LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #15   Report Post  
John H
 
Posts: n/a
Default ( OT ) ORigional Iraq coalition supporters (Not all sent troops)

On Mon, 22 Mar 2004 07:32:55 -0500, DSK wrote:

John H wrote:
You have put yourself in the "you guys" pot.


Not at all. You are a self-appointed cheerleader for BushCo, and to you
reality is far less important than tub thumping. If Dick Cheney,
speaking ex cathedra from his secret underground bunker, proclaimed that
water flowed uphill, you (and an embarassingly large group) fall for it.

I do not want to belong to your club, therefor to you I *must* be a
scion of EVIL CLINTON. But that is no more true than that water flows
uphill.


... What countries would
satisfy you? Be specific. Or, be honest.


I gav e a very strong hint in prior post, guess it went over your head.
How about any 4 of the G-7? Any 5 NATO allies... hey they are supposed
to be our allies, after all. But the Bush Administration's policy is to
turn allies into enemies and trumpet what a success it is.


... If any ten countries were
added to the list, it wouldn't be sufficient for folks, like yourself,
who are fanatically opposed to the current administration.


I am not "fanatically opposed" to the current administration. I oppose
them for very real & concrete & rational reasons. OTOH, no act of greed
or stupidity on the part of BushCo would convince you how bad they are.

You are simply living in a fantasy world and trying desperately to
convince other people that it's real. Go back and reread your posts
about the current state of Chesapeake Bay, then review the Bush
Administration's actions with regard to the EPA. Then tell yourself that
you *really* want to live near and fish on a body of water this group
controls.



If Clinton had done it in 1998, instead of just talking about how
necessary it was, you'd not be complaining even if we did it *all* by
ourselves.


Actually I did not like many of the actions that the Clinton
Administration did. However, 'guys like you' were always screaming that
he was soft of defense, now you're screaming that he blew up aspirin
factories. Can't have it both ways... unless you are a
propaganda-parroting hypocrit.

DSK


Blowing up an aspirin plant and being soft on defense are the same
thing.

Nine NATO allies and four G-7 countries are committed.

Obviously you've not seen my comments regarding Bush and the
environment.

Furthermore, if you'll go back and check, you'll find most of my posts
have been anti-stupidity, not pro-Bush or anti-Clinton. I find fault
with the "chicken****" appelation being applied to the prudent actions
taken to protect our President, whether Democrat or Republican.

John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
(OT) Some in Bush's 'coalition of the willing' are suddenly losingtheir will Jim General 0 March 19th 04 01:35 PM
) OT ) Bush's "needless war" Jim General 3 March 7th 04 07:16 AM
Credible journalism or a touch of bias -- OT John H General 29 December 30th 03 11:08 AM
OT--U.N. Unanimously Adopts Iraq Resolution NOYB General 1 October 17th 03 05:36 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:13 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017