"NOYB" wrote in message om...
From Reuters:



http://tinyurl.com/2aque


Without naming anybody, Kerry said he had received words of encouragement
from leaders abroad who were eager to see him defeat Bush on Nov. 2.


"I've met foreign leaders who can't go out and say this publicly, but boy
they look at you and say, 'You've got to win this, you've got to beat this
guy, we need a new policy,' things like that," he said.



----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-

So, I guess you are saying that any other leader in the world is our enemy?

"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"NOYB" wrote in message
om...
From Reuters:



http://tinyurl.com/2aque


Without naming anybody, Kerry said he had received words of
encouragement
from leaders abroad who were eager to see him defeat Bush on Nov. 2.


"I've met foreign leaders who can't go out and say this publicly, but
boy
they look at you and say, 'You've got to win this, you've got to beat
this
guy, we need a new policy,' things like that," he said.




--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
-

So, I guess you are saying that any other leader in the world is our
enemy?

No, you imbecile. I named the 5 guys that I think are no friends of ours
but you snipped that part.

"NOYB" wrote in message thlink.net...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"NOYB" wrote in message
om...
From Reuters:



http://tinyurl.com/2aque


Without naming anybody, Kerry said he had received words of
encouragement
from leaders abroad who were eager to see him defeat Bush on Nov. 2.


"I've met foreign leaders who can't go out and say this publicly, but
boy
they look at you and say, 'You've got to win this, you've got to beat
this
guy, we need a new policy,' things like that," he said.




--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
-

So, I guess you are saying that any other leader in the world is our
enemy?

No, you imbecile. I named the 5 guys that I think are no friends of ours
but you snipped that part.

Oh, man, you are just dumb. Here is the ****ing ORIGINAL Kerry quote,
that you posted:

"I've met foreign leaders who can't go out and say this publicly, but
boy
they look at you and say, 'You've got to win this, you've got to beat
this
guy, we need a new policy,' things like that,"

YOU are the one who added just five names to the list. YOU. Kerry
NEVER said anything about those five people. Now, I'll ask the
question differently, in hopes it will get through to your brain:

Are you saying that those five people,in the world, who YOU posted,
are the only people that are saying they'd like Kerry to win, so that
they can have better relations with the U.S. than they have now? If
so, then can one assume that they are the only one's who WANT those
relations with with the U.S.? Then, if that is true, are they the only
leaders in the world that are not our enemies?

"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"NOYB" wrote in message
thlink.net...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"NOYB" wrote in message
om...
From Reuters:



http://tinyurl.com/2aque


Without naming anybody, Kerry said he had received words of
encouragement
from leaders abroad who were eager to see him defeat Bush on Nov. 2.


"I've met foreign leaders who can't go out and say this publicly,
but
boy
they look at you and say, 'You've got to win this, you've got to
beat
this
guy, we need a new policy,' things like that," he said.





--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--


--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
-

So, I guess you are saying that any other leader in the world is our
enemy?

No, you imbecile. I named the 5 guys that I think are no friends of
ours
but you snipped that part.

Oh, man, you are just dumb. Here is the ****ing ORIGINAL Kerry quote,
that you posted:

"I've met foreign leaders who can't go out and say this publicly,
but
boy
they look at you and say, 'You've got to win this, you've got to
beat
this
guy, we need a new policy,' things like that,"

YOU are the one who added just five names to the list. YOU.



No kidding, ****-for-brains. *I* added the five names before you even
posted anything to this thread.. And after I already listed the 5 names, you
asked me:

"So, I guess you are saying that any other leader in the world is our
enemy?"

I never said "any other leader". I listed 5 people specifically. Now do
you see how stupid your question was?

"basskisser" wrote in message
om...

Are you saying that those five people,in the world, who YOU posted,
are the only people that are saying they'd like Kerry to win, so that
they can have better relations with the U.S. than they have now?

"Only" people? No.

If
so, then can one assume that they are the only one's who WANT those
relations with with the U.S.?

You said "if so"...but I have already answered "no"...so this question isn't
applicable any longer.

Then, if that is true, are they the only
leaders in the world that are not our enemies?

But "that is NOT true", so this question is not applicable either. However,
I believe you meant to say "are they the only leaders in the world who *are*
our enemies". And the answer to that question would also be "no".

"NOYB" wrote in message nk.net...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...

Are you saying that those five people,in the world, who YOU posted,
are the only people that are saying they'd like Kerry to win, so that
they can have better relations with the U.S. than they have now?

"Only" people? No.

If
so, then can one assume that they are the only one's who WANT those
relations with with the U.S.?

You said "if so"...but I have already answered "no"...so this question isn't
applicable any longer.

Then, if that is true, are they the only
leaders in the world that are not our enemies?

But "that is NOT true", so this question is not applicable either. However,
I believe you meant to say "are they the only leaders in the world who *are*
our enemies". And the answer to that question would also be "no".

You don't seem to understand what YOU have written, I take it. You've
accused Kerry of collaborating with the enemy.

"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...

Are you saying that those five people,in the world, who YOU posted,
are the only people that are saying they'd like Kerry to win, so that
they can have better relations with the U.S. than they have now?

"Only" people? No.

If
so, then can one assume that they are the only one's who WANT those
relations with with the U.S.?

You said "if so"...but I have already answered "no"...so this question
isn't
applicable any longer.

Then, if that is true, are they the only
leaders in the world that are not our enemies?

But "that is NOT true", so this question is not applicable either.
However,
I believe you meant to say "are they the only leaders in the world who
*are*
our enemies". And the answer to that question would also be "no".

You don't seem to understand what YOU have written, I take it. You've
accused Kerry of collaborating with the enemy.

No ****! Really? Well duhhhhhhh....

On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 13:45:35 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:


"basskisser" wrote in message
. com...
"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...

Are you saying that those five people,in the world, who YOU posted,
are the only people that are saying they'd like Kerry to win, so that
they can have better relations with the U.S. than they have now?

"Only" people? No.

If
so, then can one assume that they are the only one's who WANT those
relations with with the U.S.?

You said "if so"...but I have already answered "no"...so this question
isn't
applicable any longer.

Then, if that is true, are they the only
leaders in the world that are not our enemies?

But "that is NOT true", so this question is not applicable either.
However,
I believe you meant to say "are they the only leaders in the world who
*are*
our enemies". And the answer to that question would also be "no".

You don't seem to understand what YOU have written, I take it. You've
accused Kerry of collaborating with the enemy.

No ****! Really? Well duhhhhhhh....


If it were not so pathetic, it'd be funny!

John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

John H wrote in message . ..
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 13:45:35 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:


"basskisser" wrote in message
. com...
"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...

Are you saying that those five people,in the world, who YOU posted,
are the only people that are saying they'd like Kerry to win, so that
they can have better relations with the U.S. than they have now?

"Only" people? No.

If
so, then can one assume that they are the only one's who WANT those
relations with with the U.S.?

You said "if so"...but I have already answered "no"...so this question
isn't
applicable any longer.

Then, if that is true, are they the only
leaders in the world that are not our enemies?

But "that is NOT true", so this question is not applicable either.
However,
I believe you meant to say "are they the only leaders in the world who
*are*
our enemies". And the answer to that question would also be "no".

You don't seem to understand what YOU have written, I take it. You've
accused Kerry of collaborating with the enemy.

No ****! Really? Well duhhhhhhh....


If it were not so pathetic, it'd be funny!

John H

I know, John. I fully realize that you don't understand the
ramifications of issuing blanket statements like Kerry is
collaborating with the enemy. You see, I asked, so is every country in
the world that backs Kerry our "enemy"?

"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
John H wrote in message
. ..
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 13:45:35 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:


"basskisser" wrote in message
. com...
"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...

Are you saying that those five people,in the world, who YOU
posted,
are the only people that are saying they'd like Kerry to win, so
that
they can have better relations with the U.S. than they have now?

"Only" people? No.

If
so, then can one assume that they are the only one's who WANT
those
relations with with the U.S.?

You said "if so"...but I have already answered "no"...so this
question
isn't
applicable any longer.

Then, if that is true, are they the only
leaders in the world that are not our enemies?

But "that is NOT true", so this question is not applicable either.
However,
I believe you meant to say "are they the only leaders in the world
who
*are*
our enemies". And the answer to that question would also be "no".

You don't seem to understand what YOU have written, I take it. You've
accused Kerry of collaborating with the enemy.

No ****! Really? Well duhhhhhhh....


If it were not so pathetic, it'd be funny!

John H

I know, John. I fully realize that you don't understand the
ramifications of issuing blanket statements like Kerry is
collaborating with the enemy. You see, I asked, so is every country in
the world that backs Kerry our "enemy"?

I might have to add Spain to the list now that the dumbasses elected
Zapatero.

Let's see...
Al Qaeda blows up trains to punish Spain for supporting the U.S. in the war
on Iraq. They demand the withdrawal of troops, and the imbecile Zapatero
agrees. That should send a wonderful message to the enemy: "hit us hard
enough and we'll do whatever you say". That type of thinking in Somalia and
afterwards was the direct reason for 9/11.

Blair, John Howard, and Bush are the only brave, steadfast, and honorable
leaders left in the World...and are the West's last hope before we've been
assimilated by Muslim extremists.

If American's are dumb enough to elect a pacifist at a time we're engaged in
an epic battle for survival, we deserve the fate that befalls us.