Harry.Krause wrote:


All good little fascists and communists want national photo IDs.


Is NOYB a 'closet communist'?

On Tue, 03 May 2005 19:55:20 +0000, NOYB wrote:


No I didn't. I'm all for a National Photo ID card and fingerprint and/or
retinal scans at the airport and border crossings.

So what's the new slogan? "America, Land of the once Free?"

"Harry.Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
thlink.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
arthlink.net...


Perhaps. But only if the ACLU continues to dismantle the President's
authority to detain illegal combatants in this war on terror.

You mean, the government's new hobby, detaining people like these?

And, don't hand us any bull**** about the source, as you usually do.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...2005Apr20.html


Muslims Detained at Border Sue U.S. Homeland Security

By Michelle Garcia
Special to The Washington Post
Thursday, April 21, 2005; Page A08

NEW YORK, April 20 -- American Muslims detained at the border as they
returned from a religious conference in Toronto sued the Department of
Homeland Security on Wednesday alleging they were targets of ethnic and
religious profiling.

The five Muslims, all U.S. citizens, say customs officials detained
dozens of others from their conference in December, subjecting them to
interrogations, fingerprinting and photographing.

I have no problem with the "source" of this story...nor with actions of
the Dept. of Homeland Security.

Those 5 folks who were detained are certainly more apt to commit
terrorist attacks than an 80 year old grandmother. It's about time they
started racial profiling...especially for people who travel to
"conferences" that have suspected ties to terrorism.


Besides...questioning, fingerprinting, and photographing hardly qualify
as "detainment". So what's the big deal?

But professor, you objected to the exact same type of policies when
practiced by the USSR. Sorry. Can't have it both ways.


No I didn't. I'm all for a National Photo ID card and fingerprint and/or
retinal scans at the airport and border crossings.



All good little fascists and communists want national photo IDs.

Only us fascists with nothing to hide. What's the difference, really? We
already have passports and state-issued drivers licenses.

"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 03 May 2005 19:55:20 +0000, NOYB wrote:


No I didn't. I'm all for a National Photo ID card and fingerprint and/or
retinal scans at the airport and border crossings.

So what's the new slogan? "America, Land of the once Free?"

Land of the free-to-show-your-ID-card-and-be-on-your-way.

"Harry.Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Harry.Krause" wrote in message
...

NOYB wrote:

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...


"NOYB" wrote in message
arthlink.net...


"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...


"NOYB" wrote in message
.earthlink.net...



Perhaps. But only if the ACLU continues to dismantle the
President's authority to detain illegal combatants in this war on
terror.

You mean, the government's new hobby, detaining people like these?

And, don't hand us any bull**** about the source, as you usually do.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...2005Apr20.html


Muslims Detained at Border Sue U.S. Homeland Security

By Michelle Garcia
Special to The Washington Post
Thursday, April 21, 2005; Page A08

NEW YORK, April 20 -- American Muslims detained at the border as they
returned from a religious conference in Toronto sued the Department
of Homeland Security on Wednesday alleging they were targets of
ethnic and religious profiling.

The five Muslims, all U.S. citizens, say customs officials detained
dozens of others from their conference in December, subjecting them
to interrogations, fingerprinting and photographing.

I have no problem with the "source" of this story...nor with actions
of the Dept. of Homeland Security.

Those 5 folks who were detained are certainly more apt to commit
terrorist attacks than an 80 year old grandmother. It's about time
they started racial profiling...especially for people who travel to
"conferences" that have suspected ties to terrorism.


Besides...questioning, fingerprinting, and photographing hardly
qualify as "detainment". So what's the big deal?

But professor, you objected to the exact same type of policies when
practiced by the USSR. Sorry. Can't have it both ways.


No I didn't. I'm all for a National Photo ID card and fingerprint
and/or retinal scans at the airport and border crossings.



All good little fascists and communists want national photo IDs.


Only us fascists with nothing to hide. What's the difference, really?
We already have passports and state-issued drivers licenses.



Never read much WW II/Soviet State history, eh?

I meant...
What's the difference between a national photo idea and a passport or
state-issued drivers license? Or even a social security card?

"Harry.Krause" wrote in message
...
Harold wrote:

You don't really think anyone cares about your idiotic posts, do you?

Who's Harold?

"Don White" wrote in message
...
Harry.Krause wrote:


All good little fascists and communists want national photo IDs.


Is NOYB a 'closet communist'?

Why don't you tell us, you live in a society that is closer to communism?

Bert Robbins wrote:


Why don't you tell us, you live in a society that is closer to communism?

1930's Germany was closer to communism than America under Bush!

Harold wrote:

Doug Kanter, Harry Krause, NOYB, Don White. The same old bunch of OT
posters. Why don't you all just get the **** out of this group and take
your **** to alt.politics.circlejerkers?

That is where assholes like you belong.


You seem to have a 'thing' for the male anatomy. Trying to 'come out
of the closet', are you?

"Don White" wrote in message
...
Bert Robbins wrote:


Why don't you tell us, you live in a society that is closer to communism?

1930's Germany was closer to communism than America under Bush!

I knew that a good communist, like you Don, would know a lot about it.