( OT ) Follow the "Leader"
 

"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
Charles wrote in message
...
basskisser wrote:

So, you DO think it wise to judge someone without knowing them?

I'm beginning to believe b'asskisser has a tail which he chases all day
long.

-- Charlie

If you are "beginning to believe" that, may I suggest you seek some
professional help?

LMAO!!!!!!!!

I guess you mean Charlie should have believed it since day one.

You are a real trip 'kisser. Thanks for providing us a good chuckle every
day.

( OT ) Follow the "Leader"
 

basskisser wrote:

Charles wrote in message ...
basskisser wrote:

So, you DO think it wise to judge someone without knowing them?

I'm beginning to believe b'asskisser has a tail which he chases all day long.

-- Charlie

If you are "beginning to believe" that, may I suggest you seek some
professional help?

In a way, you're correct.

I should have caught on much sooner as to what an idiot you are.

--Charlie

( OT ) Follow the "Leader"
 

Charles wrote in message ...
basskisser wrote:

Charles wrote in message ...
basskisser wrote:

So, you DO think it wise to judge someone without knowing them?

I'm beginning to believe b'asskisser has a tail which he chases all day long.

-- Charlie

If you are "beginning to believe" that, may I suggest you seek some
professional help?

In a way, you're correct.

I should have caught on much sooner as to what an idiot you are.

--Charlie

Well, let's just break it down, there, Charlie. Do YOU think it wise
to judge someone without knowing them? Yes or no. If yes, then you are
just plain stupid. Next, are you really beginning to believe that I
have "a tail which he chases all day long"? Yes or no. If yes, you DO
in fact, need professional help. Now, I reiterate, I think that
anybody that judges someone by what they write in a newsgroup is
lacking in any character.

( OT ) Follow the "Leader"
 

"Jim" wrote in message ...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
Charles wrote in message
...
basskisser wrote:

So, you DO think it wise to judge someone without knowing them?

I'm beginning to believe b'asskisser has a tail which he chases all day
long.

-- Charlie

If you are "beginning to believe" that, may I suggest you seek some
professional help?

LMAO!!!!!!!!

I guess you mean Charlie should have believed it since day one.

You are a real trip 'kisser. Thanks for providing us a good chuckle every
day.

Where did I say that? That's quite a stretch, even for you. Let me
clarify for the fool. Why would you automatically ASSUME that? Do you
not think that it could be that, because he is thinking that at all,
that he needs help? Would you think that anybody who thinks that about
a person because of what they write in a newgroup is mentally healthy?

( OT ) Follow the "Leader"
 

basskisser wrote:

Now, I reiterate, I think that anybody that judges someone by what they
write in a newsgroup is lacking in any character.

Since you judge others in the newsgroup by what they write, you're
confirming that you lack any character. I concur with your judgment in
this one instance.

Seldom does one rise to your level of idiocy.

-- Charlie

( OT ) Follow the "Leader"
 

Charles wrote in message ...
basskisser wrote:

Now, I reiterate, I think that anybody that judges someone by what they
write in a newsgroup is lacking in any character.

Since you judge others in the newsgroup by what they write, you're
confirming that you lack any character. I concur with your judgment in
this one instance.

Seldom does one rise to your level of idiocy.

-- Charlie

No, sorry, Charlie. I don't judge anyone here, merely by what they
write in a newsgroup. I know that trying to get you to understand
something, is like pulling teeth, but, here goes. When someone makes
wild allegations, assumptions, and statements, with NO basis of fact,
then that indeed shows ignorance. But, when someone makes a statement
that they KNOW someone, because they've met them once, and they are
called out about it, then they come up with, well, I am qualified to
judge him by what he writes in a newsgroup is just dumb. Take YOU for
instance. By what you write here, one could make an assumption that
you are nothing but a blow hard, frustrated, over the hill ego maniac,
and that you think you are much better than everybody else, but are
actually quite dumb, appearing like you would rather argue, than make
any sense. Now, there is a slight chance that that is not correct.
See?

( OT ) Follow the "Leader"
 

basskisser wrote:

Charles wrote in message ...
basskisser wrote:

Now, I reiterate, I think that anybody that judges someone by what they
write in a newsgroup is lacking in any character.

Since you judge others in the newsgroup by what they write, you're
confirming that you lack any character. I concur with your judgment in
this one instance.

Seldom does one rise to your level of idiocy.

-- Charlie

No, sorry, Charlie. I don't judge anyone here, merely by what they
write in a newsgroup.

Must you constantly prove you're an idiot?

-- Charlie

( OT ) Follow the "Leader"
 

"Charles" wrote in message
...


basskisser wrote:

Charles wrote in message
...
basskisser wrote:

Now, I reiterate, I think that anybody that judges someone by what
they
write in a newsgroup is lacking in any character.

Since you judge others in the newsgroup by what they write, you're
confirming that you lack any character. I concur with your judgment in
this one instance.

Seldom does one rise to your level of idiocy.

-- Charlie

No, sorry, Charlie. I don't judge anyone here, merely by what they
write in a newsgroup.

Must you constantly prove you're an idiot?

-- Charlie

Funny, and certainly true. Every day is a new 'basskisser blunder.

I think he is playing us. No one can be that stupid.

( OT ) Follow the "Leader"
 

"jim--" wrote in message
...

"Charles" wrote in message
...


basskisser wrote:

Charles wrote in message
...
basskisser wrote:

Now, I reiterate, I think that anybody that judges someone by
what
they
write in a newsgroup is lacking in any character.

Since you judge others in the newsgroup by what they write, you're
confirming that you lack any character. I concur with your
judgment in
this one instance.

Seldom does one rise to your level of idiocy.

-- Charlie

No, sorry, Charlie. I don't judge anyone here, merely by what they
write in a newsgroup.

Must you constantly prove you're an idiot?

-- Charlie

Funny, and certainly true. Every day is a new 'basskisser blunder.

I think he is playing us. No one can be that stupid.


You obviously have never driven through some of the Atlanta suburbs.

( OT ) Follow the "Leader"
 

Charles wrote in message ...
basskisser wrote:

Charles wrote in message ...
basskisser wrote:

Now, I reiterate, I think that anybody that judges someone by what they
write in a newsgroup is lacking in any character.

Since you judge others in the newsgroup by what they write, you're
confirming that you lack any character. I concur with your judgment in
this one instance.

Seldom does one rise to your level of idiocy.

-- Charlie

No, sorry, Charlie. I don't judge anyone here, merely by what they
write in a newsgroup.

Must you constantly prove you're an idiot?

-- Charlie

Where have I judged anyone here, soley by what they've written here?
Quite contrary, there, Charlie. I only call people stupid, when
they've proven themselves so.

( OT ) Follow the "Leader"
 

"jim--" wrote in message ...
"Charles" wrote in message
...


basskisser wrote:

Charles wrote in message
...
basskisser wrote:

Now, I reiterate, I think that anybody that judges someone by what
they
write in a newsgroup is lacking in any character.

Since you judge others in the newsgroup by what they write, you're
confirming that you lack any character. I concur with your judgment in
this one instance.

Seldom does one rise to your level of idiocy.

-- Charlie

No, sorry, Charlie. I don't judge anyone here, merely by what they
write in a newsgroup.

Must you constantly prove you're an idiot?

-- Charlie

Funny, and certainly true. Every day is a new 'basskisser blunder.

I think he is playing us. No one can be that stupid.

Jim--, please show where I've judged someone here, soley by what they
write. You on the other hand, use only assumptions, and unproven
allegations.

( OT ) Follow the "Leader"
 

basskisser wrote:

Charles wrote in message ...
basskisser wrote:

Charles wrote in message ...
basskisser wrote:

Now, I reiterate, I think that anybody that judges someone by what they
write in a newsgroup is lacking in any character.

Since you judge others in the newsgroup by what they write, you're
confirming that you lack any character. I concur with your judgment in
this one instance.

Seldom does one rise to your level of idiocy.

-- Charlie

No, sorry, Charlie. I don't judge anyone here, merely by what they
write in a newsgroup.

Must you constantly prove you're an idiot?

-- Charlie

Where have I judged anyone here, soley by what they've written here?
Quite contrary, there, Charlie. I only call people stupid, when
they've proven themselves so.

And when you call them stupid, as you frequently do, are you judging
them by what they have written in the newsgroup, or have you paid them a
personal visit?

shakin' head

-- Charlie

( OT ) Follow the "Leader"
 

basskisser wrote:

"jim--" wrote in message ...
"Charles" wrote in message
...


basskisser wrote:

Charles wrote in message
...
basskisser wrote:

Now, I reiterate, I think that anybody that judges someone by what
they
write in a newsgroup is lacking in any character.

Since you judge others in the newsgroup by what they write, you're
confirming that you lack any character. I concur with your judgment in
this one instance.

Seldom does one rise to your level of idiocy.

-- Charlie

No, sorry, Charlie. I don't judge anyone here, merely by what they
write in a newsgroup.

Must you constantly prove you're an idiot?

-- Charlie

Funny, and certainly true. Every day is a new 'basskisser blunder.

I think he is playing us. No one can be that stupid.

Jim--, please show where I've judged someone here, soley by what they
write. You on the other hand, use only assumptions, and unproven
allegations.

Apparently b'asskisser is doing face to face interviews with people
before he judges them stupid.

-- Charlie

( OT ) Follow the "Leader"
 

Damn, can you possibly not know what you just said? According to what you
just wrote, everyone you call stupid, you have personally meet and are not
basing your opinion on what they have written in rec.boats.


"basskisser" wrote in message
...
Charles wrote in message
...
basskisser wrote:

Charles wrote in message
...
basskisser wrote:

Now, I reiterate, I think that anybody that judges someone by what
they
write in a newsgroup is lacking in any character.

Since you judge others in the newsgroup by what they write, you're
confirming that you lack any character. I concur with your judgment
in
this one instance.

Seldom does one rise to your level of idiocy.

-- Charlie

No, sorry, Charlie. I don't judge anyone here, merely by what they
write in a newsgroup.

Must you constantly prove you're an idiot?

-- Charlie

Where have I judged anyone here, soley by what they've written here?
Quite contrary, there, Charlie. I only call people stupid, when
they've proven themselves so.

( OT ) Follow the "Leader"
 

"John Smith" wrote in message news:cPW9c.29956$w54.214716@attbi_s01...
Damn, can you possibly not know what you just said? According to what you
just wrote, everyone you call stupid, you have personally meet and are not
basing your opinion on what they have written in rec.boats.

Oh, no. I never said that you can't possibly deem someone as "stupid"
because you've never met them. You need to go back and read the
original post. John H claimed to know all about Harry, because he met
him once. As far as calling someone stupid here, there are mitigating
circumstances involved. I think it quite fair to call someone stupid
without actually meeting them, when they made wild assumptions, and
allegations based on absolutely NO fact, then present them here as
truth. The only people I've called stupid here, have done just that.
Accused someone of something, without knowing anything about them, nor
the details, nor even know anything about the accusations they are
slinging around. That IS stupid.

( OT ) Follow the "Leader"
 

basskisser wrote:

As far as calling someone stupid here, there are mitigating
circumstances involved. I think it quite fair to call someone stupid
without actually meeting them, when they made wild assumptions, and
allegations based on absolutely NO fact, then present them here as
truth.

So then you have judged people "stupid" based upon what they have
written here.


basskisser wrote:

Now, I reiterate, I think that anybody that judges someone by what they
write in a newsgroup is lacking in any character.

You have judged yourself as "lacking in any character".

There seems to be an inability with you to have a rational, logical
thought process. Are you sure you have all your marbles?

-- Charlie

( OT ) Follow the "Leader"
 

Ok, so using your logic, when you called someone a toothless redneck
wouldn't that make you stupid?


"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"John Smith" wrote in message
news:cPW9c.29956$w54.214716@attbi_s01...
Damn, can you possibly not know what you just said? According to what
you
just wrote, everyone you call stupid, you have personally meet and are
not
basing your opinion on what they have written in rec.boats.

Oh, no. I never said that you can't possibly deem someone as "stupid"
because you've never met them. You need to go back and read the
original post. John H claimed to know all about Harry, because he met
him once. As far as calling someone stupid here, there are mitigating
circumstances involved. I think it quite fair to call someone stupid
without actually meeting them, when they made wild assumptions, and
allegations based on absolutely NO fact, then present them here as
truth. The only people I've called stupid here, have done just that.
Accused someone of something, without knowing anything about them, nor
the details, nor even know anything about the accusations they are
slinging around. That IS stupid.

( OT ) Follow the "Leader"
 

On 29 Mar 2004 12:19:03 -0800, (basskisser) wrote:

"John Smith" wrote in message news:cPW9c.29956$w54.214716@attbi_s01...
Damn, can you possibly not know what you just said? According to what you
just wrote, everyone you call stupid, you have personally meet and are not
basing your opinion on what they have written in rec.boats.

Oh, no. I never said that you can't possibly deem someone as "stupid"
because you've never met them. You need to go back and read the
original post. John H claimed to know all about Harry, because he met
him once. As far as calling someone stupid here, there are mitigating
circumstances involved. I think it quite fair to call someone stupid
without actually meeting them, when they made wild assumptions, and
allegations based on absolutely NO fact, then present them here as
truth. The only people I've called stupid here, have done just that.
Accused someone of something, without knowing anything about them, nor
the details, nor even know anything about the accusations they are
slinging around. That IS stupid.

Never have I claimed to know all about anyone!

John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

( OT ) Follow the "Leader"
 

John H wrote in message . ..
On 29 Mar 2004 12:19:03 -0800, (basskisser) wrote:

"John Smith" wrote in message news:cPW9c.29956$w54.214716@attbi_s01...
Damn, can you possibly not know what you just said? According to what you
just wrote, everyone you call stupid, you have personally meet and are not
basing your opinion on what they have written in rec.boats.

Oh, no. I never said that you can't possibly deem someone as "stupid"
because you've never met them. You need to go back and read the
original post. John H claimed to know all about Harry, because he met
him once. As far as calling someone stupid here, there are mitigating
circumstances involved. I think it quite fair to call someone stupid
without actually meeting them, when they made wild assumptions, and
allegations based on absolutely NO fact, then present them here as
truth. The only people I've called stupid here, have done just that.
Accused someone of something, without knowing anything about them, nor
the details, nor even know anything about the accusations they are
slinging around. That IS stupid.

Never have I claimed to know all about anyone!

John H

Never made wild assumptions, or allegations with no fact?