| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
We are talking about the US of A, New York State in particular,
..........................lots of snip................... Larry Weiss "...Ever After!" "a little after..." Larry: In Canada, the "Navigable Waterways" are under Federal Jurisdiction. I don't know about NY State, but , why don't you write to your State Attorney General Office, and find out the full story? It may be that the Town has the rights to the park land but not the water. That's the way it is here. Jim Carter "The Boat" Bayfield |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Wed, 04 Feb 2004 13:57:11 GMT, "Jim Carter"
wrote: We are talking about the US of A, New York State in particular, .........................lots of snip................... Larry Weiss "...Ever After!" "a little after..." Larry: In Canada, the "Navigable Waterways" are under Federal Jurisdiction. I don't know about NY State, but , why don't you write to your State Attorney General Office, and find out the full story? It may be that the Town has the rights to the park land but not the water. That's the way it is here. The town could simply condemn the land for public use.....like they'll do to your house if some politician owns the acreage next door and the politician wants to sell it to the state for that new road the politician wants. Government can take your land any ol' time they want, actually. Larry W4CSC No, no, Scotty! I said, "Beam me a wrench.", not a WENCH! Kirk Out..... |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Larry W4CSC wrote: The town could simply condemn the land for public use.....like they'll do to your house if some politician owns the acreage next door and the politician wants to sell it to the state for that new road the politician wants. Government can take your land any ol' time they want, actually. They can't really do that. The major park in Macon was donated to the city by a Senator Bacon for the use of the "white women and children of the city". When the city could no longer inforce that covenant, the heirs of the estate sued to get title back. Went all the way to the USSC. The city couldn't possibly afford to buy it back so now our only real park is a shopping center. Can you imagine a WalMart in the middle of Hampton Park? -- Glenn Ashmore I'm building a 45' cutter in strip/composite. Watch my progress (or lack there of) at: http://www.rutuonline.com Shameless Commercial Division: http://www.spade-anchor-us.com |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Glenn Ashmore" wrote in message news:rG8Ub.19221 They can't really do that. The major park in Macon was donated to the city by a Senator Bacon for the use of the "white women and children of the city". When the city could no longer inforce that covenant, the heirs of the estate sued to get title back. Went all the way to the USSC. The city couldn't possibly afford to buy it back so now our only real park is a shopping center. Just out of curiosity, what is the Supreme Court case that decided this? In Shelley vs. Kramer the court ruled that restrictive covenants are unenforceable, how does this play into the heirs getting the property back? |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
EVANS ET AL. v. ABNEY ET AL.
Basically, because the covenants of the bequest were not enforcable the city had to return the property to the heirs. John Wentworth wrote: "Glenn Ashmore" wrote in message news:rG8Ub.19221 They can't really do that. The major park in Macon was donated to the city by a Senator Bacon for the use of the "white women and children of the city". When the city could no longer inforce that covenant, the heirs of the estate sued to get title back. Went all the way to the USSC. The city couldn't possibly afford to buy it back so now our only real park is a shopping center. Just out of curiosity, what is the Supreme Court case that decided this? In Shelley vs. Kramer the court ruled that restrictive covenants are unenforceable, how does this play into the heirs getting the property back? -- Glenn Ashmore I'm building a 45' cutter in strip/composite. Watch my progress (or lack there of) at: http://www.rutuonline.com Shameless Commercial Division: http://www.spade-anchor-us.com |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Wed, 04 Feb 2004 10:53:03 -0500, Glenn Ashmore
wrote: Can you imagine a WalMart in the middle of Hampton Park? Walmart wouldn't last 24 hours in the middle of Hampton Park. It would simply be shoplifted clean! I have a friend who owns a liqour store not far from Hampton Park. You gotta see it to believe it....(c; Larry W4CSC No, no, Scotty! I said, "Beam me a wrench.", not a WENCH! Kirk Out..... |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hmmm ... on the Rideau, I see RCMP and OntarioPP (OPP) boats. On the St
Lawrence (cdn side) and the Ottawa I see OPP (and Coastguard on the St Lawence) boats ??? "Jim Carter" wrote in message able.rogers.com... We are talking about the US of A, New York State in particular, .........................lots of snip................... Larry Weiss "...Ever After!" "a little after..." Larry: In Canada, the "Navigable Waterways" are under Federal Jurisdiction. I don't know about NY State, but , why don't you write to your State Attorney General Office, and find out the full story? It may be that the Town has the rights to the park land but not the water. That's the way it is here. Jim Carter "The Boat" Bayfield |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
"bowgus" wrote in message . cable.rogers.com... Hmmm ... on the Rideau, I see RCMP and OntarioPP (OPP) boats. On the St Lawrence (cdn side) and the Ottawa I see OPP (and Coastguard on the St Lawence) boats ??? "Jim Carter" wrote in message Larry: In Canada, the "Navigable Waterways" are under Federal Jurisdiction. I don't know about NY State, but , why don't you write to your State Attorney General Office, and find out the full story? It may be that the Town has the rights to the park land but not the water. That's the way it is here. Jim Carter Hello Mr. Bowgus: A simple way to explain the different official watercraft is that the Federal Government of Canada has the task of setting out the laws under several statutes. Rules of the road are set by the Federal Goverment under the Collision Regulations. They have the right to designate who will enforce these laws. In Navigatable Waterways, the enforcement could be City, Provincial or Federal Police. The other statues and/or Provincial statues and/or municipal statues can be enforced by whomever has the local jurisdiction. Jim Carter "The Boat" Bayfield |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Anyone familiar with Sears Sea-Vee 15' fibreglass? | General | |||