| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Lawrence's Ship of Death...
John H wrote in message . ..
On 4 Mar 2004 06:20:31 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: John H wrote in message . .. On 3 Mar 2004 05:27:33 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: John H wrote in message . .. On 2 Mar 2004 12:02:01 -0800, (basskisser) wrote: "John Gaquin" wrote in message ... "John H" wrote in message None would be so bold as to compare their meager intellectual capacity with your's, Harry. You have demonstrated your acumen and intellectual integrity repeatedly. Who could hope to compare? snipped b'asskisser, do you always mean *exactly* what you say? Do you not, sometimes, expect people to understand what you are *trying* to say even though you aren't completely precise? Like, for example, if you misspell a few words, or use them incorrectly, don't you expect people to overlook that? Don't you expect that even when you are telling them how *stupid* they are? Perhaps I was just giving you the benefit of the doubt. Giving ME the benefit of doubt? Haahaaa!!! You have NO MORE CLUE about statistical processes than the man in the moon, yet you TRIED to come off here like you do! Now, WHY did you even bother to post Cochran's approximation? I truly don't understand. Are you under the impression that that was what was used? I'm really quite curious, here. Why DID You post that particular analysis? Purely, and I mean purely like in 100% pure, purely to get your reaction. I needed a chuckle on this damp Thursday morning. Thank you! No problem, I always try to react when someone tries to act like the know something of a particular subject, and DO NOT. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| viking ship plans ripoff | General | |||
| On Topic: Anniversary of Jack London's death | General | |||
| Parker Death Trap | General | |||
| Death be not proud | General | |||
Hybrid Mode
