"John H" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 21:21:08 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:


"P.Fritz" wrote in message
...

The strongest indication that Terri could have given as to what she
wanted would have been formally assigning DPOA to her husband.

And the strongest evidence that her husband could have given was
announcing her desire immediately, not years later when he was
impregnating someone else.

Bingo! Why didn't he attempt to grant Terri's supposed wishes 14 years
earlier? His timing speaks volumes about the validity of his claim.


If you believe that Michael's motives were dishonorable, then nothing
will
change your mind.

If you believe that Michael's motives were honorable, then you wish that
the end
had come in 1998 when he first asked the court.

Why did he wait until then 1998? Who knows. Maybe he had spent years
hoping for
a breakthrough.

I don't know if his intentions where honorable, I do think they were
questionalbe......as were the parents.

--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."