|
Leaving The Newsgroup
Love those comments by the cowards who hide behind false email names.
If the shoe fits.......... |
Leaving The Newsgroup
Very good.
Uberspamlords Smith and Blackmoore added to the filter listing. Finally getting this newsgtoup to be readable, just takes a couple months of patience to descuzz it. -- {{ MudFish (Co30){(' www.Co30.com "Careful with that Axe Eugene." "Florida Keyz" wrote in message ... Love those comments by the cowards who hide behind false email names. If the shoe fits.......... |
Leaving The Newsgroup
(JAXAshby) wrote in message ...
wait a minute!! (b)asskisser, aren't you the guy complaining that someone else talked like a sailor, and how terrible it was to show such a lack of breeding and education and good manners and, well, sophistication? so why did you talk that way yourself? btw, *if* you were to check out the meaning of the word "sophisticated" you take such pride in using to describe yourself, you would find the word if freighted with nuances of disceet. From: (basskisser) Nice going, asshole. Idiot, show where I've used the word "sophisticated" to "describe myself." |
Leaving The Newsgroup
6
"basskisser" wrote in message om... (Henry Blackmoore) wrote in message link.net... In article , (JAXAshby) wrote: wait a minute!! (b)asskisser, aren't you the guy complaining that someone else talked like a sailor, and how terrible it was to show such a lack of breeding and education and good manners and, well, sophistication? so why did you talk that way yourself? he didn't mean it, his mind was probably clouded by the marijuana that he "doesn't smoke" (but just grows)... Proof? |
Leaving The Newsgroup
7
"basskisser" wrote in message m... (JAXAshby) wrote in message ... wait a minute!! (b)asskisser, aren't you the guy complaining that someone else talked like a sailor, and how terrible it was to show such a lack of breeding and education and good manners and, well, sophistication? so why did you talk that way yourself? btw, *if* you were to check out the meaning of the word "sophisticated" you take such pride in using to describe yourself, you would find the word if freighted with nuances of disceet. From: (basskisser) Nice going, asshole. Idiot, show where I've used the word "sophisticated" to "describe myself." |
Leaving The Newsgroup
"basskisser" wrote in message m... You are just as much the cause as anybody. Pothead. |
Leaving The Newsgroup
"Joe" wrote in message ...
"basskisser" wrote in message m... You are just as much the cause as anybody. Pothead. Proof? Oh, and how DID You see that? Don't you remember saying you were blocking me? |
Leaving The Newsgroup
"jim--" wrote in message ...
6 Did the nice nurse teach you how to type numbers today? |
Leaving The Newsgroup
|
Leaving The Newsgroup
In article , (basskisser) wrote:
(Henry Blackmoore) wrote in message link.net... In article , (JAXAshby) wrote: wait a minute!! (b)asskisser, aren't you the guy complaining that someone else talked like a sailor, and how terrible it was to show such a lack of breeding and education and good manners and, well, sophistication? so why did you talk that way yourself? he didn't mean it, his mind was probably clouded by the marijuana that he "doesn't smoke" (but just grows)... Proof? More like "Poof"... |
Leaving The Newsgroup
In article IdFac.152978$po.900515@attbi_s52, "John Smith" wrote:
Krause is as nasty of a person as any I have ever read in a newsgroup, he talks about being compassionate, but shows no compassion towards anyone who disagrees with any of his beliefs, hence, I don't care what anyone says about him that is true. The problem is if you make an incorrect statement that you know to be incorrect, with the express purpose of harming his reputation, you can be sued for libel. Bull**** I could not find any reliable posts that showed or documented Harry flashing anyone, but if he was found guilty of a sex crime in FL. he should be on their list of sex offenders. So? I did find a Harry Krause on their lists, but I have no idea if it is the same Harry Krause who posts in this group. Who cares? http://www3.fdle.state.fl.us/sexual_...asp?keys=21399 In Maryland their is no sex offenders listed under the name Krause. The biggest reason I think you should avoid making unfounded allegations is you bring yourself down to his level, with is pretty low. I am not making any allegations but you are doing a pretty good job of it. "Henry Blackmoore" wrote in message link.net... In article lXCac.43622$gA5.555362@attbi_s03, "John Smith" wrote: What makes you think anyone in here was accused of flashing a school bus? While I find some of the people in here extremely annoying, I would not make that kind of accusation without some proof. I didn't accuse anybody of anything. I merely asked a question. And if you would care to do Deja News archive searches on Herr' Kraut you might find some interesting subject matter. Old Sour Kraut fired the first shot here with a jab at Texas having a bad name. He deserves any blow-back that he receives on this. My point is that Maryland's reputation most certainly is soiled with that disgusting old sour fart living there. You have a problem with that? "Henry Blackmoore" wrote in message link.net... In article , Harry Krause wrote: Don White wrote: Henry Blackmoore wrote in message nk.net... Don can't stop because he thinks (like most Canadian socialist planner wannabes) that he knows what is best for Americans. Don thinks that he knows who the best US President will be. Not to mention that he feels Texans and Floridians (along with others) are all "gun-nutz" (ala' daddy krause his mentor) and shouldn't be allowed to protect themselves from criminals and that they should totally depend on government for solutions to all of their problems like he does. snip... Just being neighbourly by pointing out what may be 'bad' for you.....the US is too big and complex for an outsider like me to think they know what's best....or even who the best president would be. I diss Texas & Florida a bit just to jab at certain deserving posters. By your antics here, a person could argue you are giving Texas a bad name. Texas already has a bad name. Really? Are there more school bus flashers here than in ohhh-sayyyy -- --Maryland Krause? What sayeth you? |
Leaving The Newsgroup
In article c3dhc2g=.5e12bff489145a61846dd393ec7365ef@1080764 140.nulluser.com, "Harry Krause" wrote:
John Smith wrote: Krause is as nasty of a person as any I have ever read in a newsgroup, Oh, I'm not all that bad... he talks about being compassionate, but shows no compassion towards anyone who disagrees with any of his beliefs, Sure I do. Just the other day, I persuaded the trash man to leave you on the curb, despite your festering sores and bad aroma. that you know to be incorrect, with the express purpose of harming his reputation, you can be sued for libel. Garbage like you never has any worthwhile assets to grab... I could not find any reliable posts that showed or documented Harry flashing anyone, but if he was found guilty of a sex crime in FL. he should be on their list of sex offenders. I did find a Harry Krause on their lists, but I have no idea if it is the same Harry Krause who posts in this group. Naw. According to the right-wing garbage on this newsgroup, I live in Gambrills, Maryland. In Maryland their is no sex offenders listed under the name Krause. Naw. My only citation was many years ago in upstate New York, where I was fined $50,000 for criminal contempt during a teachers' strike. But the cite and fine were reversed. The biggest reason I think you should avoid making unfounded allegations is you bring yourself down to his level, with is pretty low. Not nearly as low as you. Or your vomitus buddy, Henry Blackmore. Interesting that neither of you have the balls to post with real names. It's 'Blackmoore' with two o's sour Kraut. Not my real name? Really? And you determined that how? Didn't find anything in your USSEARCH scan eh simpleton? Really now. You make me laugh. Later Ciao! |
Leaving The Newsgroup
In article 4DGac.49124$JO3.31772@attbi_s04, "John Smith" wrote:
my feelings are hurt, and I thought I was helping your case that you are not a sex offender, well whatever . maybe he is a sex offender? "Harry Krause" wrote in message news:c3dhc2g=.5e12bff489145a61846dd393ec7365ef@10 80764140.nulluser.com... John Smith wrote: |
Leaving The Newsgroup
In article , Harry Krause wrote:
: N Butch Ammon wrote: It just happens that you are one of the worst and are a key player in the destroying rec.boats as a boating newsgroup. *Applause* Someone finally stood up and said what needed to be said. Butch Ammon {If I'm not here (doubtful, anymore), you can find me at http://www.iboats.com} You leave here more times than a cat has lives. You used to be a pretty decent fellow, Butch...but I guess Wayne LaPierre's mind-control turned you to the dark side. Actually it was old Charleton.... |
Leaving The Newsgroup
In article , "Mudfish\(Co30\)" wrote:
Very good. Uberspamlords Smith and Blackmoore added to the filter listing. Finally getting this newsgtoup to be readable, just takes a couple months of patience to descuzz it. You obviously don't have a clue as to what "spam" is dim one. Glad that I am on your 'uber' list though anyway. Sheesh |
Leaving The Newsgroup
In article , "Gene Kearns" wrote:
On Mon, 05 Apr 2004 17:35:27 GMT, (Henry Blackmoore) wrote: In article , "Mudfish\(Co30\)" wrote: Very good. Uberspamlords Smith and Blackmoore added to the filter listing. Finally getting this newsgtoup to be readable, just takes a couple months of patience to descuzz it. You obviously don't have a clue as to what "spam" is dim one. Glad that I am on your 'uber' list though anyway. Sheesh I think I know how you made the list. Out of 317 posts you have made on rec.boats: http://tinyurl.com/3dxej Hi officer, Sorry but I didn't see your badge. Did you show it? Guess you made the Newsgroup Patrol eh? Keep up the good work! Maybe you can get promoted soon... you mentioned "boat" 22 times..... and at least 4 of those are off-topic, the word "boat" being incidental to the post. http://tinyurl.com/25tfu that means less than 6 out of every hundred posts you have anything on topic to offer. 94+% OT should qualify you for 'uber' something. |
Leaving The Newsgroup
(Henry Blackmoore) wrote in message hlink.net...
In article , (basskisser) wrote: (Henry Blackmoore) wrote in message link.net... In article , (JAXAshby) wrote: wait a minute!! (b)asskisser, aren't you the guy complaining that someone else talked like a sailor, and how terrible it was to show such a lack of breeding and education and good manners and, well, sophistication? so why did you talk that way yourself? he didn't mean it, his mind was probably clouded by the marijuana that he "doesn't smoke" (but just grows)... Proof? More like "Poof"... As suspected, idiot. |
Leaving The Newsgroup
In article , "Gene Kearns" wrote:
On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 01:07:04 GMT, (Henry Blackmoore) wrote: Hi officer, Sorry but I didn't see your badge. Did you show it? Guess you made the Newsgroup Patrol eh? Keep up the good work! Maybe you can get promoted soon... You fancy yourself as better than most folks don't ya Gene ol' boy? It doesn't take an "officer" to observe boorish behavior... you probably jabber on your cell phone in restaurants and comment loudly throughout movies, too. Everybody wants to hear *you*, don't they? You got that wrong. Just shows that you aren't as perceptive as you think that you are. I leave my cell phone in the truck when I go in a movie, store or restaurant. Right smack dab in the ashtray. However I do take it with me in my BOAT. Anyhow, I'll add you to my list of people that don't get heard... people that refuse to post on topic. Goodbye. Whatever you say officer O'kearns.... |
Leaving The Newsgroup
In article , (basskisser) wrote:
(Henry Blackmoore) wrote in message hlink.net... In article , (basskisser) wrote: (Henry Blackmoore) wrote in message link.net... In article , (JAXAshby) wrote: wait a minute!! (b)asskisser, aren't you the guy complaining that someone else talked like a sailor, and how terrible it was to show such a lack of breeding and education and good manners and, well, sophistication? so why did you talk that way yourself? he didn't mean it, his mind was probably clouded by the marijuana that he "doesn't smoke" (but just grows)... Proof? More like "Poof"... As suspected, idiot. Or "Puff".... |
Leaving The Newsgroup
is this the kindergarden room?
|
Leaving The Newsgroup
How do you get and work that kill file? These guys are so predictable its
laughable. |
Leaving The Newsgroup
In article , "Gene Kearns" wrote:
On 07 Apr 2004 01:23:08 GMT, (Florida Keyz) wrote: is this the kindergarden room? It certainly is for about 6 people. Killfile them and the number of off-topic posts drops to near nil. They are easily identified by the speed and willingness with which they remind you that they are going to do what they want to do and *you* can't stop them. Since I have never said anything of the sort then obviously I am not one of the 6? Because if I was Officer O'Kearns then that would make you full of baloney. Where is it written that one can only talk about boating matters in this newsgroup and just who deputized you to go after anybody? This newsgroup is akin to a pub where most everyone shares a common interest. A pub on the waterfront perhaps that attracts boaters. And like any pub filled with free spirited individuals the folks can and will talk about most anything that they wish. Be it boats, politics or anything else. Just who are you to say otherwise? And your ridiculous analogies relating to obnoxious cell-phone users doesn't hold water here because in this pub one is free to choose which conversation that they wish to engage in. It isn't like you are forced to listen to somebody's Aunt Marge talking to her doctor while you are dining out. Don't like certain threads then by all means ignore them or filter them out. But you can take your pathetic attempts at newsgroup policing and -- well you can figure that out. This isn't a moderated newsgroup and you are certainly not anybody's moderator. Get over it. later! |
Leaving The Newsgroup
|
Leaving The Newsgroup
On Wed, 07 Apr 2004 16:53:25 GMT, (Henry Blackmoore) wrote:
In article , "Gene Kearns" wrote: On 07 Apr 2004 01:23:08 GMT, (Florida Keyz) wrote: is this the kindergarden room? It certainly is for about 6 people. Killfile them and the number of off-topic posts drops to near nil. They are easily identified by the speed and willingness with which they remind you that they are going to do what they want to do and *you* can't stop them. Since I have never said anything of the sort then obviously I am not one of the 6? Because if I was Officer O'Kearns then that would make you full of baloney. Where is it written that one can only talk about boating matters in this newsgroup and just who deputized you to go after anybody? This newsgroup is akin to a pub where most everyone shares a common interest. It's nothing at all like a pub. In a pub--or in any face to face gathering--there are certain built-in constraints to behavior. Those constraints tend to be closely tied to a) shame; and b) one's instinct for self-preservation. Here on rec.boats, a very small handful of people behave in ways I presume they never would in real life, simply because they'd risk personal embarrassment, shame and likely personal injury. It takes no courage whatsoever to post insults from behind the comparative anonymity of a Usenet handle--and in many instances here I see pure cowardice. A pub on the waterfront perhaps that attracts boaters. Many of the people here (like you) would not last ten minutes in an actual physical gathering of boaters. Besides--I see very little evidence of any interest in boating among the more prolific combatants here. My hunch is that, even with the onset of the boating season, you who have effectively ruined rec.boats as a boating resource will continue your sociopathic behavior here. And like any pub filled with free spirited individuals the folks can and will talk about most anything that they wish. Be it boats, politics or anything else. Ah. Never been in a pub full of "free spirited individuals," I see--unless you subsist on a diet of Ensure, sucked through a wired jaw. Just who are you to say otherwise? I've always found this kind of position amusing: people like you, who contribute to the rapid deterioration of a formerly useful community under some sort of "free speech" umbrella, yet who whine and complain hypocritically when called to account for that same behavior. Joe Parsons |
Leaving The Newsgroup
"Gene Kearns" wrote in message ... On 07 Apr 2004 16:05:00 GMT, (Florida Keyz) wrote: How do you get and work that kill file? These guys are so predictable its laughable. I don't know how to do it via AOL, though I understand there is a way. If interested, I'll send you the names, etc. that will eliminate nearly all of the "spam." If Gene accidently omits my name (NOYB), then please add it as well. Of course, I may be the very reason for Gene's killfile list! ;-) |
Leaving The Newsgroup
Will you kindly change the "Subject:Leaving The Newsgroup" subject. It not
something many of us would read though I'm glad I checked it out before including you in my kill rule. I have been avoding this subject matter for some time hoping it would go away and finally decided to check it out before... "Gene Kearns" wrote in message ... On 07 Apr 2004 16:05:00 GMT, (Florida Keyz) wrote: How do you get and work that kill file? These guys are so predictable its laughable. I don't know how to do it via AOL, though I understand there is a way. If interested, I'll send you the names, etc. that will eliminate nearly all of the "spam." -- 23' Grady White, out of Southport, NC. http://myworkshop.idleplay.net/cavern/ Homepage http://www.southharbourvillage.com/directions.asp Where Southport,NC is located. http://www.southharbourvillage.com/autoupdater.htm Real Time Pictures at My Marina http://www.thebayguide.com/rec.boats Rec.boats at Lee Yeaton's Bayguide |
Leaving The Newsgroup
In article ,
wrote: On Wed, 07 Apr 2004 16:53:25 GMT, (Henry Blackmoore) wrote: In article , "Gene Kearns" wrote: On 07 Apr 2004 01:23:08 GMT, (Florida Keyz) wrote: is this the kindergarden room? It certainly is for about 6 people. Killfile them and the number of off-topic posts drops to near nil. They are easily identified by the speed and willingness with which they remind you that they are going to do what they want to do and *you* can't stop them. Since I have never said anything of the sort then obviously I am not one of the 6? Because if I was Officer O'Kearns then that would make you full of baloney. Where is it written that one can only talk about boating matters in this newsgroup and just who deputized you to go after anybody? This newsgroup is akin to a pub where most everyone shares a common interest. It's nothing at all like a pub. In a pub--or in any face to face gathering--there are certain built-in constraints to behavior. Those constraints tend to be closely tied to a) shame; and b) one's instinct for self-preservation. Here on rec.boats, a very small handful of people behave in ways I presume they never would in real life, simply because they'd risk personal embarrassment, shame and likely personal injury. You have a point there. But you are preaching to the wrong person. I didn't come to this newsgroup to get into it with folks. But I be god-damned if I have to remain silent while sob's throw insults my way. Just like in a real pub I can fight back if I so choose. It takes no courage whatsoever to post insults from behind the comparative anonymity of a Usenet handle--and in many instances here I see pure cowardice. Bully for you. A pub on the waterfront perhaps that attracts boaters. Many of the people here (like you) would not last ten minutes in an actual physical gathering of boaters. Besides--I see very little evidence of any interest in boating among the more prolific combatants here. My hunch is that, even with the onset of the boating season, you who have effectively ruined rec.boats as a boating resource will continue your sociopathic behavior here. How come I don't see posts like this chewing out Harry K. and company, like 'asskisser? Why is that? Am I missing something? Is it okay for them to spew their vile and bullsh*t but shame on me for putting it back in front of them? All the chastizing seems to be very one-sided around here. And like any pub filled with free spirited individuals the folks can and will talk about most anything that they wish. Be it boats, politics or anything else. Ah. Never been in a pub full of "free spirited individuals," I see--unless you subsist on a diet of Ensure, sucked through a wired jaw. Just who are you to say otherwise? I've always found this kind of position amusing: people like you, who contribute to the rapid deterioration of a formerly useful community under some sort of "free speech" umbrella, yet who whine and complain hypocritically when called to account for that same behavior. Oh really now? I have been coming here for years now and you know something? I came in here originally to talk about boats and I still do. However when I first started posting I also got insulted and had mud flung at me by various members of the newsgroup that made fun of my home state, my name, my email addresses, my boat and my political affliations amongst other things. The folks that I retort to or insult in here are the ones that started throwing their **** at me first. Same as in a pub or bar I don't walk away from too many jerks throwing verbal punches or otherwise. Why should I? I have the right to speak my mind as well. You expect me and others to just settle down and be silent while the left-wing whacko contingent says and does what they please? You are preaching to the wrong person here. Go play NetCop to somebody else. Let's see you engage some of the lefties on this issue. later Joe Parsons |
Leaving The Newsgroup
In article ,
wrote: On Wed, 07 Apr 2004 16:53:25 GMT, (Henry Blackmoore) wrote: In article , "Gene Kearns" wrote: On 07 Apr 2004 01:23:08 GMT, (Florida Keyz) wrote: is this the kindergarden room? It certainly is for about 6 people. Killfile them and the number of off-topic posts drops to near nil. They are easily identified by the speed and willingness with which they remind you that they are going to do what they want to do and *you* can't stop them. Since I have never said anything of the sort then obviously I am not one of the 6? Because if I was Officer O'Kearns then that would make you full of baloney. Where is it written that one can only talk about boating matters in this newsgroup and just who deputized you to go after anybody? This newsgroup is akin to a pub where most everyone shares a common interest. It's nothing at all like a pub. In a pub--or in any face to face gathering--there are certain built-in constraints to behavior. Those constraints tend to be closely tied to a) shame; and b) one's instinct for self-preservation. Here on rec.boats, a very small handful of people behave in ways I presume they never would in real life, simply because they'd risk personal embarrassment, shame and likely personal injury. You have a point there. But you are preaching to the wrong person. I didn't come to this newsgroup to get into it with folks. But I be god-damned if I have to remain silent while sob's throw insults my way. Just like in a real pub I can fight back if I so choose. It takes no courage whatsoever to post insults from behind the comparative anonymity of a Usenet handle--and in many instances here I see pure cowardice. Bully for you. A pub on the waterfront perhaps that attracts boaters. Many of the people here (like you) would not last ten minutes in an actual physical gathering of boaters. Besides--I see very little evidence of any interest in boating among the more prolific combatants here. My hunch is that, even with the onset of the boating season, you who have effectively ruined rec.boats as a boating resource will continue your sociopathic behavior here. How come I don't see posts like this chewing out Harry K. and company, like 'asskisser? Why is that? Am I missing something? Is it okay for them to spew their vile and bullsh*t but shame on me for putting it back in front of them? All the chastizing seems to be very one-sided around here. And like any pub filled with free spirited individuals the folks can and will talk about most anything that they wish. Be it boats, politics or anything else. Ah. Never been in a pub full of "free spirited individuals," I see--unless you subsist on a diet of Ensure, sucked through a wired jaw. Just who are you to say otherwise? I've always found this kind of position amusing: people like you, who contribute to the rapid deterioration of a formerly useful community under some sort of "free speech" umbrella, yet who whine and complain hypocritically when called to account for that same behavior. Oh really now? I have been coming here for years now and you know something? I came in here originally to talk about boats and I still do. However when I first started posting I also got insulted and had mud flung at me by various members of the newsgroup that made fun of my home state, my name, my email addresses, my boat and my political affliations amongst other things. The folks that I retort to or insult in here are the ones that started throwing their **** at me first. Same as in a pub or bar I don't walk away from too many jerks throwing verbal punches or otherwise. Why should I? I have the right to speak my mind as well. You expect me and others to just settle down and be silent while the left-wing whacko contingent says and does what they please? You are preaching to the wrong person here. Go play NetCop to somebody else. Let's see you engage some of the lefties on this issue. later Joe Parsons |
Leaving The Newsgroup
In article , wrote:
I'll be... -- correction |
Leaving The Newsgroup
"Henry Blackmoore" wrote in message k.net... How come I don't see posts like this chewing out Harry K. and company, like 'asskisser? Why is that? Am I missing something? It's because he's as full of **** as both of them. He's had his "goodbye cruel newsgroup I'm never coming back" posts before, but it seems he just can't stay away. If I remember correctly he even invited (b)asskisser to go boating with him once. See if he invites you. |
Leaving The Newsgroup
|
Leaving The Newsgroup
If you have any knowlege, and mental ability, you can see how predictable these
guys are. They live for anyone posting on this list legit. They get "off" inadequetly trying to put down or **** off legit posters. It has beeen best said, and I quote"Many of the people here (like you) would not last ten minutes in an actual physical gathering of boaters'.No kidding, how would you like to raft up to one of those guys? Ain't that the truth. The real boaters that I have known and experienced, are not these assholes.They are helpful, frindley, and considerate. If you doubt me, wait till you read what they post after this. sterling My real email listed with this post.(not like the cowards hiding behing false email addresses!) |
Leaving The Newsgroup
In article , wrote:
Path: On Wed, 07 Apr 2004 21:37:29 GMT, (Henry Blackmoore) wrote: [snip] This newsgroup is akin to a pub where most everyone shares a common interest. It's nothing at all like a pub. In a pub--or in any face to face gathering--there are certain built-in constraints to behavior. Those constraints tend to be closely tied to a) shame; and b) one's instinct for self-preservation. Here on rec.boats, a very small handful of people behave in ways I presume they never would in real life, simply because they'd risk personal embarrassment, shame and likely personal injury. You have a point there. But you are preaching to the wrong person. I didn't come to this newsgroup to get into it with folks. And yet, strangely, out of all the posts you've made to rec.boats under your current 'nym, almost none of them have anything to do with boating. Maybe you were a prolific and valued boater posting under some other handle? Strangely I don't use different names. I use my real name. I just don't give out my email address to just anyone or publicly. And if you insist on playing Encyclopedia Brown or Joe Hardy and want to do a bit of sleuthing then read up on just what 'X-no-archive:yes' is all about. The majority of my previous posting were never archived Sherlock. But I be god-damned if I have to remain silent while sob's throw insults my way. Just like in a real pub I can fight back if I so choose. It takes no courage whatsoever to post insults from behind the comparative anonymity of a Usenet handle--and in many instances here I see pure cowardice. Bully for you. A pub on the waterfront perhaps that attracts boaters. Many of the people here (like you) would not last ten minutes in an actual physical gathering of boaters. Besides--I see very little evidence of any interest in boating among the more prolific combatants here. My hunch is that, even with the onset of the boating season, you who have effectively ruined rec.boats as a boating resource will continue your sociopathic behavior here. How come I don't see posts like this chewing out Harry K. and company, like 'asskisser? Why is that? Am I missing something? Probably, yes. Tell you what: why don't you do a search of the rec.boats archives for all the posts I've made here (you should find well over 400 of them); you should be able to discern what my positions are, and to whom I express them. You may be surprised. You are not important enough for me to warrant much more than a reply or two to your comments. I don't feel the need to research your life or to try and find out if you use your real name or where you live etc... Obviously the reverse isn't true though eh? Maybe you are a bit unbalanced mentally, no? Is it okay for them to spew their vile and bullsh*t but shame on me for putting it back in front of them? All the chastizing seems to be very one-sided around here. I suspect you're reading only a small part of the traffic in rec.boats. You are the sleuthing expert. You tell me. And like any pub filled with free spirited individuals the folks can and will talk about most anything that they wish. Be it boats, politics or anything else. Ah. Never been in a pub full of "free spirited individuals," I see--unless you subsist on a diet of Ensure, sucked through a wired jaw. Just who are you to say otherwise? I've always found this kind of position amusing: people like you, who contribute to the rapid deterioration of a formerly useful community under some sort of "free speech" umbrella, yet who whine and complain hypocritically when called to account for that same behavior. Oh really now? I have been coming here for years now and you know something? I came in here originally to talk about boats and I still do. Really? Under what handle? And when? Under my OWN name. And I go back to at least 1999 or 1998. But you can figure all of that out yourself since you are so smart. However when I first started posting I also got insulted and had mud flung at me by various members of the newsgroup that made fun of my home state, my name, my email addresses, my boat and my political affliations amongst other things. Can you consider the strong possibility that you may have contributed significantly to that state of affairs? Even caused it? You seem to be upset that you've been insulted, and that your "political affiliations" have been ridiculed. I never seem to have that problem. Care to guess why? What are you? A school-marm? What role are you trying to assume here? Look, if you don't like my posts (or any other ones for that matter) then either ignore them or use the filtering features of your news client. It's really that simple. Like I said if mud gets slung my way I reserve the right to sling some right back. You can try and be NetCop or Newsgroup Moderator all that you want to but you don't have anything to stand on in that capacity. The folks that I retort to or insult in here are the ones that started throwing their **** at me first. Really. So poor, innocent Henry first posted to rec.boats about--what, boats? And was immediately maligned for his innocent, on-topic posting. No, unless you x-no some of your posts, or have posted earlier under some different 'nym; just about every post I've been able to find from you has seemed to be spoiling for some kind of fight. What makes you think that you have seen EVERY post that I have made. Do you think that Deja-News has everything archived? I don't have to explain anything to you fella. You can figure things out for yourself. You obviously fancy yourself as some kind of elite. Same as in a pub or bar I don't walk away from too many jerks throwing verbal punches or otherwise. Why should I? I have the right to speak my mind as well. This is what is called a "straw man." No one has said that you don't have a right to behave badly on Usenet--but you can't reasonably expect not to receive consequences--verbal on Usenet, possibly physical in meatspace. I have never seen anyone behave IRL as you and several others do here without either being assaulted or ejected from the premises. Your one-sidedness is really showing here. You expect me and others to just settle down and be silent while the left-wing whacko contingent says and does what they please? You are preaching to the wrong person here. Go play NetCop to somebody else. Let's see you engage some of the lefties on this issue. As I've said--I suspect you have read rec.boats quite selectively. Check the archives. As you are quite "selective" in those you engage too eh? Joe Parsons Go talk about boats Joe. Stop getting your panties in a wad because I and others won't conform to your expectations. Learn how to and use a good kill filter. Nobody forces you to click on a post or thread in here. You are not part of a captive audience. You have the freedom to choose (just as you have the freedom to post what you like on ANY subject). later.... |
Leaving The Newsgroup
On Thu, 08 Apr 2004 17:36:22 GMT, (Henry Blackmoore) wrote:
In article , wrote: Path: On Wed, 07 Apr 2004 21:37:29 GMT, (Henry Blackmoore) wrote: [snip] This newsgroup is akin to a pub where most everyone shares a common interest. It's nothing at all like a pub. In a pub--or in any face to face gathering--there are certain built-in constraints to behavior. Those constraints tend to be closely tied to a) shame; and b) one's instinct for self-preservation. Here on rec.boats, a very small handful of people behave in ways I presume they never would in real life, simply because they'd risk personal embarrassment, shame and likely personal injury. You have a point there. But you are preaching to the wrong person. I didn't come to this newsgroup to get into it with folks. And yet, strangely, out of all the posts you've made to rec.boats under your current 'nym, almost none of them have anything to do with boating. Maybe you were a prolific and valued boater posting under some other handle? Strangely I don't use different names. I use my real name. I just don't give out my email address to just anyone or publicly. And if you insist on playing Encyclopedia Brown or Joe Hardy and want to do a bit of sleuthing then read up on just what 'X-no-archive:yes' is all about. The majority of my previous posting were never archived Sherlock. And I acknowledged that possibility. But I be god-damned if I have to remain silent while sob's throw insults my way. Just like in a real pub I can fight back if I so choose. It takes no courage whatsoever to post insults from behind the comparative anonymity of a Usenet handle--and in many instances here I see pure cowardice. Bully for you. A pub on the waterfront perhaps that attracts boaters. Many of the people here (like you) would not last ten minutes in an actual physical gathering of boaters. Besides--I see very little evidence of any interest in boating among the more prolific combatants here. My hunch is that, even with the onset of the boating season, you who have effectively ruined rec.boats as a boating resource will continue your sociopathic behavior here. How come I don't see posts like this chewing out Harry K. and company, like 'asskisser? Why is that? Am I missing something? Probably, yes. Tell you what: why don't you do a search of the rec.boats archives for all the posts I've made here (you should find well over 400 of them); you should be able to discern what my positions are, and to whom I express them. You may be surprised. You are not important enough for me to warrant much more than a reply or two to your comments. I hope this doesn't come as too much of a blow to you, but my "importance" in your eyes is of no concern to me. You've claimed that I don't take others to task (Krause, for example) for their posts. You're wrong--and a quick search of past posts to rec.boats will show you *how* wrong. But suit yourself. I don't feel the need to research your life or to try and find out if you use your real name or where you live etc... Obviously the reverse isn't true though eh? Maybe you are a bit unbalanced mentally, no? I think this may be a personal record for you: longest time corresponding with someone before making some irrelevant, childish personal insult. Is it okay for them to spew their vile and bullsh*t but shame on me for putting it back in front of them? All the chastizing seems to be very one-sided around here. I suspect you're reading only a small part of the traffic in rec.boats. You are the sleuthing expert. You tell me. Nope. You've made a claim. Back it up. And like any pub filled with free spirited individuals the folks can and will talk about most anything that they wish. Be it boats, politics or anything else. Ah. Never been in a pub full of "free spirited individuals," I see--unless you subsist on a diet of Ensure, sucked through a wired jaw. Just who are you to say otherwise? I've always found this kind of position amusing: people like you, who contribute to the rapid deterioration of a formerly useful community under some sort of "free speech" umbrella, yet who whine and complain hypocritically when called to account for that same behavior. Oh really now? I have been coming here for years now and you know something? I came in here originally to talk about boats and I still do. Really? Under what handle? And when? Under my OWN name. And I go back to at least 1999 or 1998. But you can figure all of that out yourself since you are so smart. However when I first started posting I also got insulted and had mud flung at me by various members of the newsgroup that made fun of my home state, my name, my email addresses, my boat and my political affliations amongst other things. Can you consider the strong possibility that you may have contributed significantly to that state of affairs? Even caused it? You seem to be upset that you've been insulted, and that your "political affiliations" have been ridiculed. I never seem to have that problem. Care to guess why? What are you? A school-marm? What role are you trying to assume here? Look, if you don't like my posts (or any other ones for that matter) then either ignore them or use the filtering features of your news client. It's really that simple. Henry, I *love* your posts. I don't get all that much opportunity to respond to anyone quite so mean-spirited, petty and fatuous as you seem to be. And my hunch is, you'll keep responding for some time. I'm just wondering how long it'll take you to level some accusation of perversion or lawlessness at me. Or you could just ignore it, let it stand and allow anyone who might happen to read it draw their own conclusions. Like I said if mud gets slung my way I reserve the right to sling some right back. You can try and be NetCop or Newsgroup Moderator all that you want to but you don't have anything to stand on in that capacity. The folks that I retort to or insult in here are the ones that started throwing their **** at me first. Really. So poor, innocent Henry first posted to rec.boats about--what, boats? And was immediately maligned for his innocent, on-topic posting. No, unless you x-no some of your posts, or have posted earlier under some different 'nym; just about every post I've been able to find from you has seemed to be spoiling for some kind of fight. What makes you think that you have seen EVERY post that I have made. Do you think that Deja-News has everything archived? Oh, my goodness. I seem to have overestimated your knowledge of Usenet. When I qualified my statement, above, with "...unless you x-no some of your posts..." I should have been more explicit. What I should have written was, "...unless you include the directive, 'x-no-archive:yes' in some of your posts to inhibit archive display by DejaNews or Google..." I incorrectly assumed that you'd recognize what "x-no" referred to. Terribly sorry. But your biggest problem, IMO, is that you're just boring. And predictable. You don't bring anything interesting to the table--unless your demonstrated fixation on basskisser's imagined sexual preference and practices, and your apparent obsession with labeling him as some kind of drug addict have entertainment value. Joe Parsons I don't have to explain anything to you fella. You can figure things out for yourself. You obviously fancy yourself as some kind of elite. Same as in a pub or bar I don't walk away from too many jerks throwing verbal punches or otherwise. Why should I? I have the right to speak my mind as well. This is what is called a "straw man." No one has said that you don't have a right to behave badly on Usenet--but you can't reasonably expect not to receive consequences--verbal on Usenet, possibly physical in meatspace. I have never seen anyone behave IRL as you and several others do here without either being assaulted or ejected from the premises. Your one-sidedness is really showing here. You expect me and others to just settle down and be silent while the left-wing whacko contingent says and does what they please? You are preaching to the wrong person here. Go play NetCop to somebody else. Let's see you engage some of the lefties on this issue. As I've said--I suspect you have read rec.boats quite selectively. Check the archives. As you are quite "selective" in those you engage too eh? Joe Parsons Go talk about boats Joe. Stop getting your panties in a wad because I and others won't conform to your expectations. Learn how to and use a good kill filter. Nobody forces you to click on a post or thread in here. You are not part of a captive audience. You have the freedom to choose (just as you have the freedom to post what you like on ANY subject). later.... |
Leaving The Newsgroup
Henry Blackmoore wrote in message k.net... snip How come I don't see posts like this chewing out Harry K. and company, like 'asskisser? Why is that? Am I missing something? Is it okay for them to spew their vile and bullsh*t but shame on me for putting it back in front of them? All the chastizing seems to be very one-sided around here. snip Henry...please stop whining, and take your medicine 'like a man'! |
Leaving The Newsgroup
In article , wrote:
On Thu, 08 Apr 2004 17:36:22 GMT, (Henry Blackmoore) wrote: In article , wrote: Path: On Wed, 07 Apr 2004 21:37:29 GMT, (Henry Blackmoore) wrote: [snip] This newsgroup is akin to a pub where most everyone shares a common interest. It's nothing at all like a pub. In a pub--or in any face to face gathering--there are certain built-in constraints to behavior. Those constraints tend to be closely tied to a) shame; and b) one's instinct for self-preservation. Here on rec.boats, a very small handful of people behave in ways I presume they never would in real life, simply because they'd risk personal embarrassment, shame and likely personal injury. You have a point there. But you are preaching to the wrong person. I didn't come to this newsgroup to get into it with folks. And yet, strangely, out of all the posts you've made to rec.boats under your current 'nym, almost none of them have anything to do with boating. Maybe you were a prolific and valued boater posting under some other handle? Strangely I don't use different names. I use my real name. I just don't give out my email address to just anyone or publicly. And if you insist on playing Encyclopedia Brown or Joe Hardy and want to do a bit of sleuthing then read up on just what 'X-no-archive:yes' is all about. The majority of my previous posting were never archived Sherlock. And I acknowledged that possibility. Sure, but I don't always read the whole post and then come back and write comments. I just take paragraphs that interest me from the top down as they come. Sometimes new developments farther down warrant revisions, sometimes not or I don't feel like it. In any case, get over it. But I be god-damned if I have to remain silent while sob's throw insults my way. Just like in a real pub I can fight back if I so choose. It takes no courage whatsoever to post insults from behind the comparative anonymity of a Usenet handle--and in many instances here I see pure cowardice. Bully for you. A pub on the waterfront perhaps that attracts boaters. Many of the people here (like you) would not last ten minutes in an actual physical gathering of boaters. Besides--I see very little evidence of any interest in boating among the more prolific combatants here. My hunch is that, even with the onset of the boating season, you who have effectively ruined rec.boats as a boating resource will continue your sociopathic behavior here. How come I don't see posts like this chewing out Harry K. and company, like 'asskisser? Why is that? Am I missing something? Probably, yes. Tell you what: why don't you do a search of the rec.boats archives for all the posts I've made here (you should find well over 400 of them); you should be able to discern what my positions are, and to whom I express them. You may be surprised. You are not important enough for me to warrant much more than a reply or two to your comments. I hope this doesn't come as too much of a blow to you, but my "importance" in your eyes is of no concern to me. Good then buzz off. You've claimed that I don't take others to task (Krause, for example) for their posts. You're wrong--and a quick search of past posts to rec.boats will show you *how* wrong. But suit yourself. I don't feel the need to research your life or to try and find out if you use your real name or where you live etc... Obviously the reverse isn't true though eh? Maybe you are a bit unbalanced mentally, no? I think this may be a personal record for you: longest time corresponding with someone before making some irrelevant, childish personal insult. Kind of one the level with your "people like you" stereotyping and labeling is it? Is it okay for them to spew their vile and bullsh*t but shame on me for putting it back in front of them? All the chastizing seems to be very one-sided around here. I suspect you're reading only a small part of the traffic in rec.boats. You are the sleuthing expert. You tell me. Nope. You've made a claim. Back it up. I will leave the Hardy Boys crap to you Joe. And like any pub filled with free spirited individuals the folks can and will talk about most anything that they wish. Be it boats, politics or anything else. Ah. Never been in a pub full of "free spirited individuals," I see--unless you subsist on a diet of Ensure, sucked through a wired jaw. Just who are you to say otherwise? I've always found this kind of position amusing: people like you, who contribute to the rapid deterioration of a formerly useful community under some sort of "free speech" umbrella, yet who whine and complain hypocritically when called to account for that same behavior. Oh really now? I have been coming here for years now and you know something? I came in here originally to talk about boats and I still do. Really? Under what handle? And when? Under my OWN name. And I go back to at least 1999 or 1998. But you can figure all of that out yourself since you are so smart. However when I first started posting I also got insulted and had mud flung at me by various members of the newsgroup that made fun of my home state, my name, my email addresses, my boat and my political affliations amongst other things. Can you consider the strong possibility that you may have contributed significantly to that state of affairs? Even caused it? You seem to be upset that you've been insulted, and that your "political affiliations" have been ridiculed. I never seem to have that problem. Care to guess why? What are you? A school-marm? What role are you trying to assume here? Look, if you don't like my posts (or any other ones for that matter) then either ignore them or use the filtering features of your news client. It's really that simple. Henry, I *love* your posts. I don't get all that much opportunity to respond to anyone quite so mean-spirited, petty and fatuous as you seem to be. And my hunch is, you'll keep responding for some time. I'm just wondering how long it'll take you to level some accusation of perversion or lawlessness at me. Or you could just ignore it, let it stand and allow anyone who might happen to read it draw their own conclusions. Ignore it? Why? So you can get the last word. I''ll ignore something when I so choose. And if you are talking about Harry K and/or school buses and you are playing detective then you will find that I didn't start that sh*t. And if you want to defend that vile piece of sh*t then you go right ahead. However I never had unkind words to say to Krause until he started throwing his insults around. The terrible things that Krause has said about Texas and Texans alone warrants anything that gets thrown back at him. I don't feel sorry for the "rectal fissure". It is obvious how one-sided that you really are Joey. Funny how I am "mean-spirited" for engaging left-wing whackos throwing barbs, insults and threats around ain't it Joe? Funny how 'asskisser is throwing around the very same things that you accuse me of and you ain't saying jack as far as I can see. Like I said Joe, get a kill filter and unbind your panties. Like I said if mud gets slung my way I reserve the right to sling some right back. You can try and be NetCop or Newsgroup Moderator all that you want to but you don't have anything to stand on in that capacity. The folks that I retort to or insult in here are the ones that started throwing their **** at me first. Really. So poor, innocent Henry first posted to rec.boats about--what, boats? And was immediately maligned for his innocent, on-topic posting. No, unless you x-no some of your posts, or have posted earlier under some different 'nym; just about every post I've been able to find from you has seemed to be spoiling for some kind of fight. What makes you think that you have seen EVERY post that I have made. Do you think that Deja-News has everything archived? Oh, my goodness. I seem to have overestimated your knowledge of Usenet. When I qualified my statement, above, with "...unless you x-no some of your posts..." I should have been more explicit. What I should have written was, "...unless you include the directive, 'x-no-archive:yes' in some of your posts to inhibit archive display by DejaNews or Google..." I incorrectly assumed that you'd recognize what "x-no" referred to. Terribly sorry. What are you rambling about now? I know perfectly well what "x-no" refers to. However there are (and were) some newsgroups that were never part of Deja's or Google's Archives. The only that you are "overestimating" is your own intelligence. But your biggest problem, IMO, is that you're just boring. And predictable. You don't bring anything interesting to the table--unless your demonstrated fixation on basskisser's imagined sexual preference and practices, and your apparent obsession with labeling him as some kind of drug addict have entertainment value. You are not exactly the most exciting thing to have hit this newsgroup either Joe. And if you want to stick up for and feel sorry for an admitted drug-cultivator then that is certainly your perogative. Go talk about boats Joey. Like I said you can use your kill filter or just ignore anything that "bores" you. Quite simple actually. Try to grasp it. Joe Parsons I don't have to explain anything to you fella. You can figure things out for yourself. You obviously fancy yourself as some kind of elite. Same as in a pub or bar I don't walk away from too many jerks throwing verbal punches or otherwise. Why should I? I have the right to speak my mind as well. This is what is called a "straw man." No one has said that you don't have a right to behave badly on Usenet--but you can't reasonably expect not to receive consequences--verbal on Usenet, possibly physical in meatspace. I have never seen anyone behave IRL as you and several others do here without either being assaulted or ejected from the premises. Your one-sidedness is really showing here. You expect me and others to just settle down and be silent while the left-wing whacko contingent says and does what they please? You are preaching to the wrong person here. Go play NetCop to somebody else. Let's see you engage some of the lefties on this issue. As I've said--I suspect you have read rec.boats quite selectively. Check the archives. As you are quite "selective" in those you engage too eh? Joe Parsons Go talk about boats Joe. Stop getting your panties in a wad because I and others won't conform to your expectations. Learn how to and use a good kill filter. Nobody forces you to click on a post or thread in here. You are not part of a captive audience. You have the freedom to choose (just as you have the freedom to post what you like on ANY subject). later.... |
Leaving The Newsgroup
In article , "Don White" wrote:
Henry Blackmoore wrote in message nk.net... snip How come I don't see posts like this chewing out Harry K. and company, like 'asskisser? Why is that? Am I missing something? Is it okay for them to spew their vile and bullsh*t but shame on me for putting it back in front of them? All the chastizing seems to be very one-sided around here. snip Henry...please stop whining, and take your medicine 'like a man'! Speak of "one-sidedness". Sheesh |
Leaving The Newsgroup
You just can't resist responding, can you?
On Fri, 09 Apr 2004 01:37:40 GMT, (Henry Blackmoore) wrote: In article , wrote: On Thu, 08 Apr 2004 17:36:22 GMT, (Henry Blackmoore) wrote: In article , wrote: Path: On Wed, 07 Apr 2004 21:37:29 GMT, (Henry Blackmoore) wrote: [snip] This newsgroup is akin to a pub where most everyone shares a common interest. It's nothing at all like a pub. In a pub--or in any face to face gathering--there are certain built-in constraints to behavior. Those constraints tend to be closely tied to a) shame; and b) one's instinct for self-preservation. Here on rec.boats, a very small handful of people behave in ways I presume they never would in real life, simply because they'd risk personal embarrassment, shame and likely personal injury. You have a point there. But you are preaching to the wrong person. I didn't come to this newsgroup to get into it with folks. And yet, strangely, out of all the posts you've made to rec.boats under your current 'nym, almost none of them have anything to do with boating. Maybe you were a prolific and valued boater posting under some other handle? Strangely I don't use different names. I use my real name. I just don't give out my email address to just anyone or publicly. And if you insist on playing Encyclopedia Brown or Joe Hardy and want to do a bit of sleuthing then read up on just what 'X-no-archive:yes' is all about. The majority of my previous posting were never archived Sherlock. And I acknowledged that possibility. Sure, but I don't always read the whole post and then come back and write comments. I just take paragraphs that interest me from the top down as they come. Sometimes new developments farther down warrant revisions, sometimes not or I don't feel like it. In any case, get over it. But I be god-damned if I have to remain silent while sob's throw insults my way. Just like in a real pub I can fight back if I so choose. It takes no courage whatsoever to post insults from behind the comparative anonymity of a Usenet handle--and in many instances here I see pure |
Leaving The Newsgroup
In article , wrote:
You just can't resist responding, can you? What makes you any different than me when it comes to this Joe? Save for the fact that you brung it up? I see with the relative quickness of the response that you have been hangin' around. Waiting for me no doubt? But wait! I am "boring" so that is odd. You must have one sad life to get worked up over some boring "mean-spirited" "nym" using poster like me where you have to lay in wait? Am I suppose to just clam up because you play the ol' "you can't resist posting" card? Are you supposed to get the last word in? I will tell you what. I will test you and see if you can shut the hell up and not give in to temptation and reply to me again okay Joe? And I will do the same! Here goes. Not another peep from you or will show the world how weak that you really are and how much you have fixated on me. Bye! :^P |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:49 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com