| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
OT Bush as Big Brother
This, from our Republican government, all the while claiming they want
LESS government in their lives: They Really Are Watching You Ready for your own all-new, sinister ID card, courtesy of Homeland Security? Shudder By Mark Morford, SF Gate Columnist Wednesday, May 18, 2005 Printable Version Email This Article Mark Morford Archives Subscribe to Notes & Errata Subscribe to RSS Feed Who is this guy? -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Smoke Pot, Not E-mail - In which it is proven that excessive inf... 05/13/2005 My Totally Gay Boy Scout Leader - The tormented Republican mayor... 05/11/2005 Hang Up Or Get Off The Plane - Using cell phones on flights: Gre... 05/06/2005 What's On Jesus' iPod? Pt. II - Readers respond! Ministry, Moby,... 05/04/2005 Well, now we've done it. Congress just passed it and Dubya has promised to sign it and the Homeland Security Department is giddier than Mel Gibson in a nail factory over it and marketers nationwide are salivating at the groin at the prospect of it, and the next big step toward America becoming an even more delightfully paranoid and draconian Big Brother wonderland has now officially been taken. It's called Real ID. It is, in short, a new and genetically mutated type of driver's license for all Americans, replacing your current license and replacing your Social Security card and replacing your sense of well being and privacy and humanity and part of a new, uniform, deeply sinister, national uniform card system whereby every person living and breathing in these paranoid and tense times shall henceforth be much more traceable and watchable given how we will all soon be required by law to carry this super-deluxe computerized ID card with us at all times, packed as it will be with more personal, digitized info about you than even your mother knows. Real ID is coming very soon. The legislation was passed with little outcry and zero debate by both House and Senate just last week because lawmakers snuck it into a massive $82 billion military spending bill, and therefore no one was really paying much attention and this is the way you get thorny disturbing culturally demeaning bills to pass without resistance from smart people who should know better. The new law will, according to the Wired News story linked above, require everyone to hand over not one, not two, but fully four types of documentation to renew their driver's license, such as a photo ID, a birth certificate, proof that their Social Security number is legit and something that validates their home address, like a phone bill. DMV employees will then have to verify the documents against giant teeming federal databases and store the documents and a digital photo of you in a database. Isn't that fun? Doesn't that sound gratifying? What's more, the card's design plan includes multiple openings for the Homeland Security Department to add on whatever features they deem necessary, with or without your knowledge, consent or who the hell cares what you think because we do what we want now please shut the hell up and quit asking questions. Computer (RFID) microchip? Likely. Digital fingerprint? Sure. Political affiliation? You bet. Web-site-visit log and religious affiliation and recent sperm count and arrest record and drug addictions and medical history and blood type and gender orientation and parent's/children's home address and number of personal blog posts calling Dr. Phil a "slug-licking ego-bitch charlatan" and your recent purchase history on shotathome.com? One guess. Make no mistake: Real ID, in short, takes us one happy step closer to a total surveillance state, where everyone is stamped and everyone is watchable and everyone is traceable and unless you live way, way off the grid out in the increasingly nonexistent hinterlands, you cannot escape the spazzy and twitchy and paranoid eye of Homeland Security. Remember the scenes in that surprisingly not-awful Tom Cruise flick "Minority Report" with the ubiquitous eye scanners, installed all over the near-future city? And as poor Tommy ran around like a maniac, little scanner machines installed by the gummint would read the eye pattern of every citizen as they walked around and the system could track anyone at any time no matter where they might wander and all the info was dumped into a huge database that was studied and cross-checked and manipulated by the CIA and FBI and Banana Republic? Real ID feels much like that, only not nearly as cool. Real ID is, as you might expect, giving civil liberties groups and immigrant-support groups the hives. State governors across the nation are none too happy, either, as implementation of the new law will cost each state hundreds of millions of dollars, but, of course, the bill provides zero federal funds to help. Such is the BushCo way. This is the funny thing. This is the sad thing. This is the terrifying thing. We have suffered one major debilitating act of terrorism in this nation and we have recoiled so violently, so rabidly, so desperately that we are still more than willing to give up whatever freedoms necessary in a vain and silly attempt to control chaos and plug every hole, when of course the nation is basically one giant hole to begin with. Of course, any good conspiracy theorist worth his secret underground bootleg Area 51 videos will tell you this sort of citizen-surveillance thing has been going on for years, decades, from spy satellites to GPS to all manner of phone tracking and e-mail snooping and behavior watching and this Real ID thing only takes it a little more public, national, makes it part of the cultural lexicon because we have finally weakened so much we just don't seem to give a damn what they do to us anymore. Don't think it's all that bad? Think BushCo's flying monkeys in the CIA and FBI and Homeland Security really have your best interests at heart and are genuinely trying to protect you from scary swarthy furriners who want to sneak into our country and poison our Cheerios and paint our flag orange and cover our wimmin in burlap? Have at it. The GOP would love to have you. Oh, and while you're at it, enjoy that tiny grain-of-rice-size bar-coded implant RFID microchip the FDA just approved, which they can permanently slip under your skin in about 20 seconds, with nary a peep. This is what's happening now. With Real ID (and who knows what else), the government is cracking down and creating a new and improved and far more devious and exploitable system to monitor its citizens because, well, because we let them. Because millions of us have been pummeled so successfully by the fear-mongering Right. Because we have never been so lax, so blinded by warmongering and dread, so numbed to what might become of us. Ah, but maybe I'm wrong. Maybe this is just rampant paranoia talking and it's just a silly piece of harmless legislation and Real ID is overall a genuinely good and useful idea that will ultimately make us safer and more secure. You think? Because hasn't BushCo proven to be reliable and honest and just reeking with integrity about privacy and security issues so far? Hasn't the USA Patriot Act been just a wondrous boon to police and CIA and our sense that we are trusted and cared for by our government? Aren't we all feeling just so much safer with this most secretive, least accountable administration at the helm? After all, why not trust the government on this? Why not put our faith in the goodly Homeland Security Department? Maybe Real ID really is patriotic and constructive and it will be a smooth and secure and completely inviolable system, one that protects citizens while giving them a new sense of freedom to move about the country with carefree flag-waving ease, safe in the knowledge that their big, snarling gummint is watching over them like a protective mother bear -- as opposed to, say, a female praying mantis, who greedily screws her lover, and then, of course, eats him alive. |
wrote in message oups.com... Smoke Pot, Not E-mail - In which it is proven that excessive inf... 05/13/2005 My Totally Gay Boy Scout Leader - Interesting topics in your headers, Kevin: 1) smoking Pot and 2)gay boy scout leaders. You sure do live a sordid lifestyle. |
"NOYB" wrote in message ink.net... wrote in message oups.com... Smoke Pot, Not E-mail - In which it is proven that excessive inf... 05/13/2005 My Totally Gay Boy Scout Leader - Interesting topics in your headers, Kevin: 1) smoking Pot and 2)gay boy scout leaders. You sure do live a sordid lifestyle. What else should one expect from the "King of the NG idiots"? |
I suspect that using advanced technology available for free, to everyone, it
will be fairly simple to give one of those cards a massive stroke and digital Alzheimer's. I'm thinking the tools involve a wool sweater, a low-humidity day, and a nice, fat magnet. |
Now that I think about it, I realize it would take NO special technology to
disable one of those cards. My wallet already does it to every card I carry, within about 3 months. Magnetic strips are worn off, and the photo on my pistol permit is beginning to look like an M.C. Escher painting. |
NOYB wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Smoke Pot, Not E-mail - In which it is proven that excessive inf... 05/13/2005 My Totally Gay Boy Scout Leader - Interesting topics in your headers, Kevin: 1) smoking Pot and 2)gay boy scout leaders. You sure do live a sordid lifestyle. You're showing your ignorance again, NOYB. Those lines aren't from MY HEADER!!!!!! What an idiot, as soon as you read something, a random thought pops into your skull, and your brain somehow processes that as truth and fact. It's strange how an addled mind works. |
P.Fritz wrote: "NOYB" wrote in message ink.net... wrote in message oups.com... Smoke Pot, Not E-mail - In which it is proven that excessive inf... 05/13/2005 My Totally Gay Boy Scout Leader - Interesting topics in your headers, Kevin: 1) smoking Pot and 2)gay boy scout leaders. You sure do live a sordid lifestyle. What else should one expect from the "King of the NG idiots"? For the idiots in the group, like you and NOYB, it's not MY HEADER!!!!! I love it, you show your stupidity just like this every day, then call someone else an idiot! |
|
|
"Alfred" wrote in message ... I am top posting to be rude. Where the **** do you think think you have a right to post this **** to a boating newsgroup asshole? **** off you stupid *******. Get a ****ing life. Stupid people have a right to post their views on this issue too, Alfred. So...how do you feel about the ID's? |
"Haroldy" wrote in message ... On 18 May 2005, wrote: You're showing your ignorance again, NOYB. Those lines aren't from MY HEADER!!!!!! What an idiot, as soon as you read something, a random thought pops into your skull, and your brain somehow processes that as truth and fact. It's strange how an addled mind works. No ****ing wonder this group is a mess. You ****ing asshole. How many quarts of booze did you suck down today? Wait...you post the same message four times, and you're asking HIM how much booze he consumed today? Hmm. When you live in a glass house.... |
"Userbeam Remailer" wrote in message ... On Thu, 19 May 2005, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "Haroldy" wrote in message ... On 18 May 2005, wrote: You're showing your ignorance again, NOYB. Those lines aren't from MY HEADER!!!!!! What an idiot, as soon as you read something, a random thought pops into your skull, and your brain somehow processes that as truth and fact. It's strange how an addled mind works. No ****ing wonder this group is a mess. You ****ing asshole. How many quarts of booze did you suck down today? Wait...you post the same message four times, and you're asking HIM how much booze he consumed today? Hmm. When you live in a glass house.... Always there to save your drunken buddies eh asshole? The writing style of our anonymous and spoofing poster is becoming apparent. |
On 19 May 2005 01:18:33 -0000, Alfred wrote:
I am top posting to be rude. Where the **** do you think think you have a right to post this **** to a boating newsgroup asshole? **** off you stupid *******. Get a ****ing life. What kind of language is that? Name-calling is detrimental to group harmony. I do, however, *totally* agree with your sentiment. The post was designed to cause conflict. -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." |
"John H" wrote in message ... On Thu, 19 May 2005 07:27:39 -0400, "Harry.Krause" wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: "Userbeam Remailer" wrote in message ... On Thu, 19 May 2005, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "Haroldy" wrote in message . .. On 18 May 2005, wrote: You're showing your ignorance again, NOYB. Those lines aren't from MY HEADER!!!!!! What an idiot, as soon as you read something, a random thought pops into your skull, and your brain somehow processes that as truth and fact. It's strange how an addled mind works. No ****ing wonder this group is a mess. You ****ing asshole. How many quarts of booze did you suck down today? Wait...you post the same message four times, and you're asking HIM how much booze he consumed today? Hmm. When you live in a glass house.... Always there to save your drunken buddies eh asshole? The writing style of our anonymous and spoofing poster is becoming apparent. Oh? Is it you? Smithers? Netsucker? Hert? Harry, I notice you've started using your conflict inspiring signature line again. Shoot, I was hoping you were coming around. -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." I told you so John. Harry Krause is hopelessly lost....let him self destruct. |
On Thu, 19 May 2005 07:51:10 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote: John H wrote: On 19 May 2005 01:18:33 -0000, Alfred wrote: I am top posting to be rude. Where the **** do you think think you have a right to post this **** to a boating newsgroup asshole? **** off you stupid *******. Get a ****ing life. What kind of language is that? Name-calling is detrimental to group harmony. I do, however, *totally* agree with your sentiment. The post was designed to cause conflict. It only causes "conflict" if you read his crap, get upset and respond to it. If you ignore it, it causes no conflict. The only interesting aspect of the moron is, who is he when he uses his normal rec.boats handle. Guesses so far: Netsock, "Smithers," Robbins, Hertvik. I just filter the trash out. When I logged in this AM, there were new posts indicated, and when my filter strained them, there were about 20 left, including NONE from the anon asses and the rest of the useless. Are you saying basskisser didn't post it? I didn't read more than the first line, so don't really know anything about it. My response was: On 18 May 2005 06:02:42 -0700, cut and pasted some off topic trash which did nothing to enhance the tone of the newsgroup, but *was* intended to create more political conflict. For shame! I think the words I added were correct. His post has started a lot of name calling. -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." |
"John H" wrote in message ... On Thu, 19 May 2005 07:51:10 -0400, "Harry.Krause" wrote: John H wrote: On 19 May 2005 01:18:33 -0000, Alfred wrote: I am top posting to be rude. Where the **** do you think think you have a right to post this **** to a boating newsgroup asshole? **** off you stupid *******. Get a ****ing life. What kind of language is that? Name-calling is detrimental to group harmony. I do, however, *totally* agree with your sentiment. The post was designed to cause conflict. It only causes "conflict" if you read his crap, get upset and respond to it. If you ignore it, it causes no conflict. The only interesting aspect of the moron is, who is he when he uses his normal rec.boats handle. Guesses so far: Netsock, "Smithers," Robbins, Her. I just filter the trash out. When I logged in this AM, there were new posts indicated, and when my filter strained them, there were about 20 left, including NONE from the anon asses and the rest of the useless. Are you saying basskisser didn't post it? I didn't read more than the first line, so don't really know anything about it. My response was: On 18 May 2005 06:02:42 -0700, cut and pasted some off topic trash which did nothing to enhance the tone of the newsgroup, but *was* intended to create more political conflict. For shame! I think the words I added were correct. His post has started a lot of name calling. -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." Funny that Krause places me as a suspect. I would love to see his proof, or that from anyone else. It isn't me folks. |
"Timmy Tommy" wrote in message news:WJK6YNIM38491.3432407407@anonymous... Hmmm...."Tim", and then "Timmy Tommy" - I'm detecting a pattern here. ROFL! |
On Thu, 19 May 2005 08:13:39 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote: John H wrote: On Thu, 19 May 2005 07:27:39 -0400, "Harry.Krause" wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: "Userbeam Remailer" wrote in message news:f82a2d6d61f6bfec765ab3941a798b6b@userbeam .net... On Thu, 19 May 2005, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "Haroldy" wrote in message .. . On 18 May 2005, wrote: You're showing your ignorance again, NOYB. Those lines aren't from MY HEADER!!!!!! What an idiot, as soon as you read something, a random thought pops into your skull, and your brain somehow processes that as truth and fact. It's strange how an addled mind works. No ****ing wonder this group is a mess. You ****ing asshole. How many quarts of booze did you suck down today? Wait...you post the same message four times, and you're asking HIM how much booze he consumed today? Hmm. When you live in a glass house.... Always there to save your drunken buddies eh asshole? The writing style of our anonymous and spoofing poster is becoming apparent. Oh? Is it you? Smithers? Netsucker? Hertvik? Harry, I notice you've started using your conflict inspiring signature line again. Shoot, I was hoping you were coming around. It is getting kind of old. I'll come up with a new one. There's no shortage of "truths" to point out about Bush. How about a good one about Parkers? -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." |
John H wrote: On 18 May 2005 09:04:26 -0700, wrote: NOYB wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Smoke Pot, Not E-mail - In which it is proven that excessive inf... 05/13/2005 My Totally Gay Boy Scout Leader - Interesting topics in your headers, Kevin: 1) smoking Pot and 2)gay boy scout leaders. You sure do live a sordid lifestyle. You're showing your ignorance again, NOYB. Those lines aren't from MY HEADER!!!!!! What an idiot, as soon as you read something, a random thought pops into your skull, and your brain somehow processes that as truth and fact. It's strange how an addled mind works. Same trick, different machine. Please stop, Kevin. -- John H My names not Kevin, John. But, you are dead wrong. Perhaps you should read a little before spewing garbage. NOYB said that stuff came from MY HEADER. With me so far? Okay, now. It DIDN'T. It came from the article's WEBPAGE. It is simply a list of this particular writer's previous pieces. Get it now? Now, do you remember a few days ago saying that someone needs to be invited to a thread? Who invited you? |
On Thu, 19 May 2005 08:18:43 -0400, "JimH" wrote:
"John H" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 19 May 2005 07:51:10 -0400, "Harry.Krause" wrote: John H wrote: On 19 May 2005 01:18:33 -0000, Alfred wrote: I am top posting to be rude. Where the **** do you think think you have a right to post this **** to a boating newsgroup asshole? **** off you stupid *******. Get a ****ing life. What kind of language is that? Name-calling is detrimental to group harmony. I do, however, *totally* agree with your sentiment. The post was designed to cause conflict. It only causes "conflict" if you read his crap, get upset and respond to it. If you ignore it, it causes no conflict. The only interesting aspect of the moron is, who is he when he uses his normal rec.boats handle. Guesses so far: Netsock, "Smithers," Robbins, Her. I just filter the trash out. When I logged in this AM, there were new posts indicated, and when my filter strained them, there were about 20 left, including NONE from the anon asses and the rest of the useless. Are you saying basskisser didn't post it? I didn't read more than the first line, so don't really know anything about it. My response was: On 18 May 2005 06:02:42 -0700, cut and pasted some off topic trash which did nothing to enhance the tone of the newsgroup, but *was* intended to create more political conflict. For shame! I think the words I added were correct. His post has started a lot of name calling. -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." Funny that Krause places me as a suspect. I would love to see his proof, or that from anyone else. It isn't me folks. I don't think it's you or any of the regulars. (Although I *did* think basskisser made the original post!) -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." |
John H wrote: On 18 May 2005 06:02:42 -0700, cut and pasted some off topic trash which did nothing to enhance the tone of the newsgroup, but *was* intended to create more political conflict. For shame! -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." Hmm, here's where I'll use YOUR tactic for "changing the tone of the newsgroup" BULL****! HORSE****! YOU'RE A ****ING LIAR! Sound familiar, John? That's YOUR idea of changing the "tone of the newsgroup", huh? |
Alfred wrote: I am top posting to be rude. Where the **** do you think think you have a right to post this **** to a boating newsgroup asshole? **** off you stupid *******. Get a ****ing life. I can tell, Smithers, by your inability to post anything without profanity that you aren't too bright, but I have just as much right to post anything here as you. So, there's your answer. Get it? Doubtful. |
On 19 May 2005 05:30:16 -0700, wrote:
John H wrote: On 18 May 2005 09:04:26 -0700, wrote: NOYB wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Smoke Pot, Not E-mail - In which it is proven that excessive inf... 05/13/2005 My Totally Gay Boy Scout Leader - Interesting topics in your headers, Kevin: 1) smoking Pot and 2)gay boy scout leaders. You sure do live a sordid lifestyle. You're showing your ignorance again, NOYB. Those lines aren't from MY HEADER!!!!!! What an idiot, as soon as you read something, a random thought pops into your skull, and your brain somehow processes that as truth and fact. It's strange how an addled mind works. Same trick, different machine. Please stop, Kevin. -- John H My names not Kevin, John. But, you are dead wrong. Perhaps you should read a little before spewing garbage. NOYB said that stuff came from MY HEADER. With me so far? Okay, now. It DIDN'T. It came from the article's WEBPAGE. It is simply a list of this particular writer's previous pieces. Get it now? Now, do you remember a few days ago saying that someone needs to be invited to a thread? Who invited you? What made you think I was talking to you? -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." |
On 19 May 2005 05:32:34 -0700, wrote:
John H wrote: On 18 May 2005 06:02:42 -0700, cut and pasted some off topic trash which did nothing to enhance the tone of the newsgroup, but *was* intended to create more political conflict. For shame! -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." Hmm, here's where I'll use YOUR tactic for "changing the tone of the newsgroup" BULL****! HORSE****! YOU'RE A ****ING LIAR! Sound familiar, John? That's YOUR idea of changing the "tone of the newsgroup", huh? Bad hair day? -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." |
On Thu, 19 May 2005 08:36:14 -0400, John H wrote:
On 19 May 2005 05:32:34 -0700, wrote: John H wrote: On 18 May 2005 06:02:42 -0700, cut and pasted some off topic trash which did nothing to enhance the tone of the newsgroup, but *was* intended to create more political conflict. For shame! -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." Hmm, here's where I'll use YOUR tactic for "changing the tone of the newsgroup" BULL****! HORSE****! YOU'RE A ****ING LIAR! Sound familiar, John? That's YOUR idea of changing the "tone of the newsgroup", huh? Bad hair day? PS. I guess it *was* you that made the original post, unless this isn't really you either. -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." |
John H wrote: On 19 May 2005 05:30:16 -0700, wrote: John H wrote: On 18 May 2005 09:04:26 -0700, wrote: NOYB wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Smoke Pot, Not E-mail - In which it is proven that excessive inf... 05/13/2005 My Totally Gay Boy Scout Leader - Interesting topics in your headers, Kevin: 1) smoking Pot and 2)gay boy scout leaders. You sure do live a sordid lifestyle. You're showing your ignorance again, NOYB. Those lines aren't from MY HEADER!!!!!! What an idiot, as soon as you read something, a random thought pops into your skull, and your brain somehow processes that as truth and fact. It's strange how an addled mind works. Same trick, different machine. Please stop, Kevin. -- John H My names not Kevin, John. But, you are dead wrong. Perhaps you should read a little before spewing garbage. NOYB said that stuff came from MY HEADER. With me so far? Okay, now. It DIDN'T. It came from the article's WEBPAGE. It is simply a list of this particular writer's previous pieces. Get it now? Now, do you remember a few days ago saying that someone needs to be invited to a thread? Who invited you? What made you think I was talking to you? -- John H Perhaps because YOU REPLIED TO MY POST?????? Ya think????? |
On 19 May 2005 05:37:50 -0700, wrote:
John H wrote: On 19 May 2005 05:30:16 -0700, wrote: John H wrote: On 18 May 2005 09:04:26 -0700, wrote: NOYB wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Smoke Pot, Not E-mail - In which it is proven that excessive inf... 05/13/2005 My Totally Gay Boy Scout Leader - Interesting topics in your headers, Kevin: 1) smoking Pot and 2)gay boy scout leaders. You sure do live a sordid lifestyle. You're showing your ignorance again, NOYB. Those lines aren't from MY HEADER!!!!!! What an idiot, as soon as you read something, a random thought pops into your skull, and your brain somehow processes that as truth and fact. It's strange how an addled mind works. Same trick, different machine. Please stop, Kevin. -- John H My names not Kevin, John. But, you are dead wrong. Perhaps you should read a little before spewing garbage. NOYB said that stuff came from MY HEADER. With me so far? Okay, now. It DIDN'T. It came from the article's WEBPAGE. It is simply a list of this particular writer's previous pieces. Get it now? Now, do you remember a few days ago saying that someone needs to be invited to a thread? Who invited you? What made you think I was talking to you? -- John H Perhaps because YOU REPLIED TO MY POST?????? Ya think????? Is your name 'Kevin'? If not, then I wasn't talking to you. -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." |
On Thu, 19 May 2005 09:13:12 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote: John H wrote: On Thu, 19 May 2005 08:13:39 -0400, "Harry.Krause" wrote: John H wrote: On Thu, 19 May 2005 07:27:39 -0400, "Harry.Krause" wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: "Userbeam Remailer" wrote in message news:f82a2d6d61f6bfec765ab3941a798b6b@userbe am.net... On Thu, 19 May 2005, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "Haroldy" wrote in message ... On 18 May 2005, wrote: You're showing your ignorance again, NOYB. Those lines aren't from MY HEADER!!!!!! What an idiot, as soon as you read something, a random thought pops into your skull, and your brain somehow processes that as truth and fact. It's strange how an addled mind works. No ****ing wonder this group is a mess. You ****ing asshole. How many quarts of booze did you suck down today? Wait...you post the same message four times, and you're asking HIM how much booze he consumed today? Hmm. When you live in a glass house.... Always there to save your drunken buddies eh asshole? The writing style of our anonymous and spoofing poster is becoming apparent. Oh? Is it you? Smithers? Netsucker? Hertvik? Harry, I notice you've started using your conflict inspiring signature line again. Shoot, I was hoping you were coming around. It is getting kind of old. I'll come up with a new one. There's no shortage of "truths" to point out about Bush. How about a good one about Parkers? Peter Pecker Picked a Pack of Purple Parkers? Peter *PIPER*... Get your mind out of the gutter. But yeah, that's much better. -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." |
"John H" wrote in message
... On Thu, 19 May 2005 08:36:14 -0400, John H wrote: On 19 May 2005 05:32:34 -0700, wrote: John H wrote: On 18 May 2005 06:02:42 -0700, cut and pasted some off topic trash which did nothing to enhance the tone of the newsgroup, but *was* intended to create more political conflict. For shame! -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." Hmm, here's where I'll use YOUR tactic for "changing the tone of the newsgroup" BULL****! HORSE****! YOU'RE A ****ING LIAR! Sound familiar, John? That's YOUR idea of changing the "tone of the newsgroup", huh? Bad hair day? PS. I guess it *was* you that made the original post, unless this isn't really you either. The moon is approaching full soon..... :-) |
On Thu, 19 May 2005 09:11:32 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote: John H wrote: On Thu, 19 May 2005 07:51:10 -0400, "Harry.Krause" wrote: John H wrote: On 19 May 2005 01:18:33 -0000, Alfred wrote: I am top posting to be rude. Where the **** do you think think you have a right to post this **** to a boating newsgroup asshole? **** off you stupid *******. Get a ****ing life. What kind of language is that? Name-calling is detrimental to group harmony. I do, however, *totally* agree with your sentiment. The post was designed to cause conflict. It only causes "conflict" if you read his crap, get upset and respond to it. If you ignore it, it causes no conflict. The only interesting aspect of the moron is, who is he when he uses his normal rec.boats handle. Guesses so far: Netsock, "Smithers," Robbins, Hertvik. I just filter the trash out. When I logged in this AM, there were new posts indicated, and when my filter strained them, there were about 20 left, including NONE from the anon asses and the rest of the useless. Are you saying basskisser didn't post it? I didn't read more than the first line, so don't really know anything about it. No, I don't believe Basskisser is the anon "Smithers." Yeah, but he posted the original article. Otherwise why would he have gotten so bent out of shape about my comment regarding the original post? -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." |
On Thu, 19 May 2005 13:54:46 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote: "John H" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 19 May 2005 08:36:14 -0400, John H wrote: On 19 May 2005 05:32:34 -0700, wrote: John H wrote: On 18 May 2005 06:02:42 -0700, cut and pasted some off topic trash which did nothing to enhance the tone of the newsgroup, but *was* intended to create more political conflict. For shame! -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." Hmm, here's where I'll use YOUR tactic for "changing the tone of the newsgroup" BULL****! HORSE****! YOU'RE A ****ING LIAR! Sound familiar, John? That's YOUR idea of changing the "tone of the newsgroup", huh? Bad hair day? PS. I guess it *was* you that made the original post, unless this isn't really you either. The moon is approaching full soon..... :-) I was wondering.... -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." |
John H wrote: On 19 May 2005 05:37:50 -0700, wrote: John H wrote: On 19 May 2005 05:30:16 -0700, wrote: John H wrote: On 18 May 2005 09:04:26 -0700, wrote: NOYB wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Smoke Pot, Not E-mail - In which it is proven that excessive inf... 05/13/2005 My Totally Gay Boy Scout Leader - Interesting topics in your headers, Kevin: 1) smoking Pot and 2)gay boy scout leaders. You sure do live a sordid lifestyle. You're showing your ignorance again, NOYB. Those lines aren't from MY HEADER!!!!!! What an idiot, as soon as you read something, a random thought pops into your skull, and your brain somehow processes that as truth and fact. It's strange how an addled mind works. Same trick, different machine. Please stop, Kevin. -- John H My names not Kevin, John. But, you are dead wrong. Perhaps you should read a little before spewing garbage. NOYB said that stuff came from MY HEADER. With me so far? Okay, now. It DIDN'T. It came from the article's WEBPAGE. It is simply a list of this particular writer's previous pieces. Get it now? Now, do you remember a few days ago saying that someone needs to be invited to a thread? Who invited you? What made you think I was talking to you? -- John H Perhaps because YOU REPLIED TO MY POST?????? Ya think????? Is your name 'Kevin'? If not, then I wasn't talking to you. -- John H John, if you wasn't talking to me, then why to hell did you REPLY TO ME????? |
On 19 May 2005 07:21:01 -0700, wrote:
John H wrote: On 19 May 2005 05:37:50 -0700, wrote: John H wrote: On 19 May 2005 05:30:16 -0700, wrote: John H wrote: On 18 May 2005 09:04:26 -0700, wrote: NOYB wrote: wrote in message roups.com... Smoke Pot, Not E-mail - In which it is proven that excessive inf... 05/13/2005 My Totally Gay Boy Scout Leader - Interesting topics in your headers, Kevin: 1) smoking Pot and 2)gay boy scout leaders. You sure do live a sordid lifestyle. You're showing your ignorance again, NOYB. Those lines aren't from MY HEADER!!!!!! What an idiot, as soon as you read something, a random thought pops into your skull, and your brain somehow processes that as truth and fact. It's strange how an addled mind works. Same trick, different machine. Please stop, Kevin. -- John H My names not Kevin, John. But, you are dead wrong. Perhaps you should read a little before spewing garbage. NOYB said that stuff came from MY HEADER. With me so far? Okay, now. It DIDN'T. It came from the article's WEBPAGE. It is simply a list of this particular writer's previous pieces. Get it now? Now, do you remember a few days ago saying that someone needs to be invited to a thread? Who invited you? What made you think I was talking to you? -- John H Perhaps because YOU REPLIED TO MY POST?????? Ya think????? Is your name 'Kevin'? If not, then I wasn't talking to you. -- John H John, if you wasn't talking to me, then why to hell did you REPLY TO ME????? Your post was a convenient way to get a message to Kevin about the garbage being posted. -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
My, my, what a bad little stinker you are! If you didn't expect anyone to reply to your post, why did you post it? Just being an asshole, retarded, ****ing, troublemaker? On 19 May 2005, wrote: John H wrote: On 19 May 2005 05:37:50 -0700, wrote: John H wrote: On 19 May 2005 05:30:16 -0700, wrote: John H wrote: On 18 May 2005 09:04:26 -0700, wrote: NOYB wrote: wrote in message roups.com... Smoke Pot, Not E-mail - In which it is proven that excessive inf... 05/13/2005 My Totally Gay Boy Scout Leader - Interesting topics in your headers, Kevin: 1) smoking Pot and 2)gay boy scout leaders. You sure do live a sordid lifestyle. You're showing your ignorance again, NOYB. Those lines aren't from MY HEADER!!!!!! What an idiot, as soon as you read something, a random thought pops into your skull, and your brain somehow processes that as truth and fact. It's strange how an addled mind works. Same trick, different machine. Please stop, Kevin. -- John H My names not Kevin, John. But, you are dead wrong. Perhaps you should read a little before spewing garbage. NOYB said that stuff came from MY HEADER. With me so far? Okay, now. It DIDN'T. It came from the article's WEBPAGE. It is simply a list of this particular writer's previous pieces. Get it now? Now, do you remember a few days ago saying that someone needs to be invited to a thread? Who invited you? What made you think I was talking to you? -- John H Perhaps because YOU REPLIED TO MY POST?????? Ya think????? Is your name 'Kevin'? If not, then I wasn't talking to you. -- John H John, if you wasn't talking to me, then why to hell did you REPLY TO ME????? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 6.58ckt iQA/AwUBQo0kIf5McEU5rTr2EQLfXgCfRxK11ZvAd+RAJ5g7B5fwdW jVhm8An2DX bUQM1QyMqW+vFxE10NsJ2RNq =X6b5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -=- This message was sent via two or more anonymous remailing services. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services. The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header is unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post to groups other than alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages. Visit www.panta-rhei.dyndns.org for abuse and hashcash info. |
John H wrote: On 19 May 2005 07:21:01 -0700, wrote: John H wrote: On 19 May 2005 05:37:50 -0700, wrote: John H wrote: On 19 May 2005 05:30:16 -0700, wrote: John H wrote: On 18 May 2005 09:04:26 -0700, wrote: NOYB wrote: wrote in message roups.com... Smoke Pot, Not E-mail - In which it is proven that excessive inf... 05/13/2005 My Totally Gay Boy Scout Leader - Interesting topics in your headers, Kevin: 1) smoking Pot and 2)gay boy scout leaders. You sure do live a sordid lifestyle. You're showing your ignorance again, NOYB. Those lines aren't from MY HEADER!!!!!! What an idiot, as soon as you read something, a random thought pops into your skull, and your brain somehow processes that as truth and fact. It's strange how an addled mind works. Same trick, different machine. Please stop, Kevin. -- John H My names not Kevin, John. But, you are dead wrong. Perhaps you should read a little before spewing garbage. NOYB said that stuff came from MY HEADER. With me so far? Okay, now. It DIDN'T. It came from the article's WEBPAGE. It is simply a list of this particular writer's previous pieces. Get it now? Now, do you remember a few days ago saying that someone needs to be invited to a thread? Who invited you? What made you think I was talking to you? -- John H Perhaps because YOU REPLIED TO MY POST?????? Ya think????? Is your name 'Kevin'? If not, then I wasn't talking to you. -- John H John, if you wasn't talking to me, then why to hell did you REPLY TO ME????? Your post was a convenient way to get a message to Kevin about the garbage being posted. -- John H John, just what garbage is Kevin posting? |
John H wrote: On 19 May 2005 05:32:34 -0700, wrote: John H wrote: On 18 May 2005 06:02:42 -0700, cut and pasted some off topic trash which did nothing to enhance the tone of the newsgroup, but *was* intended to create more political conflict. For shame! -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." Hmm, here's where I'll use YOUR tactic for "changing the tone of the newsgroup" BULL****! HORSE****! YOU'RE A ****ING LIAR! Sound familiar, John? That's YOUR idea of changing the "tone of the newsgroup", huh? Bad hair day? -- John H John, those were quoted directly from YOU, John!!!! Now, you've stated over and over to others here that name calling isn't good for group harmony, doesn't help the tone of the group, etc. But, it seems it's okay for YOU to do it, huh? And, what about your statement that I wasn't "invited" to a particular discussion. Must everyone here be "invited"? Sure would be a short thread that way.... What if someone were to ask a question? Would they have to "invite" just who they wanted to answer that question? |
wrote in message oups.com... John H wrote: On 19 May 2005 05:32:34 -0700, wrote: John H wrote: On 18 May 2005 06:02:42 -0700, cut and pasted some off topic trash which did nothing to enhance the tone of the newsgroup, but *was* intended to create more political conflict. For shame! -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." Hmm, here's where I'll use YOUR tactic for "changing the tone of the newsgroup" BULL****! HORSE****! YOU'RE A ****ING LIAR! Sound familiar, John? That's YOUR idea of changing the "tone of the newsgroup", huh? Bad hair day? -- John H John, those were quoted directly from YOU, John!!!! Now, you've stated over and over to others here that name calling isn't good for group harmony, doesn't help the tone of the group, etc. But, it seems it's okay for YOU to do it, huh? And, what about your statement that I wasn't "invited" to a particular discussion. Must everyone here be "invited"? Sure would be a short thread that way.... What if someone were to ask a question? Would they have to "invite" just who they wanted to answer that question? Do you really have to post here day after day with this attitude of yours? It is really getting old Kevin. Try a positive attitude for a change....you will like it. |
"JimH" wrote in message ... wrote in message oups.com... John H wrote: On 19 May 2005 05:32:34 -0700, wrote: John H wrote: On 18 May 2005 06:02:42 -0700, cut and pasted some off topic trash which did nothing to enhance the tone of the newsgroup, but *was* intended to create more political conflict. For shame! -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." Hmm, here's where I'll use YOUR tactic for "changing the tone of the newsgroup" BULL****! HORSE****! YOU'RE A ****ING LIAR! Sound familiar, John? That's YOUR idea of changing the "tone of the newsgroup", huh? Bad hair day? -- John H John, those were quoted directly from YOU, John!!!! Now, you've stated over and over to others here that name calling isn't good for group harmony, doesn't help the tone of the group, etc. But, it seems it's okay for YOU to do it, huh? And, what about your statement that I wasn't "invited" to a particular discussion. Must everyone here be "invited"? Sure would be a short thread that way.... What if someone were to ask a question? Would they have to "invite" just who they wanted to answer that question? Do you really have to post here day after day with this attitude of yours? It is really getting old Kevin. Try a positive attitude for a change....you will like it. Kevin is smarting over geting bitch slapped for not knowing the definition of slander. |
"JimH" wrote in message ... John H wrote in : On Thu, 19 May 2005 08:18:43 -0400, "JimH" wrote: "John H" wrote in message ... On Thu, 19 May 2005 07:51:10 -0400, "Harry.Krause" wrote: John H wrote: On 19 May 2005 01:18:33 -0000, Alfred wrote: I am top posting to be rude. Where the **** do you think think you have a right to post this **** to a boating newsgroup asshole? **** off you stupid *******. Get a ****ing life. What kind of language is that? Name-calling is detrimental to group harmony. I do, however, *totally* agree with your sentiment. The post was designed to cause conflict. It only causes "conflict" if you read his crap, get upset and respond to it. If you ignore it, it causes no conflict. The only interesting aspect of the moron is, who is he when he uses his normal rec.boats handle. Guesses so far: Netsock, "Smithers," Robbins, Her. I just filter the trash out. When I logged in this AM, there were new posts indicated, and when my filter strained them, there were about 20 left, including NONE from the anon asses and the rest of the useless. Are you saying basskisser didn't post it? I didn't read more than the first line, so don't really know anything about it. My response was: On 18 May 2005 06:02:42 -0700, cut and pasted some off topic trash which did nothing to enhance the tone of the newsgroup, but *was* intended to create more political conflict. For shame! I think the words I added were correct. His post has started a lot of name calling. -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." Funny that Krause places me as a suspect. I would love to see his proof, or that from anyone else. It isn't me folks. I don't think it's you or any of the regulars. (Although I *did* think basskisser made the original post!) You're dazed and confused as usual. I did not make that post. The ass has now assumed my identity. I will be changing my handle shortly. Future posts made by JimH are not by me. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:27 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com