JimH wrote:

I understand.

I snipped the remainder of your personal attack Chuck. I see no point
in
discussing this with you any further.


***************

Personal attack?

What a bizarre comment.

I described my own f'd up behavior, specifically exempted you from any
implication that you
behaved in a similar manner, and you interpret that as a "personal
attack"?

Why would you, or anybody else, figure that the behavior I castigated
and described as my own was actually representing that of another
person?

Beats the heck out of me, I mean there would have to be some evidence
or something that would put the lie to my specific assertions that
others, and you specifically, were *not* guilty of the same. I'm sure
that you and I would agree that there isn't any evidence, correct?

You have an odd definintion of a personal attack, I must say.