"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message

news:c3dhc2g=.6411803546648fe5e76cec188a5e909f@107 7816413.nulluser.com...
NOYB wrote:

The Facts Show Increase of Jobs Under Bush

Wednesday, Feb. 25, 2004

The media and Democrats keep repeating it over and over: "2.3 million
jobs
lost" since President Bush took office. His could be the worst job
record
since before World War II, they claim.
One little problem: It's not true.

Puh-lease...these apologeticas

Well, then you explain the large disparity between the Payroll Survey
data
and the Household Survey data. Can't? I didn't think so. The Payroll
Survey (that'd be the piece of crappola you Dems keep bringing up) is
flawed...and fails to account for those employed by new businesses...or
those who are self-employed.

Ah, yes...the newly self-employed...laid-off workers who can't find work.

Many a millionaire started off as a laid-off worker who became self-employed
out of necessity. Working for a corporation leaves a lot to be desired.
For many of the workers, getting laid-off may be a blessing in disguise.

Harry have you read his web site, I would have thought he would have some
concrete plans, but nope, nothing there besides nice sound bites.

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message

news:c3dhc2g=.6411803546648fe5e76cec188a5e909f@107 7816413.nulluser.com...
NOYB wrote:

The Facts Show Increase of Jobs Under Bush

Wednesday, Feb. 25, 2004

The media and Democrats keep repeating it over and over: "2.3 million
jobs
lost" since President Bush took office. His could be the worst job
record
since before World War II, they claim.
One little problem: It's not true.

Puh-lease...these apologeticas

Well, then you explain the large disparity between the Payroll Survey
data
and the Household Survey data. Can't? I didn't think so. The Payroll
Survey (that'd be the piece of crappola you Dems keep bringing up) is
flawed...and fails to account for those employed by new businesses...or
those who are self-employed.

Ah, yes...the newly self-employed...laid-off workers who can't find work.

NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message

news:c3dhc2g=.6411803546648fe5e76cec188a5e909f@107 7816413.nulluser.com...
NOYB wrote:

The Facts Show Increase of Jobs Under Bush

Wednesday, Feb. 25, 2004

The media and Democrats keep repeating it over and over: "2.3 million
jobs
lost" since President Bush took office. His could be the worst job
record
since before World War II, they claim.
One little problem: It's not true.

Puh-lease...these apologeticas

Well, then you explain the large disparity between the Payroll Survey
data
and the Household Survey data. Can't? I didn't think so. The Payroll
Survey (that'd be the piece of crappola you Dems keep bringing up) is
flawed...and fails to account for those employed by new businesses...or
those who are self-employed.

Ah, yes...the newly self-employed...laid-off workers who can't find work.

Many a millionaire started off as a laid-off worker who became self-employed
out of necessity. Working for a corporation leaves a lot to be desired.
For many of the workers, getting laid-off may be a blessing in disguise.


Are you testing the next dumb statement to come out of the Bush
Administration?

On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 01:13:37 +0000, NOYB wrote:


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
news:c1m2mm$1i79b5$1@ID-

Kerry has announced a number of plans

Oh yeah? Then name *one*.

Come on , Harry, name just *one* little plan Kerry has laid forth to stem
the flow of manufacturing jobs.

Geez guy, this is the internet, read for yourself:

http://www.johnkerry.com/

"thunder" wrote in message
news
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 01:13:37 +0000, NOYB wrote:


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
news:c1m2mm$1i79b5$1@ID-

Kerry has announced a number of plans

Oh yeah? Then name *one*.

Come on , Harry, name just *one* little plan Kerry has laid forth to
stem
the flow of manufacturing jobs.

Geez guy, this is the internet, read for yourself:

http://www.johnkerry.com/

Thanks for the link. I saw where Kerry blamed Bush for the loss of
manufacturing jobs...but there is no detailed plan on how Kerry would deal
with the issue. Go ahead and look for yourself. See if you can post one
Kerry plan for stopping the loss of manufacturing jobs overseas.

Harry ,,, why do you accuse someone else of making a dumb statement ?? When
you said,,

""Ah, yes...the newly self-employed...laid-off workers who can't find
work.""

You know these newly laid off workers, they are the uncompetitive ones, the
ones who have landed in this position because of their own stupidity. The
reason they cannot find work there Harry is because they will only work for
a ridiculous amount of money, with all the fringes. They are so spoiled by
the ridiculous packages they have had historically that they now are ruined
and will not work for anyone for less than 50,000 per year, even if it is
picking cherries.
The union mentality. Cannot find work??? I think not, I think they are
ruined, I wouldn't want to hire an ex union worker, never.






"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message


news:c3dhc2g=.6411803546648fe5e76cec188a5e909f@107 7816413.nulluser.com...
NOYB wrote:

The Facts Show Increase of Jobs Under Bush

Wednesday, Feb. 25, 2004

The media and Democrats keep repeating it over and over: "2.3
million
jobs
lost" since President Bush took office. His could be the worst job
record
since before World War II, they claim.
One little problem: It's not true.

Puh-lease...these apologeticas

Well, then you explain the large disparity between the Payroll Survey
data
and the Household Survey data. Can't? I didn't think so. The
Payroll
Survey (that'd be the piece of crappola you Dems keep bringing up) is
flawed...and fails to account for those employed by new
businesses...or
those who are self-employed.

Ah, yes...the newly self-employed...laid-off workers who can't find
work.

Many a millionaire started off as a laid-off worker who became
self-employed
out of necessity. Working for a corporation leaves a lot to be desired.
For many of the workers, getting laid-off may be a blessing in disguise.


Are you testing the next dumb statement to come out of the Bush
Administration?

"NOYB" wrote in message
om...

"thunder" wrote in message
news
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 01:13:37 +0000, NOYB wrote:


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
news:c1m2mm$1i79b5$1@ID-

Kerry has announced a number of plans

Oh yeah? Then name *one*.

Come on , Harry, name just *one* little plan Kerry has laid forth to
stem
the flow of manufacturing jobs.

Geez guy, this is the internet, read for yourself:

http://www.johnkerry.com/

Thanks for the link. I saw where Kerry blamed Bush for the loss of
manufacturing jobs...but there is no detailed plan on how Kerry would
deal
with the issue. Go ahead and look for yourself. See if you can post
one
Kerry plan for stopping the loss of manufacturing jobs overseas.



He has no room to talk about divisiveness either ......from his web site

"As president, I will put American government and our legal system back
on the side of women."

" Tuuk" wrote in message
news
Harry ,,, why do you accuse someone else of making a dumb statement ??
When
you said,,

""Ah, yes...the newly self-employed...laid-off workers who can't find
work.""

You know these newly laid off workers, they are the uncompetitive ones,
the
ones who have landed in this position because of their own stupidity.
The
reason they cannot find work there Harry is because they will only work
for
a ridiculous amount of money, with all the fringes. They are so spoiled
by
the ridiculous packages they have had historically that they now are
ruined
and will not work for anyone for less than 50,000 per year, even if it
is
picking cherries.
The union mentality. Cannot find work??? I think not, I think they are
ruined, I wouldn't want to hire an ex union worker, never.

Actually, those recently laid off self employed are the ones that have the
drive and determination to make it on their own, the union slobs would be in
line at the unemployment office waiting for the guvmint handout.







"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in
message



news:c3dhc2g=.6411803546648fe5e76cec188a5e909f@107 7816413.nulluser.com...
NOYB wrote:

The Facts Show Increase of Jobs Under Bush

Wednesday, Feb. 25, 2004

The media and Democrats keep repeating it over and over: "2.3
million
jobs
lost" since President Bush took office. His could be the worst
job
record
since before World War II, they claim.
One little problem: It's not true.

Puh-lease...these apologeticas

Well, then you explain the large disparity between the Payroll
Survey
data
and the Household Survey data. Can't? I didn't think so. The
Payroll
Survey (that'd be the piece of crappola you Dems keep bringing
up) is
flawed...and fails to account for those employed by new
businesses...or
those who are self-employed.

Ah, yes...the newly self-employed...laid-off workers who can't find
work.

Many a millionaire started off as a laid-off worker who became
self-employed
out of necessity. Working for a corporation leaves a lot to be
desired.
For many of the workers, getting laid-off may be a blessing in
disguise.


Are you testing the next dumb statement to come out of the Bush
Administration?

Tuuk wrote in message
news snip usual idiotic blathering...
The union mentality. Cannot find work??? I think not, I think they are
ruined, I wouldn't want to hire an ex union worker, never.

I suppose you'd rather hire those poor illegal immigrants smuggled in on a
regular basis.
They will work for peanuts and keep their mouths shut......as you exploit
them for your own gain.
Shame on you!

On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 12:26:26 +0000, NOYB wrote:


Thanks for the link. I saw where Kerry blamed Bush for the loss of
manufacturing jobs...but there is no detailed plan on how Kerry would deal
with the issue. Go ahead and look for yourself. See if you can post one
Kerry plan for stopping the loss of manufacturing jobs overseas.

To me, issues and campaign promises aren't very important in a President.
I look for two qualities, honor and competence, then, if both candidates
have those qualities, I'll look at the issues. Unfortunately, I rarely
get to the issues. I'm still judging Kerry, but have more than enough
information to judge Bush incompetent.