Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"tony thomas" wrote in message
news:M3Rge.74265$r53.37275@attbi_s21... It really depends on the boat. If your talking about a fishing boat then chances are it is an outboard you want. For a cruiser/runabout - I/O For at 30' cruiser - inboard. But there are variations to this. Decide the boat and the engine will probably decide for you. Just make sure it is not underpowered. -- I am curious as to why you would suggest outboards for a fishing boat. It seems to me that having the OBs hanging off the transom would be an impediment to reeling in the big ones (or small ones for that matter). -- Peter Aitken |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 12 May 2005 23:21:42 GMT, "Peter Aitken"
wrote: "tony thomas" wrote in message news:M3Rge.74265$r53.37275@attbi_s21... It really depends on the boat. If your talking about a fishing boat then chances are it is an outboard you want. For a cruiser/runabout - I/O For at 30' cruiser - inboard. But there are variations to this. Decide the boat and the engine will probably decide for you. Just make sure it is not underpowered. -- I am curious as to why you would suggest outboards for a fishing boat. It seems to me that having the OBs hanging off the transom would be an impediment to reeling in the big ones (or small ones for that matter). Not really. With or without a bracket, a "tuna door" can be installed with little or no muss, it looks good and if necessary, you can land "the big one" through the door. Later, Tom |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 12 May 2005 23:21:42 GMT, "Peter Aitken" wrote:
"tony thomas" wrote in message news:M3Rge.74265$r53.37275@attbi_s21... It really depends on the boat. If your talking about a fishing boat then chances are it is an outboard you want. For a cruiser/runabout - I/O For at 30' cruiser - inboard. But there are variations to this. Decide the boat and the engine will probably decide for you. Just make sure it is not underpowered. -- I am curious as to why you would suggest outboards for a fishing boat. It seems to me that having the OBs hanging off the transom would be an impediment to reeling in the big ones (or small ones for that matter). Take 'em to the side of the boat. -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Unless the boat is big enough to have true inboard(s), an I/O is going to be
in the way for fishing. This is why you see very few I/O fishing boats. -- Tony my boats and cars at http://t.thomas.home.mchsi.com - "Peter Aitken" wrote in message om... "tony thomas" wrote in message news:M3Rge.74265$r53.37275@attbi_s21... It really depends on the boat. If your talking about a fishing boat then chances are it is an outboard you want. For a cruiser/runabout - I/O For at 30' cruiser - inboard. But there are variations to this. Decide the boat and the engine will probably decide for you. Just make sure it is not underpowered. -- I am curious as to why you would suggest outboards for a fishing boat. It seems to me that having the OBs hanging off the transom would be an impediment to reeling in the big ones (or small ones for that matter). -- Peter Aitken |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 13 May 2005 00:29:53 GMT, "tony thomas"
wrote: Unless the boat is big enough to have true inboard(s), an I/O is going to be in the way for fishing. This is why you see very few I/O fishing boats. FYI: Just the other day, I saw a I/O, I'd guess around 25/27' or so, with an extended swim platform, "tuna" door and the nicest cockpit setup I've ever seen. I haven't seen the owner yet, but I really want to find out who made the boat - it almost looks custom. Later, Tom |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 13 May 2005 00:29:53 GMT, "tony thomas" wrote:
Unless the boat is big enough to have true inboard(s), an I/O is going to be in the way for fishing. This is why you see very few I/O fishing boats. I have an I/O used primarily for fishing. I've also been on a friend's Parker (outboard) fishing. Where I have an engine cover to contend with, I also have a nice place to cut bait, tie lures, sit, etc. Although my friend doesn't have an engine cover, he does have to use a large cooler or two on which to do the same thing. So, the 'room' ends up being close to the same. -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5/13/05, t.thomas wrote:
Unless the boat is big enough to have true inboard(s), an I/O is going to be in the way for fishing. This is why you see very few I/O fishing boats. A few I/O boats have been built with the engine amidships. They use a jack shaft running under the cockpit sole to the drive unit. Wellcraft had that option in a few of its models at one time. For an I/O, it seemed like a better arrangement to me. Like a straight inboard, it would have a better ride plus more room at the transom. Rick |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
It may or may not have a better ride depending on hull design. But it would
be slower since you have all that engine weight moved forward. Trying to trim that much weight out to reduce water drag on the hull would be impossible. Probably whey they stopped making it. -- Tony my boats and cars at http://t.thomas.home.mchsi.com - wrote in message ... On 5/13/05, t.thomas wrote: Unless the boat is big enough to have true inboard(s), an I/O is going to be in the way for fishing. This is why you see very few I/O fishing boats. A few I/O boats have been built with the engine amidships. They use a jack shaft running under the cockpit sole to the drive unit. Wellcraft had that option in a few of its models at one time. For an I/O, it seemed like a better arrangement to me. Like a straight inboard, it would have a better ride plus more room at the transom. Rick |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Agreed on the top speed. But if that's a priority, I'd skip the I/O
altogether and go with an outboard. By "better ride", I mean a more comfortable platform, easier motion, even when dead in the water. For spending all day long in a moderate sea, I'd rather have my weight concentrated low and in the middle. It makes a big difference in the way you feel at the end of the day. Rick. On 5/14/05, t.thomas wrote: It may or may not have a better ride depending on hull design. But it would be slower since you have all that engine weight moved forward. Trying to trim that much weight out to reduce water drag on the hull would be impossible. Probably whey they stopped making it. -- Tony my boats and cars at http://t.thomas.home.mchsi.com - wrote in message .. . On 5/13/05, t.thomas wrote: Unless the boat is big enough to have true inboard(s), an I/O is going to be in the way for fishing. This is why you see very few I/O fishing boats. A few I/O boats have been built with the engine amidships. They use a jack shaft running under the cockpit sole to the drive unit. Wellcraft had that option in a few of its models at one time. For an I/O, it seemed like a better arrangement to me. Like a straight inboard, it would have a better ride plus more room at the transom. Rick |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
... On 5/13/05, t.thomas wrote: Unless the boat is big enough to have true inboard(s), an I/O is going to be in the way for fishing. This is why you see very few I/O fishing boats. A few I/O boats have been built with the engine amidships. They use a jack shaft running under the cockpit sole to the drive unit. Wellcraft had that option in a few of its models at one time. For an I/O, it seemed like a better arrangement to me. Like a straight inboard, it would have a better ride plus more room at the transom. Rick Albemarle and Carolina Classic both take that approach. Nice fishing boats! -- Peter Aitken |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|