On Fri, 05 Mar 2004 14:10:59 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 05 Mar 2004 04:04:52 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"Charles" wrote in message
...


Doug Kanter wrote:

But YOU
suggested that someone's knowledge or expertise are diminished if
they
crossed over a certain line, whether that line be moral or legal.
That
is
absolutely absurd.

Ah, and that's exactly the crux of the matter with you "liberals".

Morality or legality means little or nothing to you. This might be
because those like yourself who take such a position are themselves
immoral, and must defend others immoral like themselves.

President Clinton abused the power of his office by taking advantage of
an employee (and a women), but that is a non-sequiter to fellow
im.moral.ists and phony feminists.

krause is, by the way, a good example of this, having been a easy case
study in immorality defending immorality.

If this post does not get a rise out of you, kanter, then you really
are
a stooge of krause, who sent you an email telling you not to reply to
me.

-- Charlie

Let me make sure I understand you correctly. Let's say that today you're
an
electrician with 30 years' worth of experience. Tomorrow, you somehow end
up
in bed with a woman who's not your wife. Are you saying that the moment
that
happens, your trade skills vanish?

This is a simple yes or no question. Do your trade skills vanish? Yes, or
no. No other comments. Yes, or no.

Yeah, but let's say I was a gigolo and my wife was coming through the
door with a butcher knife. Then what happens to this line of argument?

John H

Then your negotiating skills quickly come into play. :-)

Hee, hee!

John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!