Me and my wife
 

Heres a pic of me fishing.

Nevermind that 40 lb gut, how ugly I am, and how bald I am, check out
that fish!

http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/hakrau...&.dnm=bbbb.jpg

And this is my wife. Yeah, I know shes huge, but so what, its proof I
have fished, and own a boat.

http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/hakrau...&.dnm=152c.jpg

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
HaKrause wrote:
Heres a pic of me fishing.

Nevermind that 40 lb gut, how ugly I am, and how bald I am, check out
that fish!

http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/hakrau...&.dnm=bbbb.jpg


Yup. That's me, but it was the Harry Identity Thief who put up the post.

How about some pictures of the 36' Zimmerman like Lobsta' boat?

Nice picture, was it taken on your 50' Hatt. or the 36' Lobster Boat?


"HaKrause" wrote in message
...
Heres a pic of me fishing.

Nevermind that 40 lb gut, how ugly I am, and how bald I am, check out
that fish!

http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/hakrau...&.dnm=bbbb.jpg

And this is my wife. Yeah, I know shes huge, but so what, its proof I
have fished, and own a boat.

http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/hakrau...&.dnm=152c.jpg

Harry,
When I clicked on the file, Yahoo said the file is inaccessible.
Paul


Harry Krause wrote:
HaKrause wrote:

Heres a pic of me fishing.

Nevermind that 40 lb gut, how ugly I am, and how bald I am, check out
that fish!

http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/hakrau...&.dnm=bbbb.jpg



Yup. That's me, but it was the Harry Identity Thief who put up the post.

Gene, Harry,
Yes they are, thanks.
Paul


Gene Kearns wrote:
On Fri, 01 Apr 2005 22:10:47 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:



The second email should work, gene.


Thanks... nice pics!

Harry,
Upgrade to XP. :-)
Paul

Harry Krause wrote:
snipped
Thanks, guys. I'd put up a self-portrait, but every time I try to take
one, my camera reboots.

Gene,
If you ever decide to go digital be sure to check out the delay time
between when you press the shutter and the picture is actually taken.
It's my one disappointment with my cameras. Next time it's be a digital
SLR like a Nikon D70 that doesn't suffer from this ailment.
Paul


Gene Kearns wrote:


Guess that is why I am still attached to my 35+ year old Nikons that
have been drug up and down mountains, to the sea, and about everywhere
else during their long life... technology sucks...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Gene Kearns wrote:
On Sat, 02 Apr 2005 16:25:58 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:



Thanks, guys. I'd put up a self-portrait, but every time I try to take
one, my camera reboots.


Guess that is why I am still attached to my 35+ year old Nikons that
have been drug up and down mountains, to the sea, and about everywhere
else during their long life... technology sucks...


Don't Forget the Homeland Security site:

http://urlsnip.com/290935


We're prepared for all intruders!


ROFL... the pics are funny... specially the squirrel! One of my
(Army, retired) co-workers will get a special kick out of that....

Sad thing is, though, as an airport employee, "Homeland Security"
isn't all that far from true.....



Last time I was at National Airport, the TSA employee guarding the "exit"
of one of the passenger to terminal areas was sound asleep.

Way back in September 2002 (when the Democrats still controlled the Senate),
the Dems were holding up the Homeland Security bill for one reason in
particular:

Bush wanted the right to fire any security personnel that proved to be
incompetent or derelict in his/her duties.





You guys argued against giving him that right. And now you complain when
one of them isn't performing up to par?!?

"Paul Schilter" ""paulschilter\"@comcast dot net" wrote in message
...
Gene,
If you ever decide to go digital be sure to check out the delay time
between when you press the shutter and the picture is actually taken.

What is the name that the camera companies give to that delay time?

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Gene Kearns wrote:

On Sat, 02 Apr 2005 16:25:58 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:




Thanks, guys. I'd put up a self-portrait, but every time I try to take
one, my camera reboots.


Guess that is why I am still attached to my 35+ year old Nikons that
have been drug up and down mountains, to the sea, and about everywhere
else during their long life... technology sucks...



Don't Forget the Homeland Security site:

http://urlsnip.com/290935


We're prepared for all intruders!


ROFL... the pics are funny... specially the squirrel! One of my
(Army, retired) co-workers will get a special kick out of that....

Sad thing is, though, as an airport employee, "Homeland Security"
isn't all that far from true.....



Last time I was at National Airport, the TSA employee guarding the "exit"
of one of the passenger to terminal areas was sound asleep.


Way back in September 2002 (when the Democrats still controlled the
Senate), the Dems were holding up the Homeland Security bill for one
reason in particular:

Bush wanted the right to fire any security personnel that proved to be
incompetent or derelict in his/her duties.





You guys argued against giving him that right. And now you complain when
one of them isn't performing up to par?!?







No, what he wanted to do was avoid unionization.

But unions protect the jobs of those who are derelict in their duties.

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Paul Schilter" ""paulschilter\"@comcast dot net" wrote in message
...

Gene,
If you ever decide to go digital be sure to check out the delay time
between when you press the shutter and the picture is actually taken.


What is the name that the camera companies give to that delay time?

Delayed ejaculation.

So do the better cameras (like your Nikon) give you premature ejaculation?

On Sat, 02 Apr 2005 18:51:43 -0500, Paul Schilter ""paulschilter\"@comcast dot
net" wrote:

Gene,
If you ever decide to go digital be sure to check out the delay time
between when you press the shutter and the picture is actually taken.
It's my one disappointment with my cameras. Next time it's be a digital
SLR like a Nikon D70 that doesn't suffer from this ailment.
Paul


Gene Kearns wrote:


Guess that is why I am still attached to my 35+ year old Nikons that
have been drug up and down mountains, to the sea, and about everywhere
else during their long life... technology sucks...



I love my D70!!!!
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Paul Schilter wrote:
Gene, Harry,
Yes they are, thanks.
Paul


Gene Kearns wrote:

On Fri, 01 Apr 2005 22:10:47 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:



The second email should work, gene.



Thanks... nice pics!



Thanks, guys. I'd put up a self-portrait, but every time I try to take
one, my camera reboots.

Don't Forget the Homeland Security site:

http://urlsnip.com/290935


We're prepared for all intruders!


Saw your site, love the animal photos. You shoot a Glock 17?

NOYB,
It's been my experience the the managers don't want to go through the
hassle of dealing with incompitant workers. They in turn blame "labor
relations" for not backing them up. If management takes action against a
worker all they can do is file a grievance. They can petition the
grievance up to an arbitrator. They don't like to arbitrate unless they
think they've got a good case as these rulings set p residence. On the
other hand neither does management what to arbitrate unless they think
they can win. In 30 years of being in the UAW I've yet to see a walk out
or even organized protest over disciplinary action. As one union
official told be, "I have to take his side of it, as he's paying dues.
If I don't, I could get sued."
Most of the time it's just easier for the manager to go to someone who
does his job then deal with the one who doesn't want to. This just makes
it harder on those that do the job. We probably complain about this more
than anything else. We don't want to turn in our fellow workers but we
expect management to do their jobs of disciplining the bad one. They
being human are no different than the hourly worker, some do their jobs,
some don't.
Paul


NOYB wrote:
snipped
But unions protect the jobs of those who are derelict in their duties.

Harry,

Did you say " You or a family member are much more likely to have a gun
death in your household if you have a gun. Households without guns only have
to worry about an intruder breaking in and shooting someone. Households with
guns have to worry about intruders and about the guns in the household. " "
Ergo, if you don't have a gun in your house, you are far less likely to be
shot than someone who does.

Also, burglars love to *steal* the guns they find in houses. They're easy to
sell on the street. "

"Well, Igor, I've never been convinced there is a Constitutional *right*
to personal ownership of firearms. I am opposed to personal ownership of
concealable firearms, firearms with large magazines and a few others. "

It appears that you want to restrict handguns, just so long as it isn't your
handgun.













--


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
SoFarrell wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Paul Schilter wrote:

Gene, Harry,
Yes they are, thanks.
Paul


Gene Kearns wrote:


On Fri, 01 Apr 2005 22:10:47 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:




The second email should work, gene.



Thanks... nice pics!



Thanks, guys. I'd put up a self-portrait, but every time I try to take
one, my camera reboots.

Don't Forget the Homeland Security site:

http://urlsnip.com/290935


We're prepared for all intruders!



Saw your site, love the animal photos. You shoot a Glock 17?





I have. And also a Glock 22 and a Glock 34. I rented a Glock 17 at the
range where I learned to properly shoot modern handguns. It's a good
learner's handgun, and 9 mm ammo is pretty cheap. For 9mn, though, I like
the Glock 34 better, because it has a longer sight radius. The Glock 22
shoots .40 S&W.

For household defense, however, my weapon of choice is a 12-gauge shotgun.
In one of his movies Clint, referring to his .44 magnum revolver, said it
would take your head clean off. Well, not likely. But the loads I have in
my 12-gauge would.




--
Bush and the NeoConvicts who control him
are destroying the once-great United States.

On Fri, 01 Apr 2005 21:50:38 GMT, HaKrause
wrote:

Harry,

Nice red, dude. Nice Parker also.

bb

On Sat, 02 Apr 2005 21:42:02 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

Bush and the NeoConvicts who control him
are destroying the once-great United States.

Unfortunately, I 100% agree with this statement. I didn't think what
was great about the US would last forever, but I was hoping the
greatness of this country would outlast me. It's fairly obviously I
was wrong. It's amazing the power of greed (of those in power) and
ignorance ( of those who are their followers).

bb

Paul Schilter wrote:
Gene,
If you ever decide to go digital be sure to check out the delay time
between when you press the shutter and the picture is actually taken.
It's my one disappointment with my cameras. Next time it's be a digital
SLR like a Nikon D70 that doesn't suffer from this ailment.
Paul

You wouldn't believe how many digital pictures my wife took of Orca
tails going under.

-rick-

" Tuuk" wrote in message
...
krause you liar

wow,, I didn't know (but figured) your wife was such a slut,


I made the mistake this morning of reading a few ofyour posts and I realized
that there is something wrong with you. There is nothing but hate in your
heart for a couple of posers in this newsgroup. Reading your stuff here
turns my stomach. I guess it has the same effect on others because hardly
anyone seems to pay much attention to you. I won't be either.

You might need some professional help of some kind for all your hatred. You
should get it.

" Tuuk" wrote in message
...
no,, krause has a few loaded guns in his home.

He has a loaded shotgun in his front hall, in the closet. He also has a
hand gun in the drawer loaded just up the stairs. He has other weapons
that he keeps loaded and he claims he aims for the knees.
He also claims that he has a cop next door (of course its a country mile)
that is aware of this and advised him of this. hmmmmmmmmm



Sounds to me as if it would not be a good idea to try to break into his
house as you apparently have threatened to do unless you have some sort of
death wish.

You seem so ****ed off at so many posters here. Have you ever considered
that the problem is you?

On Sun, 3 Apr 2005 11:22:57 -0400, "SoFarrell" wrote:


" Tuuk" wrote in message
.. .
krause you liar

wow,, I didn't know (but figured) your wife was such a slut,


I made the mistake this morning of reading a few ofyour posts and I realized
that there is something wrong with you. There is nothing but hate in your
heart for a couple of posers in this newsgroup. Reading your stuff here
turns my stomach. I guess it has the same effect on others because hardly
anyone seems to pay much attention to you. I won't be either.

You might need some professional help of some kind for all your hatred. You
should get it.



He's great fodder for the killfile. Of course, most of what he's saying has been
said to him (in one form or other) by the main subject of his posts.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

On Sun, 3 Apr 2005 11:54:01 -0400, "SoFarrell" wrote:


" Tuuk" wrote in message
.. .
no,, krause has a few loaded guns in his home.

He has a loaded shotgun in his front hall, in the closet. He also has a
hand gun in the drawer loaded just up the stairs. He has other weapons
that he keeps loaded and he claims he aims for the knees.
He also claims that he has a cop next door (of course its a country mile)
that is aware of this and advised him of this. hmmmmmmmmm



Sounds to me as if it would not be a good idea to try to break into his
house as you apparently have threatened to do unless you have some sort of
death wish.

You seem so ****ed off at so many posters here. Have you ever considered
that the problem is you?


Tuuk has not threatened to break into Harry's house. That is a fabrication of
Harry's.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

JohnH,

I do not remember Tuuk ever making any posts that would be remotely
considered a threat or make Tuuk guilty of assault. If he was and Harry
actually believe he was, it would be much more effective to use the legal
system, then to give up his long standing opposition to handguns and waste
his time going to the gun range and posting pictures of his gun in
rec.boats.

Since Harry did complain to Tuuk's ISP and they reviewed all of Tuuk's
posts. and he is still using the same ISP, it is fair to say that Tuuk is
not guilty of assault. Since Harry has not used the legal system, it is
fair to say that Harry does not believe Tuuk is guilty of assault, or that
Harry is actually in fear of his life.

It is just another one of Harry's feeble attempts to say "LOOK AT ME, LOOK
AT ME".



"John H" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 3 Apr 2005 11:54:01 -0400, "SoFarrell" wrote:


" Tuuk" wrote in message
. ..
no,, krause has a few loaded guns in his home.

He has a loaded shotgun in his front hall, in the closet. He also has a
hand gun in the drawer loaded just up the stairs. He has other weapons
that he keeps loaded and he claims he aims for the knees.
He also claims that he has a cop next door (of course its a country
mile)
that is aware of this and advised him of this. hmmmmmmmmm



Sounds to me as if it would not be a good idea to try to break into his
house as you apparently have threatened to do unless you have some sort of
death wish.

You seem so ****ed off at so many posters here. Have you ever considered
that the problem is you?


Tuuk has not threatened to break into Harry's house. That is a fabrication
of
Harry's.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 3 Apr 2005 11:54:01 -0400, "SoFarrell" wrote:


" Tuuk" wrote in message
. ..
no,, krause has a few loaded guns in his home.

He has a loaded shotgun in his front hall, in the closet. He also has a
hand gun in the drawer loaded just up the stairs. He has other weapons
that he keeps loaded and he claims he aims for the knees.
He also claims that he has a cop next door (of course its a country
mile)
that is aware of this and advised him of this. hmmmmmmmmm



Sounds to me as if it would not be a good idea to try to break into his
house as you apparently have threatened to do unless you have some sort of
death wish.

You seem so ****ed off at so many posters here. Have you ever considered
that the problem is you?


Tuuk has not threatened to break into Harry's house. That is a fabrication
of
Harry's.
--
John H


No offense, but just out of curiosity I went back and read a pile of this
tuuk fellow's posts here, and several things seem perfectly clear. First is
that tuuk seems out of his mind and out of control with his hatred for
krause. Second is that he reaches some of the most bizarre illogical
conclusions I've ever seen aimed at a person he has never met. Third is I
think he is psycho in some ways. I read several of these tuuk posts in which
he made threats and not just to krause. I also noticed you seem to like to
egg him on. You should be ashamed of yourself.

"Dr. Dr. K.G. Sherlock" wrote in message
...
JohnH,

I do not remember Tuuk ever making any posts that would be remotely
considered a threat or make Tuuk guilty of assault.

I'm supposed to belive someone like you who has about a dozen identities
here?
Sorry Charlie

" Tuuk" wrote in message
...
Ok sofarrell

Lets look at what you said,,

"''''I guess it has the same effect on others because hardly
anyone seems to pay much attention to you. I won't be either."'''

and that was in another post by you,,,,,now you seem to be paying
attention,, and then you said

"''''Reading your stuff here
turns my stomach""''''

So you read more of me, and responded more than once. hmmmm and you say I
have problems?? lol,,,oooomy ,,, are you one of those who self inflict
pain to yourself??? oooo my,,,,ollololol,,,

But lets read further,,

"'"""Sounds to me as if it would not be a good idea to try to break into
his
house as you apparently have threatened to do unless you have some sort of
death wish."""'""


So you proven to be both a sucker,,,, and an idiot,, here is why

I never once threatened to break into krause's house,,, you fool,,, unless
you can prove to me where I did,, then you are a lying fool. I challenge
you to provide proof of what you have said.


I think you did. I read some of your posts. You need help and you should get
it as soon as you can.

SoF,
I thought you had me killfiled?

Either way, I really don't care, but I know anyone who was concerned about a
legitimate threat or was being stalked by someone who was guilty of assault
would be a fool not to use the legal system to follow up on the threat. It
would be very silly to post pictures of a animals holding a gun and showing
a picture of your glock. Especially if you had spent years discussing the
evils of handguns. This is not only my opinion, but the opinion of Tuuk's
ISP.

So either you believe Harry to be a fool, or you agree he really did not
view any of the idle chit chat in rec.boats to be a serious threat.

Sorry SoFarrell.

"SoFarrell" wrote in message
news:1112576392.c9b5f9eae60027faaf25fb3288557058@t eranews...

"Dr. Dr. K.G. Sherlock" wrote in message
...
JohnH,

I do not remember Tuuk ever making any posts that would be remotely
considered a threat or make Tuuk guilty of assault.

I'm supposed to belive someone like you who has about a dozen identities
here?
Sorry Charlie

SoFarrell,

Have you noticed you are guilty of the exact same thing you accuse Tuuk of?


"SoFarrell" wrote in message
news:1112576483.b1d24369f480a26fbc8493276fc714d8@t eranews...

" Tuuk" wrote in message
...
Ok sofarrell

Lets look at what you said,,

"''''I guess it has the same effect on others because hardly
anyone seems to pay much attention to you. I won't be either."'''

and that was in another post by you,,,,,now you seem to be paying
attention,, and then you said

"''''Reading your stuff here
turns my stomach""''''

So you read more of me, and responded more than once. hmmmm and you say I
have problems?? lol,,,oooomy ,,, are you one of those who self inflict
pain to yourself??? oooo my,,,,ollololol,,,

But lets read further,,

"'"""Sounds to me as if it would not be a good idea to try to break into
his
house as you apparently have threatened to do unless you have some sort
of
death wish."""'""


So you proven to be both a sucker,,,, and an idiot,, here is why

I never once threatened to break into krause's house,,, you fool,,,
unless you can prove to me where I did,, then you are a lying fool. I
challenge you to provide proof of what you have said.


I think you did. I read some of your posts. You need help and you should
get it as soon as you can.

On Sun, 3 Apr 2005 20:58:02 -0400, "SoFarrell" wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 3 Apr 2005 11:54:01 -0400, "SoFarrell" wrote:


" Tuuk" wrote in message
...
no,, krause has a few loaded guns in his home.

He has a loaded shotgun in his front hall, in the closet. He also has a
hand gun in the drawer loaded just up the stairs. He has other weapons
that he keeps loaded and he claims he aims for the knees.
He also claims that he has a cop next door (of course its a country
mile)
that is aware of this and advised him of this. hmmmmmmmmm



Sounds to me as if it would not be a good idea to try to break into his
house as you apparently have threatened to do unless you have some sort of
death wish.

You seem so ****ed off at so many posters here. Have you ever considered
that the problem is you?


Tuuk has not threatened to break into Harry's house. That is a fabrication
of
Harry's.
--
John H


No offense, but just out of curiosity I went back and read a pile of this
tuuk fellow's posts here, and several things seem perfectly clear. First is
that tuuk seems out of his mind and out of control with his hatred for
krause. Second is that he reaches some of the most bizarre illogical
conclusions I've ever seen aimed at a person he has never met. Third is I
think he is psycho in some ways. I read several of these tuuk posts in which
he made threats and not just to krause. I also noticed you seem to like to
egg him on. You should be ashamed of yourself.


Wrong. I've not egged him on, but I have asked him to stop. Harry has accused me
of egging him on, just as Harry has accused Tuuk of threatening to break into
his home.

Both are fabrications.

You, however, are free to believe what you will. You should also go back and
read a pile of Krause's posts. Perhaps you would understand what got Tuuk
started. I think, though, that you already have your agenda.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 3 Apr 2005 20:58:02 -0400, "SoFarrell" wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
. ..
On Sun, 3 Apr 2005 11:54:01 -0400, "SoFarrell" wrote:


" Tuuk" wrote in message
t...
no,, krause has a few loaded guns in his home.

He has a loaded shotgun in his front hall, in the closet. He also has
a
hand gun in the drawer loaded just up the stairs. He has other weapons
that he keeps loaded and he claims he aims for the knees.
He also claims that he has a cop next door (of course its a country
mile)
that is aware of this and advised him of this. hmmmmmmmmm



Sounds to me as if it would not be a good idea to try to break into his
house as you apparently have threatened to do unless you have some sort
of
death wish.

You seem so ****ed off at so many posters here. Have you ever considered
that the problem is you?


Tuuk has not threatened to break into Harry's house. That is a
fabrication
of
Harry's.
--
John H


No offense, but just out of curiosity I went back and read a pile of this
tuuk fellow's posts here, and several things seem perfectly clear. First
is
that tuuk seems out of his mind and out of control with his hatred for
krause. Second is that he reaches some of the most bizarre illogical
conclusions I've ever seen aimed at a person he has never met. Third is I
think he is psycho in some ways. I read several of these tuuk posts in
which
he made threats and not just to krause. I also noticed you seem to like to
egg him on. You should be ashamed of yourself.


Wrong. I've not egged him on, but I have asked him to stop. Harry has
accused me
of egging him on, just as Harry has accused Tuuk of threatening to break
into
his home.

Both are fabrications.

You, however, are free to believe what you will. You should also go back
and
read a pile of Krause's posts. Perhaps you would understand what got Tuuk
started. I think, though, that you already have your agenda.
--
John H


Well, I know what I read of tuuks posts. If I have falsely accused you I
apologize but some of yours read as if you were enjoying tuuks bad behavior.
Tuuk seems to post a half dozen times a day here almost every day and almost
every post is some wild tale he's "telling" on Harry and for the most part
Harry and almost everyone else ignores tuck. To me that says tuuk is way
over the edge and I see he is also attacking verbally other posters here
too. The word psycho comes to mind.

" Tuuk" wrote in message
...
sofarrell,,, can you prove your accusation??/ or did you just pull it from
mid air somewhere??

lets have a look at your third accusation towards me,,,, here is what you
said.


"'"''I read several of these tuuk posts in which
he made threats and not just to krause."''''"


Can you provide evidence of what you accused? If not, I call you a liar.
Point blank liar.


Get help fella. Lots of it and take whatever pills they hand you before you
get yourself into real serious trouble.

"SoFarrell" wrote in message
news:1112614161.de4fa56b28fc16520ed46596755edfd3@t eranews...

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 3 Apr 2005 20:58:02 -0400, "SoFarrell" wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 3 Apr 2005 11:54:01 -0400, "SoFarrell"
wrote:


" Tuuk" wrote in message
et...
no,, krause has a few loaded guns in his home.

He has a loaded shotgun in his front hall, in the closet. He also has
a
hand gun in the drawer loaded just up the stairs. He has other
weapons
that he keeps loaded and he claims he aims for the knees.
He also claims that he has a cop next door (of course its a country
mile)
that is aware of this and advised him of this. hmmmmmmmmm



Sounds to me as if it would not be a good idea to try to break into his
house as you apparently have threatened to do unless you have some sort
of
death wish.

You seem so ****ed off at so many posters here. Have you ever
considered
that the problem is you?


Tuuk has not threatened to break into Harry's house. That is a
fabrication
of
Harry's.
--
John H


No offense, but just out of curiosity I went back and read a pile of this
tuuk fellow's posts here, and several things seem perfectly clear. First
is
that tuuk seems out of his mind and out of control with his hatred for
krause. Second is that he reaches some of the most bizarre illogical
conclusions I've ever seen aimed at a person he has never met. Third is I
think he is psycho in some ways. I read several of these tuuk posts in
which
he made threats and not just to krause. I also noticed you seem to like
to
egg him on. You should be ashamed of yourself.


Wrong. I've not egged him on, but I have asked him to stop. Harry has
accused me
of egging him on, just as Harry has accused Tuuk of threatening to break
into
his home.

Both are fabrications.

You, however, are free to believe what you will. You should also go back
and
read a pile of Krause's posts. Perhaps you would understand what got Tuuk
started. I think, though, that you already have your agenda.
--
John H


Well, I know what I read of tuuks posts. If I have falsely accused you I
apologize but some of yours read as if you were enjoying tuuks bad
behavior.
Tuuk seems to post a half dozen times a day here almost every day and
almost every post is some wild tale he's "telling" on Harry and for the
most part Harry and almost everyone else ignores tuck. To me that says
tuuk is way over the edge and I see he is also attacking verbally other
posters here too. The word psycho comes to mind.

And the words sycophant and tunnel vision apply to you!

Harry,
Have you decided it makes sense to own a handgun?

I think you missed my point concerning the legal system. You might have
talked to a local county mounty, but if you had actually been assaulted, you
would have legal recourse. Obviously, Tuuk's ISP and your local deputy did
not agree with you.

Tell us again about the evils of owning handguns.




"Harry.Krause" wrote in message
...
Dr. Dr. K.G. Sherlock wrote:
SoF,
I thought you had me killfiled?

Either way, I really don't care, but I know anyone who was concerned
about a legitimate threat or was being stalked by someone who was guilty
of assault would be a fool not to use the legal system to follow up on
the threat. It would be very silly to post pictures of a animals holding
a gun and showing a picture of your glock. Especially if you had spent
years discussing the evils of handguns. This is not only my opinion, but
the opinion of Tuuk's ISP.

So either you believe Harry to be a fool, or you agree he really did not
view any of the idle chit chat in rec.boats to be a serious threat.


I'm not following your droppings here closely, so don't get all excited,
but are you claiming I haven't used the legal system regarding Tuuk?

If you are, you're as mistaken about that as you are about virtually
everything else in life.

Our local deputy is aware of Tuuk and Tuuk's threats. He contacted the
RCMP as did I. That's all that was necessary.

The local deputy had some interesting advice that would be useful to
anyone facing someone trying to invade a home, as Tuuk threatened to do.
The advice: call 911 and leave the line open as you shoot the invader as
many times as you are able. That way, the 911 tape recorder will catch
some of the "action" for posterity.

I see you made reference to my fun "Homeland Security" site and drew an
erroneous conclusion after looking it over, the reference to "your"
(meaning my) Glock. I do not own a Glock 17. The one in the photo on my
site was a rental I practice with at one of the ranges I frequent. I rent
the Glock 17 because it is a simple, reliable and accurate semi-automatic
with a large magazine and it shoots relatively cheap 9mm ammo. My favorite
practice ammo for a Glock 9mm is CCI/Speer Blazer 115 grain full metal
jacket in aluminum casings. With aluminum instead of brass, the price for
100 rounds is around $11.00 from many mail-order suppliers. The FMJ
encases the lead bullet and keeps lead particles from from clogging up the
barrel.

I'm surprised you didn't have some idiotic comment on how pale my hand
looks in that photo.

If I were going to depend upon a handgun for home defense, I'd probably go
for something heavier than 9mm. Probably .45ACP.

In another post, you inferred you were "Roger" of sheep-porking fame.
How's the dog?

Yes, I think I got it. When you threatened to shot him between the eyes,
you were just puffing up your chest, and it didn't mean anything.

I am surprised Tuuk's ISP allows him to keep his account since one would
assume a "threat to invade your house" would be in violation of his TOS. Is
it possible Tuuk has bribed his ISP and their is a conspiracy against you?


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Dr. Dr. K.G. Sherlock wrote:
Harry,
Have you decided it makes sense to own a handgun?

I think you missed my point concerning the legal system. You might have
talked to a local county mounty, but if you had actually been assaulted,
you would have legal recourse. Obviously, Tuuk's ISP and your local
deputy did not agree with you.

Tell us again about the evils of owning handguns.


I think the only point you have is the one on top of your head.

Tuuk has threatened to invade my home. The deputy is in possession of
Tuuk's threats, and both the deputy and I have made contact with the RCMP.
Period.

If I am forced to used a weapon to defend myself in my home, it will be a
12-gauge shotgun. I think handguns are fun to shoot, but are not the best
choice for home defense.

Got it?










--
Bush and the NeoConvicts who control him
are destroying the once-great United States.

You are incorrect, I did not infer I am Roger and I don't have a dog.
You might have interpreted that I am Roger or I have a dog, but you were
incorrect.

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Dr. Dr. K.G. Sherlock wrote:
Harry,
Have you decided it makes sense to own a handgun?

I think you missed my point concerning the legal system. You might have
talked to a local county mounty, but if you had actually been assaulted,
you would have legal recourse. Obviously, Tuuk's ISP and your local
deputy did not agree with you.

Tell us again about the evils of owning handguns.

In another post, you inferred you were "Roger" of sheep-porking fame.
How's the dog?


In another post, you inferred you were "Roger" of sheep-porking fame.
You want to confirm that?
And how's the dog?


--
Bush and the NeoConvicts who control him
are destroying the once-great United States.

What made you change your mind concerning handguns? I thought you had taken
a strong position that all handguns should be banned?


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Dr. Dr. K.G. Sherlock wrote:
Yes, I think I got it. When you threatened to shot him between the eyes,
you were just puffing up your chest, and it didn't mean anything.

I am surprised Tuuk's ISP allows him to keep his account since one would
assume a "threat to invade your house" would be in violation of his TOS.
Is it possible Tuuk has bribed his ISP and their is a conspiracy against
you?



No, I don't think you have it.

*If* Tuuk invades my house, I am capable of shooting him between the eyes
with either a shotgun or a handgun. The fact that I would use a shotgun as
my primary home defense tool is not relevant to my ability to place a
shot. I have been shooting shotguns for at least 40 years, and am quite
capable with shot or with slugs. I assure you that at in the house ranges,
I am capable of putting a shotgun load between someone's eyes. It's not
chest puffery; it's fact. Notice the word "invades." Make sure you know
what that means before you jump to any other erroneous conclusions.

As for what Tuuk's ISP allows, that is the business of Tuuk's ISP. I will
point out, however, that Tuuk's ISP suggested I contact my local police
department and that it in turn would contact the RCMP. What conclusions
you reach about Tuuk and his ISP are up to you. That they probably will
not be grounded in fact obviously makes no difference to someone like you.




--
Bush and the NeoConvicts who control him
are destroying the once-great United States.

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
Ahh. You made a reference to a claim that I inferred you were intimate
with sheep. The only person I recall who seemed to have such a proclivity
was Roger Huebner, who lived in New Jersey, if memory serves, and who was
trying to sell a dog.

Well, there goes virtually any reason I have to read your posts. If you're
not Roger and you're not into animal husbandry, there's no reason to read
about your deviancies.

Since you are no longer reading my posts and you like to read about
bestiality, you may want to visit this link :
http://www.bestiality.com/

Isn't JustMe inoffensive?


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Just Me wrote:
What made you change your mind concerning handguns? I thought you had
taken a strong position that all handguns should be banned?


Tell you what, Sherlock, you pick an inoffensive identity and stick with
it, and I'll be delighted to engage you in polite discourse from time to
time. Sherlock seems to fit you perfectly, for reasons you wouldn't
understand.


--
Bush and the NeoConvicts who control him
are destroying the once-great United States.

"Just Me" wrote in message
...
Isn't JustMe inoffensive?

Funny how harry complains about identity changes when he is doig it so
often.........but that is a typical liebral.....whine about others doing
what they are guilty of.



"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Just Me wrote:
What made you change your mind concerning handguns? I thought you had
taken a strong position that all handguns should be banned?


Tell you what, Sherlock, you pick an inoffensive identity and stick with
it, and I'll be delighted to engage you in polite discourse from time to
time. Sherlock seems to fit you perfectly, for reasons you wouldn't
understand.


--
Bush and the NeoConvicts who control him
are destroying the once-great United States.

On Mon, 4 Apr 2005 07:29:22 -0400, "SoFarrell" wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 3 Apr 2005 20:58:02 -0400, "SoFarrell" wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 3 Apr 2005 11:54:01 -0400, "SoFarrell" wrote:


" Tuuk" wrote in message
et...
no,, krause has a few loaded guns in his home.

He has a loaded shotgun in his front hall, in the closet. He also has
a
hand gun in the drawer loaded just up the stairs. He has other weapons
that he keeps loaded and he claims he aims for the knees.
He also claims that he has a cop next door (of course its a country
mile)
that is aware of this and advised him of this. hmmmmmmmmm



Sounds to me as if it would not be a good idea to try to break into his
house as you apparently have threatened to do unless you have some sort
of
death wish.

You seem so ****ed off at so many posters here. Have you ever considered
that the problem is you?


Tuuk has not threatened to break into Harry's house. That is a
fabrication
of
Harry's.
--
John H


No offense, but just out of curiosity I went back and read a pile of this
tuuk fellow's posts here, and several things seem perfectly clear. First
is
that tuuk seems out of his mind and out of control with his hatred for
krause. Second is that he reaches some of the most bizarre illogical
conclusions I've ever seen aimed at a person he has never met. Third is I
think he is psycho in some ways. I read several of these tuuk posts in
which
he made threats and not just to krause. I also noticed you seem to like to
egg him on. You should be ashamed of yourself.


Wrong. I've not egged him on, but I have asked him to stop. Harry has
accused me
of egging him on, just as Harry has accused Tuuk of threatening to break
into
his home.

Both are fabrications.

You, however, are free to believe what you will. You should also go back
and
read a pile of Krause's posts. Perhaps you would understand what got Tuuk
started. I think, though, that you already have your agenda.
--
John H


Well, I know what I read of tuuks posts. If I have falsely accused you I
apologize but some of yours read as if you were enjoying tuuks bad behavior.
Tuuk seems to post a half dozen times a day here almost every day and almost
every post is some wild tale he's "telling" on Harry and for the most part
Harry and almost everyone else ignores tuck. To me that says tuuk is way
over the edge and I see he is also attacking verbally other posters here
too. The word psycho comes to mind.


But you haven't gone back and read a year's worth of Harry's posts. Your claims
are not based on the full story.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."