"Harry.Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Harry.Krause" wrote in message
...

NOYB wrote:

"Jack Goff" wrote in message
. com...


"NOYB" wrote in message
rthlink.net...


"Doug Kanter" wrote in message

This is potentially what you are agreeing with. And if you think
there
aren't enough antisocial types who'd gladly sign up, put on a
uniform,

and


do things like this to innocent citizens under the guise of "national
security", think again. You've already seen it done.

The Feds have had this power on the waterways for some time now. It
has
nothing to do with ID cards.


Forget it, NYOB. You're arguing with small-minded, liberal
chicken-littles,
and their sky is falling.


It must be a very high sky. It's been falling for over 4 years
now...and still hasn't crashed down on anybody's head.


No? What about the 3000 who died because of Bush's malfeasance? The sky
and the building and the plane crashed down on them.


The planning for that attack was under way for several years prior to
Bush taking office. Bush had the misfortune of having to rely on
information gathered by Clinton-appointees.

Notice how there hasn't been an attack since Bush went on the offensive
with *his* people in the important positions?

You are STILL trying to pin 9-11 on Clinton?

Bush was at the helm on 9-11, and had been at the helm for eight months.
He had warnings he decided to ignore. He spent the summer diddling on his
ranch. I blame Bush for being asleep on watch on 9-11. History will, too.

Not a chance...no matter how many documents Sandy Berger sticks in his socks
to conceal the Clinton administration bungling attempts at fighting
terrorism.



Your oft-repeated comment about "no attacks" is nonsense. The terrorists
will attack on their schedule, not ours.