Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 16:24:35 GMT, "Jim," wrote:
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/opinio..._thomas08.html Extract WASHINGTON -- White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan says President Bush was "pleased" with the latest investigation that blames CIA analysts for the false information that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. That's the reason Bush invaded Iraq, remember? Once again it's those low-level bureaucrats who took us into war. And once again a panel of "don't rock the boat" establishment figures has let the commander in chief off the hook. Any other president would have blown his stack. Instead, Bush honored former CIA Director George Tenet with the Presidential Medal of Freedom. Why? If the investigation was well conducted, why would 'any other president have blown his stack'? Would any other president have wanted a *crappy* investigation? Being pleased with the performance of the investigators does not mean being pleased with the providers of bad information. If Tenet had just been fired, you'd be complaining that Bush did it because Tenet was a Clinton hire. \ Get off it, Jimcomma. -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Progressive Message on the President's Budget | General |