Survey: Anger against Bush growing louder
 

http://www.salon.com/news/wire/2004/...ger/index.html

In Arizona, Judy Donovan says she feels desperate for a new president.
In Tennessee, Robert Wilson says he finds the president revolting. In
Washington state, Maria Yurasek says she'd vote for a dog if it could
beat President Bush.

Survey: Anger against Bush growing louder
 

"Jim" wrote in message
...
http://www.salon.com/news/wire/2004/...ger/index.html


Salon.com, eh? Are they getting their news from moveon.org?

Survey: Anger against Bush growing louder
 

Jim wrote:

http://www.salon.com/news/wire/2004/...ger/index.html

In Arizona, Judy Donovan says she feels desperate for a new president.
In Tennessee, Robert Wilson says he finds the president revolting. In
Washington state, Maria Yurasek says she'd vote for a dog if it could
beat President Bush.


I need maria's address...i have some extra Tellow Dog Democrat pins.

Survey: Anger against Bush growing louder
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Jim wrote:

http://www.salon.com/news/wire/2004/...ger/index.html

In Arizona, Judy Donovan says she feels desperate for a new president.
In Tennessee, Robert Wilson says he finds the president revolting. In
Washington state, Maria Yurasek says she'd vote for a dog if it could
beat President Bush.


I need maria's address...i have some extra Tellow Dog Democrat pins.

Try the local chapter of Satanic worship.

Here's the complete quote by Maria:

"Maria Yurasek, who attended a caucus at Spokane's Chase Middle School, said
Dean "reminds me of an old boyfriend. He seems angry. I don't think Dean can
beat Bush. I would vote for a dog if he could beat Bush. I would vote for
Satan."
------------------------------------------------------

I guess we can add "Satan worshippers" to the Democratic base of
homosexuals, convicted felons, and sexual deviants.

Survey: Anger against Bush growing louder
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message

......a Democratic Party more unified and more focused,

I suppose that's why there were 10 candidates (or, was it 11?) beating the
s%#t out of each other for 6 months -- because they were unified and
focused.

Survey: Anger against Bush growing louder
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

"Jim" wrote in message
...
http://www.salon.com/news/wire/2004/...ger/index.html


Salon.com, eh? Are they getting their news from moveon.org?





You ought to read some of the quotes in that piece, especially the ones
from GOP Pollster Luntz:

``They really have a head of steam up against Bush,'' said Andrew Kohut,
director of the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press. He said
the level of political polarization surrounding Bush, the division
between Republicans who favor him and Democrats who don't, exceeds even
that for President Clinton in September 1998 during the impeachment
battle.

Which is precisely why it won't matter. When all was said and done, the
Democrats circled their wagons and protected their man.


Plenty of presidents have generated intense feelings, of course, but
Democrats -- and even some Republicans -- think the phenomenon is
outsized this year.

``I've never seen a Democratic Party more unified and more focused, and
the anger helps do just that,'' said GOP pollster Frank Luntz.

Hate is a powerful motivator...and God knows, the Democrats are the party of
hate and divisiveness. Hell, they almost have a monopoly on it...so it's no
surprise, really, that hate is the emotion that drives them.

``The
intensity level is just so high. They're using four-letter words to
describe him.''

In a recent focus group that Luntz conducted for MSNBC, technicians had
to adjust the volume levels because the Bush-haters were ``so gosh-darn
loud'' they were drowning out the president's supporters, who were more
numerous, Luntz said. ``It was a real problem.''

The Bush supporters "were more numerous". That's all that really matters.
Screaming louder than the other guys gets you nowhere.




----------------------

Delightful.

You enjoy being associated with a party whose sole platform is "hatred"?

Survey: Anger against Bush growing louder
 

You must have missed this part "WASHINGTON (AP)"

Salon backs their news with Respected references. Can you say the same
for Newsmax?

NOYB wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...

http://www.salon.com/news/wire/2004/...ger/index.html



Salon.com, eh? Are they getting their news from moveon.org?

Survey: Anger against Bush growing louder
 

I don't like calling someone a liar, but when the shoe fits... Your
quote is an outright lie. Suggest you actually READ the article in
Salon. OR did you post the Newsmax version?

NOYB QUOTE

"Maria Yurasek, who attended a caucus at Spokane's Chase Middle School,
said Dean "reminds me of an old boyfriend. He seems angry. I don't think
Dean can beat Bush. I would vote for a dog if he could beat Bush. I
would vote for Satan."

NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Jim wrote:


http://www.salon.com/news/wire/2004/...ger/index.html

In Arizona, Judy Donovan says she feels desperate for a new president.
In Tennessee, Robert Wilson says he finds the president revolting. In
Washington state, Maria Yurasek says she'd vote for a dog if it could
beat President Bush.


I need maria's address...i have some extra Tellow Dog Democrat pins.


Try the local chapter of Satanic worship.

Here's the complete quote by Maria:

"Maria Yurasek, who attended a caucus at Spokane's Chase Middle School, said
Dean "reminds me of an old boyfriend. He seems angry. I don't think Dean can
beat Bush. I would vote for a dog if he could beat Bush. I would vote for
Satan."
------------------------------------------------------

I guess we can add "Satan worshippers" to the Democratic base of
homosexuals, convicted felons, and sexual deviants.

Survey: Anger against Bush growing louder
 

"NOYB" wrote in message
...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Jim wrote:

http://www.salon.com/news/wire/2004/...ger/index.html

In Arizona, Judy Donovan says she feels desperate for a new president.
In Tennessee, Robert Wilson says he finds the president revolting. In
Washington state, Maria Yurasek says she'd vote for a dog if it could
beat President Bush.


I need maria's address...i have some extra Tellow Dog Democrat pins.

Try the local chapter of Satanic worship.

Here's the complete quote by Maria:

"Maria Yurasek, who attended a caucus at Spokane's Chase Middle School,
said
Dean "reminds me of an old boyfriend. He seems angry. I don't think Dean
can
beat Bush. I would vote for a dog if he could beat Bush. I would vote for
Satan."
------------------------------------------------------

I guess we can add "Satan worshippers" to the Democratic base of
homosexuals, convicted felons, and sexual deviants.


I assume by your method of reasoning, you are also stating that she has some
sort of thing going with dogs?

Hmmm, it would seem that you are taking this a step beyond what was stated:
http://www.theolympian.com/home/spec...08/31980.shtml

As Mr. Parsons is fond of saying, you tell a great deal about yourself when
you make these silly assertions.

Mark Browne

Survey: Anger against Bush growing louder
 

"Mark Browne" wrote in message
news:UQc_b.103914$jk2.472851@attbi_s53...

"NOYB" wrote in message
...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Jim wrote:

http://www.salon.com/news/wire/2004/...ger/index.html

In Arizona, Judy Donovan says she feels desperate for a new
president.
In Tennessee, Robert Wilson says he finds the president revolting.
In
Washington state, Maria Yurasek says she'd vote for a dog if it
could
beat President Bush.


I need maria's address...i have some extra Tellow Dog Democrat pins.

Try the local chapter of Satanic worship.

Here's the complete quote by Maria:

"Maria Yurasek, who attended a caucus at Spokane's Chase Middle School,
said
Dean "reminds me of an old boyfriend. He seems angry. I don't think Dean
can
beat Bush. I would vote for a dog if he could beat Bush. I would vote
for
Satan."
------------------------------------------------------

I guess we can add "Satan worshippers" to the Democratic base of
homosexuals, convicted felons, and sexual deviants.


I assume by your method of reasoning, you are also stating that she has
some
sort of thing going with dogs?



I figured that I covered bestiality when I mentioned the Democratic "sexual
deviants".

Survey: Anger against Bush growing louder
 

"Jim" wrote in message
...
I don't like calling someone a liar, but when the shoe fits... Your
quote is an outright lie.

Really, Jim? Maybe you should expand your horizons beyond salon's cut and
snip. There's a link below. When you're done reading it, you can post an
apology. I accept your apology in advance.

http://www.theolympian.com/home/spec...08/31980.shtml

Here's the whole quote as published on February 8th in the Olympian:

Maria Yurasek, who attended a caucus at Spokane's Chase Middle School, said
Dean "reminds me of an old boyfriend. He seems angry. I don't think Dean can
beat Bush. I would vote for a dog if he could beat Bush. I would vote for
Satan."




Suggest you actually READ the article in
Salon. OR did you post the Newsmax version?

NOYB QUOTE

"Maria Yurasek, who attended a caucus at Spokane's Chase Middle School,
said Dean "reminds me of an old boyfriend. He seems angry. I don't think
Dean can beat Bush. I would vote for a dog if he could beat Bush. I
would vote for Satan."

NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Jim wrote:


http://www.salon.com/news/wire/2004/...ger/index.html

In Arizona, Judy Donovan says she feels desperate for a new president.
In Tennessee, Robert Wilson says he finds the president revolting. In
Washington state, Maria Yurasek says she'd vote for a dog if it could
beat President Bush.


I need maria's address...i have some extra Tellow Dog Democrat pins.


Try the local chapter of Satanic worship.

Here's the complete quote by Maria:

"Maria Yurasek, who attended a caucus at Spokane's Chase Middle School,
said
Dean "reminds me of an old boyfriend. He seems angry. I don't think Dean
can
beat Bush. I would vote for a dog if he could beat Bush. I would vote
for
Satan."
------------------------------------------------------

I guess we can add "Satan worshippers" to the Democratic base of
homosexuals, convicted felons, and sexual deviants.

Survey: Anger against Bush growing louder
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message

The party is unifed and focused on delivering the country from the evils
of the neofascist Republicans. Unlike Republicans, Democrats have
diverse opinions on who is best qualifed to wield the sword and slay the
evil dragon (via the political process, of course). The party has tested
its standard bearers and has eliminated all but two serious candidates.
I don't believe anyone ever gave Al Sharpton or Dennis Kucinich much of
a chance.

Jesus, what unconscionable drivel!

Survey: Anger against Bush growing louder
 

"NOYB" wrote in message news:Xnc_b.78599

The Bush supporters "were more numerous". That's all that really matters.
Screaming louder than the other guys gets you nowhere.

But you forget......

"Gore won the popular vote"! whine, whine "Gore won the popular vote"!

Survey: Anger against Bush growing louder
 

OK -- you found it, and I apologize. BUT perhaps that's the difference
between a liberal and a Bu****e artist. I gave my source up front.

May I point out that the comment origionally posted by you did not
contain this line


"http://www.theolympian.com/home/specialsections/Election2004/20040208/31980.shtml"

Nice try at a CYA though


NOYB wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...

I don't like calling someone a liar, but when the shoe fits... Your
quote is an outright lie.


Really, Jim? Maybe you should expand your horizons beyond salon's cut and
snip. There's a link below. When you're done reading it, you can post an
apology. I accept your apology in advance.

http://www.theolympian.com/home/spec...08/31980.shtml

Here's the whole quote as published on February 8th in the Olympian:

Maria Yurasek, who attended a caucus at Spokane's Chase Middle School, said
Dean "reminds me of an old boyfriend. He seems angry. I don't think Dean can
beat Bush. I would vote for a dog if he could beat Bush. I would vote for
Satan."




Suggest you actually READ the article in

Salon. OR did you post the Newsmax version?

NOYB QUOTE

"Maria Yurasek, who attended a caucus at Spokane's Chase Middle School,
said Dean "reminds me of an old boyfriend. He seems angry. I don't think
Dean can beat Bush. I would vote for a dog if he could beat Bush. I
would vote for Satan."

NOYB wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...


Jim wrote:



http://www.salon.com/news/wire/2004/...ger/index.html

In Arizona, Judy Donovan says she feels desperate for a new president.
In Tennessee, Robert Wilson says he finds the president revolting. In
Washington state, Maria Yurasek says she'd vote for a dog if it could
beat President Bush.


I need maria's address...i have some extra Tellow Dog Democrat pins.


Try the local chapter of Satanic worship.

Here's the complete quote by Maria:

"Maria Yurasek, who attended a caucus at Spokane's Chase Middle School,

said

Dean "reminds me of an old boyfriend. He seems angry. I don't think Dean

can

beat Bush. I would vote for a dog if he could beat Bush. I would vote

for

Satan."
------------------------------------------------------

I guess we can add "Satan worshippers" to the Democratic base of
homosexuals, convicted felons, and sexual deviants.

Survey: Anger against Bush growing louder
 

You know what they say about "assuming" something...so I guess we're both
guilty. You assumed I made up the Satan part...and I assumed you (or Salon)
intentionally snipped it.

Can we now both agree that Salon intentionally snipped it? Apparently, a
"Salon.com" version of a story puts out as much spin as a "Newsmax"
version...except that the political tilt is to the left rather than the
right.


"Jim" wrote in message
...
OK -- you found it, and I apologize. BUT perhaps that's the difference
between a liberal and a Bu****e artist. I gave my source up front.

May I point out that the comment origionally posted by you did not
contain this line



"http://www.theolympian.com/home/specialsections/Election2004/20040208/31980
..shtml"

Nice try at a CYA though


NOYB wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...

I don't like calling someone a liar, but when the shoe fits... Your
quote is an outright lie.


Really, Jim? Maybe you should expand your horizons beyond salon's cut
and
snip. There's a link below. When you're done reading it, you can post
an
apology. I accept your apology in advance.


http://www.theolympian.com/home/spec...08/31980.shtml

Here's the whole quote as published on February 8th in the Olympian:

Maria Yurasek, who attended a caucus at Spokane's Chase Middle School,
said
Dean "reminds me of an old boyfriend. He seems angry. I don't think Dean
can
beat Bush. I would vote for a dog if he could beat Bush. I would vote
for
Satan."




Suggest you actually READ the article in

Salon. OR did you post the Newsmax version?

NOYB QUOTE

"Maria Yurasek, who attended a caucus at Spokane's Chase Middle School,
said Dean "reminds me of an old boyfriend. He seems angry. I don't think
Dean can beat Bush. I would vote for a dog if he could beat Bush. I
would vote for Satan."

NOYB wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...


Jim wrote:



http://www.salon.com/news/wire/2004/...ger/index.html

In Arizona, Judy Donovan says she feels desperate for a new
president.
In Tennessee, Robert Wilson says he finds the president revolting. In
Washington state, Maria Yurasek says she'd vote for a dog if it could
beat President Bush.


I need maria's address...i have some extra Tellow Dog Democrat pins.


Try the local chapter of Satanic worship.

Here's the complete quote by Maria:

"Maria Yurasek, who attended a caucus at Spokane's Chase Middle School,

said

Dean "reminds me of an old boyfriend. He seems angry. I don't think
Dean

can

beat Bush. I would vote for a dog if he could beat Bush. I would vote

for

Satan."
------------------------------------------------------

I guess we can add "Satan worshippers" to the Democratic base of
homosexuals, convicted felons, and sexual deviants.

Survey: Anger against Bush growing louder
 

"NOYB" wrote in message news:Fjc_b.78597
I guess we can add "Satan worshippers" to the Democratic base of
homosexuals, convicted felons, and sexual deviants.

Jeez, NOYB, you've gone to new and lower lows! I realize it's an
election year, and you guys are running scared, but please, get your
head out of your ass.

Survey: Anger against Bush growing louder
 

On Sun, 22 Feb 2004 22:16:00 -0500, "John Gaquin"
wrote:


"NOYB" wrote in message news:Xnc_b.78599

The Bush supporters "were more numerous". That's all that really matters.
Screaming louder than the other guys gets you nowhere.

But you forget......

"Gore won the popular vote"! whine, whine "Gore won the popular vote"!

Ok, Bush won the Presidency. But, he certainly didn't win a mandate
for his extremist policies. There has been no attempt to consider the
desires of the majority of voters who didn't vote for the rascal.

bb

Survey: Anger against Bush growing louder
 

Agreed -- but next time we both give sources.

History cut for brevity

Survey: Anger against Bush growing louder
 

"bb" wrote in message

Ok, Bush won the Presidency. But, he certainly didn't win a mandate
for his extremist policies.
A) I never heard anyone claim that W received a mandate in the election of
2000.

B) W received his mandate on the morning of September 11, 2001.

C) You may consider some or all of his policies "extremist", but that is
your personal opinion, not general fact.

There has been no attempt to consider the
desires of the majority of voters who didn't vote for the rascal.

D) It may have slipped your attention, but we do not live in a democracy,
wherein the voters are consulted on virtually all matters. We live in a
Constitutional Republic. We send elected persons to staff the government
and to make decisions according to their best judgment. If we don't like
their judgment, we vote them out the next time around. This business of
consulting focus groups, or directly polling constituents, prior to any
decision-making, is, in my view, an abdication of responsibility under the
Constitution.

Survey: Anger against Bush growing louder
 

John Gaquin wrote:

"bb" wrote in message

Ok, Bush won the Presidency. But, he certainly didn't win a mandate
for his extremist policies.
A) I never heard anyone claim that W received a mandate in the election of
2000.

B) W received his mandate on the morning of September 11, 2001.

Bull. No one gave Bush carte blanche to go crazy with his brand of
right-wing extremism.

Survey: Anger against Bush growing louder
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message news:c1e347

...to go crazy with his brand of
right-wing extremism.

Ref Answer C, above.

Survey: Anger against Bush growing louder
 

In article , Jim wrote:

http://www.salon.com/news/wire/2004/...ger/index.html

In Arizona, Judy Donovan says she feels desperate for a new president.
In Tennessee,

Tennessee was Al Gore's home state was it not? And the good voters
there didn't even carry him in the last elections.

Obviously Judy is out of sync (off her meds?) with the rest of the voters
in Tennessee or they are all just not desparate enough yet?

lol




Robert Wilson says he finds the president revolting. In
Washington state, Maria Yurasek says she'd vote for a dog if it could
beat President Bush.

nobody can beat President Bush....not even Hillary....

Survey: Anger against Bush growing louder
 

In article , Harry Krause wrote:


John Gaquin wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message

......a Democratic Party more unified and more focused,

I suppose that's why there were 10 candidates (or, was it 11?) beating the
s%#t out of each other for 6 months -- because they were unified and
focused.



The party is unifed and focused on delivering the country from the evils
of the neofascist Republicans. Unlike Republicans, Democrats have
diverse opinions on who is best qualifed to wield the sword and slay the
evil dragon (via the political process, of course). The party has tested
its standard bearers and has eliminated all but two serious candidates.
I don't believe anyone ever gave Al Sharpton or Dennis Kucinich much of
a chance.

Rigghhhhhhhhhhhtttttttttttttt!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (primal scream ala' Dean)

lol

u r 2 funny old man

Survey: Anger against Bush growing louder
 

In article , Harry Krause wrote:

John Gaquin wrote:

"bb" wrote in message

Ok, Bush won the Presidency. But, he certainly didn't win a mandate
for his extremist policies.
A) I never heard anyone claim that W received a mandate in the election of
2000.

B) W received his mandate on the morning of September 11, 2001.

Bull. No one gave Bush carte blanche to go crazy with his brand of
right-wing extremism.

don't delude yourself.

Bush is a ferking moderate....

Survey: Anger against Bush growing louder
 

In article , Harry Krause wrote:

Jim wrote:

http://www.salon.com/news/wire/2004/...ger/index.html

In Arizona, Judy Donovan says she feels desperate for a new president.
In Tennessee, Robert Wilson says he finds the president revolting. In
Washington state, Maria Yurasek says she'd vote for a dog if it could
beat President Bush.


I need maria's address...i have some extra Tellow Dog Democrat pins.

Betchya you can find her he

http://www.bestialitylovers.searchengine.com

Survey: Anger against Bush growing louder
 

In article . net,
says...
In article , Harry Krause wrote:

John Gaquin wrote:

"bb" wrote in message

Ok, Bush won the Presidency. But, he certainly didn't win a mandate
for his extremist policies.
A) I never heard anyone claim that W received a mandate in the election of
2000.

B) W received his mandate on the morning of September 11, 2001.

Bull. No one gave Bush carte blanche to go crazy with his brand of
right-wing extremism.

don't delude yourself.

Bush is a ferking moderate....

With an inability to carry anything personally. This "ferker" is
programmed by his handlers.

Did you see him with Tim Russert? The "ferker" is missing most of his
brain cells or never started with many.

Survey: Anger against Bush growing louder
 

In article , jps wrote:

In article . net,
says...
In article , Harry Krause
wrote:

John Gaquin wrote:

"bb" wrote in message

Ok, Bush won the Presidency. But, he certainly didn't win a mandate
for his extremist policies.
A) I never heard anyone claim that W received a mandate in the election
of
2000.

B) W received his mandate on the morning of September 11, 2001.

Bull. No one gave Bush carte blanche to go crazy with his brand of
right-wing extremism.

don't delude yourself.

Bush is a ferking moderate....

With an inability to carry anything personally. This "ferker" is
programmed by his handlers.

Did you see him with Tim Russert? The "ferker" is missing most of his
brain cells or never started with many.

For lacking so many "brain cells" as you say this "ferker" sure has been
a lot more successful in life than you with all of your liberal education eh?

But of course Bush had the silver spoon factor and many helping hands
up and you obviously had nothing.

Can your restribution of the wealth ideals compensate for this lack
of familial unity and natural progression?

Using Deja-news (Usenet archiver) it sadly appears that you are not
quite the free-thinker and man that you fancy yourself as. It seems
many of your words echo that of a Mr. Harry Krause right down to
the letters. Would be a stretch to call Harry YOUR handler? Why
don't you call him "daddy"? He is old enough.

Survey: Anger against Bush growing louder
 

"John Gaquin" wrote in message ...
"bb" wrote in message

Ok, Bush won the Presidency. But, he certainly didn't win a mandate
for his extremist policies.
A) I never heard anyone claim that W received a mandate in the election of
2000.

B) W received his mandate on the morning of September 11, 2001.

C) You may consider some or all of his policies "extremist", but that is
your personal opinion, not general fact.

There has been no attempt to consider the
desires of the majority of voters who didn't vote for the rascal.

D) It may have slipped your attention, but we do not live in a democracy,
wherein the voters are consulted on virtually all matters. We live in a
Constitutional Republic. We send elected persons to staff the government
and to make decisions according to their best judgment. If we don't like
their judgment, we vote them out the next time around. This business of
consulting focus groups, or directly polling constituents, prior to any
decision-making, is, in my view, an abdication of responsibility under the
Constitution.

I just love how, no matter WHAT a republican does, the fellow
republicans just CAN'T seem to say, "he messed up", or "he was wrong".
It's that same tow the line, blinders on, goose stepping crap that
leads you guys to call anyone who disagrees with Bush a "traitor", or
a "communist", and on and on. Funny how BushCo, whom you guys refer to
as a UNITER, has this country the most divided that it's ever been!

Survey: Anger against Bush growing louder
 

basskisser wrote:
"John Gaquin" wrote in message ...

"bb" wrote in message

Ok, Bush won the Presidency. But, he certainly didn't win a mandate
for his extremist policies.

A) I never heard anyone claim that W received a mandate in the election of
2000.

B) W received his mandate on the morning of September 11, 2001.

C) You may consider some or all of his policies "extremist", but that is
your personal opinion, not general fact.

There has been no attempt to consider the

desires of the majority of voters who didn't vote for the rascal.

D) It may have slipped your attention, but we do not live in a democracy,
wherein the voters are consulted on virtually all matters. We live in a
Constitutional Republic. We send elected persons to staff the government
and to make decisions according to their best judgment. If we don't like
their judgment, we vote them out the next time around. This business of
consulting focus groups, or directly polling constituents, prior to any
decision-making, is, in my view, an abdication of responsibility under the
Constitution.


I just love how, no matter WHAT a republican does, the fellow
republicans just CAN'T seem to say, "he messed up", or "he was wrong".
It's that same tow the line, blinders on, goose stepping crap that
leads you guys to call anyone who disagrees with Bush a "traitor", or
a "communist", and on and on. Funny how BushCo, whom you guys refer to
as a UNITER, has this country the most divided that it's ever been!

Gotta disagree with this last statement. The country was more divided
in the 1850s and 60s with the civil war, but this comes next (at least
so far)

Survey: Anger against Bush growing louder
 

On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 08:21:04 -0500, Jim wrote:


Gotta disagree with this last statement. The country was more divided
in the 1850s and 60s with the civil war, but this comes next (at least
so far)

While I wouldn't call GWB a "uniter", this country has been through some
very divisive times. Recently, I would call the Vietnam era more divisive
than this.

Survey: Anger against Bush growing louder
 

In article , (basskisser) wrote:



I just love how, no matter WHAT a democrat does, the fellow
democrats just CAN'T seem to say, "he messed up", or "he was wrong".
It's that same tow the line, blinders on, goose stepping crap that
leads you guys to call anyone who disagrees with Clinton a "traitor", or
a "right-wing extremist", and on and on. Funny how Slick Willie & Co, whom you
guys refer to as a UNITER, has this country the most divided that it's ever
been!


LOL

Survey: Anger against Bush growing louder
 

I just love how, no matter WHAT b'asskisser does, the fellow
sycophants just CAN'T seem to say, "he messed up", or "he was wrong".
It's that same tow the line, blinders on, goose stepping crap that
leads you guys to call anyone who disagrees with b'asskisser a
"traitor", or
a "bass hating extremist", and on and on. Funny how b'asskisser, whom you
guys refer to as a UNITER, has this newsgroup the most divided that it's ever
been!

Survey: Anger against Bush growing louder
 

"Charles" wrote in message
...




I just love how, no matter WHAT b'asskisser does, the fellow
sycophants just CAN'T seem to say, "he messed up", or "he was wrong".

So prove us wrong in making those allegations. I doubt you can. ;-)

Survey: Anger against Bush growing louder
 

"Charles" wrote in message
...




I just love how, no matter WHAT b'asskisser does, the fellow
sycophants just CAN'T seem to say, "he messed up", or "he was wrong".
It's that same tow the line, blinders on, goose stepping crap that
leads you guys to call anyone who disagrees with b'asskisser a
"traitor", or
a "bass hating extremist", and on and on. Funny how b'asskisser, whom you
guys refer to as a UNITER, has this newsgroup the most divided that it's
ever
been!

Oops, I guess I am the fool by not reading you post.

I feel dumber that asskisser at this point. Is that possible?

Survey: Anger against Bush growing louder
 

"Charles" wrote in message
...




I just love how, no matter WHAT b'asskisser does, the fellow
sycophants just CAN'T seem to say, "he messed up", or "he was wrong".
It's that same tow the line, blinders on, goose stepping crap that
leads you guys to call anyone who disagrees with b'asskisser a
"traitor", or
a "bass hating extremist", and on and on. Funny how b'asskisser, whom you
guys refer to as a UNITER, has this newsgroup the most divided that it's
ever
been!


Oops, I guess I am the fool by not reading you post.

I feel dumber that asskisser at this point. Is that possible?

Survey: Anger against Bush growing louder
 

Jim-- wrote:

"Charles" wrote in message
...




I just love how, no matter WHAT b'asskisser does, the fellow
sycophants just CAN'T seem to say, "he messed up", or "he was wrong".
It's that same tow the line, blinders on, goose stepping crap that
leads you guys to call anyone who disagrees with b'asskisser a
"traitor", or
a "bass hating extremist", and on and on. Funny how b'asskisser, whom you
guys refer to as a UNITER, has this newsgroup the most divided that it's
ever
been!

Oops, I guess I am the fool by not reading you post.

I feel dumber that asskisser at this point. Is that possible?



:-)))

ha ha, the silver lining is that b'asskisser will attack you no matter
what and tell you he's brighter than you are.

Wear the badge with honor ! All hail the wisdom of b'asskisser !

-- Charlie

Survey: Anger against Bush growing louder
 

Jim-- wrote in message
...

Oops, I guess I am the fool by not reading you post.

I feel dumber that asskisser at this point. Is that possible?

Not only possible...probable!