John,
Iraq: The part about invading a foreign nation for the purpose of
deposing its leader. Afghanistan I don't have a problem with, different
circumstances,Iraq was a mistake.
If the reasons for invading Iraq are valid, when are we going to invade
Iran, China, North Korea, Cuba or any number of other non democratic
nations.
I'm not saying we shouldn't be doing something about them, but invasion
isn't the answer. Most of all because these nations aren't or didn't
invade us. They're using gorilla tactics, we should too.
IMHO
Paul


John H wrote:
On 28 Mar 2005 21:20:58 -0800, wrote:


Here's a link to most programs of this type.

http://www.defendamerica.mil/support_troops.html


The men and women serving in Iraq and their families left behind are
worthy of respect and support for their loyalty and service, even if
the mission itself is a crock of crap. The service people don't get to
debate where they're going to be sent or what moralities are involved.


What part of their mission is a crock of crap, Chuck?

On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 17:09:18 -0500, Paul Schilter ""paulschilter\"@comcast dot
net" wrote:

John,
Iraq: The part about invading a foreign nation for the purpose of
deposing its leader. Afghanistan I don't have a problem with, different
circumstances,Iraq was a mistake.
If the reasons for invading Iraq are valid, when are we going to invade
Iran, China, North Korea, Cuba or any number of other non democratic
nations.
I'm not saying we shouldn't be doing something about them, but invasion
isn't the answer. Most of all because these nations aren't or didn't
invade us. They're using gorilla tactics, we should too.
IMHO
Paul


We aren't talking about invading anyone. We're talking about the *mission* of
the soldiers who are there now.

It's really simple.

I have never said I liked the idea of invading Iraq!
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."