OT on IRAQ
 

Harry Krause wrote:

Where are the videos kept of the civilian targets hit by "accident"? Do
the AF flacks release those, too?

Have you deleted from google the post you made after 9-11 where you
advocated carpet bombing Afghanistan? Seems you cared not a wit who was killed.

Oh, right, your morality (or lack of it) is politically driven by the
highest bidder.

-- Charlie

OT on IRAQ
 

On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 07:28:41 -0500, DSK wrote:

John H wrote:
The post to which you responded had absolutely nothing to do with
rules of engagement.

Other than being about 'rules of engagement' and alleged violations of
same, yeah.



Before you jump and call names, read the posts, if you please.

I'm not calling names, just stating facts. And your posts have become
just more predictable boring fact-free BushCo cheerleading. At this
point I read very few of yours or Nobby's posts.

DSK

Please point to some (or one) of my cheerleading posts. I don't recall
ever 'cheerleading'. I may have pointed out just how fallacious some
of the anti-Bush tripe is, but that's not cheerleading.

When someone says that American soldiers purposely target innocent
women and children and villages for bombing in Iraq, I will present my
feelings on the subject. If you call this cheerleading, then I assume
that you consider any post which is not 'anti-Bush' a cheerleading
post.

John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

OT on IRAQ
 

On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 07:28:41 -0500, DSK wrote:

At this
point I read very few of yours or Nobby's posts.

DSK

You watch how NOYB changes his tune if people start taking the trek to
Mexico for cheap dental care along with a vacation. Seems he doesn't
have any problem with computer tech jobs going offshore, we'll see how
it is with offshore medical care. Course, by the time it starts
happening, it will be to late. Lets see Mr High and mighty squeal
when he's competing with Mexican dentists.

bb

OT on IRAQ
 

John H wrote:

Please point to some (or one) of my cheerleading posts

Any post where you "discuss" Bush's policies regarding the environment, the
economy, his lapse in National Guard service, the Middle East, etc etc.

Unlike Nobby, who occasionally shows a sense of humor (and who is secretly
a Socialist agitator), you are totally predictable and boring. What's sad
is that you are a teacher (or claim to be one) and are 99% clueless. If
Rove & Cheney decided to make President Bush announce that water flowed up
hill, you'd be pushing for a front row seat in the chorus angrily
denouncing all the ignorant liberals who said it flowed down hill.

DSK

OT on IRAQ
 

On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 14:49:51 -0500, DSK wrote:

John H wrote:

Please point to some (or one) of my cheerleading posts

Any post where you "discuss" Bush's policies regarding the environment, the
economy, his lapse in National Guard service, the Middle East, etc etc.

Unlike Nobby, who occasionally shows a sense of humor (and who is secretly
a Socialist agitator), you are totally predictable and boring. What's sad
is that you are a teacher (or claim to be one) and are 99% clueless. If
Rove & Cheney decided to make President Bush announce that water flowed up
hill, you'd be pushing for a front row seat in the chorus angrily
denouncing all the ignorant liberals who said it flowed down hill.

DSK

Well, my goodness. Thank God for kill files! Add me to yours soonest.
Actually, refuting the *arguments* presented by some of the folks on
the NG has nothing to do with my politics. Much of the bull**** posted
is simply that. That I may argue against the logic doesn't mean I'm
'cheerleading' for Bush.

Nevertheless, kill files are easy to use, the author is "John H". Go
for it.

John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

OT on IRAQ
 

John H wrote:

Actually, refuting the *arguments* presented by some of the folks on
the NG has nothing to do with my politics. Much of the bull**** posted
is simply that.

And the fact that you don't "refute" anything, but simply argue tirelessly and
sieze on any excuse or outright lie is 1- why you are a cheerleader and 2- why I
say you are clueless. Your current discussion with Doug Kanter on environmental
policy is a case in point.

Or the Iraq situation... you started out saying you "had reservations" and ended
up thumping the tub for Bush, capping it all with saying our troops should not
follow any rules of engagement or the Geneva Conventions. Yeah, let's just kill
any random Iraqi, or better yet all of 'em... brilliant military policy....
which is why I called you a pin head.


Nevertheless, kill files are easy to use, the author is "John H". Go
for it.

I don't kill file anybody. I just don't read posts I'm not interested in.... by
subject or author.

Bye now. I'm going to try and increase my percentage of boating related posts
here.

Doug King

OT on IRAQ
 

On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 16:20:36 -0500, DSK wrote:

John H wrote:

Actually, refuting the *arguments* presented by some of the folks on
the NG has nothing to do with my politics. Much of the bull**** posted
is simply that.

And the fact that you don't "refute" anything, but simply argue tirelessly and
sieze on any excuse or outright lie is 1- why you are a cheerleader and 2- why I
say you are clueless. Your current discussion with Doug Kanter on environmental
policy is a case in point.

Or the Iraq situation... you started out saying you "had reservations" and ended
up thumping the tub for Bush, capping it all with saying our troops should not
follow any rules of engagement or the Geneva Conventions. Yeah, let's just kill
any random Iraqi, or better yet all of 'em... brilliant military policy....
which is why I called you a pin head.


Nevertheless, kill files are easy to use, the author is "John H". Go
for it.

I don't kill file anybody. I just don't read posts I'm not interested in.... by
subject or author.

Bye now. I'm going to try and increase my percentage of boating related posts
here.

Doug King

I said that our troops shouldn't follow rules of engagement? Show me!
I commented that showing Saddam on TV was not high on my list of
bothersome things (or words to that effect). I also said I didn't give
a rats ass, a phrase which had just been used by NOYB. The fact that
we had both used that phrase prompted my 'great minds' comment.

If you'll recall, I was arguing a statement alleging that American
soldiers had targetted and killed innocent civilians. I've probably
had more experience with rules of engagement than most folks here.

John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

OT on IRAQ
 

"DSK" wrote in message
...

If
Rove & Cheney decided to make President Bush announce that water flowed up
hill

Water *does* flow uphill to money.

OT on IRAQ
 

"bb" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 07:28:41 -0500, DSK wrote:

At this
point I read very few of yours or Nobby's posts.

DSK

You watch how NOYB changes his tune if people start taking the trek to
Mexico for cheap dental care along with a vacation.

You think Mexican water can make you sick? Try putting Mexican dental
instruments in your mouth!

There are people who go to Mexico for cheap dental care now. I know,
because I've seen them here after-the-fact to correct the atrocities
committed in their mouths.

Seems he doesn't
have any problem with computer tech jobs going offshore, we'll see how
it is with offshore medical care. Course, by the time it starts
happening, it will be to late. Lets see Mr High and mighty squeal
when he's competing with Mexican dentists.

I don't do gold jacket crowns on front teeth...so I won't have many Mexican
competitors.

However, I do have a wealthy Mexican man and his wife who have done a little
over $30,000 in dentistry with me. They would fly in almost weekly from
Cancun for their appointments. The wife had already completed nearly that
much work in her mouth while in Mexico. Surprisingly, the work was
first-rate...but the Mexican dentist's fees were higher than mine!

OT on IRAQ
 

John H wrote:

On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 07:28:41 -0500, DSK wrote:

John H wrote:
The post to which you responded had absolutely nothing to do with
rules of engagement.

Other than being about 'rules of engagement' and alleged violations of
same, yeah.



Before you jump and call names, read the posts, if you please.

I'm not calling names, just stating facts. And your posts have become
just more predictable boring fact-free BushCo cheerleading. At this
point I read very few of yours or Nobby's posts.

DSK

Please point to some (or one) of my cheerleading posts. I don't recall
ever 'cheerleading'. I may have pointed out just how fallacious some
of the anti-Bush tripe is, but that's not cheerleading.

When someone says that American soldiers purposely target innocent
women and children and villages for bombing in Iraq, I will present my
feelings on the subject. If you call this cheerleading, then I assume
that you consider any post which is not 'anti-Bush' a cheerleading
post.

John H


Do you ever have anything other than simple-minded thoughts, John?