John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 09:04:15 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 06:20:59 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 05:17:02 -0700, wrote:


Capt. Neal=AE wrote:
The Internet has been invaluable in that it has demonstrated
how
the
vast
majority of the world consists of fools, idiots and ignorant
people
who
don't know how to think, what to think or why to think.

One can no longer ignore the huge majority of inferior
intellects
that
pretend to be anything but. It's especially alarming that
the
people
one reads on the newsgroups at least can operate a computer.
What
does
their appalling stupidity say about those too dull to use a
computer?

It gives the term 'dumb and dumberer' even greater meaning.

CN

What gets me is the amount of truly narrow minded people that
frequent
usenet. Their are people here who simply can not see anything
other
than their white bread, missionary style only, mundane life.
Anything
that is even a tick out of their norm is perceived as evil,
bad,
or
stupid. Oh, and to think that you've got a good sample of
people
to
be
able to make the above comments IS narrow minded. I'd say to
you
that
MAYBE 5% or so of the computer literate people in the world
frequent
usenet.

'There'

Like, "There are people here who are simply stupid."

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD


John, do YOU ever make a grammatical mistake? Want me to show one
of
yours? If I do, will you then call YOURSELF stupid?

I try to be especially careful with my grammar when I am
discussing
the
stupidity of my fellow man.

--
John H

Really, seen any Cesnas in your area!!!!!!!!!!!!!???

No. In fact, I didn't see the Cessna yesterday.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

That's odd, I see Cessnas ever day. I don't however, see Cesnas. Who
makes those?

wrote in message
ups.com...

John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 08:58:45 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 06:20:59 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 05:17:02 -0700, wrote:


Capt. Neal® wrote:
The Internet has been invaluable in that it has demonstrated
how
the
vast
majority of the world consists of fools, idiots and ignorant
people
who
don't know how to think, what to think or why to think.

One can no longer ignore the huge majority of inferior
intellects
that
pretend to be anything but. It's especially alarming that
the
people
one reads on the newsgroups at least can operate a computer.
What
does
their appalling stupidity say about those too dull to use a
computer?

It gives the term 'dumb and dumberer' even greater meaning.

CN

What gets me is the amount of truly narrow minded people that
frequent
usenet. Their are people here who simply can not see anything
other
than their white bread, missionary style only, mundane life.
Anything
that is even a tick out of their norm is perceived as evil,
bad,
or
stupid. Oh, and to think that you've got a good sample of
people
to
be
able to make the above comments IS narrow minded. I'd say to
you
that
MAYBE 5% or so of the computer literate people in the world
frequent
usenet.

'There'

Like, "There are people here who are simply stupid."

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD


John, do YOU ever make a grammatical mistake? Want me to show one
of
yours? If I do, will you then call YOURSELF stupid?

I try to be especially careful with my grammar when I am
discussing
the
stupidity of my fellow man.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Then answer the question. You always do the same thing, in that
something just doesn't hit your brain. You see a question, then
ATTEMPT
to answer it, but.....don't. Care to try again? The question I asked
you was Do you want me to show one of YOUR grammatical errors?

Please show the posts in which I've made grammatical errors while
discussing the
stupidity of my fellow man.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Ah, your usual M.O. again. Make special caveats to make yourself sound
like you don't do anything. Now, why would it have to be "while
discussing the stupidity of my fellow man"? If it is in some other
discussion that you make a grammatical error, is it then exceptable to
you? If so, then great, because *I* was discussing narrow mindedness.
If not, then you would be just as guilty of grammatical errors as I.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++

You can take me Lord because I have now seen everything.

John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 08:58:45 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 06:20:59 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 05:17:02 -0700, wrote:


Capt. Neal=AE wrote:
The Internet has been invaluable in that it has demonstrated
how
the
vast
majority of the world consists of fools, idiots and ignorant
people
who
don't know how to think, what to think or why to think.

One can no longer ignore the huge majority of inferior
intellects
that
pretend to be anything but. It's especially alarming that
the
people
one reads on the newsgroups at least can operate a computer.
What
does
their appalling stupidity say about those too dull to use a
computer?

It gives the term 'dumb and dumberer' even greater meaning.

CN

What gets me is the amount of truly narrow minded people that
frequent
usenet. Their are people here who simply can not see anything
other
than their white bread, missionary style only, mundane life.
Anything
that is even a tick out of their norm is perceived as evil,
bad,
or
stupid. Oh, and to think that you've got a good sample of
people
to
be
able to make the above comments IS narrow minded. I'd say to
you
that
MAYBE 5% or so of the computer literate people in the world
frequent
usenet.

'There'

Like, "There are people here who are simply stupid."

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD


John, do YOU ever make a grammatical mistake? Want me to show one
of
yours? If I do, will you then call YOURSELF stupid?

I try to be especially careful with my grammar when I am
discussing
the
stupidity of my fellow man.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Then answer the question. You always do the same thing, in that
something just doesn't hit your brain. You see a question, then
ATTEMPT
to answer it, but.....don't. Care to try again? The question I asked
you was Do you want me to show one of YOUR grammatical errors?

Please show the posts in which I've made grammatical errors while
discussing the
stupidity of my fellow man.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Hey, John, how come you don't get on Fritz's back? Below, as usual he's
name calling, which you tell others here isn't conducive to the "tone
of the group". AND, your newest peeve, while calling me an idiot, he
doesn't seem to know how to spell "bitch".

On 24 May 2005 12:12:05 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 08:58:45 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 06:20:59 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 05:17:02 -0700, wrote:


Capt. Neal® wrote:
The Internet has been invaluable in that it has demonstrated
how
the
vast
majority of the world consists of fools, idiots and ignorant
people
who
don't know how to think, what to think or why to think.

One can no longer ignore the huge majority of inferior
intellects
that
pretend to be anything but. It's especially alarming that
the
people
one reads on the newsgroups at least can operate a computer.
What
does
their appalling stupidity say about those too dull to use a
computer?

It gives the term 'dumb and dumberer' even greater meaning.

CN

What gets me is the amount of truly narrow minded people that
frequent
usenet. Their are people here who simply can not see anything
other
than their white bread, missionary style only, mundane life.
Anything
that is even a tick out of their norm is perceived as evil,
bad,
or
stupid. Oh, and to think that you've got a good sample of
people
to
be
able to make the above comments IS narrow minded. I'd say to
you
that
MAYBE 5% or so of the computer literate people in the world
frequent
usenet.

'There'

Like, "There are people here who are simply stupid."

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD


John, do YOU ever make a grammatical mistake? Want me to show one
of
yours? If I do, will you then call YOURSELF stupid?

I try to be especially careful with my grammar when I am
discussing
the
stupidity of my fellow man.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Then answer the question. You always do the same thing, in that
something just doesn't hit your brain. You see a question, then
ATTEMPT
to answer it, but.....don't. Care to try again? The question I asked
you was Do you want me to show one of YOUR grammatical errors?

Please show the posts in which I've made grammatical errors while
discussing the
stupidity of my fellow man.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Ah, your usual M.O. again. Make special caveats to make yourself sound
like you don't do anything. Now, why would it have to be "while
discussing the stupidity of my fellow man"? If it is in some other
discussion that you make a grammatical error, is it then exceptable to
you? If so, then great, because *I* was discussing narrow mindedness.
If not, then you would be just as guilty of grammatical errors as I.

Yes, it's then exceptable. :)

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes (A true binary thinker!)

On 24 May 2005 12:13:41 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 09:04:15 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 06:20:59 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 05:17:02 -0700, wrote:


Capt. Neal® wrote:
The Internet has been invaluable in that it has demonstrated
how
the
vast
majority of the world consists of fools, idiots and ignorant
people
who
don't know how to think, what to think or why to think.

One can no longer ignore the huge majority of inferior
intellects
that
pretend to be anything but. It's especially alarming that
the
people
one reads on the newsgroups at least can operate a computer.
What
does
their appalling stupidity say about those too dull to use a
computer?

It gives the term 'dumb and dumberer' even greater meaning.

CN

What gets me is the amount of truly narrow minded people that
frequent
usenet. Their are people here who simply can not see anything
other
than their white bread, missionary style only, mundane life.
Anything
that is even a tick out of their norm is perceived as evil,
bad,
or
stupid. Oh, and to think that you've got a good sample of
people
to
be
able to make the above comments IS narrow minded. I'd say to
you
that
MAYBE 5% or so of the computer literate people in the world
frequent
usenet.

'There'

Like, "There are people here who are simply stupid."

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD


John, do YOU ever make a grammatical mistake? Want me to show one
of
yours? If I do, will you then call YOURSELF stupid?

I try to be especially careful with my grammar when I am
discussing
the
stupidity of my fellow man.

--
John H

Really, seen any Cesnas in your area!!!!!!!!!!!!!???

No. In fact, I didn't see the Cessna yesterday.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

That's odd, I see Cessnas ever day. I don't however, see Cesnas. Who
makes those?

Ever day, huh? Same ones? Do they get hit by lightning? Ever day?

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes (A true binary thinker!)

"*JimH*" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
ups.com...

John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 08:58:45 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 06:20:59 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 05:17:02 -0700, wrote:


Capt. Neal® wrote:
The Internet has been invaluable in that it has demonstrated
how
the
vast
majority of the world consists of fools, idiots and ignorant
people
who
don't know how to think, what to think or why to think.

One can no longer ignore the huge majority of inferior
intellects
that
pretend to be anything but. It's especially alarming that
the
people
one reads on the newsgroups at least can operate a computer.
What
does
their appalling stupidity say about those too dull to use a
computer?

It gives the term 'dumb and dumberer' even greater meaning.

CN

What gets me is the amount of truly narrow minded people that
frequent
usenet. Their are people here who simply can not see anything
other
than their white bread, missionary style only, mundane life.
Anything
that is even a tick out of their norm is perceived as evil,
bad,
or
stupid. Oh, and to think that you've got a good sample of
people
to
be
able to make the above comments IS narrow minded. I'd say to
you
that
MAYBE 5% or so of the computer literate people in the world
frequent
usenet.

'There'

Like, "There are people here who are simply stupid."

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD


John, do YOU ever make a grammatical mistake? Want me to show one
of
yours? If I do, will you then call YOURSELF stupid?

I try to be especially careful with my grammar when I am
discussing
the
stupidity of my fellow man.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Then answer the question. You always do the same thing, in that
something just doesn't hit your brain. You see a question, then
ATTEMPT
to answer it, but.....don't. Care to try again? The question I asked
you was Do you want me to show one of YOUR grammatical errors?

Please show the posts in which I've made grammatical errors while
discussing the
stupidity of my fellow man.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Ah, your usual M.O. again. Make special caveats to make yourself sound
like you don't do anything. Now, why would it have to be "while
discussing the stupidity of my fellow man"? If it is in some other
discussion that you make a grammatical error, is it then exceptable to
you? If so, then great, because *I* was discussing narrow mindedness.
If not, then you would be just as guilty of grammatical errors as I.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++

You can take me Lord because I have now seen everything.

And kevin wonders why he is the "KING"

On 24 May 2005 12:13:41 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 09:04:15 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 06:20:59 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 05:17:02 -0700, wrote:


Capt. Neal® wrote:
The Internet has been invaluable in that it has demonstrated
how
the
vast
majority of the world consists of fools, idiots and ignorant
people
who
don't know how to think, what to think or why to think.

One can no longer ignore the huge majority of inferior
intellects
that
pretend to be anything but. It's especially alarming that
the
people
one reads on the newsgroups at least can operate a computer.
What
does
their appalling stupidity say about those too dull to use a
computer?

It gives the term 'dumb and dumberer' even greater meaning.

CN

What gets me is the amount of truly narrow minded people that
frequent
usenet. Their are people here who simply can not see anything
other
than their white bread, missionary style only, mundane life.
Anything
that is even a tick out of their norm is perceived as evil,
bad,
or
stupid. Oh, and to think that you've got a good sample of
people
to
be
able to make the above comments IS narrow minded. I'd say to
you
that
MAYBE 5% or so of the computer literate people in the world
frequent
usenet.

'There'

Like, "There are people here who are simply stupid."

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD


John, do YOU ever make a grammatical mistake? Want me to show one
of
yours? If I do, will you then call YOURSELF stupid?

I try to be especially careful with my grammar when I am
discussing
the
stupidity of my fellow man.

--
John H

Really, seen any Cesnas in your area!!!!!!!!!!!!!???

No. In fact, I didn't see the Cessna yesterday.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

That's odd, I see Cessnas ever day. I don't however, see Cesnas. Who
makes those?

Oh, these folks make 'em: http://www.ben****ers4fun.com/flyingcesna.html

I see 'em ever' day!

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes (A true binary thinker!)

On Tue, 24 May 2005 15:15:17 -0400, "*JimH*" wrote:


wrote in message
oups.com...

John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 08:58:45 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 06:20:59 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 05:17:02 -0700, wrote:


Capt. Neal® wrote:
The Internet has been invaluable in that it has demonstrated
how
the
vast
majority of the world consists of fools, idiots and ignorant
people
who
don't know how to think, what to think or why to think.

One can no longer ignore the huge majority of inferior
intellects
that
pretend to be anything but. It's especially alarming that
the
people
one reads on the newsgroups at least can operate a computer.
What
does
their appalling stupidity say about those too dull to use a
computer?

It gives the term 'dumb and dumberer' even greater meaning.

CN

What gets me is the amount of truly narrow minded people that
frequent
usenet. Their are people here who simply can not see anything
other
than their white bread, missionary style only, mundane life.
Anything
that is even a tick out of their norm is perceived as evil,
bad,
or
stupid. Oh, and to think that you've got a good sample of
people
to
be
able to make the above comments IS narrow minded. I'd say to
you
that
MAYBE 5% or so of the computer literate people in the world
frequent
usenet.

'There'

Like, "There are people here who are simply stupid."

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD


John, do YOU ever make a grammatical mistake? Want me to show one
of
yours? If I do, will you then call YOURSELF stupid?

I try to be especially careful with my grammar when I am
discussing
the
stupidity of my fellow man.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Then answer the question. You always do the same thing, in that
something just doesn't hit your brain. You see a question, then
ATTEMPT
to answer it, but.....don't. Care to try again? The question I asked
you was Do you want me to show one of YOUR grammatical errors?

Please show the posts in which I've made grammatical errors while
discussing the
stupidity of my fellow man.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Ah, your usual M.O. again. Make special caveats to make yourself sound
like you don't do anything. Now, why would it have to be "while
discussing the stupidity of my fellow man"? If it is in some other
discussion that you make a grammatical error, is it then exceptable to
you? If so, then great, because *I* was discussing narrow mindedness.
If not, then you would be just as guilty of grammatical errors as I.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++

You can take me Lord because I have now seen everything.


Who said Kevin had no sense of humor? I think he's *really* humorous!

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes (A true binary thinker!)

On 24 May 2005 12:15:34 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 08:58:45 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 06:20:59 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 May 2005 05:17:02 -0700, wrote:


Capt. Neal® wrote:
The Internet has been invaluable in that it has demonstrated
how
the
vast
majority of the world consists of fools, idiots and ignorant
people
who
don't know how to think, what to think or why to think.

One can no longer ignore the huge majority of inferior
intellects
that
pretend to be anything but. It's especially alarming that
the
people
one reads on the newsgroups at least can operate a computer.
What
does
their appalling stupidity say about those too dull to use a
computer?

It gives the term 'dumb and dumberer' even greater meaning.

CN

What gets me is the amount of truly narrow minded people that
frequent
usenet. Their are people here who simply can not see anything
other
than their white bread, missionary style only, mundane life.
Anything
that is even a tick out of their norm is perceived as evil,
bad,
or
stupid. Oh, and to think that you've got a good sample of
people
to
be
able to make the above comments IS narrow minded. I'd say to
you
that
MAYBE 5% or so of the computer literate people in the world
frequent
usenet.

'There'

Like, "There are people here who are simply stupid."

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD


John, do YOU ever make a grammatical mistake? Want me to show one
of
yours? If I do, will you then call YOURSELF stupid?

I try to be especially careful with my grammar when I am
discussing
the
stupidity of my fellow man.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Then answer the question. You always do the same thing, in that
something just doesn't hit your brain. You see a question, then
ATTEMPT
to answer it, but.....don't. Care to try again? The question I asked
you was Do you want me to show one of YOUR grammatical errors?

Please show the posts in which I've made grammatical errors while
discussing the
stupidity of my fellow man.

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Hey, John, how come you don't get on Fritz's back? Below, as usual he's
name calling, which you tell others here isn't conducive to the "tone
of the group". AND, your newest peeve, while calling me an idiot, he
doesn't seem to know how to spell "bitch".

I believe he was talking to Kevin, the guy who doesn't exist. So, why do you pay
attention to a post like that?

--
John H
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes (A true binary thinker!)

"Harlan Lachman" wrote:
Capt. Neal® wrote:

It gives the term 'dumb and dumberer' even greater meaning.

CN

Have you ever noted that people see in others what they hate in
themselves.

Yes, very true.

Thanks for getting me to finally make the effort to figure out how to
kill file someone.

It's like trying to killfile yourself, no doubt!

LP