On Sat, 02 Apr 2005 17:14:40 -0500, Paul Schilter ""paulschilter\"@comcast dot
net" wrote:

John H,
Which Harry Krause? The impostor running around the newsgroup is a coward!
Paul


John H wrote:

It's just those damn conservatives and the one's who are sick of Harry's ****.
It's certainly none of the libs or Harry himself, right Chuck.

Sounds like sanctimonious, hypocritical crap to me.

There's only one, as far as I'm concerned.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

On Sat, 02 Apr 2005 14:15:11 -0800, Garth Almgren wrote:

Around 4/2/2005 1:50 PM, Paul Schilter wrote:

Dan,
I have no respect for this impostor. In my book he's lower then
whale ****. It's one thing to be anonymous, it's an other to take
someone else's identity. I'm sure you wouldn't want me to post under
your name and make you look like an idiot. This impostor is just scum!
Paul


At least the fake Harry's posts are so asinine that he/she/it is
/really/ easy to spot... Just killfile the idiot and move on.

I've noticed that killfiling one is fairly effective at killfiling the other.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

Paul,

99% of the people who read rec.boats, would not fall for any of mini-me's
posts, they are a parody of the real Harry's posts but they are overboard
even for Harry.

When Harry responded to one of Netsocks post using the handle Netsucks was
Harry scum? It is obvious that Netsocks is not mini-me, by tone of the
post, the creativity of the post, the ISP and IP used by the person posting.



"Paul Schilter" ""paulschilter\"@comcast dot net" wrote in message
...
Dan,
I have no respect for this impostor. In my book he's lower then whale
****. It's one thing to be anonymous, it's an other to take someone else's
identity. I'm sure you wouldn't want me to post under your name and make
you look like an idiot. This impostor is just scum!
Paul

Dan Krueger wrote:
He's got you running. You must be tired of the retractions...

HaKrause wrote:

HaKrause wrote:

On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 14:49:08 -0500, "Jim Carter"
wrote:


Can anyone remember the web site with the large waves that were
breaking
over the large ships?




That was me skippering the CG vessel. My crew insisted that it would
not take waves that large, but I pleasently proved them wrong, and set
a new standard fo CG operations.





Nope. This is the "Harry Identity Thief" again, posting from roadrunner
in Columbus, Ohio.

Garth,
Are you talking about mini-me or the real Harry?


"Garth Almgren" wrote in message

Just killfile the idiot and move on.

Paul,
Thanks for the correction.

I was mistaken because for the last month Harry has been talking about how
he was going to shot Tuuk if he come onto his property and how he has been
target practicing with his pistol so he could shot Tuuk between the eyes.

For Harry, to now assume JohnH (Herring) was following him and "after his
butt" followed by a link to his pictures of Harry and his gun, seemed very
paranoid.





"Paul Schilter" ""paulschilter\"@comcast dot net" wrote in message
...
N S,
Watch my six is a military term for "watch my back". Goes off the clock
quadrants. 12 would be ahead, 3 to the right, 6 to the rear, and 9 to the
left.
Paul


N S Sherlock wrote:
Harry,

Didn't you used to support banning all handguns?

Why are you now bragging about always keep a "6" close by.

No sane reasonable person would ever conclude that JohnH would wish harm
upon anyone, including yourself. For you to insinuate that he would
actually try to harm you, shows how delusional you are.






"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

John H wrote:

On 2 Apr 2005 09:35:16 -0800, wrote:




"Exchanges between Harry and his obsessed nemesi", for example.
Specifically includes Harry, wouldn't you agree?


Let's see...

You refer to Harry as 'Harry'.

You're really stuck on me, Herring. I guess if I ever see you following
me into Deale, I should keep a close watch on my "six," because you
obviously are after my butt.



See How We've Spent Our
Homeland Defense Grant:

http://urlsnip.com/290935


--
Bush and the NeoConvicts who control him
are destroying the once-great United States.

T S Sherlock,
An interesting post, especially in view of the fact you post as T S
Sherlock. I'm I to presume you're actually N S Sherlock? Interesting,
sort of a parody. Gives one something to think about, well done.
To answer your question, Netsuck wouldn't be confused with Netsock. So
I wouldn't consider this an impostor. Is Harry scum for attacking
Netsock? I don't know. I guess if I had to say, I'd say it was the first
one who flung the ****. Who was that, who knows. Is Harry guilty of OT
political posts? Hell yes. I've had Harry kill filed on occasion, it's
just that he also post interesting information. The threads that are
marked at political OT I just skip over. Unfortunitly there are still
some perles in those threads, I just don't want to wade through them.
There's a lot of people in here who engage in threads that I have no
interest in. Threads that don't belong here, but in the end there's
nothing you or I can do about it. We can only make the best of it.
Sometimes we can change people's minds and their conduct by convincing
them otherwise. But this will only happen if they're receptive to the
suggestion. This will never happen by attacking anyone. I prefer to
acknowledge the good in people and encourage more of it then critize
what *I* perceive as wrong.
Paul

T S Sherlock wrote:
Paul,

99% of the people who read rec.boats, would not fall for any of mini-me's
posts, they are a parody of the real Harry's posts but they are overboard
even for Harry.

When Harry responded to one of Netsocks post using the handle Netsucks was
Harry scum? It is obvious that Netsocks is not mini-me, by tone of the
post, the creativity of the post, the ISP and IP used by the person posting.



"Paul Schilter" ""paulschilter\"@comcast dot net" wrote in message
...

Dan,
I have no respect for this impostor. In my book he's lower then whale
****. It's one thing to be anonymous, it's an other to take someone else's
identity. I'm sure you wouldn't want me to post under your name and make
you look like an idiot. This impostor is just scum!
Paul

Dan Krueger wrote:

He's got you running. You must be tired of the retractions...

HaKrause wrote:


HaKrause wrote:


On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 14:49:08 -0500, "Jim Carter"
wrote:



Can anyone remember the web site with the large waves that were
breaking
over the large ships?




That was me skippering the CG vessel. My crew insisted that it would
not take waves that large, but I pleasently proved them wrong, and set
a new standard fo CG operations.





Nope. This is the "Harry Identity Thief" again, posting from roadrunner
in Columbus, Ohio.

John H,
That's rather unfair of you. Any of us are subject to the criticism for
what we post, but we shouldn't be held for what an impostor posts.
Paul

John H wrote:


There's only one, as far as I'm concerned.

You missed my point.

Harry Krause wrote:
Dan Krueger wrote:

He's got you running. You must be tired of the retractions...

HaKrause wrote:

HaKrause wrote:

On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 14:49:08 -0500, "Jim Carter"
wrote:


Can anyone remember the web site with the large waves that were
breaking
over the large ships?





That was me skippering the CG vessel. My crew insisted that it would
not take waves that large, but I pleasently proved them wrong, and set
a new standard fo CG operations.






Nope. This is the "Harry Identity Thief" again, posting from
roadrunner in Columbus, Ohio.



Not at all. I think the fool is doing great damage here, not to me, but
to the newsgroup in general, by dispensing his idiocy. If you can't see
why, then you are also the fool.

On Sat, 02 Apr 2005 19:20:58 -0500, Paul Schilter ""paulschilter\"@comcast dot
net" wrote:

John H,
That's rather unfair of you. Any of us are subject to the criticism for
what we post, but we shouldn't be held for what an impostor posts.
Paul

John H wrote:


There's only one, as far as I'm concerned.

I think you misunderstood me. Harry Krause is Harry Krause. The imposter is
whoever. I have no trouble determining which is which when I see a response with
their post in it.

I see very few of *either* of their posts. I have never, to my knowledge,
criticized Harry for something the imposter posted. From what I've seen, which
is not a whole lot, the imposter seems to be embellishing stories Harry has
already told.

Harry (I'm sure you're looking over Paul's shoulder), if I have held you to
account for something a Harry imposter said, I apologize.

You, Harry, deserve to be held account for *your* posts and *only* your posts.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

Around 4/2/2005 3:17 PM, T S Sherlock wrote:

"Garth Almgren" wrote in message

Just killfile the idiot and move on.

Garth,
Are you talking about mini-me or the real Harry?


The fake one, of course. That should have been quite clear from what I
wrote about the fake Harry's posts being asinine and easy to spot.


--
~/Garth - 1966 Glastron V-142 Skiflite: "Blue-Boat"
"There is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing
as simply messing about in boats."
-Kenneth Grahame, The Wind in the Willows

"N S Sherlock" no****sherlock.com wrote in message
...
Harry,

Didn't you used to support banning all handguns?

Why are you now bragging about always keep a "6" close by.

No sane reasonable person would ever conclude that JohnH would wish harm
upon anyone, including yourself. For you to insinuate that he would
actually try to harm you, shows how delusional you are.






"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
John H wrote:
On 2 Apr 2005 09:35:16 -0800, wrote:



"Exchanges between Harry and his obsessed nemesi", for example.
Specifically includes Harry, wouldn't you agree?


Let's see...

You refer to Harry as 'Harry'.

You're really stuck on me, Herring. I guess if I ever see you following
me into Deale, I should keep a close watch on my "six," because you
obviously are after my butt.



See How We've Spent Our
Homeland Defense Grant:

http://urlsnip.com/290935




I think by "six" your buddy Harry is referring to his backside, not to a six
gun.

Besides if you looked at Harry's photo site, you'd see he's been shooting a
Glock. The standard magazine for that model holds 17 rounds, plus one in the
spout which would make it a six shooter X 3. Good shooting too.

Paul,

Ahhhhh I am glad to see you picked up on my name change, very good my
grasshopper. I have changed my nick many times, in fact, I change it
whenever I feel like it, sort of like changing underwear. I would tell you
those I communicate with in rec.boats, they know it is me no matter what my
"nick" is, I have never had any intention of deceiving people, anymore than
Harry does when he is using Hkrause, HAKrause, Harry Krause or Netsuck.
I don't believe Harry's MiniMe is trying to deceive anyone,anymore than
Harry and I are guilty of trying to deceive anyone. I would tell you some
of his posts I found very funny, others were just redundant.

No matter what, I am positive he is not guilty of Identity Theft.

Now when Harry "posed" as a Chesapeake boater who was wondering if Harry
owned a Lobster Boat he saw on the Bay, Harry was trying to deceive
everyone.





"Paul Schilter" ""paulschilter\"@comcast dot net" wrote in message
...
T S Sherlock,
An interesting post, especially in view of the fact you post as T S
Sherlock. I'm I to presume you're actually N S Sherlock? Interesting, sort
of a parody. Gives one something to think about, well done.
To answer your question, Netsuck wouldn't be confused with Netsock. So I
wouldn't consider this an impostor. Is Harry scum for attacking Netsock? I
don't know. I guess if I had to say, I'd say it was the first one who
flung the ****. Who was that, who knows. Is Harry guilty of OT political
posts? Hell yes. I've had Harry kill filed on occasion, it's just that he
also post interesting information. The threads that are marked at
political OT I just skip over. Unfortunitly there are still some perles in
those threads, I just don't want to wade through them.
There's a lot of people in here who engage in threads that I have no
interest in. Threads that don't belong here, but in the end there's
nothing you or I can do about it. We can only make the best of it.
Sometimes we can change people's minds and their conduct by convincing
them otherwise. But this will only happen if they're receptive to the
suggestion. This will never happen by attacking anyone. I prefer to
acknowledge the good in people and encourage more of it then critize what
*I* perceive as wrong.
Paul

T S Sherlock wrote:
Paul,

99% of the people who read rec.boats, would not fall for any of mini-me's
posts, they are a parody of the real Harry's posts but they are overboard
even for Harry.

When Harry responded to one of Netsocks post using the handle Netsucks
was Harry scum? It is obvious that Netsocks is not mini-me, by tone of
the post, the creativity of the post, the ISP and IP used by the person
posting.



"Paul Schilter" ""paulschilter\"@comcast dot net" wrote in message
...

Dan,
I have no respect for this impostor. In my book he's lower then whale
****. It's one thing to be anonymous, it's an other to take someone
else's identity. I'm sure you wouldn't want me to post under your name
and make you look like an idiot. This impostor is just scum!
Paul

Dan Krueger wrote:

He's got you running. You must be tired of the retractions...

HaKrause wrote:


HaKrause wrote:


On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 14:49:08 -0500, "Jim Carter"
wrote:



Can anyone remember the web site with the large waves that were
breaking
over the large ships?




That was me skippering the CG vessel. My crew insisted that it would
not take waves that large, but I pleasently proved them wrong, and set
a new standard fo CG operations.





Nope. This is the "Harry Identity Thief" again, posting from roadrunner
in Columbus, Ohio.

"Garth Almgren" wrote in message

The fake one, of course. That should have been quite clear from what I
wrote about the fake Harry's posts being asinine and easy to spot.


Thanks for the clarification. I am glad you agree that no one who reads
rec.boats would fall for the fake MiniHarry.

" Tuuk" wrote in message
...
schilter,,

you said

''''''After a certain point it no longer matters who
"started it".
Paul'''''

you did schilter,,, you made a couple lies,, point blank lies,, and I
caught you smoking guns.

Then you lied about your lie,,, hmmmmm

just apologize for it and lets get over it,,, then it no longer matters
who started it,,

What you think? You man enough?????


You are some piece of cake Mr Tuck. Get some help.

SoFarrell,

It is interesting to note how Tuuk has gotten your attention with some minor
comments concerning Harry. I guess you can appreciate the Tuuk's
frustration when he "baited" Tuuk with discussions of Tuuk screwing his
sister and his sister and mother being prostitutes in Thailand. I for one
would not allow any comments made in rec.boats to upset me, but some do.


"SoFarrell" wrote in message
news:1112614403.c522ce10253e249b9cf40693219bfe76@t eranews...

" Tuuk" wrote in message
...
schilter,,

you said

''''''After a certain point it no longer matters who
"started it".
Paul'''''

you did schilter,,, you made a couple lies,, point blank lies,, and I
caught you smoking guns.

Then you lied about your lie,,, hmmmmm

just apologize for it and lets get over it,,, then it no longer matters
who started it,,

What you think? You man enough?????


You are some piece of cake Mr Tuck. Get some help.

On Mon, 4 Apr 2005 09:57:04 -0400, "Dr. Dr. K.G. Sherlock"
wrote:

SoFarrell,

It is interesting to note how Tuuk has gotten your attention with some minor
comments concerning Harry. I guess you can appreciate the Tuuk's
frustration when he "baited" Tuuk with discussions of Tuuk screwing his
sister and his sister and mother being prostitutes in Thailand. I for one
would not allow any comments made in rec.boats to upset me, but some do.


"SoFarrell" wrote in message
news:1112614403.c522ce10253e249b9cf40693219bfe76@ teranews...

" Tuuk" wrote in message
...
schilter,,

you said

''''''After a certain point it no longer matters who
"started it".
Paul'''''

you did schilter,,, you made a couple lies,, point blank lies,, and I
caught you smoking guns.

Then you lied about your lie,,, hmmmmm

just apologize for it and lets get over it,,, then it no longer matters
who started it,,

What you think? You man enough?????


You are some piece of cake Mr Tuck. Get some help.




I've asked SoFarrel to go read a years worth of Harry's posts, but I think he's
already developed his agenda.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

"Dr. Dr. K.G. Sherlock" wrote in message
...
SoFarrell,

It is interesting to note how Tuuk has gotten your attention with some
minor comments concerning Harry. I guess you can appreciate the Tuuk's
frustration when he "baited" Tuuk with discussions of Tuuk screwing his
sister and his sister and mother being prostitutes in Thailand. I for one
would not allow any comments made in rec.boats to upset me, but some do.

Tuuk needs to get over it and move on. He comes across as a crazy out of
control lunatic.

SoF,
I don't disagree with you, but my point is Tuuk's posts have gotten you
upset (without even directing his comments to you) so you have made numerous
posts concerning his behavior, his mental health and his medication level.

Your posts to Tuuk, while less intense than Tuuk's, are very similar in
natue.


"SoFarrell" wrote in message
news:1112638754.f2de2bb5f2c6afaabbc4909b7c97ae89@t eranews...

"Dr. Dr. K.G. Sherlock" wrote in message
...
SoFarrell,

It is interesting to note how Tuuk has gotten your attention with some
minor comments concerning Harry. I guess you can appreciate the Tuuk's
frustration when he "baited" Tuuk with discussions of Tuuk screwing his
sister and his sister and mother being prostitutes in Thailand. I for
one would not allow any comments made in rec.boats to upset me, but some
do.

Tuuk needs to get over it and move on. He comes across as a crazy out of
control lunatic.

"Just Me" wrote in message
...
SoF,
I don't disagree with you, but my point is Tuuk's posts have gotten you
upset (without even directing his comments to you) so you have made
numerous posts concerning his behavior, his mental health and his
medication level.

Your posts to Tuuk, while less intense than Tuuk's, are very similar in
natue.



My first few days here finding 6, 11, 13 post a day from this Tuuk person
that were nothing but expressions of hate and craziness made me wonder a lot
about this place. Sure, when I see really bad behavior instead of decent
discussion it is upsetting. I certainly do think Tuuk has mental health
problems and I urged him to seek help. Maybe you don't care about your
fellow people enough to say something but I do.

SoFarrell,
It is nice to see someone who cares about his neighbor, you should be
commended. I do care about my neighbors, but I know enough about NG's to
understand no one is going to seek healthcare, based upon my post in
rec.boats.


"SoFarrell" wrote in message
news:1112644049.93a47e7bb641ee560ffedf5cf2675466@t eranews...

"Just Me" wrote in message
...
SoF,
I don't disagree with you, but my point is Tuuk's posts have gotten you
upset (without even directing his comments to you) so you have made
numerous posts concerning his behavior, his mental health and his
medication level.

Your posts to Tuuk, while less intense than Tuuk's, are very similar in
natue.



My first few days here finding 6, 11, 13 post a day from this Tuuk person
that were nothing but expressions of hate and craziness made me wonder a
lot about this place. Sure, when I see really bad behavior instead of
decent discussion it is upsetting. I certainly do think Tuuk has mental
health problems and I urged him to seek help. Maybe you don't care about
your fellow people enough to say something but I do.