me to show one
of
yours? If I do, will you then call YOURSELF stupid?

I try to be especially careful with my grammar when I am discussing
the
stupidity of my fellow man.

Poor kevin.........still suffering from the side effects of the bitch

slapping he took over 'slander'

I wonder if he will ever learn the difference between "your" and
"you're"
It might make his alternate personalities easier to hide.


Hey, idiot Fritz. First, I'm not Kevin, though I DO find it quite
humorous that you are too stupid to figure it out! Now, go hide little
sissy, before you get hurt playing with grown ups. By the way, I posted
just how a lie could be slanderous, you dolt.

John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 06:20:59 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 05:17:02 -0700, wrote:


Capt. Neal=AE wrote:
The Internet has been invaluable in that it has demonstrated
how
the
vast
majority of the world consists of fools, idiots and ignorant
people
who
don't know how to think, what to think or why to think.

One can no longer ignore the huge majority of inferior
intellects
that
pretend to be anything but. It's especially alarming that the
people
one reads on the newsgroups at least can operate a computer.
What
does
their appalling stupidity say about those too dull to use a
computer?

It gives the term 'dumb and dumberer' even greater meaning.

CN

What gets me is the amount of truly narrow minded people that
frequent
usenet. Their are people here who simply can not see anything
other
than their white bread, missionary style only, mundane life.
Anything
that is even a tick out of their norm is perceived as evil, bad,
or
stupid. Oh, and to think that you've got a good sample of people
to
be
able to make the above comments IS narrow minded. I'd say to you
that
MAYBE 5% or so of the computer literate people in the world
frequent
usenet.

'There'

Like, "There are people here who are simply stupid."

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD


John, do YOU ever make a grammatical mistake? Want me to show one of
yours? If I do, will you then call YOURSELF stupid?

I try to be especially careful with my grammar when I am discussing
the
stupidity of my fellow man.

--=20
John H

Really, seen any Cesnas in your area!!!!!!!!!!!!!???

On 24 May 2005 09:01:37 -0700, wrote:


P.Fritz wrote:
"John H" wrote in message
...
On 24 May 2005 06:20:59 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 05:17:02 -0700, wrote:


Capt. Neal® wrote:
The Internet has been invaluable in that it has demonstrated
how
the
vast
majority of the world consists of fools, idiots and ignorant
people
who
don't know how to think, what to think or why to think.

One can no longer ignore the huge majority of inferior
intellects
that
pretend to be anything but. It's especially alarming that the
people
one reads on the newsgroups at least can operate a computer.
What
does
their appalling stupidity say about those too dull to use a
computer?

It gives the term 'dumb and dumberer' even greater meaning.

CN

What gets me is the amount of truly narrow minded people that
frequent
usenet. Their are people here who simply can not see anything
other
than their white bread, missionary style only, mundane life.
Anything
that is even a tick out of their norm is perceived as evil, bad,
or
stupid. Oh, and to think that you've got a good sample of people
to
be
able to make the above comments IS narrow minded. I'd say to you
that
MAYBE 5% or so of the computer literate people in the world
frequent
usenet.

'There'

Like, "There are people here who are simply stupid."

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD


John, do YOU ever make a grammatical mistake? Want me to show one
of
yours? If I do, will you then call YOURSELF stupid?

I try to be especially careful with my grammar when I am discussing
the
stupidity of my fellow man.

Poor kevin.........still suffering from the side effects of the bitch

slapping he took over 'slander'

I wonder if he will ever learn the difference between "your" and
"you're"
It might make his alternate personalities easier to hide.


Hey, idiot Fritz. First, I'm not Kevin, though I DO find it quite
humorous that you are too stupid to figure it out! Now, go hide little
sissy, before you get hurt playing with grown ups. By the way, I posted
just how a lie could be slanderous, you dolt.

A slanderous lie is like alcoholic whiskey. Simple.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes (A true binary thinker!)

On 24 May 2005 08:58:45 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 06:20:59 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 05:17:02 -0700, wrote:


Capt. Neal® wrote:
The Internet has been invaluable in that it has demonstrated
how
the
vast
majority of the world consists of fools, idiots and ignorant
people
who
don't know how to think, what to think or why to think.

One can no longer ignore the huge majority of inferior
intellects
that
pretend to be anything but. It's especially alarming that the
people
one reads on the newsgroups at least can operate a computer.
What
does
their appalling stupidity say about those too dull to use a
computer?

It gives the term 'dumb and dumberer' even greater meaning.

CN

What gets me is the amount of truly narrow minded people that
frequent
usenet. Their are people here who simply can not see anything
other
than their white bread, missionary style only, mundane life.
Anything
that is even a tick out of their norm is perceived as evil, bad,
or
stupid. Oh, and to think that you've got a good sample of people
to
be
able to make the above comments IS narrow minded. I'd say to you
that
MAYBE 5% or so of the computer literate people in the world
frequent
usenet.

'There'

Like, "There are people here who are simply stupid."

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD


John, do YOU ever make a grammatical mistake? Want me to show one of
yours? If I do, will you then call YOURSELF stupid?

I try to be especially careful with my grammar when I am discussing
the
stupidity of my fellow man.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Then answer the question. You always do the same thing, in that
something just doesn't hit your brain. You see a question, then ATTEMPT
to answer it, but.....don't. Care to try again? The question I asked
you was Do you want me to show one of YOUR grammatical errors?

Please show the posts in which I've made grammatical errors while discussing the
stupidity of my fellow man.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes (A true binary thinker!)

On 24 May 2005 09:04:15 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 06:20:59 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 05:17:02 -0700, wrote:


Capt. Neal® wrote:
The Internet has been invaluable in that it has demonstrated
how
the
vast
majority of the world consists of fools, idiots and ignorant
people
who
don't know how to think, what to think or why to think.

One can no longer ignore the huge majority of inferior
intellects
that
pretend to be anything but. It's especially alarming that the
people
one reads on the newsgroups at least can operate a computer.
What
does
their appalling stupidity say about those too dull to use a
computer?

It gives the term 'dumb and dumberer' even greater meaning.

CN

What gets me is the amount of truly narrow minded people that
frequent
usenet. Their are people here who simply can not see anything
other
than their white bread, missionary style only, mundane life.
Anything
that is even a tick out of their norm is perceived as evil, bad,
or
stupid. Oh, and to think that you've got a good sample of people
to
be
able to make the above comments IS narrow minded. I'd say to you
that
MAYBE 5% or so of the computer literate people in the world
frequent
usenet.

'There'

Like, "There are people here who are simply stupid."

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD


John, do YOU ever make a grammatical mistake? Want me to show one of
yours? If I do, will you then call YOURSELF stupid?

I try to be especially careful with my grammar when I am discussing
the
stupidity of my fellow man.

--
John H

Really, seen any Cesnas in your area!!!!!!!!!!!!!???

No. In fact, I didn't see the Cessna yesterday.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes (A true binary thinker!)

"John H" wrote in message
...
On 24 May 2005 09:01:37 -0700, wrote:


P.Fritz wrote:
"John H" wrote in message
...
On 24 May 2005 06:20:59 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 05:17:02 -0700, wrote:


Capt. Neal® wrote:
The Internet has been invaluable in that it has demonstrated
how
the
vast
majority of the world consists of fools, idiots and ignorant
people
who
don't know how to think, what to think or why to think.

One can no longer ignore the huge majority of inferior
intellects
that
pretend to be anything but. It's especially alarming that the
people
one reads on the newsgroups at least can operate a computer.
What
does
their appalling stupidity say about those too dull to use a
computer?

It gives the term 'dumb and dumberer' even greater meaning.

CN

What gets me is the amount of truly narrow minded people that
frequent
usenet. Their are people here who simply can not see anything
other
than their white bread, missionary style only, mundane life.
Anything
that is even a tick out of their norm is perceived as evil, bad,
or
stupid. Oh, and to think that you've got a good sample of people
to
be
able to make the above comments IS narrow minded. I'd say to you
that
MAYBE 5% or so of the computer literate people in the world
frequent
usenet.

'There'

Like, "There are people here who are simply stupid."

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD


John, do YOU ever make a grammatical mistake? Want me to show one
of
yours? If I do, will you then call YOURSELF stupid?

I try to be especially careful with my grammar when I am discussing
the
stupidity of my fellow man.

Poor kevin.........still suffering from the side effects of the bitch

slapping he took over 'slander'

I wonder if he will ever learn the difference between "your" and
"you're"
It might make his alternate personalities easier to hide.


Hey, idiot Fritz. First, I'm not Kevin, though I DO find it quite
humorous that you are too stupid to figure it out! Now, go hide little
sissy, before you get hurt playing with grown ups. By the way, I posted
just how a lie could be slanderous, you dolt.

A slanderous lie is like alcoholic whiskey. Simple.

Poor kevin......still having problems grasping simple english......I guess
he enjoyed that bich slapping

.......and he wonders why he is the "King of the NG idiots"


--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to
resolve it."
Rene Descartes (A true binary thinker!)

P=2EFritz wrote:
"John H" wrote in message
...
On 24 May 2005 09:01:37 -0700, wrote:


P.Fritz wrote:
"John H" wrote in message
...
On 24 May 2005 06:20:59 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 05:17:02 -0700, wrote:


Capt. Neal=AE wrote:
The Internet has been invaluable in that it has
demonstrated
how
the
vast
majority of the world consists of fools, idiots and
ignorant
people
who
don't know how to think, what to think or why to think.

One can no longer ignore the huge majority of inferior
intellects
that
pretend to be anything but. It's especially alarming that
the
people
one reads on the newsgroups at least can operate a
computer.
What
does
their appalling stupidity say about those too dull to use
a
computer?

It gives the term 'dumb and dumberer' even greater
meaning.

CN

What gets me is the amount of truly narrow minded people
that
frequent
usenet. Their are people here who simply can not see
anything
other
than their white bread, missionary style only, mundane life.
Anything
that is even a tick out of their norm is perceived as evil,
bad,
or
stupid. Oh, and to think that you've got a good sample of
people
to
be
able to make the above comments IS narrow minded. I'd say to
you
that
MAYBE 5% or so of the computer literate people in the world
frequent
usenet.

'There'

Like, "There are people here who are simply stupid."

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD


John, do YOU ever make a grammatical mistake? Want me to show
one
of
yours? If I do, will you then call YOURSELF stupid?

I try to be especially careful with my grammar when I am
discussing
the
stupidity of my fellow man.

Poor kevin.........still suffering from the side effects of the
bitch

slapping he took over 'slander'

I wonder if he will ever learn the difference between "your" and
"you're"
It might make his alternate personalities easier to hide.


Hey, idiot Fritz. First, I'm not Kevin, though I DO find it quite
humorous that you are too stupid to figure it out! Now, go hide
little
sissy, before you get hurt playing with grown ups. By the way, I
posted
just how a lie could be slanderous, you dolt.

A slanderous lie is like alcoholic whiskey. Simple.

Poor kevin......still having problems grasping simple english......I
guess
he enjoyed that bich slapping

......and he wonders why he is the "King of the NG idiots"

HEHEHEHE!!!!!!!!!!! Fritz whining like an idiot about ME, and can't
even spell!!!!!!!!!!!

John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 09:01:37 -0700, wrote:


P.Fritz wrote:
"John H" wrote in message
...
On 24 May 2005 06:20:59 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 05:17:02 -0700, wrote:


Capt. Neal=AE wrote:
The Internet has been invaluable in that it has
demonstrated
how
the
vast
majority of the world consists of fools, idiots and
ignorant
people
who
don't know how to think, what to think or why to think.

One can no longer ignore the huge majority of inferior
intellects
that
pretend to be anything but. It's especially alarming that
the
people
one reads on the newsgroups at least can operate a
computer.
What
does
their appalling stupidity say about those too dull to use a
computer?

It gives the term 'dumb and dumberer' even greater meaning.

CN

What gets me is the amount of truly narrow minded people that
frequent
usenet. Their are people here who simply can not see anything
other
than their white bread, missionary style only, mundane life.
Anything
that is even a tick out of their norm is perceived as evil,
bad,
or
stupid. Oh, and to think that you've got a good sample of
people
to
be
able to make the above comments IS narrow minded. I'd say to
you
that
MAYBE 5% or so of the computer literate people in the world
frequent
usenet.

'There'

Like, "There are people here who are simply stupid."

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD


John, do YOU ever make a grammatical mistake? Want me to show
one
of
yours? If I do, will you then call YOURSELF stupid?

I try to be especially careful with my grammar when I am
discussing
the
stupidity of my fellow man.

Poor kevin.........still suffering from the side effects of the
bitch

slapping he took over 'slander'

I wonder if he will ever learn the difference between "your" and
"you're"
It might make his alternate personalities easier to hide.


Hey, idiot Fritz. First, I'm not Kevin, though I DO find it quite
humorous that you are too stupid to figure it out! Now, go hide
little
sissy, before you get hurt playing with grown ups. By the way, I
posted
just how a lie could be slanderous, you dolt.

A slanderous lie is like alcoholic whiskey. Simple.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Nope, you are wrong, John. Dead wrong. AND, I'll bet you don't have
enough sense to figure out how, do you? NOW, are you going to answer my
question posed to you, John, or not?

John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 08:58:45 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 06:20:59 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 05:17:02 -0700, wrote:


Capt. Neal=AE wrote:
The Internet has been invaluable in that it has demonstrated
how
the
vast
majority of the world consists of fools, idiots and ignorant
people
who
don't know how to think, what to think or why to think.

One can no longer ignore the huge majority of inferior
intellects
that
pretend to be anything but. It's especially alarming that
the
people
one reads on the newsgroups at least can operate a computer.
What
does
their appalling stupidity say about those too dull to use a
computer?

It gives the term 'dumb and dumberer' even greater meaning.

CN

What gets me is the amount of truly narrow minded people that
frequent
usenet. Their are people here who simply can not see anything
other
than their white bread, missionary style only, mundane life.
Anything
that is even a tick out of their norm is perceived as evil,
bad,
or
stupid. Oh, and to think that you've got a good sample of
people
to
be
able to make the above comments IS narrow minded. I'd say to
you
that
MAYBE 5% or so of the computer literate people in the world
frequent
usenet.

'There'

Like, "There are people here who are simply stupid."

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD


John, do YOU ever make a grammatical mistake? Want me to show one
of
yours? If I do, will you then call YOURSELF stupid?

I try to be especially careful with my grammar when I am
discussing
the
stupidity of my fellow man.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Then answer the question. You always do the same thing, in that
something just doesn't hit your brain. You see a question, then
ATTEMPT
to answer it, but.....don't. Care to try again? The question I asked
you was Do you want me to show one of YOUR grammatical errors?

Please show the posts in which I've made grammatical errors while
discussing the
stupidity of my fellow man.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Ah, your usual M.O. again. Make special caveats to make yourself sound
like you don't do anything. Now, why would it have to be "while
discussing the stupidity of my fellow man"? If it is in some other
discussion that you make a grammatical error, is it then exceptable to
you? If so, then great, because *I* was discussing narrow mindedness.
If not, then you would be just as guilty of grammatical errors as I.

John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 09:04:15 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 06:20:59 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 05:17:02 -0700, wrote:


Capt. Neal=AE wrote:
The Internet has been invaluable in that it has demonstrated
how
the
vast
majority of the world consists of fools, idiots and ignorant
people
who
don't know how to think, what to think or why to think.

One can no longer ignore the huge majority of inferior
intellects
that
pretend to be anything but. It's especially alarming that
the
people
one reads on the newsgroups at least can operate a computer.
What
does
their appalling stupidity say about those too dull to use a
computer?

It gives the term 'dumb and dumberer' even greater meaning.

CN

What gets me is the amount of truly narrow minded people that
frequent
usenet. Their are people here who simply can not see anything
other
than their white bread, missionary style only, mundane life.
Anything
that is even a tick out of their norm is perceived as evil,
bad,
or
stupid. Oh, and to think that you've got a good sample of
people
to
be
able to make the above comments IS narrow minded. I'd say to
you
that
MAYBE 5% or so of the computer literate people in the world
frequent
usenet.

'There'

Like, "There are people here who are simply stupid."

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD


John, do YOU ever make a grammatical mistake? Want me to show one
of
yours? If I do, will you then call YOURSELF stupid?

I try to be especially careful with my grammar when I am
discussing
the
stupidity of my fellow man.

--
John H

Really, seen any Cesnas in your area!!!!!!!!!!!!!???

No. In fact, I didn't see the Cessna yesterday.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

That's odd, I see Cessnas ever day. I don't however, see Cesnas. Who
makes those?

wrote in message
ups.com...

John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 08:58:45 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 06:20:59 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 05:17:02 -0700, wrote:


Capt. Neal® wrote:
The Internet has been invaluable in that it has demonstrated
how
the
vast
majority of the world consists of fools, idiots and ignorant
people
who
don't know how to think, what to think or why to think.

One can no longer ignore the huge majority of inferior
intellects
that
pretend to be anything but. It's especially alarming that
the
people
one reads on the newsgroups at least can operate a computer.
What
does
their appalling stupidity say about those too dull to use a
computer?

It gives the term 'dumb and dumberer' even greater meaning.

CN

What gets me is the amount of truly narrow minded people that
frequent
usenet. Their are people here who simply can not see anything
other
than their white bread, missionary style only, mundane life.
Anything
that is even a tick out of their norm is perceived as evil,
bad,
or
stupid. Oh, and to think that you've got a good sample of
people
to
be
able to make the above comments IS narrow minded. I'd say to
you
that
MAYBE 5% or so of the computer literate people in the world
frequent
usenet.

'There'

Like, "There are people here who are simply stupid."

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD


John, do YOU ever make a grammatical mistake? Want me to show one
of
yours? If I do, will you then call YOURSELF stupid?

I try to be especially careful with my grammar when I am
discussing
the
stupidity of my fellow man.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Then answer the question. You always do the same thing, in that
something just doesn't hit your brain. You see a question, then
ATTEMPT
to answer it, but.....don't. Care to try again? The question I asked
you was Do you want me to show one of YOUR grammatical errors?

Please show the posts in which I've made grammatical errors while
discussing the
stupidity of my fellow man.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Ah, your usual M.O. again. Make special caveats to make yourself sound
like you don't do anything. Now, why would it have to be "while
discussing the stupidity of my fellow man"? If it is in some other
discussion that you make a grammatical error, is it then exceptable to
you? If so, then great, because *I* was discussing narrow mindedness.
If not, then you would be just as guilty of grammatical errors as I.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++

You can take me Lord because I have now seen everything.

John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 08:58:45 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 06:20:59 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 05:17:02 -0700, wrote:


Capt. Neal=AE wrote:
The Internet has been invaluable in that it has demonstrated
how
the
vast
majority of the world consists of fools, idiots and ignorant
people
who
don't know how to think, what to think or why to think.

One can no longer ignore the huge majority of inferior
intellects
that
pretend to be anything but. It's especially alarming that
the
people
one reads on the newsgroups at least can operate a computer.
What
does
their appalling stupidity say about those too dull to use a
computer?

It gives the term 'dumb and dumberer' even greater meaning.

CN

What gets me is the amount of truly narrow minded people that
frequent
usenet. Their are people here who simply can not see anything
other
than their white bread, missionary style only, mundane life.
Anything
that is even a tick out of their norm is perceived as evil,
bad,
or
stupid. Oh, and to think that you've got a good sample of
people
to
be
able to make the above comments IS narrow minded. I'd say to
you
that
MAYBE 5% or so of the computer literate people in the world
frequent
usenet.

'There'

Like, "There are people here who are simply stupid."

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD


John, do YOU ever make a grammatical mistake? Want me to show one
of
yours? If I do, will you then call YOURSELF stupid?

I try to be especially careful with my grammar when I am
discussing
the
stupidity of my fellow man.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Then answer the question. You always do the same thing, in that
something just doesn't hit your brain. You see a question, then
ATTEMPT
to answer it, but.....don't. Care to try again? The question I asked
you was Do you want me to show one of YOUR grammatical errors?

Please show the posts in which I've made grammatical errors while
discussing the
stupidity of my fellow man.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Hey, John, how come you don't get on Fritz's back? Below, as usual he's
name calling, which you tell others here isn't conducive to the "tone
of the group". AND, your newest peeve, while calling me an idiot, he
doesn't seem to know how to spell "bitch".

On 24 May 2005 12:12:05 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 08:58:45 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 06:20:59 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 05:17:02 -0700, wrote:


Capt. Neal® wrote:
The Internet has been invaluable in that it has demonstrated
how
the
vast
majority of the world consists of fools, idiots and ignorant
people
who
don't know how to think, what to think or why to think.

One can no longer ignore the huge majority of inferior
intellects
that
pretend to be anything but. It's especially alarming that
the
people
one reads on the newsgroups at least can operate a computer.
What
does
their appalling stupidity say about those too dull to use a
computer?

It gives the term 'dumb and dumberer' even greater meaning.

CN

What gets me is the amount of truly narrow minded people that
frequent
usenet. Their are people here who simply can not see anything
other
than their white bread, missionary style only, mundane life.
Anything
that is even a tick out of their norm is perceived as evil,
bad,
or
stupid. Oh, and to think that you've got a good sample of
people
to
be
able to make the above comments IS narrow minded. I'd say to
you
that
MAYBE 5% or so of the computer literate people in the world
frequent
usenet.

'There'

Like, "There are people here who are simply stupid."

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD


John, do YOU ever make a grammatical mistake? Want me to show one
of
yours? If I do, will you then call YOURSELF stupid?

I try to be especially careful with my grammar when I am
discussing
the
stupidity of my fellow man.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Then answer the question. You always do the same thing, in that
something just doesn't hit your brain. You see a question, then
ATTEMPT
to answer it, but.....don't. Care to try again? The question I asked
you was Do you want me to show one of YOUR grammatical errors?

Please show the posts in which I've made grammatical errors while
discussing the
stupidity of my fellow man.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Ah, your usual M.O. again. Make special caveats to make yourself sound
like you don't do anything. Now, why would it have to be "while
discussing the stupidity of my fellow man"? If it is in some other
discussion that you make a grammatical error, is it then exceptable to
you? If so, then great, because *I* was discussing narrow mindedness.
If not, then you would be just as guilty of grammatical errors as I.

Yes, it's then exceptable. :)

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes (A true binary thinker!)

On 24 May 2005 12:13:41 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 09:04:15 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 06:20:59 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 05:17:02 -0700, wrote:


Capt. Neal® wrote:
The Internet has been invaluable in that it has demonstrated
how
the
vast
majority of the world consists of fools, idiots and ignorant
people
who
don't know how to think, what to think or why to think.

One can no longer ignore the huge majority of inferior
intellects
that
pretend to be anything but. It's especially alarming that
the
people
one reads on the newsgroups at least can operate a computer.
What
does
their appalling stupidity say about those too dull to use a
computer?

It gives the term 'dumb and dumberer' even greater meaning.

CN

What gets me is the amount of truly narrow minded people that
frequent
usenet. Their are people here who simply can not see anything
other
than their white bread, missionary style only, mundane life.
Anything
that is even a tick out of their norm is perceived as evil,
bad,
or
stupid. Oh, and to think that you've got a good sample of
people
to
be
able to make the above comments IS narrow minded. I'd say to
you
that
MAYBE 5% or so of the computer literate people in the world
frequent
usenet.

'There'

Like, "There are people here who are simply stupid."

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD


John, do YOU ever make a grammatical mistake? Want me to show one
of
yours? If I do, will you then call YOURSELF stupid?

I try to be especially careful with my grammar when I am
discussing
the
stupidity of my fellow man.

--
John H

Really, seen any Cesnas in your area!!!!!!!!!!!!!???

No. In fact, I didn't see the Cessna yesterday.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

That's odd, I see Cessnas ever day. I don't however, see Cesnas. Who
makes those?

Ever day, huh? Same ones? Do they get hit by lightning? Ever day?

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes (A true binary thinker!)

"*JimH*" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
ups.com...

John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 08:58:45 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 06:20:59 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 05:17:02 -0700, wrote:


Capt. Neal® wrote:
The Internet has been invaluable in that it has demonstrated
how
the
vast
majority of the world consists of fools, idiots and ignorant
people
who
don't know how to think, what to think or why to think.

One can no longer ignore the huge majority of inferior
intellects
that
pretend to be anything but. It's especially alarming that
the
people
one reads on the newsgroups at least can operate a computer.
What
does
their appalling stupidity say about those too dull to use a
computer?

It gives the term 'dumb and dumberer' even greater meaning.

CN

What gets me is the amount of truly narrow minded people that
frequent
usenet. Their are people here who simply can not see anything
other
than their white bread, missionary style only, mundane life.
Anything
that is even a tick out of their norm is perceived as evil,
bad,
or
stupid. Oh, and to think that you've got a good sample of
people
to
be
able to make the above comments IS narrow minded. I'd say to
you
that
MAYBE 5% or so of the computer literate people in the world
frequent
usenet.

'There'

Like, "There are people here who are simply stupid."

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD


John, do YOU ever make a grammatical mistake? Want me to show one
of
yours? If I do, will you then call YOURSELF stupid?

I try to be especially careful with my grammar when I am
discussing
the
stupidity of my fellow man.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Then answer the question. You always do the same thing, in that
something just doesn't hit your brain. You see a question, then
ATTEMPT
to answer it, but.....don't. Care to try again? The question I asked
you was Do you want me to show one of YOUR grammatical errors?

Please show the posts in which I've made grammatical errors while
discussing the
stupidity of my fellow man.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Ah, your usual M.O. again. Make special caveats to make yourself sound
like you don't do anything. Now, why would it have to be "while
discussing the stupidity of my fellow man"? If it is in some other
discussion that you make a grammatical error, is it then exceptable to
you? If so, then great, because *I* was discussing narrow mindedness.
If not, then you would be just as guilty of grammatical errors as I.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++

You can take me Lord because I have now seen everything.

And kevin wonders why he is the "KING"

On 24 May 2005 12:13:41 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 09:04:15 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 06:20:59 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 05:17:02 -0700, wrote:


Capt. Neal® wrote:
The Internet has been invaluable in that it has demonstrated
how
the
vast
majority of the world consists of fools, idiots and ignorant
people
who
don't know how to think, what to think or why to think.

One can no longer ignore the huge majority of inferior
intellects
that
pretend to be anything but. It's especially alarming that
the
people
one reads on the newsgroups at least can operate a computer.
What
does
their appalling stupidity say about those too dull to use a
computer?

It gives the term 'dumb and dumberer' even greater meaning.

CN

What gets me is the amount of truly narrow minded people that
frequent
usenet. Their are people here who simply can not see anything
other
than their white bread, missionary style only, mundane life.
Anything
that is even a tick out of their norm is perceived as evil,
bad,
or
stupid. Oh, and to think that you've got a good sample of
people
to
be
able to make the above comments IS narrow minded. I'd say to
you
that
MAYBE 5% or so of the computer literate people in the world
frequent
usenet.

'There'

Like, "There are people here who are simply stupid."

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD


John, do YOU ever make a grammatical mistake? Want me to show one
of
yours? If I do, will you then call YOURSELF stupid?

I try to be especially careful with my grammar when I am
discussing
the
stupidity of my fellow man.

--
John H

Really, seen any Cesnas in your area!!!!!!!!!!!!!???

No. In fact, I didn't see the Cessna yesterday.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

That's odd, I see Cessnas ever day. I don't however, see Cesnas. Who
makes those?

Oh, these folks make 'em: http://www.ben****ers4fun.com/flyingcesna.html

I see 'em ever' day!

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes (A true binary thinker!)

On Tue, 24 May 2005 15:15:17 -0400, "*JimH*" wrote:


wrote in message
oups.com...

John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 08:58:45 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 06:20:59 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 05:17:02 -0700, wrote:


Capt. Neal® wrote:
The Internet has been invaluable in that it has demonstrated
how
the
vast
majority of the world consists of fools, idiots and ignorant
people
who
don't know how to think, what to think or why to think.

One can no longer ignore the huge majority of inferior
intellects
that
pretend to be anything but. It's especially alarming that
the
people
one reads on the newsgroups at least can operate a computer.
What
does
their appalling stupidity say about those too dull to use a
computer?

It gives the term 'dumb and dumberer' even greater meaning.

CN

What gets me is the amount of truly narrow minded people that
frequent
usenet. Their are people here who simply can not see anything
other
than their white bread, missionary style only, mundane life.
Anything
that is even a tick out of their norm is perceived as evil,
bad,
or
stupid. Oh, and to think that you've got a good sample of
people
to
be
able to make the above comments IS narrow minded. I'd say to
you
that
MAYBE 5% or so of the computer literate people in the world
frequent
usenet.

'There'

Like, "There are people here who are simply stupid."

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD


John, do YOU ever make a grammatical mistake? Want me to show one
of
yours? If I do, will you then call YOURSELF stupid?

I try to be especially careful with my grammar when I am
discussing
the
stupidity of my fellow man.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Then answer the question. You always do the same thing, in that
something just doesn't hit your brain. You see a question, then
ATTEMPT
to answer it, but.....don't. Care to try again? The question I asked
you was Do you want me to show one of YOUR grammatical errors?

Please show the posts in which I've made grammatical errors while
discussing the
stupidity of my fellow man.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Ah, your usual M.O. again. Make special caveats to make yourself sound
like you don't do anything. Now, why would it have to be "while
discussing the stupidity of my fellow man"? If it is in some other
discussion that you make a grammatical error, is it then exceptable to
you? If so, then great, because *I* was discussing narrow mindedness.
If not, then you would be just as guilty of grammatical errors as I.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++

You can take me Lord because I have now seen everything.


Who said Kevin had no sense of humor? I think he's *really* humorous!

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes (A true binary thinker!)

On 24 May 2005 12:15:34 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 08:58:45 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 06:20:59 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 05:17:02 -0700, wrote:


Capt. Neal® wrote:
The Internet has been invaluable in that it has demonstrated
how
the
vast
majority of the world consists of fools, idiots and ignorant
people
who
don't know how to think, what to think or why to think.

One can no longer ignore the huge majority of inferior
intellects
that
pretend to be anything but. It's especially alarming that
the
people
one reads on the newsgroups at least can operate a computer.
What
does
their appalling stupidity say about those too dull to use a
computer?

It gives the term 'dumb and dumberer' even greater meaning.

CN

What gets me is the amount of truly narrow minded people that
frequent
usenet. Their are people here who simply can not see anything
other
than their white bread, missionary style only, mundane life.
Anything
that is even a tick out of their norm is perceived as evil,
bad,
or
stupid. Oh, and to think that you've got a good sample of
people
to
be
able to make the above comments IS narrow minded. I'd say to
you
that
MAYBE 5% or so of the computer literate people in the world
frequent
usenet.

'There'

Like, "There are people here who are simply stupid."

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD


John, do YOU ever make a grammatical mistake? Want me to show one
of
yours? If I do, will you then call YOURSELF stupid?

I try to be especially careful with my grammar when I am
discussing
the
stupidity of my fellow man.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Then answer the question. You always do the same thing, in that
something just doesn't hit your brain. You see a question, then
ATTEMPT
to answer it, but.....don't. Care to try again? The question I asked
you was Do you want me to show one of YOUR grammatical errors?

Please show the posts in which I've made grammatical errors while
discussing the
stupidity of my fellow man.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Hey, John, how come you don't get on Fritz's back? Below, as usual he's
name calling, which you tell others here isn't conducive to the "tone
of the group". AND, your newest peeve, while calling me an idiot, he
doesn't seem to know how to spell "bitch".

I believe he was talking to Kevin, the guy who doesn't exist. So, why do you pay
attention to a post like that?

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes (A true binary thinker!)

"Harlan Lachman" wrote:
Capt. Neal® wrote:

It gives the term 'dumb and dumberer' even greater meaning.

CN

Have you ever noted that people see in others what they hate in
themselves.

Yes, very true.

Thanks for getting me to finally make the effort to figure out how to
kill file someone.

It's like trying to killfile yourself, no doubt!

LP

On Mon, 23 May 2005 16:53:44 -0400,
Capt Neal® wrote:
The Internet has been invaluable in that it has demonstrated how the vast
majority of the world consists of fools, idiots and ignorant people who
don't know how to think, what to think or why to think.

One can no longer ignore the huge majority of inferior intellects that
pretend to be anything but. It's especially alarming that the people
one reads on the newsgroups at least can operate a computer. What does
their appalling stupidity say about those too dull to use a computer?

It gives the term 'dumb and dumberer' even greater meaning.

CN


don't be so hard on yourself, although this kind of self discovery can
be painful, it's only after you've come to grips with your mental
limits, that you can learn to overcome them.



--
Jim Richardson http://www.eskimo.com/~warlock
If space is warped, time is all that's weft.

John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 12:13:41 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 09:04:15 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 06:20:59 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 05:17:02 -0700, wrote:


Capt. Neal=AE wrote:
The Internet has been invaluable in that it has demonstrated
how
the
vast
majority of the world consists of fools, idiots and ignorant
people
who
don't know how to think, what to think or why to think.

One can no longer ignore the huge majority of inferior
intellects
that
pretend to be anything but. It's especially alarming that
the
people
one reads on the newsgroups at least can operate a computer.
What
does
their appalling stupidity say about those too dull to use a
computer?

It gives the term 'dumb and dumberer' even greater meaning.

CN

What gets me is the amount of truly narrow minded people that
frequent
usenet. Their are people here who simply can not see anything
other
than their white bread, missionary style only, mundane life.
Anything
that is even a tick out of their norm is perceived as evil,
bad,
or
stupid. Oh, and to think that you've got a good sample of
people
to
be
able to make the above comments IS narrow minded. I'd say to
you
that
MAYBE 5% or so of the computer literate people in the world
frequent
usenet.

'There'

Like, "There are people here who are simply stupid."

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD


John, do YOU ever make a grammatical mistake? Want me to show one
of
yours? If I do, will you then call YOURSELF stupid?

I try to be especially careful with my grammar when I am
discussing
the
stupidity of my fellow man.

--
John H

Really, seen any Cesnas in your area!!!!!!!!!!!!!???

No. In fact, I didn't see the Cessna yesterday.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

That's odd, I see Cessnas ever day. I don't however, see Cesnas. Who
makes those?

Oh, these folks make 'em: http://www.ben****ers4fun.com/flyingcesna.html

I see 'em ever' day!

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD
My god you are dumb. Are you REALLY saying that the F-16's you spoke
about were chasing a toy??????

John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 12:12:05 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 08:58:45 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 06:20:59 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 05:17:02 -0700, wrote:


Capt. Neal=AE wrote:
The Internet has been invaluable in that it has demonstrated
how
the
vast
majority of the world consists of fools, idiots and ignorant
people
who
don't know how to think, what to think or why to think.

One can no longer ignore the huge majority of inferior
intellects
that
pretend to be anything but. It's especially alarming that
the
people
one reads on the newsgroups at least can operate a computer.
What
does
their appalling stupidity say about those too dull to use a
computer?

It gives the term 'dumb and dumberer' even greater meaning.

CN

What gets me is the amount of truly narrow minded people that
frequent
usenet. Their are people here who simply can not see anything
other
than their white bread, missionary style only, mundane life.
Anything
that is even a tick out of their norm is perceived as evil,
bad,
or
stupid. Oh, and to think that you've got a good sample of
people
to
be
able to make the above comments IS narrow minded. I'd say to
you
that
MAYBE 5% or so of the computer literate people in the world
frequent
usenet.

'There'

Like, "There are people here who are simply stupid."

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD


John, do YOU ever make a grammatical mistake? Want me to show one
of
yours? If I do, will you then call YOURSELF stupid?

I try to be especially careful with my grammar when I am
discussing
the
stupidity of my fellow man.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Then answer the question. You always do the same thing, in that
something just doesn't hit your brain. You see a question, then
ATTEMPT
to answer it, but.....don't. Care to try again? The question I asked
you was Do you want me to show one of YOUR grammatical errors?

Please show the posts in which I've made grammatical errors while
discussing the
stupidity of my fellow man.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Ah, your usual M.O. again. Make special caveats to make yourself sound
like you don't do anything. Now, why would it have to be "while
discussing the stupidity of my fellow man"? If it is in some other
discussion that you make a grammatical error, is it then exceptable to
you? If so, then great, because *I* was discussing narrow mindedness.
If not, then you would be just as guilty of grammatical errors as I.

Yes, it's then exceptable. :)
=20
--=20
John H

John, thank you for pointing out your ignorance!

John H wrote:

I believe he was talking to Kevin, the guy who doesn't exist. So, why do you pay
attention to a post like that?

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Hmmm, let's see if even a dried up old drunk like you can figure this
out. HE WAS REPLYING TO SOMETHING *I* SAID......Now, being how his is
too stupid to figure this all out (and it's quite simple), he believes
I'm Kevin. I don't mind, it's fun watching Fritz, who thinks he's quite
special wallow around in ignorance!

Kevin,
You are way to funny. Telling John he is ignorant, when you are using the
word "exceptable", when you really mean acceptable.

What year did you graduate from U of Penn?

wrote in message
oups.com...


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 12:12:05 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 08:58:45 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 06:20:59 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 05:17:02 -0700, wrote:


Capt. Neal® wrote:
The Internet has been invaluable in that it has demonstrated
how
the
vast
majority of the world consists of fools, idiots and ignorant
people
who
don't know how to think, what to think or why to think.

One can no longer ignore the huge majority of inferior
intellects
that
pretend to be anything but. It's especially alarming that
the
people
one reads on the newsgroups at least can operate a computer.
What
does
their appalling stupidity say about those too dull to use a
computer?

It gives the term 'dumb and dumberer' even greater meaning.

CN

What gets me is the amount of truly narrow minded people that
frequent
usenet. Their are people here who simply can not see anything
other
than their white bread, missionary style only, mundane life.
Anything
that is even a tick out of their norm is perceived as evil,
bad,
or
stupid. Oh, and to think that you've got a good sample of
people
to
be
able to make the above comments IS narrow minded. I'd say to
you
that
MAYBE 5% or so of the computer literate people in the world
frequent
usenet.

'There'

Like, "There are people here who are simply stupid."

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD


John, do YOU ever make a grammatical mistake? Want me to show one
of
yours? If I do, will you then call YOURSELF stupid?

I try to be especially careful with my grammar when I am
discussing
the
stupidity of my fellow man.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Then answer the question. You always do the same thing, in that
something just doesn't hit your brain. You see a question, then
ATTEMPT
to answer it, but.....don't. Care to try again? The question I asked
you was Do you want me to show one of YOUR grammatical errors?

Please show the posts in which I've made grammatical errors while
discussing the
stupidity of my fellow man.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Ah, your usual M.O. again. Make special caveats to make yourself sound
like you don't do anything. Now, why would it have to be "while
discussing the stupidity of my fellow man"? If it is in some other
discussion that you make a grammatical error, is it then exceptable to
you? If so, then great, because *I* was discussing narrow mindedness.
If not, then you would be just as guilty of grammatical errors as I.

Yes, it's then exceptable. :)

--
John H

John, thank you for pointing out your ignorance!

On 25 May 2005 05:19:24 -0700, wrote:



John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 12:13:41 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 09:04:15 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 06:20:59 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 05:17:02 -0700, wrote:


Capt. Neal® wrote:
The Internet has been invaluable in that it has demonstrated
how
the
vast
majority of the world consists of fools, idiots and ignorant
people
who
don't know how to think, what to think or why to think.

One can no longer ignore the huge majority of inferior
intellects
that
pretend to be anything but. It's especially alarming that
the
people
one reads on the newsgroups at least can operate a computer.
What
does
their appalling stupidity say about those too dull to use a
computer?

It gives the term 'dumb and dumberer' even greater meaning.

CN

What gets me is the amount of truly narrow minded people that
frequent
usenet. Their are people here who simply can not see anything
other
than their white bread, missionary style only, mundane life.
Anything
that is even a tick out of their norm is perceived as evil,
bad,
or
stupid. Oh, and to think that you've got a good sample of
people
to
be
able to make the above comments IS narrow minded. I'd say to
you
that
MAYBE 5% or so of the computer literate people in the world
frequent
usenet.

'There'

Like, "There are people here who are simply stupid."

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD


John, do YOU ever make a grammatical mistake? Want me to show one
of
yours? If I do, will you then call YOURSELF stupid?

I try to be especially careful with my grammar when I am
discussing
the
stupidity of my fellow man.

--
John H

Really, seen any Cesnas in your area!!!!!!!!!!!!!???

No. In fact, I didn't see the Cessna yesterday.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

That's odd, I see Cessnas ever day. I don't however, see Cesnas. Who
makes those?

Oh, these folks make 'em: http://www.ben****ers4fun.com/flyingcesna.html

I see 'em ever' day!

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD
My god you are dumb. Are you REALLY saying that the F-16's you spoke
about were chasing a toy??????

I spoke of F-16's? Chasing a toy?

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes (A true binary thinker!)

On 25 May 2005 05:23:20 -0700, wrote:



John H wrote:

I believe he was talking to Kevin, the guy who doesn't exist. So, why do you pay
attention to a post like that?

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Hmmm, let's see if even a dried up old drunk like you can figure this
out. HE WAS REPLYING TO SOMETHING *I* SAID......Now, being how his is
too stupid to figure this all out (and it's quite simple), he believes
I'm Kevin. I don't mind, it's fun watching Fritz, who thinks he's quite
special wallow around in ignorance!

Who are you? You've used Kevin, basskisser, atl man, etc. etc. Just who are you?

Also, please translate: "Now, being how his is
too stupid to figure this all out (and it's quite simple), he believes
I'm Kevin. I don't mind, it's fun watching Fritz, who thinks he's quite
special wallow around in ignorance!"

Is that supposed to be a sentence? Remember what I said about trying to use
decent grammar and spelling when discussing the stupidity of your fellow man?

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes (A true binary thinker!)

On 25 May 2005 05:20:17 -0700, wrote:


Ah, your usual M.O. again. Make special caveats to make yourself sound
like you don't do anything. Now, why would it have to be "while
discussing the stupidity of my fellow man"? If it is in some other
discussion that you make a grammatical error, is it then exceptable to
you? If so, then great, because *I* was discussing narrow mindedness.
If not, then you would be just as guilty of grammatical errors as I.

Yes, it's then exceptable. :)

--
John H

John, thank you for pointing out your ignorance!

Thanks Kevin. You've made my day. LMFAO!!

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes (A true binary thinker!)

On Wed, 25 May 2005 08:26:27 -0400, "The Snapper Trapper"
wrote:

Kevin,
You are way to funny. Telling John he is ignorant, when you are using the
word "exceptable", when you really mean acceptable.

What year did you graduate from U of Penn?



Ah, your usual M.O. again. Make special caveats to make yourself sound
like you don't do anything. Now, why would it have to be "while
discussing the stupidity of my fellow man"? If it is in some other
discussion that you make a grammatical error, is it then exceptable to
you? If so, then great, because *I* was discussing narrow mindedness.
If not, then you would be just as guilty of grammatical errors as I.

Yes, it's then exceptable. :)

--
John H

John, thank you for pointing out your ignorance!


Why did you tell him? That was too funny, and it could have gotten better!

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes (A true binary thinker!)

I can not make fun of the less fortunate. In some cultures people with
Kevin's infirmity are considered "special".


"John H" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 25 May 2005 08:26:27 -0400, "The Snapper Trapper"
wrote:

Kevin,
You are way to funny. Telling John he is ignorant, when you are using the
word "exceptable", when you really mean acceptable.

What year did you graduate from U of Penn?



Ah, your usual M.O. again. Make special caveats to make yourself sound
like you don't do anything. Now, why would it have to be "while
discussing the stupidity of my fellow man"? If it is in some other
discussion that you make a grammatical error, is it then exceptable to
you? If so, then great, because *I* was discussing narrow mindedness.
If not, then you would be just as guilty of grammatical errors as I.

Yes, it's then exceptable. :)

--
John H

John, thank you for pointing out your ignorance!


Why did you tell him? That was too funny, and it could have gotten better!

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to
resolve it."
Rene Descartes (A true binary thinker!)