|
Just got back from voting.
We the omnipotent in NH will decide who's left for the rest of you to choose
between.!! -W |
Just got back from voting.
Clams Canino wrote:
We the omnipotent in NH will decide who's left for the rest of you to choose between.!! -W How's the turnout? How's the weather across the state? -- Email sent to is never read. |
Just got back from voting.
Turnout looks pretty good. Weather is holding so far. Cold though. So far it smells like a close call between Dean and Carrey. -W "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Clams Canino wrote: We the omnipotent in NH will decide who's left for the rest of you to choose between.!! -W How's the turnout? How's the weather across the state? -- Email sent to is never read. |
Just got back from voting.
John Gaquin wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message How's the turnout? How's the weather across the state? Most news outlets reporting unusually high turnout. Some weatherfolk are now downgrading the storm forecast. That's good. I always like to see high turnout. It means the voters are engaged. -- Email sent to is never read. |
Just got back from voting.
"Harry Krause" wrote in message How's the turnout? How's the weather across the state? Most news outlets reporting unusually high turnout. Some weatherfolk are now downgrading the storm forecast. |
Just got back from voting.
GOOD!
"John Gaquin" wrote in message news:yJqdnU7FzIQdd4vdRVn- Some weatherfolk are now downgrading the storm forecast. |
Just got back from voting.
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... John Gaquin wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message How's the turnout? How's the weather across the state? Most news outlets reporting unusually high turnout. Some weatherfolk are now downgrading the storm forecast. That's good. I always like to see high turnout. It means the voters are engaged. In the 2000 election in Wisconsin, high turnout simply meant that people were eager to get their free cartons of cigarettes for voting Democrat. |
Just got back from voting.
You owe me a new mouthfull of chicken!
-W "NOYB" wrote in message news:zQCRb.27951 In the 2000 election in Wisconsin, high turnout simply meant that people were eager to get their free cartons of cigarettes for voting Democrat. |
Just got back from voting.
Gene Kearns wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 17:51:12 -0500, "John Gaquin" wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message How's the turnout? How's the weather across the state? Most news outlets reporting unusually high turnout. Some weatherfolk are now downgrading the storm forecast. Where the hell were they when we needed them??? Dunno, but the exit poll data is interesting: The exit poll results, which were based largely on interviews conducted with voters as they left the polls, showed that about half of voters considered themselves Democrats, and nearly that many called themselves independent or "something else." Forty-eight percent said they or someone else in their household had served in the U.S. military. (Half Democrats, half indies or something else...really interesting) About a third said they had finally decided on a candidate within the past three days, the exit poll results showed. Slightly more than a third said they chose their candidate because they think he can defeat President Bush in November. More than half said it was because the candidate agreed with them on the major issues. Asked to name the one issue that mattered most in deciding which candidate to support, the largest number of those polled -- about 30 percent -- cited "health care/Medicare," an issue that Kerry repeatedly emphasized. About a fifth said their biggest concern was the economy and jobs, while a similar share said it was the war in Iraq. About eight in ten said they were very or somewhat worried about the direction of the nation's economy in the next few years. Nearly two-thirds said they disapproved of the U.S. decision to go to war with Iraq, and about seven in ten said they felt the war did not make American safer from terrorism. ALL issues on which Bush is very, very vulnerable. If Kerry is the nominee, he'll have Bush on the run from the get-go. -- Email sent to is never read. |
Just got back from voting.
Gene Kearns wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 20:20:39 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: Dunno, but the exit poll data is interesting: This is, truly, a race to be watched. Pres. Bush is wise enough to realize that this may not be a cakewalk.... and from the Clinton administration years, I've learned to disregard how people *say* they are going to vote..... As long as the candidate isn't from my home state... I'll at least listen..... I've seen enough not to beat the drum loudly for GW as I did in the last election..... You might be interesting in knowing that Kerry is not nearly as liberal as the label the neocons are trying to lay over him. I think Kerry will unite the party and it will get behind him, and even Democrats who were not supporting him will. I'm reminded of Lane Kirkland's comments on Walter Mondale. Kirkland, the former head of the AFL-CIO, was not a fan of Mondale. But when it became obvious Mondale was going to be the nominee, Kirkland said "We'll find things to admire about Mondale that even his mother didn't know." -- Email sent to is never read. |
Just got back from voting.
Harry Krause wrote: I'm reminded of Lane Kirkland's comments on Walter Mondale. Kirkland, the former head of the AFL-CIO, was not a fan of Mondale. But when it became obvious Mondale was going to be the nominee, Kirkland said "We'll find things to admire about Mondale that even his mother didn't know." Yup, the typical insincerity of politics. Puke.......... -- Charlie ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
Just got back from voting.
"Clams Canino" wrote in message news:huBRb.165773$I06.1636384@attbi_s01... Turnout looks pretty good. Weather is holding so far. Cold though. So far it smells like a close call between Dean and Carrey. The Kohn's have changed their family name again? http://www.jewishsf.com/bk030207/us02.shtml |
Just got back from voting.
I think its going to be a l-o-n-g year....
Capt. Frank Clams Canino wrote: We the omnipotent in NH will decide who's left for the rest of you to choose between.!! -W |
Just got back from voting.
ROFL
I don't useually get involved in OT discussinos, but I loved your comment! Capt. Frank www.home.earthlink.net/~aartworks ======= COMING SOON ====== SPLASH! ==== NOYB wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... John Gaquin wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message How's the turnout? How's the weather across the state? Most news outlets reporting unusually high turnout. Some weatherfolk are now downgrading the storm forecast. That's good. I always like to see high turnout. It means the voters are engaged. In the 2000 election in Wisconsin, high turnout simply meant that people were eager to get their free cartons of cigarettes for voting Democrat. |
Just got back from voting.
"Harry Krause" wrote in message news:bv72q8 The exit poll results, which were based largely on interviews conducted with voters as they left the polls, Gee, ya think? :-) |
Just got back from voting.
"Harry Krause" wrote in message news:bv74l9 You might be interesting in knowing that Kerry is not nearly as liberal as the label the neocons are trying to lay over him. Don't try to dance to that music. Kerry's voting record for years has been a virtual duplicate of Kennedy's. Some folks here think Ted Kennedy is the conservative one. I bet TK doesn't hear that too often! |
Just got back from voting.
"Capt. Frank Hopkins" wrote in I think its going to be a l-o-n-g year.... Not at all!!! This is the greatest sport there is. Super-Bowl, Shmooper-Bowl! |
Just got back from voting.
"Gene Kearns" wrote: I'll keep an open mind..... but as long as the Democrats run idiots like Johnson, Carter, and Clinton..... I just can't do it. You may not like Carter or Clinton. You may think one was weak or the other was morally bankrupt. I can understand how you might disagree with their policies. But how in the world can you honestly peg either of those men as an idiot?? These are two VERY bright men. Really, I'm curious. |
Just got back from voting.
yeah John, I know.
I have had stupid-bowl shoved up my asterisk unitl I am sick of it. Herr Mayor and cronies have raised taxes to rebuild the bold new sewer of the south to host the damn thing next year. Of course, a lot of the money found its way into Herr Mayor's (daddy's) oil, concrete, construction, and retail corporations. Nothing I can do abouot it though except put up with another 12 months of misery. Regards, Capt. Frank John Gaquin wrote: "Capt. Frank Hopkins" wrote in I think its going to be a l-o-n-g year.... Not at all!!! This is the greatest sport there is. Super-Bowl, Shmooper-Bowl! |
Just got back from voting.
"Gene Kearns" wrote: I'll keep an open mind..... but as long as the Democrats run idiots like Johnson, Carter, and Clinton..... I just can't do it. Gary Warner wrote: You may not like Carter or Clinton. You may think one was weak or the other was morally bankrupt. I can understand how you might disagree with their policies. But how in the world can you honestly peg either of those men as an idiot?? These are two VERY bright men. Really, I'm curious. Pure bigotry, what else? The hatred of the Religious Right for President Jimmy Carter shows that they are neither religious nor right. Jimmy Carter is an outstanding example of Christian ethics and principles in action. There is nobody on the "religious" right who walks the walk like Carter does... and has, all his life. He may not have been a great President... IMHO the fiasco at Desert One has overshadowed a lot of his positive accomplishments... but he is a great man... and that _bothers_ them. Regards Doug King |
Just got back from voting.
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 21:45:03 GMT, "Clams Canino"
wrote: We the omnipotent in NH will decide who's left for the rest of you to choose between.!! -W You guys up there did good, Clams. Don't know if Kerry was your choice, but he's the one I'd have picked. I would have liked to see Edwards get a better turnout, at the expense of Clark (especially) and Dean. But, all in all you guys did pretty good. John H On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! |
Just got back from voting.
From what I saw Edwards got a lot of write in votes on the VP side of the ballot. And let's face it, to have a prayer of carrying the south, Damn Yankees like Kerry or Dean will need his ass in the VP slot. To me that's a no-brainer. -W "John H" wrote in message ... On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 21:45:03 GMT, "Clams Canino" wrote: We the omnipotent in NH will decide who's left for the rest of you to choose between.!! -W You guys up there did good, Clams. Don't know if Kerry was your choice, but he's the one I'd have picked. I would have liked to see Edwards get a better turnout, at the expense of Clark (especially) and Dean. But, all in all you guys did pretty good. John H On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! |
Just got back from voting.
"Clams Canino" wrote in message We the omnipotent in NH will decide who's left for the rest of you to choose between.!! What's fascinating to ponder as the primary season develops is this: in both Iowa and NH, Al Gore took a slap with each percentage point that Dean faded. Likewise in NH, Gen. Clark, the Clintons' stalking horse, went nowhere at all. In essence, the top echelon of the Democrat Party has thus far been repudiated by Democrat voters. Many states to go, but an interesting start. |
Just got back from voting.
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 23:09:00 -0500, "John Gaquin"
wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message news:bv72q8 The exit poll results, which were based largely on interviews conducted with voters as they left the polls, Gee, ya think? :-) Harry in his 'Educator of the Masses' role. John H On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! |
Just got back from voting.
"DSK" wrote in message
... The hatred of the Religious Right for President Jimmy Carter shows that they are neither religious nor right. Jimmy Carter is an outstanding example of Christian ethics and principles in action. There is nobody on the "religious" right who walks the walk like Carter does... and has, all his life. He may not have been a great President... IMHO the fiasco at Desert One has overshadowed a lot of his positive accomplishments... but he is a great man... and that _bothers_ them. Well, Beatrice, hushed tones....he runs that monstrous Habitat for Humanity thing! Did you know that quite a few of those houses ended up being built for colored folk??? Negroes! The nerve of that man. Not only that, but he's a fly fisherman. Too high & mighty to use stinkbait like the rest of us. Would you like another mint julep? |
Just got back from voting.
"John H" wrote in message
... On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 23:09:00 -0500, "John Gaquin" wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message news:bv72q8 The exit poll results, which were based largely on interviews conducted with voters as they left the polls, Gee, ya think? :-) Harry in his 'Educator of the Masses' role. John H I think Harry's had too much exposure to President Airhead. :-) This is why I won't let my son watch Georgie. |
Just got back from voting.
Hey....are youse suggestin that there might be some kinda malfeasance
between da mayor and the holy construction industry? I hope not, 'cause youse could end up closely linked wit da cement business, if youse not careful. "Capt. Frank Hopkins" wrote in message link.net... yeah John, I know. I have had stupid-bowl shoved up my asterisk unitl I am sick of it. Herr Mayor and cronies have raised taxes to rebuild the bold new sewer of the south to host the damn thing next year. Of course, a lot of the money found its way into Herr Mayor's (daddy's) oil, concrete, construction, and retail corporations. Nothing I can do abouot it though except put up with another 12 months of misery. Regards, Capt. Frank John Gaquin wrote: "Capt. Frank Hopkins" wrote in I think its going to be a l-o-n-g year.... Not at all!!! This is the greatest sport there is. Super-Bowl, Shmooper-Bowl! |
Just got back from voting.
"Harry Krause" wrote in message Are you fellas really as stupid as you present? Exit polls are nothing more than raw data. The data has to be analyzed and put into meaningful form. Exit poll results are based upon more than just interviews with voters as they leave the polls. In other words, exit poll results are based *largely* but not entirely on these interviews. OK, I think I've got it now. Let me see -- you take the Exit Polls, read the data, think about the data, arrange the data in neat rows and columns, and when your done, you have -- Exit Polls! OK!!!! Thanks, Harry! |
Just got back from voting.
"John Gaquin" wrote in message ... "Harry Krause" wrote in message Are you fellas really as stupid as you present? Exit polls are nothing more than raw data. The data has to be analyzed and put into meaningful form. Exit poll results are based upon more than just interviews with voters as they leave the polls. In other words, exit poll results are based *largely* but not entirely on these interviews. OK, I think I've got it now. Let me see -- you take the Exit Polls, read the data, think about the data, arrange the data in neat rows and columns, and when your done, you have -- Exit Polls! OK!!!! Thanks, Harry! John you ****in' simpleton. You're just so stupid it's not even worth debating any further. If you weren't so dumb, Harry could explain it to you. Of course, your binary thinking would make you conclude that "exit polls" and "exit polls" are the same thing. Bush is dumb. You're dumber. Geez. Don't you get it!? turn off sarcasm mode |
Just got back from voting.
"NOYB" wrote in message news:F9XRb.612 John you ****in' simpleton... Geez. Don't you get it!? Doh!!! |
Just got back from voting.
Of course, if I were smart enough to truly understand these things, I couldn't help but be a democrat! |
Just got back from voting.
John Gaquin wrote: OK, I think I've got it now. Let me see -- you take the Exit Polls, read the data, think about the data, arrange the data in neat rows and columns, and when your done, you have -- Exit Polls! OK!!!! Thanks, Harry! John, you forgot the spin part. When krause says, "The data has to be analyzed and put into meaningful form", that's krause spinning it. -- Charlie ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
Just got back from voting.
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 22:59:49 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:
"John Gaquin" wrote in message ... "Harry Krause" wrote in message Are you fellas really as stupid as you present? Exit polls are nothing more than raw data. The data has to be analyzed and put into meaningful form. Exit poll results are based upon more than just interviews with voters as they leave the polls. In other words, exit poll results are based *largely* but not entirely on these interviews. OK, I think I've got it now. Let me see -- you take the Exit Polls, read the data, think about the data, arrange the data in neat rows and columns, and when your done, you have -- Exit Polls! OK!!!! Thanks, Harry! John you ****in' simpleton. You're just so stupid it's not even worth debating any further. If you weren't so dumb, Harry could explain it to you. Of course, your binary thinking would make you conclude that "exit polls" and "exit polls" are the same thing. Bush is dumb. You're dumber. Geez. Don't you get it!? turn off sarcasm mode I sure hope you're talking to that other John and not this one. Hell, I only thought that exit polls were taken as they *entered*. I'm not near as badly off as the other guy. Thank God for the Harry's of this world to keep us straight. John H On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! |
Just got back from voting.
"John Gaquin" wrote in message ... Of course, if I were smart enough to truly understand these things, I couldn't help but be a democrat! Its not the exit poll that is important it it the person that analyizes the exit pool, just like it's not the vote that is important it is the vote coutner that is important. Bert |
Just got back from voting.
"Gene Kearns" wrote in message ... Stupid is as stupid does. That's one of the stupidest things I've ever heard. |
Just got back from voting.
DSK wrote in message . ..
"Gene Kearns" wrote: I'll keep an open mind..... but as long as the Democrats run idiots like Johnson, Carter, and Clinton..... I just can't do it. Gary Warner wrote: You may not like Carter or Clinton. You may think one was weak or the other was morally bankrupt. I can understand how you might disagree with their policies. But how in the world can you honestly peg either of those men as an idiot?? These are two VERY bright men. Really, I'm curious. Pure bigotry, what else? The hatred of the Religious Right for President Jimmy Carter shows that they are neither religious nor right. Jimmy Carter is an outstanding example of Christian ethics and principles in action. There is nobody on the "religious" right who walks the walk like Carter does... and has, all his life. He may not have been a great President... IMHO the fiasco at Desert One has overshadowed a lot of his positive accomplishments... but he is a great man... and that _bothers_ them. Regards Doug King You are absolutely correct! |
Just got back from voting.
only cowards hide behind fake email names!
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:16 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com