Henry Blackmoore wrote:

In article , "Doug Kanter" wrote:

"Henry Blackmoore" wrote in message
rthlink.net...
In article ,
(basskisser) wrote:
was getting at

And you are an expert at ???

Quite a few things, actually. What is your point?

you figure it out...



I thought we did that already. Your point is that if someone's behavior
doesn't align with your moral compass, their entire history of expertise is
erased.

No, but it is certainly suspect.

What is your point? That we don't need moral and ethical standards at all?
Or that there shouldn't be punitive measures in place for those that cross
over the line?

If moral and ethical standards concern you, you cannot be a Bush supporter.

On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 16:34:36 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

Henry Blackmoore wrote:

In article , "Doug Kanter" wrote:

"Henry Blackmoore" wrote in message
arthlink.net...
In article ,
(basskisser) wrote:
was getting at

And you are an expert at ???

Quite a few things, actually. What is your point?

you figure it out...



I thought we did that already. Your point is that if someone's behavior
doesn't align with your moral compass, their entire history of expertise is
erased.

No, but it is certainly suspect.

What is your point? That we don't need moral and ethical standards at all?
Or that there shouldn't be punitive measures in place for those that cross
over the line?

If moral and ethical standards concern you, you cannot be a Bush supporter.

Spoken by one with only the *highest* of moral and ethical standards!

John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

In article , Harry Krause wrote:

Henry Blackmoore wrote:

In article , "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"Henry Blackmoore" wrote in message
arthlink.net...
In article ,
(basskisser) wrote:
was getting at

And you are an expert at ???

Quite a few things, actually. What is your point?

you figure it out...



I thought we did that already. Your point is that if someone's behavior
doesn't align with your moral compass, their entire history of expertise is
erased.

No, but it is certainly suspect.

What is your point? That we don't need moral and ethical standards at all?
Or that there shouldn't be punitive measures in place for those that cross
over the line?

If moral and ethical standards concern you, you cannot be a Bush supporter.

I can't support Kerry either...