On 20 May 2005 10:24:18 -0700, wrote:


JimH wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

John H wrote:
On 19 May 2005 05:32:34 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 18 May 2005 06:02:42 -0700, cut and
pasted
some
off topic
trash which did nothing to enhance the tone of the newsgroup,
but
*was* intended
to create more political conflict.

For shame!


--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

Hmm, here's where I'll use YOUR tactic for "changing the tone of
the
newsgroup"

BULL****! HORSE****! YOU'RE A ****ING LIAR! Sound familiar, John?
That's YOUR idea of changing the "tone of the newsgroup", huh?

Bad hair day?
--
John H

John, those were quoted directly from YOU, John!!!! Now, you've
stated
over and over to others here that name calling isn't good for group
harmony, doesn't help the tone of the group, etc. But, it seems
it's
okay for YOU to do it, huh? And, what about your statement that I
wasn't "invited" to a particular discussion. Must everyone here be
"invited"? Sure would be a short thread that way.... What if
someone
were to ask a question? Would they have to "invite" just who they
wanted to answer that question?


Do you really have to post here day after day with this attitude of
yours?
It is really getting old Kevin. Try a positive attitude for a
change....you
will like it.


Why is it MY attitude? JohnH is the one that chastised me for not
"being invited" to a thread!! THAT is a negative attitude. I was simply
trying to figure out just how the "inviting" thing is going to
work.....

Your graciousness and that happy face are welcome in *any* thread. Kevin is the
one who's not welcome!
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

"John H" wrote in message
...
On 20 May 2005 10:22:04 -0700, wrote:


P.Fritz wrote:
"JimH" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...

John H wrote:
On 19 May 2005 05:32:34 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 18 May 2005 06:02:42 -0700, cut and
pasted
some
off topic
trash which did nothing to enhance the tone of the newsgroup,
but
*was* intended
to create more political conflict.

For shame!


--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

Hmm, here's where I'll use YOUR tactic for "changing the tone of
the
newsgroup"

BULL****! HORSE****! YOU'RE A ****ING LIAR! Sound familiar,
John?
That's YOUR idea of changing the "tone of the newsgroup", huh?

Bad hair day?
--
John H

John, those were quoted directly from YOU, John!!!! Now, you've
stated
over and over to others here that name calling isn't good for
group
harmony, doesn't help the tone of the group, etc. But, it seems
it's
okay for YOU to do it, huh? And, what about your statement that I
wasn't "invited" to a particular discussion. Must everyone here be
"invited"? Sure would be a short thread that way.... What if
someone
were to ask a question? Would they have to "invite" just who they
wanted to answer that question?


Do you really have to post here day after day with this attitude of
yours?
It is really getting old Kevin. Try a positive attitude for a
change....you will like it.

Kevin is smarting over geting bitch slapped for not knowing the
definition
of slander.

First, I'm not Kevin, second, Fritz, I'll tell you right now, right
away, you aren't and won't EVER be man enough to "bitch slap" me. Get,
you little twit?

Why do you respond to posts to or about Kevin? And, name-calling does not
add to
group harmony.

Kevin is too stupid to realize when he has been bitch slapped so violently,

But it is sure easy to tell when his buttons have been pushed. LMAO

--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

I would bitch slap Kevin every way but loose.


wrote in message
ups.com...

P.Fritz wrote:
"JimH" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...

John H wrote:
On 19 May 2005 05:32:34 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 18 May 2005 06:02:42 -0700, cut and
pasted
some
off topic
trash which did nothing to enhance the tone of the newsgroup,
but
*was* intended
to create more political conflict.

For shame!


--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

Hmm, here's where I'll use YOUR tactic for "changing the tone of
the
newsgroup"

BULL****! HORSE****! YOU'RE A ****ING LIAR! Sound familiar,
John?
That's YOUR idea of changing the "tone of the newsgroup", huh?

Bad hair day?
--
John H

John, those were quoted directly from YOU, John!!!! Now, you've
stated
over and over to others here that name calling isn't good for
group
harmony, doesn't help the tone of the group, etc. But, it seems
it's
okay for YOU to do it, huh? And, what about your statement that I
wasn't "invited" to a particular discussion. Must everyone here be
"invited"? Sure would be a short thread that way.... What if
someone
were to ask a question? Would they have to "invite" just who they
wanted to answer that question?


Do you really have to post here day after day with this attitude of
yours?
It is really getting old Kevin. Try a positive attitude for a
change....you will like it.

Kevin is smarting over geting bitch slapped for not knowing the
definition
of slander.

First, I'm not Kevin, second, Fritz, I'll tell you right now, right
away, you aren't and won't EVER be man enough to "bitch slap" me. Get,
you little twit?

"The Snapper Trapper" wrote in message
...
I would bitch slap Kevin every way but loose.

Hell, half the NG already did.

Isn't it comical how kevin thinks he can determine who is 'man enough' yet
he has to hide behind his multitude of anonymous names.

No wonder he is the "King"






wrote in message
ups.com...

P.Fritz wrote:
"JimH" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...

John H wrote:
On 19 May 2005 05:32:34 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 18 May 2005 06:02:42 -0700, cut and
pasted
some
off topic
trash which did nothing to enhance the tone of the newsgroup,
but
*was* intended
to create more political conflict.

For shame!


--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

Hmm, here's where I'll use YOUR tactic for "changing the tone of
the
newsgroup"

BULL****! HORSE****! YOU'RE A ****ING LIAR! Sound familiar,
John?
That's YOUR idea of changing the "tone of the newsgroup", huh?

Bad hair day?
--
John H

John, those were quoted directly from YOU, John!!!! Now, you've
stated
over and over to others here that name calling isn't good for
group
harmony, doesn't help the tone of the group, etc. But, it seems
it's
okay for YOU to do it, huh? And, what about your statement that I
wasn't "invited" to a particular discussion. Must everyone here be
"invited"? Sure would be a short thread that way.... What if
someone
were to ask a question? Would they have to "invite" just who they
wanted to answer that question?


Do you really have to post here day after day with this attitude of
yours?
It is really getting old Kevin. Try a positive attitude for a
change....you will like it.

Kevin is smarting over geting bitch slapped for not knowing the
definition
of slander.

First, I'm not Kevin, second, Fritz, I'll tell you right now, right
away, you aren't and won't EVER be man enough to "bitch slap" me. Get,
you little twit?

On Fri, 20 May 2005 16:00:35 -0400, "P.Fritz"
wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
.. .
On 20 May 2005 10:22:04 -0700, wrote:


P.Fritz wrote:
"JimH" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...

John H wrote:
On 19 May 2005 05:32:34 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 18 May 2005 06:02:42 -0700, cut and
pasted
some
off topic
trash which did nothing to enhance the tone of the newsgroup,
but
*was* intended
to create more political conflict.

For shame!


--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

Hmm, here's where I'll use YOUR tactic for "changing the tone of
the
newsgroup"

BULL****! HORSE****! YOU'RE A ****ING LIAR! Sound familiar,
John?
That's YOUR idea of changing the "tone of the newsgroup", huh?

Bad hair day?
--
John H

John, those were quoted directly from YOU, John!!!! Now, you've
stated
over and over to others here that name calling isn't good for
group
harmony, doesn't help the tone of the group, etc. But, it seems
it's
okay for YOU to do it, huh? And, what about your statement that I
wasn't "invited" to a particular discussion. Must everyone here be
"invited"? Sure would be a short thread that way.... What if
someone
were to ask a question? Would they have to "invite" just who they
wanted to answer that question?


Do you really have to post here day after day with this attitude of
yours?
It is really getting old Kevin. Try a positive attitude for a
change....you will like it.

Kevin is smarting over geting bitch slapped for not knowing the
definition
of slander.

First, I'm not Kevin, second, Fritz, I'll tell you right now, right
away, you aren't and won't EVER be man enough to "bitch slap" me. Get,
you little twit?

Why do you respond to posts to or about Kevin? And, name-calling does not
add to
group harmony.

Kevin is too stupid to realize when he has been bitch slapped so violently,

But it is sure easy to tell when his buttons have been pushed. LMAO

How can you bitch slap someone who is non-existent? It's kinda like atheists
arguing the non-existence of something that (in their minds) is non-existent.

Oh well, even though I don't know, the Shadow knows!
John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

On Fri, 20 May 2005 18:22:55 -0400, "P. Fritz"
wrote:


"The Snapper Trapper" wrote in message
...
I would bitch slap Kevin every way but loose.

Hell, half the NG already did.

Isn't it comical how kevin thinks he can determine who is 'man enough' yet
he has to hide behind his multitude of anonymous names.

No wonder he is the "King"






wrote in message
ups.com...

P.Fritz wrote:
"JimH" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...

John H wrote:
On 19 May 2005 05:32:34 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 18 May 2005 06:02:42 -0700, cut and
pasted
some
off topic
trash which did nothing to enhance the tone of the newsgroup,
but
*was* intended
to create more political conflict.

For shame!


--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

Hmm, here's where I'll use YOUR tactic for "changing the tone of
the
newsgroup"

BULL****! HORSE****! YOU'RE A ****ING LIAR! Sound familiar,
John?
That's YOUR idea of changing the "tone of the newsgroup", huh?

Bad hair day?
--
John H

John, those were quoted directly from YOU, John!!!! Now, you've
stated
over and over to others here that name calling isn't good for
group
harmony, doesn't help the tone of the group, etc. But, it seems
it's
okay for YOU to do it, huh? And, what about your statement that I
wasn't "invited" to a particular discussion. Must everyone here be
"invited"? Sure would be a short thread that way.... What if
someone
were to ask a question? Would they have to "invite" just who they
wanted to answer that question?


Do you really have to post here day after day with this attitude of
yours?
It is really getting old Kevin. Try a positive attitude for a
change....you will like it.

Kevin is smarting over geting bitch slapped for not knowing the
definition
of slander.

First, I'm not Kevin, second, Fritz, I'll tell you right now, right
away, you aren't and won't EVER be man enough to "bitch slap" me. Get,
you little twit?







Here's the question:

Calling a person names detracts from our famous group harmony. But, does calling
a non-existent person names do the same?

The Shadow knows.
John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes