Maybe, but he got you with a "yo mama" joke right between the eyes.

-W

"JAXAshby" wrote in message
...
you're one sick ****, dude.

From: "NOYB"
Date: 2/3/2004 4:47 PM Eastern Standard Time
Message-id: et


"WaIIy" wrote in message
.. .
On 03 Feb 2004 20:31:05 GMT, (JAXAshby) wrote:

ah, yes, of course. california bill (San fransisco?) won't look at a
tit
unless it is perfect or nearly so.

me, I am happy to see a bare tit of two, any size from just a hard
nipple
up to
a triple D, firm or soft, any shape. The only natural triple D I ever
had a
chance to get my hands on frankly was soft enough so it looked like
pancake
batter on a griddle. Still happy to see it, to touch it, to mouth it,
to
listen to the woman moaning.

Best fifteen dollars you ever spent.


I believe his mom did it gratis.

nah, he just showed himself to be a sick ****. if *you* think is a joke that
just shows you, too, to consume oxygen that might otherwise be used by human
beings.

"Clams Canino"
Date: 2/3/2004 6:15 PM Eastern Standard Time
Message-id: hYVTb.210382$I06.2331007@attbi_s01

Maybe, but he got you with a "yo mama" joke right between the eyes.

-W

"JAXAshby" wrote in message
...
you're one sick ****, dude.

From: "NOYB"
Date: 2/3/2004 4:47 PM Eastern Standard Time
Message-id: et


"WaIIy" wrote in message
.. .
On 03 Feb 2004 20:31:05 GMT, (JAXAshby) wrote:

ah, yes, of course. california bill (San fransisco?) won't look at a
tit
unless it is perfect or nearly so.

me, I am happy to see a bare tit of two, any size from just a hard
nipple
up to
a triple D, firm or soft, any shape. The only natural triple D I ever
had a
chance to get my hands on frankly was soft enough so it looked like
pancake
batter on a griddle. Still happy to see it, to touch it, to mouth it,
to
listen to the woman moaning.

Best fifteen dollars you ever spent.


I believe his mom did it gratis.

what *IS* it with all these gayboys coming out bitching that a woman has tits
and how horrible that is?

"JAXAshby" wrote in message
...
ah, yes, of course. california bill (San fransisco?) won't look at a tit
unless it is perfect or nearly so.

me, I am happy to see a bare tit of two, any size from just a hard nipple
up to
a triple D, firm or soft, any shape. The only natural triple D I ever had
a
chance to get my hands on frankly was soft enough so it looked like
pancake
batter on a griddle. Still happy to see it, to touch it, to mouth it, to
listen to the woman moaning.

bill, try women. What an experience!!!!!!!!


Although.....some are much nicer than
others!

Yup, some are indeed better than others, but never found a bare one I
didn't
like. [grin]

Pretty low standards.


I have been married 36 years. Seems as you have to spend at least 50 bucks
for a date. 50 gets you the ugly ones. Still low standards. Or you have
not looked at a lot of titties. Spend some money for a trip to the
Mediterranean beaches. You will get to look at lots of titties. And a lot
of them would be better looking covered up.
Bill

"JAXAshby" wrote in message
...
sorry, wallu, I don't pay for a woman's company. If *you* do that you are
guaranteed to get a woman who doesn't want you. That's why she thinks she
can
get money from *you*. You want her and she doens't want you and she is
willing
to rent herself out to a guy she doesn't want (not many women will do
that).

(JAXAshby) wrote:

Maybe you ought to just hire a hooker. Then you are guaranteed a conquest.
As a friend told me about 40 years ago "Cheaper than dating." As to not
many women renting themselves. You never worked in a red light area. I
worked near the Tenderloin in SF during college. Lots of hookers. And
years ago, while in college and fishing from the shore by the SF-Oakland
bridge, the funniest line I have ever heard about Ho's was uddered .
There used to be about 250 hookers lined up on West MacArthur in Oakland.
Lady judge refused to take them to court if no John brought in, so the cops
just ignored them. Black guy I am fishing next to says "Damn! 250 Ho's and
all they know is 20 dollars. You think they would have a price war." I
nearly fell in the bay I was laughing so hard.

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Calif Bill wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
JAXAshby wrote:

hoary, you got to be too old iffin you no longer care to look at a
bare
breast.

Although.....some are much nicer than
others!

Yup, some are indeed better than others, but never found a bare one
I
didn't
like. [grin]


Too much ado over a breast. What a backwards country this is.


--
Email sent to is never read.


You misunderstand. It's the "ado" over the nearly bare breast on
television I find absurd. I'm not too old to be "titillated," as it
were. Anyone who has traveled any and has tuned in to television in
Great Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Japan and dozens of other
countries has seen bare female breasts during primetime hours on the
major television stations. It is Americans who are so backwards about
this they flip out when they see tits on TV. It's perfectly ok, though,
to show someone being shot.




--
Email sent to is never read.

I think most of the uproar is over the low class stunt. Draw attention
to
yourselves as you have no real talent. PBS shows bare titties, and not
uproar. Most of the soaps probably come close, and Baywatch etc, were
as
good as showing.



Apparently Bill and I agree that television would be much improved if
more bare female breasts were shown in a high-class fashion.

--
Email sent to is never read.

Janet has apologized for the stunt. Planned. Same as always, all OK now
that a apology was issued. Get caught taking illegal political money, give
it back and say sorry. Maybe it will work with robbing banks also. As to
TV. High class display of boobs will not help TV. The medium is now aimed
at the lower socio stratum of 17-28 year olds. They spend what money they
have, and tune in. Most of the shows are extremely intelligence challenged.
Where is Ed Sullivan with new acts with talent? Star Search was not display
of the hosts bad / obnoxious manners. Look at the New Years shows. Gansta
Nation, rapping about violence. Who are these shows aimed to?

BTW: I think I will buy a Jon Boat this spring. Need feed back from
jon boat users, are they better or worse than conventional aluminum
fishing boats?

What's a "conventional aluminum fishing boat"??????



A conventional boat has a V up front and it looks like a boat, a jon
boat looks like the boat in Pogo.

Pros - Cons:

Jon boat: low cost, simple, rugged, no frills.

V bottom: better in waves, wakes, higher speeds on plane, etc

(basskisser) wrote in message
First, what credentials do YOU have to be able to state what is
artistic talent and what is not? Second, there were no sexual antics
on stage. A woman's breast was shown. Do you not think that their
dance routine took talent? If they had no talent, how did they get
where they are? The dance WAS "artistic material". It's just that some
people are too narrow minded to understand!

Hey Ass Licker, got news for you, the dance routine was lousy and
Janet Jackson's knocker is homely and stretched out, yuck. Just for
comparison I'd like to get a picture of Hairballs tits and see how
they compare to Janet Jackson's.

Yep, looks that way. And if that wasn't a planned exposure, why the
pastie?
What passes for talent these days really sucks!

Absolutely! Isn't it time that we all state the obvious and tell these
faux
entertainers that we know they all have no talent and resort to sexual
antics on stage to hide that which is all too evident? Whatever
happened to
musicians and singers who actually relied on their talent and creative /
artistic material rather than shock value?

First, what credentials do YOU have to be able to state what is
artistic talent and what is not? Second, there were no sexual antics
on stage. A woman's breast was shown. Do you not think that their
dance routine took talent? If they had no talent, how did they get
where they are? The dance WAS "artistic material". It's just that some
people are too narrow minded to understand!

Actually, I don't see what creds are needed to state that which is painfully
obvious. That is, the total so called half time entertainment, as a whole,
was lacking in talent. What we were given in lieu of talent is crotch
grabbing, pelvis humping, verbal sexual innuendo and the now famous bare
breast - all of which would qualify as sexual antics in a performance.
Since you asked, I think these people got where they are through promotion
and marketing by the right people and a willingness to act out blatant
suggestive sexual acts.

36 years, and the dude STILL does like to look at tits. Why, do you suppose?

ah, yes, of course. california bill (San fransisco?) won't look at a tit
unless it is perfect or nearly so.

me, I am happy to see a bare tit of two, any size from just a hard nipple
up to
a triple D, firm or soft, any shape. The only natural triple D I ever had
a
chance to get my hands on frankly was soft enough so it looked like
pancake
batter on a griddle. Still happy to see it, to touch it, to mouth it, to
listen to the woman moaning.

bill, try women. What an experience!!!!!!!!


Although.....some are much nicer than
others!

Yup, some are indeed better than others, but never found a bare one I
didn't
like. [grin]

Pretty low standards.


I have been married 36 years. Seems as you have to spend at least 50 bucks
for a date. 50 gets you the ugly ones. Still low standards. Or you have
not looked at a lot of titties. Spend some money for a trip to the
Mediterranean beaches. You will get to look at lots of titties. And a lot
of them would be better looking covered up.
Bill