![]() |
Cuban Boating
Gould 0738 wrote:
Minimum wage jobs can not support our economy. Something will have to give. Either the prices will come way down, or wages will have to be adjusted accordingly. Dave Your premise surmises that the economy will be supported. Don't be so sure. If the economy tanks, then who will prop up the profits of those "evil" corporations? It is, afterall, the mass populace who buy the most goods. If they can no longer afford to buy, then who will these corporations sell to? It is intrinsincally important to have a healthy consumer base, for any corporation to survive. There are a lot of people who could give a dang less about the Golden Goose- just as long as they *personally* get their share of eggs before the old bird kicks off. This may be true. But those people have not thought about the big picture, beyond their own selfish needs. Dave |
Cuban Boating
"Dave Hall" wrote in message
... I suspect your ancestors, who were native Americans, didn't have to put up with such nonsense. They were natives, right? They must be. You speak as if you belong here and others don't. Where did you come up with that one? Never mind, I'm sure you have a very active immagination. With few exceptions, every new group of immigrants to this country have been targets of prejudice, ridicule, misunderstanding, violence, to varying degrees. Yea, and what does this have to do with the price of tea in China? It's funny that most ethnic groups HAVE had some sort of prejudice, and yet managed to overcome it, and become an integral part of our society, with the exception of a very visible few. I wonder why that is? Dave's back!!!!! So....each ethnic group has had to overcome prejudice. Does that somehow make it OK for you to continue such practice, like it's a harmless hazing ritual at a fraternity? |
Cuban Boating
Dave Hall wrote:
It's funny that most ethnic groups HAVE had some sort of prejudice, and yet managed to overcome it, and become an integral part of our society, with the exception of a very visible few. I wonder why that is? Because, you ignorant ass, their ethnic background was visible on their faces. -- * * * email sent to will *never* get to me. |
Cuban Boating
"Dave Hall" wrote in message
... Yea, and what does this have to do with the price of tea in China? It's funny that most ethnic groups HAVE had some sort of prejudice, and yet managed to overcome it, and become an integral part of our society, with the exception of a very visible few. I wonder why that is? Dave's back!!!!! So....each ethnic group has had to overcome prejudice. Does that somehow make it OK for you to continue such practice, like it's a harmless hazing ritual at a fraternity? Who's continuing anything? I have no prejudice against anyone who attempts to become a productive citizen, and assimilates into the existing culture. Dave Right. As long as they're not Islamic, have an accent, or arrive here illegally from Mexico and annoy you when you're at Wal Mart. |
Cuban Boating
"Dave Hall" wrote in message
... "Dave Hall" wrote in message ... But they have to learn English first..... Dave Nah...language isn't the big deal people make it out to be. Travel to Mexico or Puerto Rico and you'll find that people try very hard to help non-Spanish speakers. It takes very little effort for us to do the same for new arrivals. Only America and France have such ridiculous attitudes toward visitors. There's a difference between visiting countries and those who settle here. It is highly impractical for "native" Americans to have to learn several different languages to "accomodate" the needs of immigrants. It is far more practical, and a sign of comittment, for all immigrants to become proficient in English, as at least a second language. Dave Clue and FACT: The best time to learn a language is when you're age 1-4. In this country, we do our kids a disservice by starting foreign language study in 7th or 8th grade. For people over 20, learning a foreign language is an uphill climb at best and a train wreck at worst. You love sources for such statements. So, ask your kids' pediatrician, or call their school and talk to the speech pathologist about language development vs age. Unless that person is an idiot, you'll get a good explanation of why an immigrant can live here for a couple of years and still have problems with English. Same reason you'd have problems if you moved to their country. |
Cuban Boating
There are a lot of people who could give a dang less about the Golden
Goose- just as long as they *personally* get their share of eggs before the old bird kicks off. This may be true. But those people have not thought about the big picture, beyond their own selfish needs. Dave Holy smokaronies! Those last two sentences are completely right! |
Cuban Boating
Doug Kanter wrote:
"Dave Hall" wrote in message ... Yea, and what does this have to do with the price of tea in China? It's funny that most ethnic groups HAVE had some sort of prejudice, and yet managed to overcome it, and become an integral part of our society, with the exception of a very visible few. I wonder why that is? Dave's back!!!!! So....each ethnic group has had to overcome prejudice. Does that somehow make it OK for you to continue such practice, like it's a harmless hazing ritual at a fraternity? Who's continuing anything? I have no prejudice against anyone who attempts to become a productive citizen, and assimilates into the existing culture. Dave Right. As long as they're not Islamic, have an accent, or arrive here illegally from Mexico and annoy you when you're at Wal Mart. Ah! Ladies and gentlemen, we are here once more, to witness that classic "debate" technique of the left, where if one is unable to debate the issues and points, then demonize the opposition. Many on the left, love to use the "Racist, Bigot, Prejudice" words (Known from now on as RBP), to paint an opponent's views with a broad brush of generalizations, designed to drown them in the stigma of shame and ridicule, therby losing their original point in a sea of defense, and deflection. Much in the same way as Johnny Cochrane attempted to play the race card at the O.J. trial, to deflect from the very real evidence against O.J. and attempt to discredit it, by clouding it with the RBP term. These same people cannot, or refuse to differentiate between a difference in principles, and one of "RBP". Because I do not condone the acts of radical Islam, who preach the killing of "infidels", and who routinely brutalize and subjugate women and children, I am called "prejudiced". Because I don't care for freeloaders, and people taking advantage of a system (at our taxpaying expense), I am called "bigoted" or "racist". It's classic..... Dave |
Cuban Boating
"Dave Hall" wrote in message
... Who's continuing anything? I have no prejudice against anyone who attempts to become a productive citizen, and assimilates into the existing culture. Dave Right. As long as they're not Islamic, have an accent, or arrive here illegally from Mexico and annoy you when you're at Wal Mart. Ah! Ladies and gentlemen, we are here once more, to witness that classic "debate" technique of the left, where if one is unable to debate the issues and points, then demonize the opposition. Dave, you've been shown that the illegal presence of farm workers is an integral part of our agricultural structure, and you've almost admitted that there's nothing we can do about it. It's also been made clear that the practice of hiring them is not hidden by farmers, which is why farmers are willing to discuss the issue, on the record, to reporters. And, the article I pointed out to you discussed the fact that some states have laws in the works to afford a few more kinds of worker protection for migrants. But, you still focus on "illegal", even though the food these people produce is crucial to the healthy development of your children. Perhaps I'm overly suspicious, but all of this leads me to one conclusion. You're a racist. |
Cuban Boating
Dave Hall wrote:
Ah! Ladies and gentlemen, we are here once more, to witness that classic "debate" technique of the left, where if one is unable to debate the issues and points, then demonize the opposition. Funny, it seems to be far more common among right-winger who have nothing constructive to say, and so they constantly insult & abuse any who challenge their statements. Many on the left, love to use the "Racist, Bigot, Prejudice" words (Known from now on as RBP), to paint an opponent's views with a broad brush of generalizations, designed to drown them in the stigma of shame and ridicule Does that mean that you're actually proud of being a bigot and a racist? Who woulda thunk it..... DSK |
Cuban Boating
DSK wrote:
Dave Hall wrote: Ah! Ladies and gentlemen, we are here once more, to witness that classic "debate" technique of the left, where if one is unable to debate the issues and points, then demonize the opposition. Funny, it seems to be far more common among right-winger who have nothing constructive to say, and so they constantly insult & abuse any who challenge their statements. In the same way that you've accused me of being a draft dodger and condoning the burning of witches and owning slaves? Many on the left, love to use the "Racist, Bigot, Prejudice" words (Known from now on as RBP), to paint an opponent's views with a broad brush of generalizations, designed to drown them in the stigma of shame and ridicule Does that mean that you're actually proud of being a bigot and a racist? Who woulda thunk it..... It's just that I can separate a problem with someon'e actions without disliking the person according to superficial attributes. If a black guy robs a store and shoots a cop, am I not allowed to condemn his actions out of fear of being called a "racist", even though his race has no bearing on his actions? Such is the stigma used by the left to silence constructive criticism of many liberal ideas, which are discriminatory in nature. Dave DSK |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:14 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com