"John Gaquin" wrote in message
news

"JimH" wrote in message news:VPmdnev4CNTf1NXfRVn-

Sorry for doubting you. Folks here sometimes have fun with Bayliners.
;-)

Never mind that..... you said "...Looks like a PhotoShop job to me..."
Just what interpretive standards were you applying? :-)


No depth, no shadows.

JimH wrote:
"John Gaquin" wrote in message
news

"JimH" wrote in message news:VPmdnev4CNTf1NXfRVn-

Sorry for doubting you. Folks here sometimes have fun with
Bayliners.
;-)

Never mind that..... you said "...Looks like a PhotoShop job to
me..."
Just what interpretive standards were you applying? :-)


No depth, no shadows.

The further away a subject is, the less depth of field there is.

"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

JimH wrote:
"John Gaquin" wrote in message
news

"JimH" wrote in message news:VPmdnev4CNTf1NXfRVn-

Sorry for doubting you. Folks here sometimes have fun with
Bayliners.
;-)

Never mind that..... you said "...Looks like a PhotoShop job to
me..."
Just what interpretive standards were you applying? :-)


No depth, no shadows.

The further away a subject is, the less depth of field there is.


I realize that. But the boat is not that far away yet there are no shadows
(depth) on it or cast onto the surrounding landscape by it.

It was an initial reaction. I was wrong. I explained my reasoning. Time
to move on.

On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 08:51:35 -0500, "JimH" wrote:


"basskisser" wrote in message
roups.com...

JimH wrote:
"John Gaquin" wrote in message
news
"JimH" wrote in message news:VPmdnev4CNTf1NXfRVn-

Sorry for doubting you. Folks here sometimes have fun with
Bayliners.
;-)

Never mind that..... you said "...Looks like a PhotoShop job to
me..."
Just what interpretive standards were you applying? :-)


No depth, no shadows.

The further away a subject is, the less depth of field there is.


I realize that. But the boat is not that far away yet there are no shadows
(depth) on it or cast onto the surrounding landscape by it.

It was an initial reaction. I was wrong. I explained my reasoning. Time
to move on.

Think about it for a minute and you will answer your own question.

There is a reason is looks flat.

Later,

Tom

On 29 Mar 2005 05:26:21 -0800, "basskisser" wrote:


JimH wrote:
"John Gaquin" wrote in message
news

"JimH" wrote in message news:VPmdnev4CNTf1NXfRVn-

Sorry for doubting you. Folks here sometimes have fun with
Bayliners.
;-)

Never mind that..... you said "...Looks like a PhotoShop job to
me..."
Just what interpretive standards were you applying? :-)


No depth, no shadows.

The further away a subject is, the less depth of field there is.

I think you've got it backwards.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."