On Topic (sort of) re OT posts
 

Why all the bitching about OT posts -- If *I* can go to all the trouble
of labeling them (as do others) What is *YOUR* problem with installing
an OT filter. Them who want to argue politics, religion, whatever, can,
and them who don't let the filter do the work.

In Netscape and mozilla it's tools/message filters/new/ set to if
subject contains OT/ move to trash or read

Sam Graphics wrote:
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, "Jim," wrote:

Why all the bitching about OT posts -- If *I* can go to all the trouble
of labeling them (as do others) What is *YOUR* problem with installing
an OT filter. Them who want to argue politics, religion, whatever, can,
and them who don't let the filter do the work.

In Netscape and mozilla it's tools/message filters/new/ set to if
subject contains OT/ move to trash or read


**** you asshole. Why do I have to filter out your ****? It's up to you not
to post OT ****. It's all up to you asshole.

You go find the right newsgroup you want to post to. Then I don't have to
**** with filters.

If it ain't about boats, don't post it here!!!!


Gee such a nasty response, and I was only trying to help you

"Jim," wrote in message
...
Sam Graphics wrote:
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, "Jim," wrote:

Why all the bitching about OT posts -- If *I* can go to all the trouble
of labeling them (as do others) What is *YOUR* problem with installing an
OT filter. Them who want to argue politics, religion, whatever, can, and
them who don't let the filter do the work.

In Netscape and mozilla it's tools/message filters/new/ set to if subject
contains OT/ move to trash or read


**** you asshole. Why do I have to filter out your ****? It's up to you
not
to post OT ****. It's all up to you asshole. You go find the right
newsgroup you want to post to. Then I don't have to
**** with filters.

If it ain't about boats, don't post it here!!!!


Gee such a nasty response, and I was only trying to help you

The world can do without your "help."

A.Melon wrote:
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, "Jim," wrote:

Why all the bitching about OT posts -- If *I* can go to all the trouble
of labeling them (as do others) What is *YOUR* problem with installing
an OT filter. Them who want to argue politics, religion, whatever, can,
and them who don't let the filter do the work.

In Netscape and mozilla it's tools/message filters/new/ set to if
subject contains OT/ move to trash or read


**** you asshole. Why do I have to filter out your ****? It's up to you not
to post OT ****. It's all up to you asshole.

You go find the right newsgroup you want to post to. Then I don't have to
**** with filters.

If it ain't about boats, don't post it here!!!!


You would rather I *didn't* label then (OT)?

Steven Shelikoff wrote:

On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 01:27:34 GMT, "Jim," wrote:


Why all the bitching about OT posts -- If *I* can go to all the trouble
of labeling them (as do others) What is *YOUR* problem with installing
an OT filter. Them who want to argue politics, religion, whatever, can,
and them who don't let the filter do the work.

In Netscape and mozilla it's tools/message filters/new/ set to if
subject contains OT/ move to trash or read


Can I just ask you why you start so many off topic threads here in the
first place?

Steve

Someone has to counter all the right wing BS I see here -- think of it
as making the group "fair and balanced"

When the righties stop, so will I

Steven,
Jim, does not have the ability to think for himself. Heck he has trouble
understanding what he reads. When he cuts and paste an article it makes him
feels like he is contributing.


"Steven Shelikoff" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 01:27:34 GMT, "Jim," wrote:

Why all the bitching about OT posts -- If *I* can go to all the trouble
of labeling them (as do others) What is *YOUR* problem with installing
an OT filter. Them who want to argue politics, religion, whatever, can,
and them who don't let the filter do the work.

In Netscape and mozilla it's tools/message filters/new/ set to if
subject contains OT/ move to trash or read

Can I just ask you why you start so many off topic threads here in the
first place?

Steve

Jim, wrote:
Why all the bitching about OT posts -- If *I* can go to all the
trouble
of labeling them (as do others) What is *YOUR* problem with
installing
an OT filter. Them who want to argue politics, religion, whatever,
can,
and them who don't let the filter do the work.


Too lazy ... useing google (I know, I know) ...

Having an OT is a good thing but also take in mind there are newsgroups
for just these OT posts where they are On topic ;)

Matt

In article ,
er says...
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, "Jim," wrote:
Steven Shelikoff wrote:

On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 01:27:34 GMT, "Jim," wrote:


Why all the bitching about OT posts -- If *I* can go to all the trouble
of labeling them (as do others) What is *YOUR* problem with installing
an OT filter. Them who want to argue politics, religion, whatever, can,
and them who don't let the filter do the work.

In Netscape and mozilla it's tools/message filters/new/ set to if
subject contains OT/ move to trash or read


Can I just ask you why you start so many off topic threads here in the
first place?

Steve

Someone has to counter all the right wing BS I see here -- think of it
as making the group "fair and balanced"

When the righties stop, so will I

Why don't you post to alt.faggots with the topic of "Help, I want to come
out of the closet"


Are your posts so important that they deserve to be posted multiple
times or should we assume you're losing muscular motor control?

Do you need more attention?

jps

In article , says...

"Jim," wrote in message

Gee such a nasty response, and I was only trying to help you

The world can do without your "help."


I've chosen Jim as my personal savior. I need his help just like the
"conservatives" here need their daily dose of Bush, Cheney, Wolfowitz,
Dobson, Robertson, Graham, Limbaugh, Rumsfeld, etc.

Please keep posting Jim.

jps

In article ,
says...
**** you asshole. Why do I have to filter out your ****? It's up to you not
to post OT ****. It's all up to you asshole.

George Orwell would never be so inarticulate.

You should stop using his name.

jps