LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10   Report Post  
 
Posts: n/a
Default


DSK wrote:
John H wrote:
You deviate. Here is the mission, as of now. With what do you

disagree?

WARFIGHTING

1. Protect, promote and preserve U.S. interests in the Central

Region

Like what? Removing a dictator which we left in power in the 1st Gulf

War?

... to
include the free flow of energy resources,


Then why is the price of oil going up? Or do you interpret "free flow

of
energy resources" to mean "increased profits for oil companies"?


... access to regional states


Like Syria and Iran?

... freedom of navigation


Wow, now this one's almost on topic.

... and maintenance of regional stability.


Like in Lebanon and Saudi Arabia?


2. Develop and maintain the forces and infrastructure needed to

respond to
the full spectrum of military operations.


Good one... we are rebuilding the Iraq security force into a
self-sufficent unit. Not happening fast enough, but it's happening.

But
if that was a goal from the start, why did we destroy the Iraqi

security
forces in the first place?

3. Deter conflict through demonstrated resolve in such efforts

as forward
presence, prepositioning, exercises, and confidence building

measures.

It's hard to explain how we "deter conflict" by invading &

instigating a
war.

4. Maintain command readiness to fight and win decisively at all

levels of
conflict.


Now here (as I said earlier) we're going backwards. The Iraq war has
been a disaster for U.S. military readiness.


5. Protect the force by providing an appropriate level of

security and
safety.


I guess this is why so much of the security of U.S. bases is handled

by
subcontractors?

ENGAGEMENT
1. Maintain, support and contribute to coalitions and other

collective
security efforts that support U.S. and mutual interests in the

region.

That's why so many members of our Iraq coalition are pulling out.

2. Promote and support responsible and capable regional

militaries.

Like Syria?

3. Promote efforts in the region to counter threats from weapons

of mass
destruction, terrorism, information warfare, and drug trafficking.


That must be why we concluded there are none... are were no... WMDs

in
Iraq, why terrorism in the region is increasing, why the terrorist &
fundamentalists are gaining increasing access to public media and are


increasingly popular; and finally, why the heroin trade is booming in


Afghanistan.

The rest of the list is seeing similar results. The Bush

Administration
clearly had *none* of these goals in mind for the Iraq invasion.

DSK


It won't work, John just isn't getting it. He's asked the question over
and over, you guys have answered over and over, and his response is to
ask the same damned thing again!!!!



 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
(OT) Some in Bush's 'coalition of the willing' are suddenly losingtheir will Jim General 0 March 19th 04 01:35 PM
The same people Simple Simon ASA 28 July 23rd 03 03:20 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:36 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017