"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

Perhaps. But only if the ACLU continues to dismantle the President's
authority to detain illegal combatants in this war on terror.

You mean, the government's new hobby, detaining people like these?

And, don't hand us any bull**** about the source, as you usually do.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...2005Apr20.html


Muslims Detained at Border Sue U.S. Homeland Security

By Michelle Garcia
Special to The Washington Post
Thursday, April 21, 2005; Page A08

NEW YORK, April 20 -- American Muslims detained at the border as they
returned from a religious conference in Toronto sued the Department of
Homeland Security on Wednesday alleging they were targets of ethnic and
religious profiling.

The five Muslims, all U.S. citizens, say customs officials detained
dozens of others from their conference in December, subjecting them to
interrogations, fingerprinting and photographing.

I have no problem with the "source" of this story...nor with actions of
the Dept. of Homeland Security.

Those 5 folks who were detained are certainly more apt to commit
terrorist attacks than an 80 year old grandmother. It's about time they
started racial profiling...especially for people who travel to
"conferences" that have suspected ties to terrorism.


Besides...questioning, fingerprinting, and photographing hardly qualify
as "detainment". So what's the big deal?

But professor, you objected to the exact same type of policies when
practiced by the USSR. Sorry. Can't have it both ways.

No I didn't. I'm all for a National Photo ID card and fingerprint and/or
retinal scans at the airport and border crossings.

On Tue, 03 May 2005 19:55:20 +0000, NOYB wrote:


No I didn't. I'm all for a National Photo ID card and fingerprint and/or
retinal scans at the airport and border crossings.

So what's the new slogan? "America, Land of the once Free?"

"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 03 May 2005 19:55:20 +0000, NOYB wrote:


No I didn't. I'm all for a National Photo ID card and fingerprint and/or
retinal scans at the airport and border crossings.

So what's the new slogan? "America, Land of the once Free?"

Land of the free-to-show-your-ID-card-and-be-on-your-way.

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

Perhaps. But only if the ACLU continues to dismantle the President's
authority to detain illegal combatants in this war on terror.

You mean, the government's new hobby, detaining people like these?

And, don't hand us any bull**** about the source, as you usually do.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...2005Apr20.html


Muslims Detained at Border Sue U.S. Homeland Security

By Michelle Garcia
Special to The Washington Post
Thursday, April 21, 2005; Page A08

NEW YORK, April 20 -- American Muslims detained at the border as they
returned from a religious conference in Toronto sued the Department of
Homeland Security on Wednesday alleging they were targets of ethnic and
religious profiling.

The five Muslims, all U.S. citizens, say customs officials detained
dozens of others from their conference in December, subjecting them to
interrogations, fingerprinting and photographing.

I have no problem with the "source" of this story...nor with actions of
the Dept. of Homeland Security.

Those 5 folks who were detained are certainly more apt to commit
terrorist attacks than an 80 year old grandmother. It's about time they
started racial profiling...especially for people who travel to
"conferences" that have suspected ties to terrorism.


Besides...questioning, fingerprinting, and photographing hardly qualify
as "detainment". So what's the big deal?

But professor, you objected to the exact same type of policies when
practiced by the USSR. Sorry. Can't have it both ways.

No I didn't. I'm all for a National Photo ID card and fingerprint and/or
retinal scans at the airport and border crossings.


Nope. You're lying. When you were younger, you went along with the
anti-communist party line, agreed with Reagan 100% about his "evil empire"
views. The totalitarian tactics were the bane of your existence. You only
claim to approve of them now because the only way you can tread water in a
debate is to bait your opponents.

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

Perhaps. But only if the ACLU continues to dismantle the President's
authority to detain illegal combatants in this war on terror.

You mean, the government's new hobby, detaining people like these?

And, don't hand us any bull**** about the source, as you usually do.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...2005Apr20.html


Muslims Detained at Border Sue U.S. Homeland Security

By Michelle Garcia
Special to The Washington Post
Thursday, April 21, 2005; Page A08

NEW YORK, April 20 -- American Muslims detained at the border as they
returned from a religious conference in Toronto sued the Department of
Homeland Security on Wednesday alleging they were targets of ethnic
and religious profiling.

The five Muslims, all U.S. citizens, say customs officials detained
dozens of others from their conference in December, subjecting them to
interrogations, fingerprinting and photographing.

I have no problem with the "source" of this story...nor with actions of
the Dept. of Homeland Security.

Those 5 folks who were detained are certainly more apt to commit
terrorist attacks than an 80 year old grandmother. It's about time
they started racial profiling...especially for people who travel to
"conferences" that have suspected ties to terrorism.


Besides...questioning, fingerprinting, and photographing hardly qualify
as "detainment". So what's the big deal?

But professor, you objected to the exact same type of policies when
practiced by the USSR. Sorry. Can't have it both ways.

No I didn't. I'm all for a National Photo ID card and fingerprint and/or
retinal scans at the airport and border crossings.


Nope. You're lying. When you were younger, you went along with the
anti-communist party line, agreed with Reagan 100% about his "evil empire"
views. The totalitarian tactics were the bane of your existence. You only
claim to approve of them now because the only way you can tread water in a
debate is to bait your opponents.

WTF are you talking about?

"NOYB" wrote in message
...


"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

Perhaps. But only if the ACLU continues to dismantle the
President's authority to detain illegal combatants in this war on
terror.

You mean, the government's new hobby, detaining people like these?

And, don't hand us any bull**** about the source, as you usually do.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...2005Apr20.html


Muslims Detained at Border Sue U.S. Homeland Security

By Michelle Garcia
Special to The Washington Post
Thursday, April 21, 2005; Page A08

NEW YORK, April 20 -- American Muslims detained at the border as they
returned from a religious conference in Toronto sued the Department
of Homeland Security on Wednesday alleging they were targets of
ethnic and religious profiling.

The five Muslims, all U.S. citizens, say customs officials detained
dozens of others from their conference in December, subjecting them
to interrogations, fingerprinting and photographing.

I have no problem with the "source" of this story...nor with actions
of the Dept. of Homeland Security.

Those 5 folks who were detained are certainly more apt to commit
terrorist attacks than an 80 year old grandmother. It's about time
they started racial profiling...especially for people who travel to
"conferences" that have suspected ties to terrorism.


Besides...questioning, fingerprinting, and photographing hardly
qualify as "detainment". So what's the big deal?

But professor, you objected to the exact same type of policies when
practiced by the USSR. Sorry. Can't have it both ways.

No I didn't. I'm all for a National Photo ID card and fingerprint
and/or retinal scans at the airport and border crossings.


Nope. You're lying. When you were younger, you went along with the
anti-communist party line, agreed with Reagan 100% about his "evil
empire" views. The totalitarian tactics were the bane of your existence.
You only claim to approve of them now because the only way you can tread
water in a debate is to bait your opponents.

WTF are you talking about?

I'll simplify this. You say you believe in things like ID cards, etc., and
that you were OK with similar obscenities when practiced in the USSR and its
Eastern European satellite countries. You're lying to yourself when you make
that statement. Why? Because you haven't thoroughly thought out all the
ramifications of these practices, many of which are the reason so many fled
from those countries.

You will now say that people left those countries because they wanted to
live in a free enterprise system, but that's hardly the whole story and you
know it.

So, think about this: You're anchored somewhere quiet on your boat, just you
and the girlfriend, or maybe even your wife. You're about to administer a
beef injection down in the cabin when a boat pulls up and announces on its
loudspeaker "Come out of the cabin with your ID cards. You have 30 seconds."
You can't get dressed quick enough, so you are boarded, and both of you are
dragged, half naked, out of the cabin. The cabin is tossed by the
"authorities" you say you believe in. Meanwhile, your ID card is in your
pocket, but they toss the entire cabin anyway.

They search your girlfriend's purse and find she's carrying a handgun. They
see her permit. In Florida, you are not required to notify an officer that
you're carrying, but these guys are Feds, so because they think their ****
don't stink, they believe the law applies only to state or local cops. They
tell your girlfriend that because she forgot to inform them of the gun,
they're confiscating it, and her too. "The president's gonna be down this
way for a fund raiser next week. What did you have in mind with the gun,
lady?"

This is potentially what you are agreeing with. And if you think there
aren't enough antisocial types who'd gladly sign up, put on a uniform, and
do things like this to innocent citizens under the guise of "national
security", think again. You've already seen it done.

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
...


"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

Perhaps. But only if the ACLU continues to dismantle the
President's authority to detain illegal combatants in this war on
terror.

You mean, the government's new hobby, detaining people like these?

And, don't hand us any bull**** about the source, as you usually do.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...2005Apr20.html


Muslims Detained at Border Sue U.S. Homeland Security

By Michelle Garcia
Special to The Washington Post
Thursday, April 21, 2005; Page A08

NEW YORK, April 20 -- American Muslims detained at the border as
they returned from a religious conference in Toronto sued the
Department of Homeland Security on Wednesday alleging they were
targets of ethnic and religious profiling.

The five Muslims, all U.S. citizens, say customs officials detained
dozens of others from their conference in December, subjecting them
to interrogations, fingerprinting and photographing.

I have no problem with the "source" of this story...nor with actions
of the Dept. of Homeland Security.

Those 5 folks who were detained are certainly more apt to commit
terrorist attacks than an 80 year old grandmother. It's about time
they started racial profiling...especially for people who travel to
"conferences" that have suspected ties to terrorism.


Besides...questioning, fingerprinting, and photographing hardly
qualify as "detainment". So what's the big deal?

But professor, you objected to the exact same type of policies when
practiced by the USSR. Sorry. Can't have it both ways.

No I didn't. I'm all for a National Photo ID card and fingerprint
and/or retinal scans at the airport and border crossings.


Nope. You're lying. When you were younger, you went along with the
anti-communist party line, agreed with Reagan 100% about his "evil
empire" views. The totalitarian tactics were the bane of your existence.
You only claim to approve of them now because the only way you can tread
water in a debate is to bait your opponents.

WTF are you talking about?

I'll simplify this. You say you believe in things like ID cards, etc., and
that you were OK with similar obscenities when practiced in the USSR and
its Eastern European satellite countries. You're lying to yourself when
you make that statement. Why? Because you haven't thoroughly thought out
all the ramifications of these practices, many of which are the reason so
many fled from those countries.

You will now say that people left those countries because they wanted to
live in a free enterprise system, but that's hardly the whole story and
you know it.

So, think about this: You're anchored somewhere quiet on your boat, just
you and the girlfriend, or maybe even your wife. You're about to
administer a beef injection down in the cabin when a boat pulls up and
announces on its loudspeaker "Come out of the cabin with your ID cards.
You have 30 seconds." You can't get dressed quick enough, so you are
boarded, and both of you are dragged, half naked, out of the cabin. The
cabin is tossed by the "authorities" you say you believe in. Meanwhile,
your ID card is in your pocket, but they toss the entire cabin anyway.

They search your girlfriend's purse and find she's carrying a handgun.
They see her permit. In Florida, you are not required to notify an officer
that you're carrying, but these guys are Feds, so because they think their
**** don't stink, they believe the law applies only to state or local
cops. They tell your girlfriend that because she forgot to inform them of
the gun, they're confiscating it, and her too. "The president's gonna be
down this way for a fund raiser next week. What did you have in mind with
the gun, lady?"

This is potentially what you are agreeing with. And if you think there
aren't enough antisocial types who'd gladly sign up, put on a uniform, and
do things like this to innocent citizens under the guise of "national
security", think again. You've already seen it done.

The Feds have had this power on the waterways for some time now. It has
nothing to do with ID cards.

"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message


This is potentially what you are agreeing with. And if you think there
aren't enough antisocial types who'd gladly sign up, put on a uniform,
and
do things like this to innocent citizens under the guise of "national
security", think again. You've already seen it done.

The Feds have had this power on the waterways for some time now. It has
nothing to do with ID cards.


Forget it, NYOB. You're arguing with small-minded, liberal chicken-littles,
and their sky is falling.

Jack

"Jack Goff" wrote in message
. ..

"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message


This is potentially what you are agreeing with. And if you think there
aren't enough antisocial types who'd gladly sign up, put on a uniform,
and
do things like this to innocent citizens under the guise of "national
security", think again. You've already seen it done.

The Feds have had this power on the waterways for some time now. It has
nothing to do with ID cards.


Forget it, NYOB. You're arguing with small-minded, liberal
chicken-littles,
and their sky is falling.

It must be a very high sky. It's been falling for over 4 years now...and
still hasn't crashed down on anybody's head.

On Wed, 04 May 2005 11:19:43 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:


So, think about this: You're anchored somewhere quiet on your boat, just you
and the girlfriend, or maybe even your wife. You're about to administer a
beef injection down in the cabin when a boat pulls up and announces on its
loudspeaker "Come out of the cabin with your ID cards. You have 30 seconds."
You can't get dressed quick enough, so you are boarded, and both of you are
dragged, half naked, out of the cabin. The cabin is tossed by the
"authorities" you say you believe in. Meanwhile, your ID card is in your
pocket, but they toss the entire cabin anyway.

They search your girlfriend's purse and find she's carrying a handgun. They
see her permit. In Florida, you are not required to notify an officer that
you're carrying, but these guys are Feds, so because they think their ****
don't stink, they believe the law applies only to state or local cops. They
tell your girlfriend that because she forgot to inform them of the gun,
they're confiscating it, and her too. "The president's gonna be down this
way for a fund raiser next week. What did you have in mind with the gun,
lady?"

This is potentially what you are agreeing with. And if you think there
aren't enough antisocial types who'd gladly sign up, put on a uniform, and
do things like this to innocent citizens under the guise of "national
security", think again. You've already seen it done.


What tripe!
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."