(Henry Blackmoore) wrote in message hlink.net...
In article , (basskisser) wrote:

"Jim--" wrote in message news:0Jidnb_VPo5XyNPdRVn-
What a thing to say about someone. Unbelievable.

No more unbelievable than someone here claiming that another person
smokes pot, without ANY shred of evidence to back their wild
allegations. Those mood swings, mixed with wild allegations would make
someone suspect that perhaps THAT individual may be in need of help.

Do you use bongs or rolling papers?

Here's the deal. Either you have some knowledge that I smoke pot, or
you are just a blow hard idiot. So, either provide facts, or be known
from now on, as the blow hard idiot, that makes wild, unproven
allegations about someone, just because something pops into your
feeble mind. Facts please. I'll be waiting.

basskisser wrote in message
om...
Here's the deal. Either you have some knowledge that I smoke pot, or
you are just a blow hard idiot. So, either provide facts, or be known
from now on, as the blow hard idiot, that makes wild, unproven
allegations about someone, just because something pops into your
feeble mind. Facts please. I'll be waiting.

Looks like you've been called out Henry.
Might be time to disappear for a few months, as is your usual mo.

"Don White" wrote in message
...

basskisser wrote in message
om...
Here's the deal. Either you have some knowledge that I smoke pot, or
you are just a blow hard idiot. So, either provide facts, or be known
from now on, as the blow hard idiot, that makes wild, unproven
allegations about someone, just because something pops into your
feeble mind. Facts please. I'll be waiting.

Looks like you've been called out Henry.
Might be time to disappear for a few months, as is your usual mo.



Seems as if in the past, basskisser, stated he grew the dreaded weed. So,
would be a pretty safe assumption he smoked it, or he is farming for profit.

On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 18:01:00 GMT, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"Don White" wrote in message
...

basskisser wrote in message
om...
Here's the deal. Either you have some knowledge that I smoke pot, or
you are just a blow hard idiot. So, either provide facts, or be known
from now on, as the blow hard idiot, that makes wild, unproven
allegations about someone, just because something pops into your
feeble mind. Facts please. I'll be waiting.

Looks like you've been called out Henry.
Might be time to disappear for a few months, as is your usual mo.



Seems as if in the past, basskisser, stated he grew the dreaded weed. So,
would be a pretty safe assumption he smoked it, or he is farming for profit.

A couple of little flaws there, neighbor:

First, you'd have to show that basskisser made such an admission (he hasn't, so
far as I can determine). Second, IF the first statement were true (and that's
open to question), you could not logically or reasonably infer both that he used
the crop AND that he grows it to sell.

Since cannabis is not exactly renowned as a decorative houseplant, it is
reasonable to assume that EITHER of the two conclusions is true--but not both.

Come to think of it, though, there ARE many people right her in Northern
California who do NOT use marijuana, but who grow it nevertheless--as a medicine
that has proven benefits.

But I find an argument like this one to be very much a red herring: who the hell
cares whether someone has used cannabis? It's quite a benign substance, as
drugs go. I've just never seen a lot of attraction in anything that basically
makes you stupid.

Give me a nice Balvenie any day.

Joe Parsons

"Joe Parsons" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 18:01:00 GMT, "Calif Bill"

wrote:


"Don White" wrote in message
...

basskisser wrote in message
om...
Here's the deal. Either you have some knowledge that I smoke pot, or
you are just a blow hard idiot. So, either provide facts, or be known
from now on, as the blow hard idiot, that makes wild, unproven
allegations about someone, just because something pops into your
feeble mind. Facts please. I'll be waiting.

Looks like you've been called out Henry.
Might be time to disappear for a few months, as is your usual mo.



Seems as if in the past, basskisser, stated he grew the dreaded weed.
So,
would be a pretty safe assumption he smoked it, or he is farming for
profit.

A couple of little flaws there, neighbor:

First, you'd have to show that basskisser made such an admission (he
hasn't, so
far as I can determine). Second, IF the first statement were true (and
that's
open to question), you could not logically or reasonably infer both that
he used
the crop AND that he grows it to sell.

Since cannabis is not exactly renowned as a decorative houseplant, it is
reasonable to assume that EITHER of the two conclusions is true--but not
both.

Come to think of it, though, there ARE many people right her in Northern
California who do NOT use marijuana, but who grow it nevertheless--as a
medicine
that has proven benefits.

But I find an argument like this one to be very much a red herring: who
the hell
cares whether someone has used cannabis? It's quite a benign substance,
as
drugs go. I've just never seen a lot of attraction in anything that
basically
makes you stupid.

Give me a nice Balvenie any day.

Joe Parsons


I put the "OR" in the statement Joe. So he could be doing either OR both.
I know some who did do both and some who just smoked the stuff. Never knew
nyone who grew, and did not partake. Any good farmer has to check his crop.
As to the admission, was a few years ago, under one of his posting alias he
commented about growing the Dreaded Weed. The funniest growing story, was
about 25 years ago, I owned an construction equipment leasing company in
Concord area of Calif. The yard was shared with another company, whose
owner was from Missouri and kept goats as both a pet and to keep the weeds
down. His son would fence off an area of his yard and always when the dope
was about 12" tall the goats would get in and harvest it. There is
absolutely no way to keep goats contained. I personally think it ought to
be legalized with the only criteria, is you drive while toking, you lose the
car and the license. One of the problems of cannibis use is there is no
cheap and easy test like a breath-a-lyzer to test for it while possible DUI.
Bill

Bill

Bill

"Calif Bill" wrote in message hlink.net...
"Joe Parsons" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 18:01:00 GMT, "Calif Bill"

wrote:


"Don White" wrote in message
...

basskisser wrote in message
om...
Here's the deal. Either you have some knowledge that I smoke pot, or
you are just a blow hard idiot. So, either provide facts, or be known
from now on, as the blow hard idiot, that makes wild, unproven
allegations about someone, just because something pops into your
feeble mind. Facts please. I'll be waiting.

Looks like you've been called out Henry.
Might be time to disappear for a few months, as is your usual mo.



Seems as if in the past, basskisser, stated he grew the dreaded weed.
So,
would be a pretty safe assumption he smoked it, or he is farming for
profit.

A couple of little flaws there, neighbor:

First, you'd have to show that basskisser made such an admission (he
hasn't, so
far as I can determine). Second, IF the first statement were true (and
that's
open to question), you could not logically or reasonably infer both that
he used
the crop AND that he grows it to sell.

Since cannabis is not exactly renowned as a decorative houseplant, it is
reasonable to assume that EITHER of the two conclusions is true--but not
both.

Come to think of it, though, there ARE many people right her in Northern
California who do NOT use marijuana, but who grow it nevertheless--as a
medicine
that has proven benefits.

But I find an argument like this one to be very much a red herring: who
the hell
cares whether someone has used cannabis? It's quite a benign substance,
as
drugs go. I've just never seen a lot of attraction in anything that
basically
makes you stupid.

Give me a nice Balvenie any day.

Joe Parsons


I put the "OR" in the statement Joe. So he could be doing either OR both.
I know some who did do both and some who just smoked the stuff. Never knew
nyone who grew, and did not partake.
Bill

So, you NEVER knew anyone who tried to grow pot, but didn't smoke it,
huh? I realize you think you know it all, although you prove yourself
quite inept, usually, and again you are wrong. I grow radishes, too,
and wouldn't put one of those nasty things even close to my mouth.

I hate to contribute to the OT threads, but his one is way too funny to
pass. You continually state that you are smart and everyone else is stupid.
Now I ask you what would you call someone who made a public post that he is
growing pot, breaking the law and admitting it in a public forum, but does
not smoke it?

This might be the epitamy of poor judgement and lack of brain capacity.


"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"Calif Bill" wrote in message
hlink.net...
"Joe Parsons" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 18:01:00 GMT, "Calif Bill"

wrote:


"Don White" wrote in message
...

basskisser wrote in message
om...
Here's the deal. Either you have some knowledge that I smoke pot,
or
you are just a blow hard idiot. So, either provide facts, or be
known
from now on, as the blow hard idiot, that makes wild, unproven
allegations about someone, just because something pops into your
feeble mind. Facts please. I'll be waiting.

Looks like you've been called out Henry.
Might be time to disappear for a few months, as is your usual mo.



Seems as if in the past, basskisser, stated he grew the dreaded weed.
So,
would be a pretty safe assumption he smoked it, or he is farming for
profit.

A couple of little flaws there, neighbor:

First, you'd have to show that basskisser made such an admission (he
hasn't, so
far as I can determine). Second, IF the first statement were true
(and
that's
open to question), you could not logically or reasonably infer both
that
he used
the crop AND that he grows it to sell.

Since cannabis is not exactly renowned as a decorative houseplant, it
is
reasonable to assume that EITHER of the two conclusions is true--but
not
both.

Come to think of it, though, there ARE many people right her in
Northern
California who do NOT use marijuana, but who grow it nevertheless--as
a
medicine
that has proven benefits.

But I find an argument like this one to be very much a red herring:
who
the hell
cares whether someone has used cannabis? It's quite a benign
substance,
as
drugs go. I've just never seen a lot of attraction in anything that
basically
makes you stupid.

Give me a nice Balvenie any day.

Joe Parsons


I put the "OR" in the statement Joe. So he could be doing either OR
both.
I know some who did do both and some who just smoked the stuff. Never
knew
nyone who grew, and did not partake.
Bill

So, you NEVER knew anyone who tried to grow pot, but didn't smoke it,
huh? I realize you think you know it all, although you prove yourself
quite inept, usually, and again you are wrong. I grow radishes, too,
and wouldn't put one of those nasty things even close to my mouth.

(Since Calif Bill's post has not hit my server, I'm responding here)

On 14 Mar 2004 06:56:49 -0800, (basskisser) wrote:

[snip]

would be a pretty safe assumption he smoked it, or he is farming for
profit.

A couple of little flaws there, neighbor:

First, you'd have to show that basskisser made such an admission (he
hasn't, so
far as I can determine). Second, IF the first statement were true (and
that's
open to question), you could not logically or reasonably infer both that
he used
the crop AND that he grows it to sell.

Since cannabis is not exactly renowned as a decorative houseplant, it is
reasonable to assume that EITHER of the two conclusions is true--but not
both.

Come to think of it, though, there ARE many people right her in Northern
California who do NOT use marijuana, but who grow it nevertheless--as a
medicine
that has proven benefits.

But I find an argument like this one to be very much a red herring: who
the hell
cares whether someone has used cannabis? It's quite a benign substance,
as
drugs go. I've just never seen a lot of attraction in anything that
basically
makes you stupid.

Give me a nice Balvenie any day.

Joe Parsons


I put the "OR" in the statement Joe. So he could be doing either OR both.

My bad...sorta. The "or" is binary--it does not allow for both. But I did make
an error, treating your "or" as though it were an "and."

I know some who did do both and some who just smoked the stuff. Never knew
nyone who grew, and did not partake.

I've known a number who did--right here in Northern California.

But my original statement stands: that the issue if whether an individual has
smoked pot is a red herring--who the hell cares, unless they're on some sort of
anti-drug campaign? Then, their use of that drug is simple hypocrisy.

But setting that aside, you are making an assumption that has yet to be
proven--that basskisser does, in fact, regularly smoke the killer weed. Until
and unless you do that, any assertions following are built on quicksand.

Joe Parsons


Bill

So, you NEVER knew anyone who tried to grow pot, but didn't smoke it,
huh? I realize you think you know it all, although you prove yourself
quite inept, usually, and again you are wrong. I grow radishes, too,
and wouldn't put one of those nasty things even close to my mouth.

In article , wrote:

I've just never seen a lot of attraction in anything that basically
makes you stupid.

'asskisser finds it to be highly attractive....



Give me a nice Balvenie any day.

Joe Parsons

On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 22:17:32 GMT, Joe Parsons
wrote:

On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 18:01:00 GMT, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"Don White" wrote in message
...

basskisser wrote in message
om...
Here's the deal. Either you have some knowledge that I smoke pot, or
you are just a blow hard idiot. So, either provide facts, or be known
from now on, as the blow hard idiot, that makes wild, unproven
allegations about someone, just because something pops into your
feeble mind. Facts please. I'll be waiting.

Looks like you've been called out Henry.
Might be time to disappear for a few months, as is your usual mo.



Seems as if in the past, basskisser, stated he grew the dreaded weed. So,
would be a pretty safe assumption he smoked it, or he is farming for profit.

A couple of little flaws there, neighbor:

First, you'd have to show that basskisser made such an admission (he hasn't, so
far as I can determine). Second, IF the first statement were true (and that's

http://www.google.com/groups?selm=8q...nnrp1.deja.com

Steve