BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   OT--more liberal bias in the press (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/35640-ot-more-liberal-bias-press.html)

NOYB May 4th 05 01:39 PM

OT--more liberal bias in the press
 


Bomber Kills 50 at Iraqi Police Center
By YAHYA BARZANJI, Associated Press Writer 38 minutes ago

IRBIL, Iraq - An Iraqi carrying hidden explosives set them off outside a
police recruitment center Wednesday where people were applying for jobs,
police said.



(What the **** makes the author think that it was "an *Iraqi* carrying
hidden explosives"? Why not say "a *terrorist*", or "a suicide bomber", or
a "foreign national"?)



Mohsin al-Jarwa, the Sunni Arab lawmaker, said: "This is an inhuman
operation, killing the sons of the land who were coming to protect Iraq. I
don't believe those who carried this out were Iraqis. Iraqis don't kill
Iraqis, and I strongly condemn this terrorist act."

--------------------------------------------------------------

The press loves to perpetuate the idea that Iraqis are blowing themselves up
in order to kill other Iraqis. The average Iraqi is not a radical
Muslim...and radical Muslims are the ones who believe in martyrdom, not
Iraqis.



Doug Kanter May 4th 05 02:19 PM

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...


Bomber Kills 50 at Iraqi Police Center
By YAHYA BARZANJI, Associated Press Writer 38 minutes ago

IRBIL, Iraq - An Iraqi carrying hidden explosives set them off outside a
police recruitment center Wednesday where people were applying for jobs,
police said.



(What the **** makes the author think that it was "an *Iraqi* carrying
hidden explosives"? Why not say "a *terrorist*", or "a suicide bomber",
or a "foreign national"?)


Gee....I don't know. Why don't you write to the AP and find out? Is it
possible they had information which you do not, or are you so stuck on your
"Syria is responsible for everything including my flat tire" theory that you
can't allow for any other possibility?



NOYB May 4th 05 03:12 PM


"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...


Bomber Kills 50 at Iraqi Police Center
By YAHYA BARZANJI, Associated Press Writer 38 minutes ago

IRBIL, Iraq - An Iraqi carrying hidden explosives set them off outside a
police recruitment center Wednesday where people were applying for jobs,
police said.



(What the **** makes the author think that it was "an *Iraqi* carrying
hidden explosives"? Why not say "a *terrorist*", or "a suicide bomber",
or a "foreign national"?)


Gee....I don't know. Why don't you write to the AP and find out? Is it
possible they had information which you do not


I'm not alone in my belief:

"Mohsin al-Jarwa, the Sunni Arab lawmaker, said: "This is an inhuman
operation, killing the sons of the land who were coming to protect Iraq. I
don't believe those who carried this out were Iraqis. Iraqis don't kill
Iraqis, and I strongly condemn this terrorist act."


It irresponsible and careless to automatically report that "an Iraqi" was
carrying the hidden explosives. Anybody who's been following what's
happening is aware that jihadists are filtering into Iraq from several
neighboring countries.



[email protected] May 4th 05 03:38 PM

NOYB wrote:

The average Iraqi is not a radical
Muslim...and radical Muslims are the ones who believe in martyrdom, not

Iraqis.

***********
Reply

Do you continue to recommend dropping nuclear bombs all across the
region to "protect America from terrorism?"

If so, how will your nuclear bomb discriminate between your "average
Iraqi" and a radical Muslim?


Doug Kanter May 4th 05 03:52 PM


"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...


Bomber Kills 50 at Iraqi Police Center
By YAHYA BARZANJI, Associated Press Writer 38 minutes ago

IRBIL, Iraq - An Iraqi carrying hidden explosives set them off outside a
police recruitment center Wednesday where people were applying for jobs,
police said.



(What the **** makes the author think that it was "an *Iraqi* carrying
hidden explosives"? Why not say "a *terrorist*", or "a suicide bomber",
or a "foreign national"?)


Gee....I don't know. Why don't you write to the AP and find out? Is it
possible they had information which you do not


I'm not alone in my belief:

"Mohsin al-Jarwa, the Sunni Arab lawmaker, said: "This is an inhuman
operation, killing the sons of the land who were coming to protect Iraq. I
don't believe those who carried this out were Iraqis. Iraqis don't kill
Iraqis, and I strongly condemn this terrorist act."


It irresponsible and careless to automatically report that "an Iraqi" was
carrying the hidden explosives. Anybody who's been following what's
happening is aware that jihadists are filtering into Iraq from several
neighboring countries.


"from several neighboring countries" : It was obvious that such an influx
would be the result of destroying what order existed before. Therefore, your
president's sitters wanted that result. Why do you suppose that is? The
following stock answer is not allowed: "So the terrorists would come to us
in Iraq, rather than coming here to the U.S.". (You've used that one before
and it doesn't fly.)



Dr. Dr. K. Grear May 4th 05 04:13 PM

I agree with you Chuck. It was Harry who said the Muslim religion is a
radical religion bent on the destruction of the western world.


wrote in message
oups.com...
NOYB wrote:

The average Iraqi is not a radical
Muslim...and radical Muslims are the ones who believe in martyrdom, not

Iraqis.

***********
Reply

Do you continue to recommend dropping nuclear bombs all across the
region to "protect America from terrorism?"

If so, how will your nuclear bomb discriminate between your "average
Iraqi" and a radical Muslim?




NOYB May 4th 05 04:25 PM


"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...


Bomber Kills 50 at Iraqi Police Center
By YAHYA BARZANJI, Associated Press Writer 38 minutes ago

IRBIL, Iraq - An Iraqi carrying hidden explosives set them off outside
a police recruitment center Wednesday where people were applying for
jobs, police said.



(What the **** makes the author think that it was "an *Iraqi* carrying
hidden explosives"? Why not say "a *terrorist*", or "a suicide
bomber", or a "foreign national"?)

Gee....I don't know. Why don't you write to the AP and find out? Is it
possible they had information which you do not


I'm not alone in my belief:

"Mohsin al-Jarwa, the Sunni Arab lawmaker, said: "This is an inhuman
operation, killing the sons of the land who were coming to protect Iraq.
I don't believe those who carried this out were Iraqis. Iraqis don't kill
Iraqis, and I strongly condemn this terrorist act."


It irresponsible and careless to automatically report that "an Iraqi" was
carrying the hidden explosives. Anybody who's been following what's
happening is aware that jihadists are filtering into Iraq from several
neighboring countries.


"from several neighboring countries" : It was obvious that such an influx
would be the result of destroying what order existed before. Therefore,
your president's sitters wanted that result.


Yes, the Bush administration wanted it.

Why do you suppose that is? The
following stock answer is not allowed: "So the terrorists would come to us
in Iraq, rather than coming here to the U.S.".


It's not a stock answer. It's reality. As I pointed out in the thread
entitled "Washington Post admits the obvious", the general consensus among
counterterrorism officials is that "al-Qaida and like-minded groups are
focusing on Americans deployed in Iraq" rather than attacking us
domestically.

We might as well fight the terrorists over in the Middle East than on our
own soil. Bush has said as much on more than one occasion. Too bad you
weren't listening.



NOYB May 4th 05 04:27 PM


wrote in message
oups.com...
NOYB wrote:

The average Iraqi is not a radical
Muslim...and radical Muslims are the ones who believe in martyrdom, not

Iraqis.

***********
Reply

Do you continue to recommend dropping nuclear bombs all across the
region to "protect America from terrorism?"


Not "all across the region"...just on Syria and Iran.

If so, how will your nuclear bomb discriminate between your "average
Iraqi" and a radical Muslim?


The "average Iraqi" doesn't live in Syria. The ones living in Syria are
Baath Party officials.




Doug Kanter May 4th 05 04:45 PM


"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...


Bomber Kills 50 at Iraqi Police Center
By YAHYA BARZANJI, Associated Press Writer 38 minutes ago

IRBIL, Iraq - An Iraqi carrying hidden explosives set them off outside
a police recruitment center Wednesday where people were applying for
jobs, police said.



(What the **** makes the author think that it was "an *Iraqi* carrying
hidden explosives"? Why not say "a *terrorist*", or "a suicide
bomber", or a "foreign national"?)

Gee....I don't know. Why don't you write to the AP and find out? Is it
possible they had information which you do not

I'm not alone in my belief:

"Mohsin al-Jarwa, the Sunni Arab lawmaker, said: "This is an inhuman
operation, killing the sons of the land who were coming to protect Iraq.
I don't believe those who carried this out were Iraqis. Iraqis don't
kill Iraqis, and I strongly condemn this terrorist act."


It irresponsible and careless to automatically report that "an Iraqi"
was carrying the hidden explosives. Anybody who's been following what's
happening is aware that jihadists are filtering into Iraq from several
neighboring countries.


"from several neighboring countries" : It was obvious that such an influx
would be the result of destroying what order existed before. Therefore,
your president's sitters wanted that result.


Yes, the Bush administration wanted it.

Why do you suppose that is? The
following stock answer is not allowed: "So the terrorists would come to
us in Iraq, rather than coming here to the U.S.".


It's not a stock answer. It's reality. As I pointed out in the thread
entitled "Washington Post admits the obvious", the general consensus among
counterterrorism officials is that "al-Qaida and like-minded groups are
focusing on Americans deployed in Iraq" rather than attacking us
domestically.

We might as well fight the terrorists over in the Middle East than on our
own soil. Bush has said as much on more than one occasion. Too bad you
weren't listening.



Sorry. That's like saying "Oops...I meant to do that", after you
accidentally back into someone's car while parallel parking. Doesn't fly. It
worked on you, though, which proves that P.T. Barnum was right.



Don White May 4th 05 05:35 PM

wrote:

Reply

Do you continue to recommend dropping nuclear bombs all across the
region to "protect America from terrorism?"

If so, how will your nuclear bomb discriminate between your "average
Iraqi" and a radical Muslim?


NOYB must have a 'smart' nuke in his arsenal.

NOYB May 4th 05 05:58 PM


"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...


Bomber Kills 50 at Iraqi Police Center
By YAHYA BARZANJI, Associated Press Writer 38 minutes ago

IRBIL, Iraq - An Iraqi carrying hidden explosives set them off
outside a police recruitment center Wednesday where people were
applying for jobs, police said.



(What the **** makes the author think that it was "an *Iraqi*
carrying hidden explosives"? Why not say "a *terrorist*", or "a
suicide bomber", or a "foreign national"?)

Gee....I don't know. Why don't you write to the AP and find out? Is it
possible they had information which you do not

I'm not alone in my belief:

"Mohsin al-Jarwa, the Sunni Arab lawmaker, said: "This is an inhuman
operation, killing the sons of the land who were coming to protect
Iraq. I don't believe those who carried this out were Iraqis. Iraqis
don't kill Iraqis, and I strongly condemn this terrorist act."


It irresponsible and careless to automatically report that "an Iraqi"
was carrying the hidden explosives. Anybody who's been following
what's happening is aware that jihadists are filtering into Iraq from
several neighboring countries.

"from several neighboring countries" : It was obvious that such an
influx would be the result of destroying what order existed before.
Therefore, your president's sitters wanted that result.


Yes, the Bush administration wanted it.

Why do you suppose that is? The
following stock answer is not allowed: "So the terrorists would come to
us in Iraq, rather than coming here to the U.S.".


It's not a stock answer. It's reality. As I pointed out in the thread
entitled "Washington Post admits the obvious", the general consensus
among counterterrorism officials is that "al-Qaida and like-minded groups
are focusing on Americans deployed in Iraq" rather than attacking us
domestically.

We might as well fight the terrorists over in the Middle East than on our
own soil. Bush has said as much on more than one occasion. Too bad you
weren't listening.



Sorry. That's like saying "Oops...I meant to do that", after you
accidentally back into someone's car while parallel parking.


Bush has been saying for over three years that he is taking the fight to al
Qaeda instead of them taking it to us over here.

It took the Washington Post 3 years to finally write an article admitting
that his plan seems to be working.

So why would you think that it was an accident? And why does it even matter
as long as it's working?



Doug Kanter May 4th 05 06:13 PM


"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...


Bomber Kills 50 at Iraqi Police Center
By YAHYA BARZANJI, Associated Press Writer 38 minutes ago

IRBIL, Iraq - An Iraqi carrying hidden explosives set them off
outside a police recruitment center Wednesday where people were
applying for jobs, police said.



(What the **** makes the author think that it was "an *Iraqi*
carrying hidden explosives"? Why not say "a *terrorist*", or "a
suicide bomber", or a "foreign national"?)

Gee....I don't know. Why don't you write to the AP and find out? Is
it possible they had information which you do not

I'm not alone in my belief:

"Mohsin al-Jarwa, the Sunni Arab lawmaker, said: "This is an inhuman
operation, killing the sons of the land who were coming to protect
Iraq. I don't believe those who carried this out were Iraqis. Iraqis
don't kill Iraqis, and I strongly condemn this terrorist act."


It irresponsible and careless to automatically report that "an Iraqi"
was carrying the hidden explosives. Anybody who's been following
what's happening is aware that jihadists are filtering into Iraq from
several neighboring countries.

"from several neighboring countries" : It was obvious that such an
influx would be the result of destroying what order existed before.
Therefore, your president's sitters wanted that result.

Yes, the Bush administration wanted it.

Why do you suppose that is? The
following stock answer is not allowed: "So the terrorists would come to
us in Iraq, rather than coming here to the U.S.".

It's not a stock answer. It's reality. As I pointed out in the thread
entitled "Washington Post admits the obvious", the general consensus
among counterterrorism officials is that "al-Qaida and like-minded
groups are focusing on Americans deployed in Iraq" rather than attacking
us domestically.

We might as well fight the terrorists over in the Middle East than on
our own soil. Bush has said as much on more than one occasion. Too
bad you weren't listening.



Sorry. That's like saying "Oops...I meant to do that", after you
accidentally back into someone's car while parallel parking.


Bush has been saying for over three years that he is taking the fight to
al Qaeda instead of them taking it to us over here.

It took the Washington Post 3 years to finally write an article admitting
that his plan seems to be working.

So why would you think that it was an accident? And why does it even
matter as long as it's working?



Bush also says things like "Mission Accomplished", "bring 'em on", and other
stupid things. His simplistic thinking is anappropriate for public office.



[email protected] May 4th 05 10:12 PM

NOYB wrote:

If so, how will your nuclear bomb discriminate between your "average
Iraqi" and a radical Muslim?



The "average Iraqi" doesn't live in Syria. The ones living in Syria
are
Baath Party officials.

*********
Reply

There are over 16-million people living in Syria. You can't possible
believe they are all ex-Baath party officials. How will your nuclear
bombs discriminate between Baath partisans and the average, innocent,
Syrian?


NOYB May 4th 05 10:41 PM


wrote in message
oups.com...
NOYB wrote:

If so, how will your nuclear bomb discriminate between your "average
Iraqi" and a radical Muslim?



The "average Iraqi" doesn't live in Syria. The ones living in Syria
are
Baath Party officials.

*********
Reply

There are over 16-million people living in Syria. You can't possible
believe they are all ex-Baath party officials. How will your nuclear
bombs discriminate between Baath partisans and the average, innocent,
Syrian?


They won't.



John H May 5th 05 12:59 AM

On Wed, 04 May 2005 21:41:37 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:


wrote in message
roups.com...
NOYB wrote:

If so, how will your nuclear bomb discriminate between your "average
Iraqi" and a radical Muslim?



The "average Iraqi" doesn't live in Syria. The ones living in Syria
are
Baath Party officials.

*********
Reply

There are over 16-million people living in Syria. You can't possible
believe they are all ex-Baath party officials. How will your nuclear
bombs discriminate between Baath partisans and the average, innocent,
Syrian?


They won't.


Chuck is showing us how to use oxymorons. Innocent Syrians, indeed.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

Don White May 5th 05 02:16 PM

I want to be ananymous too!!! wrote:


You are welcome I think asshole but my name isn't Bert. I had an old
girlfriend nicknamed Bert but I don't think ......

snip



Ah ha! Looks like it is JimH & Bert trashing our newsgroup.









[email protected] May 5th 05 02:57 PM

Ah ha! Looks like it is JimH & Bert trashing our newsgroup.


************

There was an odd exchange between
Dr Dr Dr Dr Smithers and Bert yesterday.

After the profane remailer filled half a dozen paragraphs with the same
four four-letter words and Harry commented he was just going to ignore
it, the DR, DR, DR, DR posted, "Bert, Harry has threatened to ignore
you!"

The profane remailer responded, and not with a denial that he was Bert.
He said something like, "I'm going to f* up this group until other
people stop trying to f* up the group!"

May not mean anything at all, but I wouldn't be surprised to learn that
DR, DR, DR, DR and his close associates know *exactly* what's going on
and who's behind it.

To be fair, I don't see any evidence of JimH particiapting in the
anonymous profane postings. JimH has never been bashful about speaking
his mind and expressing his opinions of issues and other people, so I
doubt he'd need to hide behind an anonymous remail.

Regardless of the perp's identity, it is obvious he or she is
(properly) very ashamed of the behavior. Why else would anyone hide
behind a false name?
It is likely that the same person has a serious inferiority complex as
well- therefore the need to change his handle several times a day to
defeat any attempts to filter out the trash.


Dr. Dr. K.aren Smithers May 5th 05 03:15 PM

Gould,
I would not be surprised if we find out the anonymous profane posting came
from you, Harry or someone trying to besmirch my good name. ; )

Either way, I am not the anonymous poster, and I would bet it is not Bert.
My money is on a person who used to post under the name Charlie or Chuck.
He used the exact same tactics.


wrote in message
ups.com...
Ah ha! Looks like it is JimH & Bert trashing our newsgroup.


************

There was an odd exchange between
Dr Dr Dr Dr Smithers and Bert yesterday.

After the profane remailer filled half a dozen paragraphs with the same
four four-letter words and Harry commented he was just going to ignore
it, the DR, DR, DR, DR posted, "Bert, Harry has threatened to ignore
you!"

The profane remailer responded, and not with a denial that he was Bert.
He said something like, "I'm going to f* up this group until other
people stop trying to f* up the group!"

May not mean anything at all, but I wouldn't be surprised to learn that
DR, DR, DR, DR and his close associates know *exactly* what's going on
and who's behind it.

To be fair, I don't see any evidence of JimH particiapting in the
anonymous profane postings. JimH has never been bashful about speaking
his mind and expressing his opinions of issues and other people, so I
doubt he'd need to hide behind an anonymous remail.

Regardless of the perp's identity, it is obvious he or she is
(properly) very ashamed of the behavior. Why else would anyone hide
behind a false name?
It is likely that the same person has a serious inferiority complex as
well- therefore the need to change his handle several times a day to
defeat any attempts to filter out the trash.




John H May 5th 05 09:43 PM

On 5 May 2005 06:57:28 -0700, wrote:

Ah ha! Looks like it is JimH & Bert trashing our newsgroup.


************

There was an odd exchange between
Dr Dr Dr Dr Smithers and Bert yesterday.

After the profane remailer filled half a dozen paragraphs with the same
four four-letter words and Harry commented he was just going to ignore
it, the DR, DR, DR, DR posted, "Bert, Harry has threatened to ignore
you!"

The profane remailer responded, and not with a denial that he was Bert.
He said something like, "I'm going to f* up this group until other
people stop trying to f* up the group!"

May not mean anything at all, but I wouldn't be surprised to learn that
DR, DR, DR, DR and his close associates know *exactly* what's going on
and who's behind it.

To be fair, I don't see any evidence of JimH particiapting in the
anonymous profane postings. JimH has never been bashful about speaking
his mind and expressing his opinions of issues and other people, so I
doubt he'd need to hide behind an anonymous remail.

Regardless of the perp's identity, it is obvious he or she is
(properly) very ashamed of the behavior. Why else would anyone hide
behind a false name?
It is likely that the same person has a serious inferiority complex as
well- therefore the need to change his handle several times a day to
defeat any attempts to filter out the trash.


Chuck. If the anonymous poster was saying bad things about Harry's etiquette, it
could have been me.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

Don White May 5th 05 11:49 PM

John H wrote:

Chuck. If the anonymous poster was saying bad things about Harry's etiquette, it
could have been me.


JohnH...was that you admitting to having a girlfriend named 'Bert'?

Bert Robbins May 6th 05 01:58 AM


"Don White" wrote in message
...
I want to be ananymous too!!! wrote:


You are welcome I think asshole but my name isn't Bert. I had an old
girlfriend nicknamed Bert but I don't think ......

snip



Ah ha! Looks like it is JimH & Bert trashing our newsgroup.


The Canadian pussy spews oral effluent.



Bert Robbins May 6th 05 01:59 AM


"Harry.Krause" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
I want to be ananymous too!!! wrote:


You are welcome I think asshole but my name isn't Bert. I had an old
girlfriend nicknamed Bert but I don't think ......


snip



Ah ha! Looks like it is JimH & Bert trashing our newsgroup.











It wouldn't surprise me. Hertvik is bitter, and Bert is an ass. And Bert
curses a lot.


Take your delicate sensibilities and go somewhere esle!



Bert Robbins May 6th 05 02:02 AM


wrote in message
ups.com...
Ah ha! Looks like it is JimH & Bert trashing our newsgroup.


************

There was an odd exchange between
Dr Dr Dr Dr Smithers and Bert yesterday.

After the profane remailer filled half a dozen paragraphs with the same
four four-letter words and Harry commented he was just going to ignore
it, the DR, DR, DR, DR posted, "Bert, Harry has threatened to ignore
you!"


Don't you have a used car to sell to an unsuspecting buyer?

The profane remailer responded, and not with a denial that he was Bert.
He said something like, "I'm going to f* up this group until other
people stop trying to f* up the group!"


You need to read that portion of the thread again.

May not mean anything at all, but I wouldn't be surprised to learn that
DR, DR, DR, DR and his close associates know *exactly* what's going on
and who's behind it.


You need to get out and interact with real people in the real world more
often.

To be fair, I don't see any evidence of JimH particiapting in the
anonymous profane postings. JimH has never been bashful about speaking
his mind and expressing his opinions of issues and other people, so I
doubt he'd need to hide behind an anonymous remail.


Neither have I, asshole.

Regardless of the perp's identity, it is obvious he or she is
(properly) very ashamed of the behavior. Why else would anyone hide
behind a false name?
It is likely that the same person has a serious inferiority complex as
well- therefore the need to change his handle several times a day to
defeat any attempts to filter out the trash.


You are too funny.



Dr. Dr. K.aren Smithers May 6th 05 02:27 AM

Harry,

Bert is comfortable enough with himself, that he does not have to make up
stories about his life or his boat.

What would you wife say if she knew you were so ashamed of her that you had
to make up a better career for her. I hope no one send her an email telling
her about your aversion to her career choice.

My guess is your inferiority complex goes way back. Your father was
probably not proud of your accomplishments and you are not proud of you or
your wife. It is a shame.






"Harry.Krause" wrote in message
...
Bert Robbins wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...

Ah ha! Looks like it is JimH & Bert trashing our newsgroup.


************

There was an odd exchange between
Dr Dr Dr Dr Smithers and Bert yesterday.

After the profane remailer filled half a dozen paragraphs with the same
four four-letter words and Harry commented he was just going to ignore
it, the DR, DR, DR, DR posted, "Bert, Harry has threatened to ignore
you!"



Don't you have a used car to sell to an unsuspecting buyer?


The profane remailer responded, and not with a denial that he was Bert.
He said something like, "I'm going to f* up this group until other
people stop trying to f* up the group!"



You need to read that portion of the thread again.


May not mean anything at all, but I wouldn't be surprised to learn that
DR, DR, DR, DR and his close associates know *exactly* what's going on
and who's behind it.



You need to get out and interact with real people in the real world more
often.


To be fair, I don't see any evidence of JimH particiapting in the
anonymous profane postings. JimH has never been bashful about speaking
his mind and expressing his opinions of issues and other people, so I
doubt he'd need to hide behind an anonymous remail.



Neither have I, asshole.


Regardless of the perp's identity, it is obvious he or she is
(properly) very ashamed of the behavior. Why else would anyone hide
behind a false name?
It is likely that the same person has a serious inferiority complex as
well- therefore the need to change his handle several times a day to
defeat any attempts to filter out the trash.



You are too funny.

Well, there's little doubt you suffer from an inferiority complex, Bert,
as you never really discuss any aspects of your life. Of course, you share
that "attribute" with most other members of the right-wing scumbags in
here.





--
Bush and the NeoConvicts who control him
are destroying the once-great United States.




Bert Robbins May 6th 05 02:58 AM


"Harry.Krause" wrote in message
...
Bert Robbins wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message
...

I want to be ananymous too!!! wrote:


You are welcome I think asshole but my name isn't Bert. I had an old
girlfriend nicknamed Bert but I don't think ......

snip



Ah ha! Looks like it is JimH & Bert trashing our newsgroup.



The Canadian pussy spews oral effluent.



Yep...pottymouth bert and pottymouth "anon"


You are wrong asshole.

I don't have time to post anonymously. I have a job and I don't post during
working hours.



Bert Robbins May 6th 05 03:02 AM


"Harry.Krause" wrote in message
...
Bert Robbins wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...

Ah ha! Looks like it is JimH & Bert trashing our newsgroup.


************

There was an odd exchange between
Dr Dr Dr Dr Smithers and Bert yesterday.

After the profane remailer filled half a dozen paragraphs with the same
four four-letter words and Harry commented he was just going to ignore
it, the DR, DR, DR, DR posted, "Bert, Harry has threatened to ignore
you!"



Don't you have a used car to sell to an unsuspecting buyer?


The profane remailer responded, and not with a denial that he was Bert.
He said something like, "I'm going to f* up this group until other
people stop trying to f* up the group!"



You need to read that portion of the thread again.


May not mean anything at all, but I wouldn't be surprised to learn that
DR, DR, DR, DR and his close associates know *exactly* what's going on
and who's behind it.



You need to get out and interact with real people in the real world more
often.


To be fair, I don't see any evidence of JimH particiapting in the
anonymous profane postings. JimH has never been bashful about speaking
his mind and expressing his opinions of issues and other people, so I
doubt he'd need to hide behind an anonymous remail.



Neither have I, asshole.


Regardless of the perp's identity, it is obvious he or she is
(properly) very ashamed of the behavior. Why else would anyone hide
behind a false name?
It is likely that the same person has a serious inferiority complex as
well- therefore the need to change his handle several times a day to
defeat any attempts to filter out the trash.



You are too funny.

Well, there's little doubt you suffer from an inferiority complex, Bert,
as you never really discuss any aspects of your life. Of course, you share
that "attribute" with most other members of the right-wing scumbags in
here.


What do you want to know?

I am sure you have checked out my posting history on USENET? You will find
some interesting stuff there.





Bert Robbins May 6th 05 03:05 AM


"Dr. Dr. K.aren Smithers" Call180bucme@foragoodtime wrote in message
...
Harry,

Bert is comfortable enough with himself, that he does not have to make up
stories about his life or his boat.


My life is an open book. Check the Newspapers in DC, Richmond, VA and
Norfolk, VA and you find out about me.

What would you wife say if she knew you were so ashamed of her that you
had to make up a better career for her. I hope no one send her an email
telling her about your aversion to her career choice.


My wife is a rocket scientist, what does your wife do?

My guess is your inferiority complex goes way back. Your father was
probably not proud of your accomplishments and you are not proud of you or
your wife. It is a shame.


Harry tries to build himself up by tearing down others. If is sad to watch
but, it is entertaining.



Dr. Dr. K.aren Smithers May 6th 05 04:00 AM

Harry reminds me of rednecks who need to put down blacks, because if it
wasn't for this "inferior race" they would be the lowest life form on earth.
The problem is no one believes the inferior race theory anymore, so Harry is
just left with his inferior self.


"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...

"Dr. Dr. K.aren Smithers" Call180bucme@foragoodtime wrote in message
...
Harry,

Bert is comfortable enough with himself, that he does not have to make up
stories about his life or his boat.


My life is an open book. Check the Newspapers in DC, Richmond, VA and
Norfolk, VA and you find out about me.

What would you wife say if she knew you were so ashamed of her that you
had to make up a better career for her. I hope no one send her an email
telling her about your aversion to her career choice.


My wife is a rocket scientist, what does your wife do?

My guess is your inferiority complex goes way back. Your father was
probably not proud of your accomplishments and you are not proud of you
or your wife. It is a shame.


Harry tries to build himself up by tearing down others. If is sad to watch
but, it is entertaining.





Bert Robbins May 6th 05 04:09 AM

Bingo!

Harry needs to put down others to raise his self image.

"Dr. Dr. K.aren Smithers" Call180bucme@foragoodtime wrote in message
...
Harry reminds me of rednecks who need to put down blacks, because if it
wasn't for this "inferior race" they would be the lowest life form on
earth. The problem is no one believes the inferior race theory anymore, so
Harry is just left with his inferior self.


"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...

"Dr. Dr. K.aren Smithers" Call180bucme@foragoodtime wrote in message
...
Harry,

Bert is comfortable enough with himself, that he does not have to make
up stories about his life or his boat.


My life is an open book. Check the Newspapers in DC, Richmond, VA and
Norfolk, VA and you find out about me.

What would you wife say if she knew you were so ashamed of her that you
had to make up a better career for her. I hope no one send her an email
telling her about your aversion to her career choice.


My wife is a rocket scientist, what does your wife do?

My guess is your inferiority complex goes way back. Your father was
probably not proud of your accomplishments and you are not proud of you
or your wife. It is a shame.


Harry tries to build himself up by tearing down others. If is sad to
watch but, it is entertaining.







P. Fritz May 6th 05 04:23 AM


"Dr. Dr. K.aren Smithers" Call180bucme@foragoodtime wrote in message
...
Harry,

Bert is comfortable enough with himself, that he does not have to make

up
stories about his life or his boat.

What would you wife say if she knew you were so ashamed of her that you

had
to make up a better career for her. I hope no one send her an email

telling
her about your aversion to her career choice.

My guess is your inferiority complex goes way back. Your father was
probably not proud of your accomplishments and you are not proud of you

or
your wife. It is a shame.


Just like kevin








"Harry.Krause" wrote in message
...
Bert Robbins wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...

Ah ha! Looks like it is JimH & Bert trashing our newsgroup.


************

There was an odd exchange between
Dr Dr Dr Dr Smithers and Bert yesterday.

After the profane remailer filled half a dozen paragraphs with the

same
four four-letter words and Harry commented he was just going to ignore
it, the DR, DR, DR, DR posted, "Bert, Harry has threatened to ignore
you!"


Don't you have a used car to sell to an unsuspecting buyer?


The profane remailer responded, and not with a denial that he was

Bert.
He said something like, "I'm going to f* up this group until other
people stop trying to f* up the group!"


You need to read that portion of the thread again.


May not mean anything at all, but I wouldn't be surprised to learn

that
DR, DR, DR, DR and his close associates know *exactly* what's going on
and who's behind it.


You need to get out and interact with real people in the real world

more
often.


To be fair, I don't see any evidence of JimH particiapting in the
anonymous profane postings. JimH has never been bashful about speaking
his mind and expressing his opinions of issues and other people, so I
doubt he'd need to hide behind an anonymous remail.


Neither have I, asshole.


Regardless of the perp's identity, it is obvious he or she is
(properly) very ashamed of the behavior. Why else would anyone hide
behind a false name?
It is likely that the same person has a serious inferiority complex as
well- therefore the need to change his handle several times a day to
defeat any attempts to filter out the trash.


You are too funny.

Well, there's little doubt you suffer from an inferiority complex,

Bert,
as you never really discuss any aspects of your life. Of course, you

share
that "attribute" with most other members of the right-wing scumbags in
here.





--
Bush and the NeoConvicts who control him
are destroying the once-great United States.






Bert Robbins May 6th 05 12:30 PM


"Harry.Krause" wrote in message
...
Bert Robbins wrote:
"Harry.Krause" wrote in message
...

Bert Robbins wrote:

"Don White" wrote in message
...


I want to be ananymous too!!! wrote:



You are welcome I think asshole but my name isn't Bert. I had an old
girlfriend nicknamed Bert but I don't think ......

snip



Ah ha! Looks like it is JimH & Bert trashing our newsgroup.


The Canadian pussy spews oral effluent.


Yep...pottymouth bert and pottymouth "anon"



You are wrong asshole.

I don't have time to post anonymously. I have a job and I don't post
during working hours.


You have a job? Who hires foul-mouthed know-nothings like you these days?


You would be supprised!



Bert Robbins May 6th 05 12:33 PM


"Harry.Krause" wrote in message
...
Bert Robbins wrote:
"Harry.Krause" wrote in message
...

Bert Robbins wrote:

wrote in message
egroups.com...


Ah ha! Looks like it is JimH & Bert trashing our newsgroup.


************

There was an odd exchange between
Dr Dr Dr Dr Smithers and Bert yesterday.

After the profane remailer filled half a dozen paragraphs with the same
four four-letter words and Harry commented he was just going to ignore
it, the DR, DR, DR, DR posted, "Bert, Harry has threatened to ignore
you!"


Don't you have a used car to sell to an unsuspecting buyer?



The profane remailer responded, and not with a denial that he was Bert.
He said something like, "I'm going to f* up this group until other
people stop trying to f* up the group!"


You need to read that portion of the thread again.



May not mean anything at all, but I wouldn't be surprised to learn that
DR, DR, DR, DR and his close associates know *exactly* what's going on
and who's behind it.


You need to get out and interact with real people in the real world more
often.



To be fair, I don't see any evidence of JimH particiapting in the
anonymous profane postings. JimH has never been bashful about speaking
his mind and expressing his opinions of issues and other people, so I
doubt he'd need to hide behind an anonymous remail.


Neither have I, asshole.



Regardless of the perp's identity, it is obvious he or she is
(properly) very ashamed of the behavior. Why else would anyone hide
behind a false name?
It is likely that the same person has a serious inferiority complex as
well- therefore the need to change his handle several times a day to
defeat any attempts to filter out the trash.


You are too funny.

Well, there's little doubt you suffer from an inferiority complex, Bert,
as you never really discuss any aspects of your life. Of course, you
share that "attribute" with most other members of the right-wing scumbags
in here.



What do you want to know?

I am sure you have checked out my posting history on USENET? You will
find some interesting stuff there.



No, Bertie, I ain't that interested...you're just an object of scorn,
anyway. You've never been a contributor of any substance here.


You are that interested and you will do the research now. You can't help
yourself.

What is it that you do for a living, anyway, or, at least, what is it that
you can claim that you do: Is there much call for a foul-mouth ass like
you? Do you cuss continuously at work?


The work is interesting and the pay is good.

You have a lot in common with the ass who is posting anon here these
days...you're both cursing fools.


Hmmm, so two people on USENET use colorful language and you think that they
are one and the same person. One person can't be posting more than half of
the articles on USENET. Try again fool.



Don White May 6th 05 06:38 PM

A.Melon wrote:


Don't be ****ing with me clown. I don't post OT unless it is to an OT post.
A rare exception is something that Jim, posts that is so ridiculous i strip
the references and OT from in front of it. Not very often though and only
to inform other boaters of the **** being spewed here.



Who you talkin' trash to? Can't be Bert...he's a badass jarhead who's
not afraid to go out and take his beating.....or so he says.























John H May 6th 05 07:24 PM

On Thu, 05 May 2005 22:49:36 GMT, Don White wrote:

John H wrote:

Chuck. If the anonymous poster was saying bad things about Harry's etiquette, it
could have been me.


JohnH...was that you admitting to having a girlfriend named 'Bert'?


Met one called Alberta once. She was kinda cute, but not too smart. But that was
OK back then. We called her Bert for short.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

John H May 6th 05 07:26 PM

On Thu, 5 May 2005 23:00:16 -0400, "Dr. Dr. K.aren Smithers"
Call180bucme@foragoodtime wrote:

Harry reminds me of rednecks who need to put down blacks, because if it
wasn't for this "inferior race" they would be the lowest life form on earth.
The problem is no one believes the inferior race theory anymore, so Harry is
just left with his inferior self.


Now I know why you're a Dr.Dr.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

Bert Robbins May 7th 05 02:55 AM


"Don White" wrote in message
...
A.Melon wrote:


Don't be ****ing with me clown. I don't post OT unless it is to an OT
post.
A rare exception is something that Jim, posts that is so ridiculous i
strip
the references and OT from in front of it. Not very often though and only
to inform other boaters of the **** being spewed here.



Who you talkin' trash to? Can't be Bert...he's a badass jarhead who's not
afraid to go out and take his beating.....or so he says.


You really are a pussy Don. I am not cursing I am stating fact.



Don White May 7th 05 04:25 PM

Bert Robbins wrote:


You really are a pussy Don. I am not cursing I am stating fact.



You wouldn't recognize a 'fact' if it jumped up and bit you. Stick to
the cussin'...it's the one thing you do well.

Bert Robbins May 7th 05 08:54 PM


"Don White" wrote in message
...
Bert Robbins wrote:


You really are a pussy Don. I am not cursing I am stating fact.



You wouldn't recognize a 'fact' if it jumped up and bit you. Stick to the
cussin'...it's the one thing you do well.


Do you wipe your self off when Harry stops short or do you just leave them
mess all over your head?



Don White May 7th 05 10:08 PM

Bert Robbins wrote:


Do you wipe your self off when Harry stops short or do you just leave them
mess all over your head?


You drinking again...Bert?
'yourself' is one word
'just leave them mess' ...please translate in the Queens English


Shortwave Sportfishing May 8th 05 12:19 AM

On Sat, 07 May 2005 18:51:00 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote:

Don White wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote:


Do you wipe your self off when Harry stops short or do you just leave
them mess all over your head?



You drinking again...Bert?
'yourself' is one word
'just leave them mess' ...please translate in the Queens English



Hey...he's a former marine reserve person...you expect language skills?


Ok, enough of the wise ass comments about the Marine Corps.

Later,

Tom


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:41 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com