"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
news

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...


Bomber Kills 50 at Iraqi Police Center
By YAHYA BARZANJI, Associated Press Writer 38 minutes ago

IRBIL, Iraq - An Iraqi carrying hidden explosives set them off
outside a police recruitment center Wednesday where people were
applying for jobs, police said.



(What the **** makes the author think that it was "an *Iraqi*
carrying hidden explosives"? Why not say "a *terrorist*", or "a
suicide bomber", or a "foreign national"?)

Gee....I don't know. Why don't you write to the AP and find out? Is it
possible they had information which you do not

I'm not alone in my belief:

"Mohsin al-Jarwa, the Sunni Arab lawmaker, said: "This is an inhuman
operation, killing the sons of the land who were coming to protect
Iraq. I don't believe those who carried this out were Iraqis. Iraqis
don't kill Iraqis, and I strongly condemn this terrorist act."


It irresponsible and careless to automatically report that "an Iraqi"
was carrying the hidden explosives. Anybody who's been following
what's happening is aware that jihadists are filtering into Iraq from
several neighboring countries.

"from several neighboring countries" : It was obvious that such an
influx would be the result of destroying what order existed before.
Therefore, your president's sitters wanted that result.

Yes, the Bush administration wanted it.

Why do you suppose that is? The
following stock answer is not allowed: "So the terrorists would come to
us in Iraq, rather than coming here to the U.S.".

It's not a stock answer. It's reality. As I pointed out in the thread
entitled "Washington Post admits the obvious", the general consensus
among counterterrorism officials is that "al-Qaida and like-minded groups
are focusing on Americans deployed in Iraq" rather than attacking us
domestically.

We might as well fight the terrorists over in the Middle East than on our
own soil. Bush has said as much on more than one occasion. Too bad you
weren't listening.



Sorry. That's like saying "Oops...I meant to do that", after you
accidentally back into someone's car while parallel parking.

Bush has been saying for over three years that he is taking the fight to al
Qaeda instead of them taking it to us over here.

It took the Washington Post 3 years to finally write an article admitting
that his plan seems to be working.

So why would you think that it was an accident? And why does it even matter
as long as it's working?

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
news

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...


Bomber Kills 50 at Iraqi Police Center
By YAHYA BARZANJI, Associated Press Writer 38 minutes ago

IRBIL, Iraq - An Iraqi carrying hidden explosives set them off
outside a police recruitment center Wednesday where people were
applying for jobs, police said.



(What the **** makes the author think that it was "an *Iraqi*
carrying hidden explosives"? Why not say "a *terrorist*", or "a
suicide bomber", or a "foreign national"?)

Gee....I don't know. Why don't you write to the AP and find out? Is
it possible they had information which you do not

I'm not alone in my belief:

"Mohsin al-Jarwa, the Sunni Arab lawmaker, said: "This is an inhuman
operation, killing the sons of the land who were coming to protect
Iraq. I don't believe those who carried this out were Iraqis. Iraqis
don't kill Iraqis, and I strongly condemn this terrorist act."


It irresponsible and careless to automatically report that "an Iraqi"
was carrying the hidden explosives. Anybody who's been following
what's happening is aware that jihadists are filtering into Iraq from
several neighboring countries.

"from several neighboring countries" : It was obvious that such an
influx would be the result of destroying what order existed before.
Therefore, your president's sitters wanted that result.

Yes, the Bush administration wanted it.

Why do you suppose that is? The
following stock answer is not allowed: "So the terrorists would come to
us in Iraq, rather than coming here to the U.S.".

It's not a stock answer. It's reality. As I pointed out in the thread
entitled "Washington Post admits the obvious", the general consensus
among counterterrorism officials is that "al-Qaida and like-minded
groups are focusing on Americans deployed in Iraq" rather than attacking
us domestically.

We might as well fight the terrorists over in the Middle East than on
our own soil. Bush has said as much on more than one occasion. Too
bad you weren't listening.



Sorry. That's like saying "Oops...I meant to do that", after you
accidentally back into someone's car while parallel parking.

Bush has been saying for over three years that he is taking the fight to
al Qaeda instead of them taking it to us over here.

It took the Washington Post 3 years to finally write an article admitting
that his plan seems to be working.

So why would you think that it was an accident? And why does it even
matter as long as it's working?



Bush also says things like "Mission Accomplished", "bring 'em on", and other
stupid things. His simplistic thinking is anappropriate for public office.