"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
Soldiers are just civilians in uniforms...

...wearing flak jackets, driving heavily armored vehicles, and carrying
fully automatic assault rifles. Some of them even have the ability to
send 500 lb. bombs at terrorist targets.

Soldiers are aware of the job description when they sign up. Wouldn't
you rather have terrorists fighting well-armed US combatants halfway
around the world, rather than blowing up unarmed men, women, and
children in your own backyard?

Actually, the article is right. Threats are almost nonexistent. The
insurgents don't make threats. They just do the deeds.

As far as who is attacked where, I'm not picky. Soldiers can't defend
themselves against vehicles loaded with explosives unless they see them
coming, and apparently, they do NOT see them coming most of the time.
And, they don't have the armor they need, so in effect, they're often as
defenseless as if they were driving down route 95.

With a .50 caliber mounted on your roof.

No gun helps when a car blows up next to yours, professor.

Doug,
I completely agree with you, why should we bring the fight to their home, we
should wait till they attack us in our home.


"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
Soldiers are just civilians in uniforms...

...wearing flak jackets, driving heavily armored vehicles, and carrying
fully automatic assault rifles. Some of them even have the ability to
send 500 lb. bombs at terrorist targets.

Soldiers are aware of the job description when they sign up. Wouldn't
you rather have terrorists fighting well-armed US combatants halfway
around the world, rather than blowing up unarmed men, women, and
children in your own backyard?

Actually, the article is right. Threats are almost nonexistent. The
insurgents don't make threats. They just do the deeds.

As far as who is attacked where, I'm not picky. Soldiers can't defend
themselves against vehicles loaded with explosives unless they see them
coming, and apparently, they do NOT see them coming most of the time.
And, they don't have the armor they need, so in effect, they're often as
defenseless as if they were driving down route 95.

With a .50 caliber mounted on your roof.

No gun helps when a car blows up next to yours, professor.

They'll attack here anytime they please. You know that.


"Dr. Dr. K. Grear" Call180bucme@foragoodtime wrote in message
...
Doug,
I completely agree with you, why should we bring the fight to their home,
we should wait till they attack us in our home.


"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
Soldiers are just civilians in uniforms...

...wearing flak jackets, driving heavily armored vehicles, and
carrying fully automatic assault rifles. Some of them even have the
ability to send 500 lb. bombs at terrorist targets.

Soldiers are aware of the job description when they sign up. Wouldn't
you rather have terrorists fighting well-armed US combatants halfway
around the world, rather than blowing up unarmed men, women, and
children in your own backyard?

Actually, the article is right. Threats are almost nonexistent. The
insurgents don't make threats. They just do the deeds.

As far as who is attacked where, I'm not picky. Soldiers can't defend
themselves against vehicles loaded with explosives unless they see them
coming, and apparently, they do NOT see them coming most of the time.
And, they don't have the armor they need, so in effect, they're often
as defenseless as if they were driving down route 95.

With a .50 caliber mounted on your roof.

No gun helps when a car blows up next to yours, professor.

Doug,
I think their game plan of not attacking us at home is working, they have us
running scared.


"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
They'll attack here anytime they please. You know that.


"Dr. Dr. K. Grear" Call180bucme@foragoodtime wrote in message
...
Doug,
I completely agree with you, why should we bring the fight to their home,
we should wait till they attack us in our home.


"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
Soldiers are just civilians in uniforms...

...wearing flak jackets, driving heavily armored vehicles, and
carrying fully automatic assault rifles. Some of them even have the
ability to send 500 lb. bombs at terrorist targets.

Soldiers are aware of the job description when they sign up.
Wouldn't you rather have terrorists fighting well-armed US combatants
halfway around the world, rather than blowing up unarmed men, women,
and children in your own backyard?

Actually, the article is right. Threats are almost nonexistent. The
insurgents don't make threats. They just do the deeds.

As far as who is attacked where, I'm not picky. Soldiers can't defend
themselves against vehicles loaded with explosives unless they see
them coming, and apparently, they do NOT see them coming most of the
time. And, they don't have the armor they need, so in effect, they're
often as defenseless as if they were driving down route 95.

With a .50 caliber mounted on your roof.

No gun helps when a car blows up next to yours, professor.

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
They'll attack here anytime they please. You know that.



So I guess they did not *please* to do so since 9-11-01.

Right.

LMAO!!!!!!!!

s
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
Soldiers are just civilians in uniforms...

...wearing flak jackets, driving heavily armored vehicles, and carrying
fully automatic assault rifles. Some of them even have the ability to
send 500 lb. bombs at terrorist targets.

Soldiers are aware of the job description when they sign up. Wouldn't
you rather have terrorists fighting well-armed US combatants halfway
around the world, rather than blowing up unarmed men, women, and
children in your own backyard?

Actually, the article is right. Threats are almost nonexistent. The
insurgents don't make threats. They just do the deeds.

As far as who is attacked where, I'm not picky. Soldiers can't defend
themselves against vehicles loaded with explosives unless they see them
coming, and apparently, they do NOT see them coming most of the time.
And, they don't have the armor they need, so in effect, they're often as
defenseless as if they were driving down route 95.

With a .50 caliber mounted on your roof.

No gun helps when a car blows up next to yours, professor.


Not too many cars can get close enough when a Mark-19 is unleashed on 'em.

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...
s
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
Soldiers are just civilians in uniforms...

...wearing flak jackets, driving heavily armored vehicles, and
carrying fully automatic assault rifles. Some of them even have the
ability to send 500 lb. bombs at terrorist targets.

Soldiers are aware of the job description when they sign up. Wouldn't
you rather have terrorists fighting well-armed US combatants halfway
around the world, rather than blowing up unarmed men, women, and
children in your own backyard?

Actually, the article is right. Threats are almost nonexistent. The
insurgents don't make threats. They just do the deeds.

As far as who is attacked where, I'm not picky. Soldiers can't defend
themselves against vehicles loaded with explosives unless they see them
coming, and apparently, they do NOT see them coming most of the time.
And, they don't have the armor they need, so in effect, they're often
as defenseless as if they were driving down route 95.

With a .50 caliber mounted on your roof.

No gun helps when a car blows up next to yours, professor.


Not too many cars can get close enough when a Mark-19 is unleashed on 'em.

You really do live on another planet, don't you? Not only that, but you
never quite got past the age of 12. Have you noticed the return of suicide
bombings in Iraq, or are all those reports fabricated?

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...
s
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
Soldiers are just civilians in uniforms...

...wearing flak jackets, driving heavily armored vehicles, and
carrying fully automatic assault rifles. Some of them even have the
ability to send 500 lb. bombs at terrorist targets.

Soldiers are aware of the job description when they sign up.
Wouldn't you rather have terrorists fighting well-armed US combatants
halfway around the world, rather than blowing up unarmed men, women,
and children in your own backyard?

Actually, the article is right. Threats are almost nonexistent. The
insurgents don't make threats. They just do the deeds.

As far as who is attacked where, I'm not picky. Soldiers can't defend
themselves against vehicles loaded with explosives unless they see
them coming, and apparently, they do NOT see them coming most of the
time. And, they don't have the armor they need, so in effect, they're
often as defenseless as if they were driving down route 95.

With a .50 caliber mounted on your roof.

No gun helps when a car blows up next to yours, professor.


Not too many cars can get close enough when a Mark-19 is unleashed on
'em.

You really do live on another planet, don't you? Not only that, but you
never quite got past the age of 12. Have you noticed the return of suicide
bombings in Iraq, or are all those reports fabricated?


They're blowing up Iraqi men, women, and children attending weddings.
However, there's been a 35% reduction in US casualties over the last 3
months than in the 3 month period prior to that.

"NOYB" wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...
s
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
Soldiers are just civilians in uniforms...

...wearing flak jackets, driving heavily armored vehicles, and
carrying fully automatic assault rifles. Some of them even have the
ability to send 500 lb. bombs at terrorist targets.

Soldiers are aware of the job description when they sign up.
Wouldn't you rather have terrorists fighting well-armed US
combatants halfway around the world, rather than blowing up unarmed
men, women, and children in your own backyard?

Actually, the article is right. Threats are almost nonexistent. The
insurgents don't make threats. They just do the deeds.

As far as who is attacked where, I'm not picky. Soldiers can't defend
themselves against vehicles loaded with explosives unless they see
them coming, and apparently, they do NOT see them coming most of the
time. And, they don't have the armor they need, so in effect, they're
often as defenseless as if they were driving down route 95.

With a .50 caliber mounted on your roof.

No gun helps when a car blows up next to yours, professor.


Not too many cars can get close enough when a Mark-19 is unleashed on
'em.

You really do live on another planet, don't you? Not only that, but you
never quite got past the age of 12. Have you noticed the return of
suicide bombings in Iraq, or are all those reports fabricated?


They're blowing up Iraqi men, women, and children attending weddings.
However, there's been a 35% reduction in US casualties over the last 3
months than in the 3 month period prior to that.

OK, boy. If you think that last paragraph is NOT a non-sequitur, we're done
with this.

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...
s
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
Soldiers are just civilians in uniforms...

...wearing flak jackets, driving heavily armored vehicles, and
carrying fully automatic assault rifles. Some of them even have
the ability to send 500 lb. bombs at terrorist targets.

Soldiers are aware of the job description when they sign up.
Wouldn't you rather have terrorists fighting well-armed US
combatants halfway around the world, rather than blowing up unarmed
men, women, and children in your own backyard?

Actually, the article is right. Threats are almost nonexistent. The
insurgents don't make threats. They just do the deeds.

As far as who is attacked where, I'm not picky. Soldiers can't
defend themselves against vehicles loaded with explosives unless
they see them coming, and apparently, they do NOT see them coming
most of the time. And, they don't have the armor they need, so in
effect, they're often as defenseless as if they were driving down
route 95.

With a .50 caliber mounted on your roof.

No gun helps when a car blows up next to yours, professor.


Not too many cars can get close enough when a Mark-19 is unleashed on
'em.

You really do live on another planet, don't you? Not only that, but you
never quite got past the age of 12. Have you noticed the return of
suicide bombings in Iraq, or are all those reports fabricated?


They're blowing up Iraqi men, women, and children attending weddings.
However, there's been a 35% reduction in US casualties over the last 3
months than in the 3 month period prior to that.

OK, boy. If you think that last paragraph is NOT a non-sequitur, we're
done with this.

You said there had been an increase in the number of car bombings recently.
Since the bombings are effectively targeting Iraqi civilians, why are they
relevant to a discussion about terrorist attacks against US citizens?

An increase in the number of car bombings against Iraqi wedding parties
isn't of much interest to the average American. The fact is...the US
mainland has not been attacked since 9/11, and US military casualties have
fallen 35% in the last 3 months. We're winning the war on terror.