OT--Democrats On Record Concerning WMD
 

NOYB wrote:



Bush is a man of conviction. He's a man of action, not words. And when he
says something, he means what he says.

Bush is a dumbfoch who to this day probably still can't point out Iraq
or Afghanistan on a globe unless they have big letters in their spaces
spelling out their names.

He's indeed a man of convictions: two for drunk driving and one for
breaking and entering or vandalism, I forgot which, of a store in New
Haven, Connecticut. And of many quashed court cases.

If Bush is a man of action, it is because he is too stupid to think
things through. And when he says something, he's either lying or doesn't
know what he is talking about.

But, hey, he's your hero. This time next year, you can arrange to visit
him in his retirement community in DriedSpunk, Texas, or wherever the
hell his fake ranch is. Wait a few days, though...it's not easy removing
that tar and those feathers.



--
Email sent to is never read.

OT--Democrats On Record Concerning WMD
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:



Bush is a man of conviction. He's a man of action, not words. And when
he
says something, he means what he says.

Bush is a dumbfoch who to this day probably still can't point out Iraq
or Afghanistan on a globe unless they have big letters in their spaces
spelling out their names.

He's indeed a man of convictions: two for drunk driving and one for
breaking and entering or vandalism, I forgot which, of a store in New
Haven, Connecticut. And of many quashed court cases.

If Bush is a man of action, it is because he is too stupid to think
things through. And when he says something, he's either lying or doesn't
know what he is talking about.

But, hey, he's your hero. This time next year, you can arrange to visit
him in his retirement community in DriedSpunk, Texas, or wherever the
hell his fake ranch is. Wait a few days, though...it's not easy removing
that tar and those feathers.


Thanks. I enjoyed your witty post. It put a smile on my face. Now back to
reality...

OT--Democrats On Record Concerning WMD
 

In article . net,
says...

"jps" wrote in message
...
In article et,
says...

"jps" wrote in message
...
In article et,
says...

Yawn...

Let's talk about the policy of pre-emptive strikes in the light of bad
intelligence...

Stupid, stupid, stupid policy that David Kay himself said you had to
have "pristine intelligence" in order to assume.

We have blood on our hands and have lowered ourselves to the level of
Saddam. Killing innocent people for dubious reasons.

So you think that Saddam's regime, the Taliban, and al Qaeda members are
"innocent people"? How interesting.

You ****ing dweeb.

My, my, my...you're a little testy tonight...and a class act to boot!

Nevertheless, contrary to what your simple mind may think, Saddam was
anything but "innocent".'

Go ahead and cut the only intellgence you've witnessed all day.

We killed thousands of Iraqis to get to one goofball who'd obviously
already entered an advanced stage of dementia. Oh, and his eeeevil
sons.

Bush, Rumsfeld, Cheney, Perle, Wolfowitz and the rest of the
chickenhawks made the most of dubious intelligence in order to sell the
war to the American public. A collective Jim Jones sort of experience
for all us suckers who get a stiffy when the pres waves the American
flag.

You go ahead and drink that coolaid since it's so refreshing to you. I
happen to know its brewed from pure poop.

jps

OT--Democrats On Record Concerning WMD
 

"jps" wrote in message
...
In article . net,
says...

"jps" wrote in message
...
In article et,
says...

"jps" wrote in message
...
In article et,
says...

Yawn...

Let's talk about the policy of pre-emptive strikes in the light of
bad
intelligence...

Stupid, stupid, stupid policy that David Kay himself said you had
to
have "pristine intelligence" in order to assume.

We have blood on our hands and have lowered ourselves to the level
of
Saddam. Killing innocent people for dubious reasons.

So you think that Saddam's regime, the Taliban, and al Qaeda members
are
"innocent people"? How interesting.

You ****ing dweeb.

My, my, my...you're a little testy tonight...and a class act to boot!

Nevertheless, contrary to what your simple mind may think, Saddam was
anything but "innocent".'

Go ahead and cut the only intellgence you've witnessed all day.

We killed thousands of Iraqis to get to one goofball who'd obviously
already entered an advanced stage of dementia.

So dementia is a reason to excuse the guy's murderous ways, eh? Sorry, but
that ploy didn't work for Vincent "The Chin" Gigante either. Saddam was
openly paying bounties to the families of Palestinian suicide bombers. He
was pursuing long range missile technology from N. Korea. He maintained all
of his scientists, technology, and documents to continue with his pursuit of
WMD's. And, finally, there's enough circumstantial evidence for a
reasonable person to conclude that he was involved (via monetary and
intelligence aid), with several terrorist attacks against our country since
1993.

He was evil...so you're damn right he suffered from dementia. Sane people
don't order the murders of over a million people.

OT--Democrats On Record Concerning WMD
 

only cowards hide behind fake email names!

OT--Democrats On Record Concerning WMD
 

"Florida Keyz" wrote in message
...
only cowards hide behind fake email names!

And your name is...?

OT--Democrats On Record Concerning WMD
 

In article et,
says...

"jps" wrote in message
...
In article . net,
says...

"jps" wrote in message
...
In article et,
says...

"jps" wrote in message
...
In article et,
says...

Yawn...

Let's talk about the policy of pre-emptive strikes in the light of
bad
intelligence...

Stupid, stupid, stupid policy that David Kay himself said you had
to
have "pristine intelligence" in order to assume.

We have blood on our hands and have lowered ourselves to the level
of
Saddam. Killing innocent people for dubious reasons.

So you think that Saddam's regime, the Taliban, and al Qaeda members
are
"innocent people"? How interesting.

You ****ing dweeb.

My, my, my...you're a little testy tonight...and a class act to boot!

Nevertheless, contrary to what your simple mind may think, Saddam was
anything but "innocent".'

Go ahead and cut the only intellgence you've witnessed all day.

We killed thousands of Iraqis to get to one goofball who'd obviously
already entered an advanced stage of dementia.

So dementia is a reason to excuse the guy's murderous ways, eh? Sorry, but
that ploy didn't work for Vincent "The Chin" Gigante either. Saddam was
openly paying bounties to the families of Palestinian suicide bombers. He
was pursuing long range missile technology from N. Korea. He maintained all
of his scientists, technology, and documents to continue with his pursuit of
WMD's. And, finally, there's enough circumstantial evidence for a
reasonable person to conclude that he was involved (via monetary and
intelligence aid), with several terrorist attacks against our country since
1993.

He was evil...so you're damn right he suffered from dementia. Sane people
don't order the murders of over a million people.

Yeah, many of which died using the weapons and materials we supplied!!!
Most of those murdered were dead years before our little dubious
chickenhawk escapade.

GHW Bush was instrumental in tens of thousands himself at the end of the
Gulf War.

There's blood all over our hands. Your revisionist history doesn't do
anything to cover that up.

OT--Democrats On Record Concerning WMD
 

On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 16:40:55 -0800, jps wrote:

Snipped

Go ahead and cut the only intellgence you've witnessed all day.

Snipped
jps

jps, if you were referring to your posts, I missed it (the
intelligence) too.

Don't get me wrong. I'm not calling *you* anything. I just missed the
intelligent thing you imply you said.

Was it the "**** you" line?

John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

OT--Democrats On Record Concerning WMD
 

On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 18:43:51 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

NOYB wrote:



Bush is a man of conviction. He's a man of action, not words. And when he
says something, he means what he says.

Bush is a dumbfoch who to this day probably still can't point out Iraq
or Afghanistan on a globe unless they have big letters in their spaces
spelling out their names.

He's indeed a man of convictions: two for drunk driving and one for
breaking and entering or vandalism, I forgot which, of a store in New
Haven, Connecticut. And of many quashed court cases.

If Bush is a man of action, it is because he is too stupid to think
things through. And when he says something, he's either lying or doesn't
know what he is talking about.

But, hey, he's your hero. This time next year, you can arrange to visit
him in his retirement community in DriedSpunk, Texas, or wherever the
hell his fake ranch is. Wait a few days, though...it's not easy removing
that tar and those feathers.

Harry, don't you just get damn sick and tired of being continuously
wrong?


John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

OT--Democrats On Record Concerning WMD
 

"NOYB" wrote in message news:tGgSb.1758
My, my, my...you're a little testy tonight...and a class act to boot!

Nevertheless, contrary to what your simple mind may think, Saddam was
anything but "innocent".

Do you honestly, and I mean honestly think that Bush and his henchmen
didn't lie to the american public? Put away your petty politics for a
second and THINK. A little kid would come to the conclusion that we
were lied to, and you can't?