Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #51   Report Post  
John H
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 25 May 2005 09:38:09 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote:

John H wrote:
On Wed, 25 May 2005 09:05:43 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote:


John H wrote:

On Wed, 25 May 2005 08:41:55 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote:



John H wrote:


On 25 May 2005 05:23:20 -0700, wrote:




John H wrote:




I believe he was talking to Kevin, the guy who doesn't exist. So, why do you pay
attention to a post like that?

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Hmmm, let's see if even a dried up old drunk like you can figure this
out. HE WAS REPLYING TO SOMETHING *I* SAID......Now, being how his is
too stupid to figure this all out (and it's quite simple), he believes
I'm Kevin. I don't mind, it's fun watching Fritz, who thinks he's quite
special wallow around in ignorance!


Who are you? You've used Kevin, basskisser, atl man, etc. etc. Just who are you?

Also, please translate: "Now, being how his is
too stupid to figure this all out (and it's quite simple), he believes
I'm Kevin. I don't mind, it's fun watching Fritz, who thinks he's quite
special wallow around in ignorance!"

Is that supposed to be a sentence? Remember what I said about trying to use
decent grammar and spelling when discussing the stupidity of your fellow man?



And I thought you were going to be pleasant in here.

Well, fool me once...


How was I unpleasant, Harry? Was I calling someone a name? Was I posting
inflammatory political bull****?

Were you?



I'm not going to regurgitate your unpleasantness. Reread some of your
most recent posts and come to your own conclusion.



Ah. My posts referencing the grammar used in derogatory, name-calling posts by
others is offensive to you?

As you are one of the most prolific of the derogatory name-callers in the group,
I can understand why those posts may bother you.

You won't regurgitate the unpleasantness because it cuts too close to the quick.



You missed the point, John. Your posts were offensive to you. Do you get
that?


Harry, it's most of *your* posts that are offensive to me!

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes (A true binary thinker!)
  #52   Report Post  
John H
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 25 May 2005 09:39:39 -0400, "Harry.Krause" , in
a flight of fancy, wrote:


No one of good cheer, warm heart, and above-average intelligence
considers me despicable.





:)
  #53   Report Post  
P.Fritz
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"John H" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 25 May 2005 09:39:39 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
, in
a flight of fancy, wrote:


No one of good cheer, warm heart, and above-average intelligence
considers me despicable.





:)


That is right, we don't consider him despicable, we consider him a boorish
fool and habitual liar.


  #54   Report Post  
John H
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 25 May 2005 10:35:12 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote:

John H wrote:
On Wed, 25 May 2005 09:39:39 -0400, "Harry.Krause" , in
a flight of fancy, wrote:



No one of good cheer, warm heart, and above-average intelligence
considers me despicable.






:)



I'm glad you've mellowed out and agree.

There are any number of posters here of bad cheer, cold hearts and low
intelligence. I've filtered out almost all of them. I don't know why,
but you seem to enjoy playing on their team from time to time. It
doesn't become you.


Laughter may be a sign of mellowness. It is not a sign of agreement!

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes (A true binary thinker!)
  #55   Report Post  
 
Posts: n/a
Default



John H wrote:
On Wed, 25 May 2005 09:05:43 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote:

John H wrote:
On Wed, 25 May 2005 08:41:55 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote:


John H wrote:

On 25 May 2005 05:23:20 -0700, wrote:



John H wrote:



I believe he was talking to Kevin, the guy who doesn't exist. So, why do you pay
attention to a post like that?

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Hmmm, let's see if even a dried up old drunk like you can figure this
out. HE WAS REPLYING TO SOMETHING *I* SAID......Now, being how his is
too stupid to figure this all out (and it's quite simple), he believes
I'm Kevin. I don't mind, it's fun watching Fritz, who thinks he's quite
special wallow around in ignorance!


Who are you? You've used Kevin, basskisser, atl man, etc. etc. Just who are you?

Also, please translate: "Now, being how his is
too stupid to figure this all out (and it's quite simple), he believes
I'm Kevin. I don't mind, it's fun watching Fritz, who thinks he's quite
special wallow around in ignorance!"

Is that supposed to be a sentence? Remember what I said about trying to use
decent grammar and spelling when discussing the stupidity of your fellow man?



And I thought you were going to be pleasant in here.

Well, fool me once...


How was I unpleasant, Harry? Was I calling someone a name? Was I posting
inflammatory political bull****?

Were you?



I'm not going to regurgitate your unpleasantness. Reread some of your
most recent posts and come to your own conclusion.


Ah. My posts referencing the grammar used in derogatory, name-calling posts by
others is offensive to you?

As you are one of the most prolific of the derogatory name-callers in the group,
I can understand why those posts may bother you.

You won't regurgitate the unpleasantness because it cuts too close to the quick.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Oh, but you forget one little problem John. YOU are the one who wanted
to "change the tone of the group". Does "bull****", "horse****", and
"you are a ****ing liar" sound like something that helps the tone of
the group? You are nothing short of a hypocrite. You and the two that
kiss your ass daily, Fritz and Jim sling more trash in this newsgroup
daily than anyone else. Jim has finally seen the light, so to speak,
and realizes that not everyone that doesn't 100% agree with him, is bad.



  #56   Report Post  
John H
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 25 May 2005 09:07:21 -0700, wrote:



John H wrote:
On Wed, 25 May 2005 09:05:43 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote:

John H wrote:
On Wed, 25 May 2005 08:41:55 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote:


John H wrote:

On 25 May 2005 05:23:20 -0700,
wrote:



John H wrote:



I believe he was talking to Kevin, the guy who doesn't exist. So, why do you pay
attention to a post like that?

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Hmmm, let's see if even a dried up old drunk like you can figure this
out. HE WAS REPLYING TO SOMETHING *I* SAID......Now, being how his is
too stupid to figure this all out (and it's quite simple), he believes
I'm Kevin. I don't mind, it's fun watching Fritz, who thinks he's quite
special wallow around in ignorance!


Who are you? You've used Kevin, basskisser, atl man, etc. etc. Just who are you?

Also, please translate: "Now, being how his is
too stupid to figure this all out (and it's quite simple), he believes
I'm Kevin. I don't mind, it's fun watching Fritz, who thinks he's quite
special wallow around in ignorance!"

Is that supposed to be a sentence? Remember what I said about trying to use
decent grammar and spelling when discussing the stupidity of your fellow man?



And I thought you were going to be pleasant in here.

Well, fool me once...


How was I unpleasant, Harry? Was I calling someone a name? Was I posting
inflammatory political bull****?

Were you?



I'm not going to regurgitate your unpleasantness. Reread some of your
most recent posts and come to your own conclusion.


Ah. My posts referencing the grammar used in derogatory, name-calling posts by
others is offensive to you?

As you are one of the most prolific of the derogatory name-callers in the group,
I can understand why those posts may bother you.

You won't regurgitate the unpleasantness because it cuts too close to the quick.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Oh, but you forget one little problem John. YOU are the one who wanted
to "change the tone of the group". Does "bull****", "horse****", and
"you are a ****ing liar" sound like something that helps the tone of
the group? You are nothing short of a hypocrite. You and the two that
kiss your ass daily, Fritz and Jim sling more trash in this newsgroup
daily than anyone else. Jim has finally seen the light, so to speak,
and realizes that not everyone that doesn't 100% agree with him, is bad.


Go back to bed, Kevin.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes (A true binary thinker!)
  #57   Report Post  
John H
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 25 May 2005 12:14:53 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote:

wrote:

John H wrote:

On Wed, 25 May 2005 09:05:43 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote:


John H wrote:

On Wed, 25 May 2005 08:41:55 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote:



John H wrote:


On 25 May 2005 05:23:20 -0700, wrote:




John H wrote:




I believe he was talking to Kevin, the guy who doesn't exist. So, why do you pay
attention to a post like that?

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Hmmm, let's see if even a dried up old drunk like you can figure this
out. HE WAS REPLYING TO SOMETHING *I* SAID......Now, being how his is
too stupid to figure this all out (and it's quite simple), he believes
I'm Kevin. I don't mind, it's fun watching Fritz, who thinks he's quite
special wallow around in ignorance!


Who are you? You've used Kevin, basskisser, atl man, etc. etc. Just who are you?

Also, please translate: "Now, being how his is
too stupid to figure this all out (and it's quite simple), he believes
I'm Kevin. I don't mind, it's fun watching Fritz, who thinks he's quite
special wallow around in ignorance!"

Is that supposed to be a sentence? Remember what I said about trying to use
decent grammar and spelling when discussing the stupidity of your fellow man?



And I thought you were going to be pleasant in here.

Well, fool me once...


How was I unpleasant, Harry? Was I calling someone a name? Was I posting
inflammatory political bull****?

Were you?



I'm not going to regurgitate your unpleasantness. Reread some of your
most recent posts and come to your own conclusion.

Ah. My posts referencing the grammar used in derogatory, name-calling posts by
others is offensive to you?

As you are one of the most prolific of the derogatory name-callers in the group,
I can understand why those posts may bother you.

You won't regurgitate the unpleasantness because it cuts too close to the quick.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD


Oh, but you forget one little problem John. YOU are the one who wanted
to "change the tone of the group". Does "bull****", "horse****", and
"you are a ****ing liar" sound like something that helps the tone of
the group? You are nothing short of a hypocrite. You and the two that
kiss your ass daily, Fritz and Jim sling more trash in this newsgroup
daily than anyone else. Jim has finally seen the light, so to speak,
and realizes that not everyone that doesn't 100% agree with him, is bad.



Herring sometimes thinks his own nasty posts don't stink.


My posts aren't nasty. Haven't used the f-word except when referring to lies you
told, and 'horse****' and 'bull****' are very mild compared to a lot of the
stuff posted. In fact, I can't believe Kevin is even commenting on the last two
words.



--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes (A true binary thinker!)
  #58   Report Post  
The Snapper Trapper
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Harry,
Do your nasty posts stink?


"Harry.Krause" wrote in message
...
wrote:

John H wrote:

On Wed, 25 May 2005 09:05:43 -0400, "Harry.Krause"

wrote:


John H wrote:

On Wed, 25 May 2005 08:41:55 -0400, "Harry.Krause"

wrote:



John H wrote:


On 25 May 2005 05:23:20 -0700,
wrote:




John H wrote:




I believe he was talking to Kevin, the guy who doesn't exist. So,
why do you pay
attention to a post like that?

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Hmmm, let's see if even a dried up old drunk like you can figure
this
out. HE WAS REPLYING TO SOMETHING *I* SAID......Now, being how his
is
too stupid to figure this all out (and it's quite simple), he
believes
I'm Kevin. I don't mind, it's fun watching Fritz, who thinks he's
quite
special wallow around in ignorance!


Who are you? You've used Kevin, basskisser, atl man, etc. etc. Just
who are you?

Also, please translate: "Now, being how his is
too stupid to figure this all out (and it's quite simple), he
believes
I'm Kevin. I don't mind, it's fun watching Fritz, who thinks he's
quite
special wallow around in ignorance!"

Is that supposed to be a sentence? Remember what I said about trying
to use
decent grammar and spelling when discussing the stupidity of your
fellow man?



And I thought you were going to be pleasant in here.

Well, fool me once...


How was I unpleasant, Harry? Was I calling someone a name? Was I
posting
inflammatory political bull****?

Were you?



I'm not going to regurgitate your unpleasantness. Reread some of your
most recent posts and come to your own conclusion.

Ah. My posts referencing the grammar used in derogatory, name-calling
posts by
others is offensive to you?

As you are one of the most prolific of the derogatory name-callers in the
group,
I can understand why those posts may bother you.

You won't regurgitate the unpleasantness because it cuts too close to the
quick.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD


Oh, but you forget one little problem John. YOU are the one who wanted
to "change the tone of the group". Does "bull****", "horse****", and
"you are a ****ing liar" sound like something that helps the tone of
the group? You are nothing short of a hypocrite. You and the two that
kiss your ass daily, Fritz and Jim sling more trash in this newsgroup
daily than anyone else. Jim has finally seen the light, so to speak,
and realizes that not everyone that doesn't 100% agree with him, is bad.



Herring sometimes thinks his own nasty posts don't stink.



  #59   Report Post  
 
Posts: n/a
Default



John H wrote:
On 25 May 2005 09:07:21 -0700, wrote:



John H wrote:
On Wed, 25 May 2005 09:05:43 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote:

John H wrote:
On Wed, 25 May 2005 08:41:55 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote:


John H wrote:

On 25 May 2005 05:23:20 -0700,
wrote:



John H wrote:



I believe he was talking to Kevin, the guy who doesn't exist. So, why do you pay
attention to a post like that?

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Hmmm, let's see if even a dried up old drunk like you can figure this
out. HE WAS REPLYING TO SOMETHING *I* SAID......Now, being how his is
too stupid to figure this all out (and it's quite simple), he believes
I'm Kevin. I don't mind, it's fun watching Fritz, who thinks he's quite
special wallow around in ignorance!


Who are you? You've used Kevin, basskisser, atl man, etc. etc. Just who are you?

Also, please translate: "Now, being how his is
too stupid to figure this all out (and it's quite simple), he believes
I'm Kevin. I don't mind, it's fun watching Fritz, who thinks he's quite
special wallow around in ignorance!"

Is that supposed to be a sentence? Remember what I said about trying to use
decent grammar and spelling when discussing the stupidity of your fellow man?



And I thought you were going to be pleasant in here.

Well, fool me once...


How was I unpleasant, Harry? Was I calling someone a name? Was I posting
inflammatory political bull****?

Were you?



I'm not going to regurgitate your unpleasantness. Reread some of your
most recent posts and come to your own conclusion.

Ah. My posts referencing the grammar used in derogatory, name-calling posts by
others is offensive to you?

As you are one of the most prolific of the derogatory name-callers in the group,
I can understand why those posts may bother you.

You won't regurgitate the unpleasantness because it cuts too close to the quick.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Oh, but you forget one little problem John. YOU are the one who wanted
to "change the tone of the group". Does "bull****", "horse****", and
"you are a ****ing liar" sound like something that helps the tone of
the group? You are nothing short of a hypocrite. You and the two that
kiss your ass daily, Fritz and Jim sling more trash in this newsgroup
daily than anyone else. Jim has finally seen the light, so to speak,
and realizes that not everyone that doesn't 100% agree with him, is bad.


Go back to bed, Kevin.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

If you wish to correspond with Kevin, may I suggest you do so. As
usual, although, you can't answer the question, huh? Perhaps you should
WAKE UP.

  #60   Report Post  
 
Posts: n/a
Default



John H wrote:
On Wed, 25 May 2005 12:14:53 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote:

wrote:

John H wrote:

On Wed, 25 May 2005 09:05:43 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote:


John H wrote:

On Wed, 25 May 2005 08:41:55 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote:



John H wrote:


On 25 May 2005 05:23:20 -0700, wrote:




John H wrote:




I believe he was talking to Kevin, the guy who doesn't exist. So, why do you pay
attention to a post like that?

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Hmmm, let's see if even a dried up old drunk like you can figure this
out. HE WAS REPLYING TO SOMETHING *I* SAID......Now, being how his is
too stupid to figure this all out (and it's quite simple), he believes
I'm Kevin. I don't mind, it's fun watching Fritz, who thinks he's quite
special wallow around in ignorance!


Who are you? You've used Kevin, basskisser, atl man, etc. etc. Just who are you?

Also, please translate: "Now, being how his is
too stupid to figure this all out (and it's quite simple), he believes
I'm Kevin. I don't mind, it's fun watching Fritz, who thinks he's quite
special wallow around in ignorance!"

Is that supposed to be a sentence? Remember what I said about trying to use
decent grammar and spelling when discussing the stupidity of your fellow man?



And I thought you were going to be pleasant in here.

Well, fool me once...


How was I unpleasant, Harry? Was I calling someone a name? Was I posting
inflammatory political bull****?

Were you?



I'm not going to regurgitate your unpleasantness. Reread some of your
most recent posts and come to your own conclusion.

Ah. My posts referencing the grammar used in derogatory, name-calling posts by
others is offensive to you?

As you are one of the most prolific of the derogatory name-callers in the group,
I can understand why those posts may bother you.

You won't regurgitate the unpleasantness because it cuts too close to the quick.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD


Oh, but you forget one little problem John. YOU are the one who wanted
to "change the tone of the group". Does "bull****", "horse****", and
"you are a ****ing liar" sound like something that helps the tone of
the group? You are nothing short of a hypocrite. You and the two that
kiss your ass daily, Fritz and Jim sling more trash in this newsgroup
daily than anyone else. Jim has finally seen the light, so to speak,
and realizes that not everyone that doesn't 100% agree with him, is bad.



Herring sometimes thinks his own nasty posts don't stink.


My posts aren't nasty. Haven't used the f-word except when referring to lies you
told, and 'horse****' and 'bull****' are very mild compared to a lot of the
stuff posted. In fact, I can't believe Kevin is even commenting on the last two
words.



--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD


John, while I'm not Kevin, and I don't see his posts, so I don't know
what he said to you, you are replying to a reply of mine. So, that
being said, I do know why *I* am commenting on your profanity. It's
because you think that it's okay for you to do such, but then out of
the same gray matter, you state that you are trying to "improve the
tone of the group". Now, I'll ask so that any simpleton can understand.
Do YOU think that using words like "horse****", "bull****", and calling
people "****ing liars" is IMPROVING the "tone of the group"? If no,
then why do you do it? Now, above you've went and put qualifiers on
your profanity. Horse****, and bull**** seem to be okay to you. Please
provide a list with their Tone Improvement Factors, so that we may know
which words are totally acceptable to you in improving the tone of the
group, and which are not.

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ [email protected] General 0 March 30th 05 06:35 AM
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ [email protected] General 0 February 28th 05 05:28 AM
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ [email protected] General 0 June 28th 04 07:43 PM
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ [email protected] General 0 February 16th 04 10:02 AM
rec.boats.paddle sea kayaking FAQ [email protected] General 0 December 15th 03 09:48 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:34 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017