|
John H wrote: On 24 May 2005 06:20:59 -0700, wrote: John H wrote: On 24 May 2005 05:17:02 -0700, wrote: Capt. Neal=AE wrote: The Internet has been invaluable in that it has demonstrated how the vast majority of the world consists of fools, idiots and ignorant people who don't know how to think, what to think or why to think. One can no longer ignore the huge majority of inferior intellects that pretend to be anything but. It's especially alarming that the people one reads on the newsgroups at least can operate a computer. What does their appalling stupidity say about those too dull to use a computer? It gives the term 'dumb and dumberer' even greater meaning. CN What gets me is the amount of truly narrow minded people that frequent usenet. Their are people here who simply can not see anything other than their white bread, missionary style only, mundane life. Anything that is even a tick out of their norm is perceived as evil, bad, or stupid. Oh, and to think that you've got a good sample of people to be able to make the above comments IS narrow minded. I'd say to you that MAYBE 5% or so of the computer literate people in the world frequent usenet. 'There' Like, "There are people here who are simply stupid." -- John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD John, do YOU ever make a grammatical mistake? Want me to show one of yours? If I do, will you then call YOURSELF stupid? I try to be especially careful with my grammar when I am discussing the stupidity of my fellow man. -- John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD Then answer the question. You always do the same thing, in that something just doesn't hit your brain. You see a question, then ATTEMPT to answer it, but.....don't. Care to try again? The question I asked you was Do you want me to show one of YOUR grammatical errors? |
P=2EFritz wrote: "John H" wrote in message ... On 24 May 2005 06:20:59 -0700, wrote: John H wrote: On 24 May 2005 05:17:02 -0700, wrote: Capt. Neal=AE wrote: The Internet has been invaluable in that it has demonstrated how the vast majority of the world consists of fools, idiots and ignorant people who don't know how to think, what to think or why to think. One can no longer ignore the huge majority of inferior intellects that pretend to be anything but. It's especially alarming that the people one reads on the newsgroups at least can operate a computer. What does their appalling stupidity say about those too dull to use a computer? It gives the term 'dumb and dumberer' even greater meaning. CN What gets me is the amount of truly narrow minded people that frequent usenet. Their are people here who simply can not see anything other than their white bread, missionary style only, mundane life. Anything that is even a tick out of their norm is perceived as evil, bad, or stupid. Oh, and to think that you've got a good sample of people to be able to make the above comments IS narrow minded. I'd say to you that MAYBE 5% or so of the computer literate people in the world frequent usenet. 'There' Like, "There are people here who are simply stupid." -- John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD John, do YOU ever make a grammatical mistake? Want me to show one of yours? If I do, will you then call YOURSELF stupid? I try to be especially careful with my grammar when I am discussing the stupidity of my fellow man. Poor kevin.........still suffering from the side effects of the bitch slapping he took over 'slander' I wonder if he will ever learn the difference between "your" and "you're" It might make his alternate personalities easier to hide. Hey, idiot Fritz. First, I'm not Kevin, though I DO find it quite humorous that you are too stupid to figure it out! Now, go hide little sissy, before you get hurt playing with grown ups. By the way, I posted just how a lie could be slanderous, you dolt. |
John H wrote: On 24 May 2005 06:20:59 -0700, wrote: John H wrote: On 24 May 2005 05:17:02 -0700, wrote: Capt. Neal=AE wrote: The Internet has been invaluable in that it has demonstrated how the vast majority of the world consists of fools, idiots and ignorant people who don't know how to think, what to think or why to think. One can no longer ignore the huge majority of inferior intellects that pretend to be anything but. It's especially alarming that the people one reads on the newsgroups at least can operate a computer. What does their appalling stupidity say about those too dull to use a computer? It gives the term 'dumb and dumberer' even greater meaning. CN What gets me is the amount of truly narrow minded people that frequent usenet. Their are people here who simply can not see anything other than their white bread, missionary style only, mundane life. Anything that is even a tick out of their norm is perceived as evil, bad, or stupid. Oh, and to think that you've got a good sample of people to be able to make the above comments IS narrow minded. I'd say to you that MAYBE 5% or so of the computer literate people in the world frequent usenet. 'There' Like, "There are people here who are simply stupid." -- John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD John, do YOU ever make a grammatical mistake? Want me to show one of yours? If I do, will you then call YOURSELF stupid? I try to be especially careful with my grammar when I am discussing the stupidity of my fellow man. --=20 John H Really, seen any Cesnas in your area!!!!!!!!!!!!!??? |
On 24 May 2005 08:58:45 -0700, wrote:
John H wrote: On 24 May 2005 06:20:59 -0700, wrote: John H wrote: On 24 May 2005 05:17:02 -0700, wrote: Capt. Neal® wrote: The Internet has been invaluable in that it has demonstrated how the vast majority of the world consists of fools, idiots and ignorant people who don't know how to think, what to think or why to think. One can no longer ignore the huge majority of inferior intellects that pretend to be anything but. It's especially alarming that the people one reads on the newsgroups at least can operate a computer. What does their appalling stupidity say about those too dull to use a computer? It gives the term 'dumb and dumberer' even greater meaning. CN What gets me is the amount of truly narrow minded people that frequent usenet. Their are people here who simply can not see anything other than their white bread, missionary style only, mundane life. Anything that is even a tick out of their norm is perceived as evil, bad, or stupid. Oh, and to think that you've got a good sample of people to be able to make the above comments IS narrow minded. I'd say to you that MAYBE 5% or so of the computer literate people in the world frequent usenet. 'There' Like, "There are people here who are simply stupid." -- John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD John, do YOU ever make a grammatical mistake? Want me to show one of yours? If I do, will you then call YOURSELF stupid? I try to be especially careful with my grammar when I am discussing the stupidity of my fellow man. -- John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD Then answer the question. You always do the same thing, in that something just doesn't hit your brain. You see a question, then ATTEMPT to answer it, but.....don't. Care to try again? The question I asked you was Do you want me to show one of YOUR grammatical errors? Please show the posts in which I've made grammatical errors while discussing the stupidity of my fellow man. -- John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes (A true binary thinker!) |
On 24 May 2005 09:04:15 -0700, wrote:
John H wrote: On 24 May 2005 06:20:59 -0700, wrote: John H wrote: On 24 May 2005 05:17:02 -0700, wrote: Capt. Neal® wrote: The Internet has been invaluable in that it has demonstrated how the vast majority of the world consists of fools, idiots and ignorant people who don't know how to think, what to think or why to think. One can no longer ignore the huge majority of inferior intellects that pretend to be anything but. It's especially alarming that the people one reads on the newsgroups at least can operate a computer. What does their appalling stupidity say about those too dull to use a computer? It gives the term 'dumb and dumberer' even greater meaning. CN What gets me is the amount of truly narrow minded people that frequent usenet. Their are people here who simply can not see anything other than their white bread, missionary style only, mundane life. Anything that is even a tick out of their norm is perceived as evil, bad, or stupid. Oh, and to think that you've got a good sample of people to be able to make the above comments IS narrow minded. I'd say to you that MAYBE 5% or so of the computer literate people in the world frequent usenet. 'There' Like, "There are people here who are simply stupid." -- John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD John, do YOU ever make a grammatical mistake? Want me to show one of yours? If I do, will you then call YOURSELF stupid? I try to be especially careful with my grammar when I am discussing the stupidity of my fellow man. -- John H Really, seen any Cesnas in your area!!!!!!!!!!!!!??? No. In fact, I didn't see the Cessna yesterday. -- John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes (A true binary thinker!) |
"John H" wrote in message ... On 24 May 2005 09:01:37 -0700, wrote: P.Fritz wrote: "John H" wrote in message ... On 24 May 2005 06:20:59 -0700, wrote: John H wrote: On 24 May 2005 05:17:02 -0700, wrote: Capt. Neal® wrote: The Internet has been invaluable in that it has demonstrated how the vast majority of the world consists of fools, idiots and ignorant people who don't know how to think, what to think or why to think. One can no longer ignore the huge majority of inferior intellects that pretend to be anything but. It's especially alarming that the people one reads on the newsgroups at least can operate a computer. What does their appalling stupidity say about those too dull to use a computer? It gives the term 'dumb and dumberer' even greater meaning. CN What gets me is the amount of truly narrow minded people that frequent usenet. Their are people here who simply can not see anything other than their white bread, missionary style only, mundane life. Anything that is even a tick out of their norm is perceived as evil, bad, or stupid. Oh, and to think that you've got a good sample of people to be able to make the above comments IS narrow minded. I'd say to you that MAYBE 5% or so of the computer literate people in the world frequent usenet. 'There' Like, "There are people here who are simply stupid." -- John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD John, do YOU ever make a grammatical mistake? Want me to show one of yours? If I do, will you then call YOURSELF stupid? I try to be especially careful with my grammar when I am discussing the stupidity of my fellow man. Poor kevin.........still suffering from the side effects of the bitch slapping he took over 'slander' I wonder if he will ever learn the difference between "your" and "you're" It might make his alternate personalities easier to hide. Hey, idiot Fritz. First, I'm not Kevin, though I DO find it quite humorous that you are too stupid to figure it out! Now, go hide little sissy, before you get hurt playing with grown ups. By the way, I posted just how a lie could be slanderous, you dolt. A slanderous lie is like alcoholic whiskey. Simple. Poor kevin......still having problems grasping simple english......I guess he enjoyed that bich slapping .......and he wonders why he is the "King of the NG idiots" -- John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes (A true binary thinker!) |
P=2EFritz wrote: "John H" wrote in message ... On 24 May 2005 09:01:37 -0700, wrote: P.Fritz wrote: "John H" wrote in message ... On 24 May 2005 06:20:59 -0700, wrote: John H wrote: On 24 May 2005 05:17:02 -0700, wrote: Capt. Neal=AE wrote: The Internet has been invaluable in that it has demonstrated how the vast majority of the world consists of fools, idiots and ignorant people who don't know how to think, what to think or why to think. One can no longer ignore the huge majority of inferior intellects that pretend to be anything but. It's especially alarming that the people one reads on the newsgroups at least can operate a computer. What does their appalling stupidity say about those too dull to use a computer? It gives the term 'dumb and dumberer' even greater meaning. CN What gets me is the amount of truly narrow minded people that frequent usenet. Their are people here who simply can not see anything other than their white bread, missionary style only, mundane life. Anything that is even a tick out of their norm is perceived as evil, bad, or stupid. Oh, and to think that you've got a good sample of people to be able to make the above comments IS narrow minded. I'd say to you that MAYBE 5% or so of the computer literate people in the world frequent usenet. 'There' Like, "There are people here who are simply stupid." -- John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD John, do YOU ever make a grammatical mistake? Want me to show one of yours? If I do, will you then call YOURSELF stupid? I try to be especially careful with my grammar when I am discussing the stupidity of my fellow man. Poor kevin.........still suffering from the side effects of the bitch slapping he took over 'slander' I wonder if he will ever learn the difference between "your" and "you're" It might make his alternate personalities easier to hide. Hey, idiot Fritz. First, I'm not Kevin, though I DO find it quite humorous that you are too stupid to figure it out! Now, go hide little sissy, before you get hurt playing with grown ups. By the way, I posted just how a lie could be slanderous, you dolt. A slanderous lie is like alcoholic whiskey. Simple. Poor kevin......still having problems grasping simple english......I guess he enjoyed that bich slapping ......and he wonders why he is the "King of the NG idiots" HEHEHEHE!!!!!!!!!!! Fritz whining like an idiot about ME, and can't even spell!!!!!!!!!!! |
John H wrote: On 24 May 2005 09:01:37 -0700, wrote: P.Fritz wrote: "John H" wrote in message ... On 24 May 2005 06:20:59 -0700, wrote: John H wrote: On 24 May 2005 05:17:02 -0700, wrote: Capt. Neal=AE wrote: The Internet has been invaluable in that it has demonstrated how the vast majority of the world consists of fools, idiots and ignorant people who don't know how to think, what to think or why to think. One can no longer ignore the huge majority of inferior intellects that pretend to be anything but. It's especially alarming that the people one reads on the newsgroups at least can operate a computer. What does their appalling stupidity say about those too dull to use a computer? It gives the term 'dumb and dumberer' even greater meaning. CN What gets me is the amount of truly narrow minded people that frequent usenet. Their are people here who simply can not see anything other than their white bread, missionary style only, mundane life. Anything that is even a tick out of their norm is perceived as evil, bad, or stupid. Oh, and to think that you've got a good sample of people to be able to make the above comments IS narrow minded. I'd say to you that MAYBE 5% or so of the computer literate people in the world frequent usenet. 'There' Like, "There are people here who are simply stupid." -- John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD John, do YOU ever make a grammatical mistake? Want me to show one of yours? If I do, will you then call YOURSELF stupid? I try to be especially careful with my grammar when I am discussing the stupidity of my fellow man. Poor kevin.........still suffering from the side effects of the bitch slapping he took over 'slander' I wonder if he will ever learn the difference between "your" and "you're" It might make his alternate personalities easier to hide. Hey, idiot Fritz. First, I'm not Kevin, though I DO find it quite humorous that you are too stupid to figure it out! Now, go hide little sissy, before you get hurt playing with grown ups. By the way, I posted just how a lie could be slanderous, you dolt. A slanderous lie is like alcoholic whiskey. Simple. -- John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD Nope, you are wrong, John. Dead wrong. AND, I'll bet you don't have enough sense to figure out how, do you? NOW, are you going to answer my question posed to you, John, or not? |
John H wrote: On 24 May 2005 08:58:45 -0700, wrote: John H wrote: On 24 May 2005 06:20:59 -0700, wrote: John H wrote: On 24 May 2005 05:17:02 -0700, wrote: Capt. Neal=AE wrote: The Internet has been invaluable in that it has demonstrated how the vast majority of the world consists of fools, idiots and ignorant people who don't know how to think, what to think or why to think. One can no longer ignore the huge majority of inferior intellects that pretend to be anything but. It's especially alarming that the people one reads on the newsgroups at least can operate a computer. What does their appalling stupidity say about those too dull to use a computer? It gives the term 'dumb and dumberer' even greater meaning. CN What gets me is the amount of truly narrow minded people that frequent usenet. Their are people here who simply can not see anything other than their white bread, missionary style only, mundane life. Anything that is even a tick out of their norm is perceived as evil, bad, or stupid. Oh, and to think that you've got a good sample of people to be able to make the above comments IS narrow minded. I'd say to you that MAYBE 5% or so of the computer literate people in the world frequent usenet. 'There' Like, "There are people here who are simply stupid." -- John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD John, do YOU ever make a grammatical mistake? Want me to show one of yours? If I do, will you then call YOURSELF stupid? I try to be especially careful with my grammar when I am discussing the stupidity of my fellow man. -- John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD Then answer the question. You always do the same thing, in that something just doesn't hit your brain. You see a question, then ATTEMPT to answer it, but.....don't. Care to try again? The question I asked you was Do you want me to show one of YOUR grammatical errors? Please show the posts in which I've made grammatical errors while discussing the stupidity of my fellow man. -- John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD Ah, your usual M.O. again. Make special caveats to make yourself sound like you don't do anything. Now, why would it have to be "while discussing the stupidity of my fellow man"? If it is in some other discussion that you make a grammatical error, is it then exceptable to you? If so, then great, because *I* was discussing narrow mindedness. If not, then you would be just as guilty of grammatical errors as I. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:48 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com