On Wed, 4 May 2005 11:22:28 -0400, "JimH" wrote:


wrote in message
roups.com...

JimH wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

JimH wrote:

Perhaps it had more to do with the fact that he is a tax cheat and
drug
addict.

He's paid for his tax problems. So that is a non-issue.

No it isn't. He cheated and got caught. He is a tax cheat.

What evidence do you have that he "is a tax cheat"? Better call the IRS
on that one, Jim. He's a FORMER tax cheat. I'll bet YOU have broken
laws before. Are you still guilty of any and all of those, including
traffic violations?


Please show what evidence you have the Willy is a "drug addict".
Surely
you aren't confusing his free and open stance on legalization of
pot as
an addiction, are you?


The guy is constantly stoned on weed. I would call that an
addiction. Pot
is a drug...ergo drug addict.

Comprendo?

Nope, I don't. What evidence do you have that he is "constantly stoned
on weed"? Just because he is open and direct about the fact that he
does smoke the stuff, you think that he's constantly stoned????? That's
just like me saying that because you've said here that you like beer,
that you're an alcoholic!



Your logic is severely flawed. Yes I drink beer and wine once in a
while.....but I am not drunk or intoxicated every living hour of the
day....in fact I rarely am.

Doesn't matter. The fact that you use/partake/imbibe a mood altering
substance at any time disqualifies you from making any moral judgement
of another.

"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 4 May 2005 11:22:28 -0400, "JimH" wrote:


wrote in message
groups.com...

JimH wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

JimH wrote:

Perhaps it had more to do with the fact that he is a tax cheat and
drug
addict.

He's paid for his tax problems. So that is a non-issue.

No it isn't. He cheated and got caught. He is a tax cheat.

What evidence do you have that he "is a tax cheat"? Better call the IRS
on that one, Jim. He's a FORMER tax cheat. I'll bet YOU have broken
laws before. Are you still guilty of any and all of those, including
traffic violations?


Please show what evidence you have the Willy is a "drug addict".
Surely
you aren't confusing his free and open stance on legalization of
pot as
an addiction, are you?


The guy is constantly stoned on weed. I would call that an
addiction. Pot
is a drug...ergo drug addict.

Comprendo?

Nope, I don't. What evidence do you have that he is "constantly stoned
on weed"? Just because he is open and direct about the fact that he
does smoke the stuff, you think that he's constantly stoned????? That's
just like me saying that because you've said here that you like beer,
that you're an alcoholic!



Your logic is severely flawed. Yes I drink beer and wine once in a
while.....but I am not drunk or intoxicated every living hour of the
day....in fact I rarely am.

Doesn't matter. The fact that you use/partake/imbibe a mood altering
substance at any time disqualifies you from making any moral judgement
of another.

Remind me again when I made a moral judgement of the man.

On Wed, 4 May 2005 12:15:24 -0400, "JimH" wrote:


"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 4 May 2005 11:22:28 -0400, "JimH" wrote:


wrote in message
egroups.com...

JimH wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

JimH wrote:

Perhaps it had more to do with the fact that he is a tax cheat and
drug
addict.

He's paid for his tax problems. So that is a non-issue.

No it isn't. He cheated and got caught. He is a tax cheat.

What evidence do you have that he "is a tax cheat"? Better call the IRS
on that one, Jim. He's a FORMER tax cheat. I'll bet YOU have broken
laws before. Are you still guilty of any and all of those, including
traffic violations?


Please show what evidence you have the Willy is a "drug addict".
Surely
you aren't confusing his free and open stance on legalization of
pot as
an addiction, are you?


The guy is constantly stoned on weed. I would call that an
addiction. Pot
is a drug...ergo drug addict.

Comprendo?

Nope, I don't. What evidence do you have that he is "constantly stoned
on weed"? Just because he is open and direct about the fact that he
does smoke the stuff, you think that he's constantly stoned????? That's
just like me saying that because you've said here that you like beer,
that you're an alcoholic!



Your logic is severely flawed. Yes I drink beer and wine once in a
while.....but I am not drunk or intoxicated every living hour of the
day....in fact I rarely am.

Doesn't matter. The fact that you use/partake/imbibe a mood altering
substance at any time disqualifies you from making any moral judgement
of another.

Remind me again when I made a moral judgement of the man.

"Perhaps it had more to do with the fact that he is a tax cheat and
drug addict."

I would say right off the top of my head that that is pretty much a
moral judgement. :)

"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 4 May 2005 12:15:24 -0400, "JimH" wrote:


"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
. ..
On Wed, 4 May 2005 11:22:28 -0400, "JimH" wrote:


wrote in message
legroups.com...

JimH wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

JimH wrote:

Perhaps it had more to do with the fact that he is a tax cheat and
drug
addict.

He's paid for his tax problems. So that is a non-issue.

No it isn't. He cheated and got caught. He is a tax cheat.

What evidence do you have that he "is a tax cheat"? Better call the
IRS
on that one, Jim. He's a FORMER tax cheat. I'll bet YOU have broken
laws before. Are you still guilty of any and all of those, including
traffic violations?


Please show what evidence you have the Willy is a "drug addict".
Surely
you aren't confusing his free and open stance on legalization of
pot as
an addiction, are you?


The guy is constantly stoned on weed. I would call that an
addiction. Pot
is a drug...ergo drug addict.

Comprendo?

Nope, I don't. What evidence do you have that he is "constantly stoned
on weed"? Just because he is open and direct about the fact that he
does smoke the stuff, you think that he's constantly stoned?????
That's
just like me saying that because you've said here that you like beer,
that you're an alcoholic!



Your logic is severely flawed. Yes I drink beer and wine once in a
while.....but I am not drunk or intoxicated every living hour of the
day....in fact I rarely am.

Doesn't matter. The fact that you use/partake/imbibe a mood altering
substance at any time disqualifies you from making any moral judgement
of another.

Remind me again when I made a moral judgement of the man.

"Perhaps it had more to do with the fact that he is a tax cheat and
drug addict."

I would say right off the top of my head that that is pretty much a
moral judgement. :)

Nope, it was a statement of fact. He is a tax cheat. He is a drug addict.
I made no judgement on the man or his behavior.

You are barking up the wrong tree. ;-)

On Wed, 4 May 2005 17:39:02 -0400, "JimH" wrote:

~~ snippage ~~

Nope, it was a statement of fact. He is a tax cheat.

Nope. He did owe taxes, but in fact, it was a long battle with the
IRS which was settled out of court. He never cheated on his taxes -
he had a disagreement on what was owed.

He is a drug addict.

No, he is not. He is the same as you. You partake, he partakes.
Both just use different substances.

I made no judgement on the man or his behavior.

Yes you did.

You are barking up the wrong tree. ;-)

No I'm not.

Later,

Tom

"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 4 May 2005 17:39:02 -0400, "JimH" wrote:

~~ snippage ~~

Nope, it was a statement of fact. He is a tax cheat.

Nope. He did owe taxes, but in fact, it was a long battle with the
IRS which was settled out of court. He never cheated on his taxes -
he had a disagreement on what was owed.

He is a drug addict.

No, he is not. He is the same as you. You partake, he partakes.
Both just use different substances.

I made no judgement on the man or his behavior.

Yes you did.

You are barking up the wrong tree. ;-)

No I'm not.

Later,

Tom


Did you ever admit when you were wrong Tom? If not, this is a good time to
start. ;-)

Jim

Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:

Doesn't matter. The fact that you use/partake/imbibe a mood altering
substance at any time disqualifies you from making any moral judgement
of another.

Food is a mood altering substance.

On Wed, 04 May 2005 23:18:25 -0700, -rick- wrote:

Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:

Doesn't matter. The fact that you use/partake/imbibe a mood altering
substance at any time disqualifies you from making any moral judgement
of another.

Food is a mood altering substance.

Yes it is. However, the difference is that you need food to survive
and function.

Later,

Tom