John H wrote:
You have put yourself in the "you guys" pot.

Not at all. You are a self-appointed cheerleader for BushCo, and to you
reality is far less important than tub thumping. If Dick Cheney,
speaking ex cathedra from his secret underground bunker, proclaimed that
water flowed uphill, you (and an embarassingly large group) fall for it.

I do not want to belong to your club, therefor to you I *must* be a
scion of EVIL CLINTON. But that is no more true than that water flows
uphill.


... What countries would
satisfy you? Be specific. Or, be honest.

I gav e a very strong hint in prior post, guess it went over your head.
How about any 4 of the G-7? Any 5 NATO allies... hey they are supposed
to be our allies, after all. But the Bush Administration's policy is to
turn allies into enemies and trumpet what a success it is.


... If any ten countries were
added to the list, it wouldn't be sufficient for folks, like yourself,
who are fanatically opposed to the current administration.

I am not "fanatically opposed" to the current administration. I oppose
them for very real & concrete & rational reasons. OTOH, no act of greed
or stupidity on the part of BushCo would convince you how bad they are.

You are simply living in a fantasy world and trying desperately to
convince other people that it's real. Go back and reread your posts
about the current state of Chesapeake Bay, then review the Bush
Administration's actions with regard to the EPA. Then tell yourself that
you *really* want to live near and fish on a body of water this group
controls.



If Clinton had done it in 1998, instead of just talking about how
necessary it was, you'd not be complaining even if we did it *all* by
ourselves.

Actually I did not like many of the actions that the Clinton
Administration did. However, 'guys like you' were always screaming that
he was soft of defense, now you're screaming that he blew up aspirin
factories. Can't have it both ways... unless you are a
propaganda-parroting hypocrit.

DSK