Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "thunder" wrote in message ... On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 23:36:08 -0500, NOYB wrote: John McCain sits on the Commission on the Intelligence Capabilities of the United States Regarding Weapons of Mass Destruction. I wonder how much of the report will make mention of weapons shipped to Syria before the war? grin http://www.wmd.gov/about.html You are flogging a dead horse. The UN Resolutions required Saddam to disarm. *If* Saddam shipped his weapons off to Syria before the war, he was disarmed. So, no casus belli. And what were the terms of the loan of WMD to Syria? Does Syria get to keep the WMDs and used them as they see fit or is Syria supposed to return them to Iraq at some future time? You seem to be locked into this Syria WMD thing. Syria has WMD. In fact, their chemical WMD capability is considered unequaled in the middle-east. I have said this before, there is no reason for Syria to accept Saddam's second rate WMD. While you and I may not like the fact that Syria has WMD, as a sovereign nation, they are completely within their rights to have WMD. And, what will you say or do when Syria starts raining death down upon the middle east? Will you still say that Syria is a sovereign nation and that they can do what they want with their WMDs? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|