BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   OT for Fritz and Calif Bill - it's LABATT (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/29616-ot-fritz-calif-bill-its-labatt.html)

P.Fritz March 30th 05 03:24 PM


"John H" wrote in message
...
On 30 Mar 2005 05:50:58 -0800, wrote:


Calif Bill wrote:
Possessive "s"


It's NOT "Labatt's". Look at the companies website! Do you contend that
the owners of the company don't know what they are talking about?
Using your analogy, because Labatt was Labatt's 32 YEARS AGO, then it
would also be correct to call a Nissan a Datsun?????? Again, just
because people still say "Labatt's" doesn't make it correct. Hell, it's
so damned simple all you need to do is look on the label. Report back
to me what it says, okay?


basskisser, do you remember this post of yours?


You forgot the one where he claimed that schnapps was a whiskey.........or
'cow down' LMAO

Asslicker once again proves he is the "King of the NG idiots"



******************

On 29 Mar 2005 05:26:21 -0800, "basskisser" wrote:


The further away a subject is, the less depth of field there is.


**********************

Did you know what you were talking about when you said that?
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."




P.Fritz March 30th 05 03:27 PM


"JimH" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
ups.com...

P.Fritz wrote:
"JimH" wrote in message
...

"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

Calif Bill wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message
...

"basskisser" wrote in message
Well, Fritz's problem is the fact that he feels out of place.

He
just
doesn't have the ability to post anything of any value to

anyone,
so
his station in life is to stalk me and call me childish

names,
etc.
Bill's problem is he just doesn't know what he's talking

about
most of
the time. I've contributed that to senility, and he's never
disagreed
with that.

I guess if they stay away from giving 'boating advice' we can
consider
them
harmless.




You were a teacher? Damn, I pity the students you had in class.

You
are
getting almost as stupid as basskisser.

Calling ME stupid, and you can't even get Labatt correct!!!!!!!

Oh, and
HOW much does concrete weigh? Oh, and those speeding tickets where

they
take your vehicle? Just about everything that you've posted here

that
is of any relevance, I've shown you don't know what you are

talking
about. Did you take a look at the web sites I posted? Did you see
ANYTHING that said "Labatt's"???????


http://www.mylifeisbeer.com/beer/bot...topics/230.jpg

http://www.labattblue.com/blue/images/lda_usa_main.jpg

You are right and you are wrong.

Now drop it already.

And few more

http://www.beerhistory.com/gallery/h...cklabatt.shtml

http://www.breweriana.com/misc/taplabatts223.html

http://members.fortunecity.com/robsc...abatt_blue.htm

http://ilmot.co.uk/LabattsLager.html

http://mplate.com/images/Olympics/Me...ture%20342.jpg

http://mplate.com/images/Olympics/Me...ture%20067.jpg

http://mplate.com/images/Beer/Picture%20036.jpg


Many places still refer to it as Labatt's


http://www.dutyfree.ca/cgi-bin/produ...3&which_com=88

http://www.oldtownaa.com/drinks.html

http://www.handlebarchicago.com/menu.php


http://www.bevmo.com/productinfo.asp...2250&area=beer


Asslicker's attempted flame for Labatt's is just more proof that he

is "King
of the NG idiots"

ALL are pre-1973, as I've said over and over. Because it USED TO BE
Labatt's doesn't mean it is now. Jeesh......


http://www.zutroy.com/stuff/neverend/


It is getting pretty comical..........this from the person that claims that
schnapps is "whiskey"

BTW.....the vendor websites are all current........it is just as liekly to
be advertised as Labatt's as Labatt.........asslicker once again is too dumb
to realize that he is ****ing in the wind.






[email protected] March 30th 05 06:01 PM


John H wrote:
On 30 Mar 2005 05:50:58 -0800, wrote:


Calif Bill wrote:
Possessive "s"


It's NOT "Labatt's". Look at the companies website! Do you contend

that
the owners of the company don't know what they are talking about?
Using your analogy, because Labatt was Labatt's 32 YEARS AGO, then

it
would also be correct to call a Nissan a Datsun?????? Again, just
because people still say "Labatt's" doesn't make it correct. Hell,

it's
so damned simple all you need to do is look on the label. Report

back
to me what it says, okay?


basskisser, do you remember this post of yours?

******************

On 29 Mar 2005 05:26:21 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:


The further away a subject is, the less depth of field there is.


**********************

Did you know what you were talking about when you said that?
--
John H

Absolutely! And a clue for you, don't get distance vs. depth of field
confused with depth of field for different focal lengths.


[email protected] March 30th 05 06:04 PM


P.Fritz wrote:
"JimH" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
ups.com...

P.Fritz wrote:
"JimH" wrote in message
...

"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

Calif Bill wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message
...

"basskisser" wrote in message
Well, Fritz's problem is the fact that he feels out of

place.
He
just
doesn't have the ability to post anything of any value to
anyone,
so
his station in life is to stalk me and call me childish
names,
etc.
Bill's problem is he just doesn't know what he's talking
about
most of
the time. I've contributed that to senility, and he's

never
disagreed
with that.

I guess if they stay away from giving 'boating advice' we

can
consider
them
harmless.




You were a teacher? Damn, I pity the students you had in

class.
You
are
getting almost as stupid as basskisser.

Calling ME stupid, and you can't even get Labatt

correct!!!!!!!
Oh, and
HOW much does concrete weigh? Oh, and those speeding tickets

where
they
take your vehicle? Just about everything that you've posted

here
that
is of any relevance, I've shown you don't know what you are
talking
about. Did you take a look at the web sites I posted? Did you

see
ANYTHING that said "Labatt's"???????


http://www.mylifeisbeer.com/beer/bot...topics/230.jpg

http://www.labattblue.com/blue/images/lda_usa_main.jpg

You are right and you are wrong.

Now drop it already.

And few more

http://www.beerhistory.com/gallery/h...cklabatt.shtml

http://www.breweriana.com/misc/taplabatts223.html

http://members.fortunecity.com/robsc...abatt_blue.htm

http://ilmot.co.uk/LabattsLager.html

http://mplate.com/images/Olympics/Me...ture%20342.jpg

http://mplate.com/images/Olympics/Me...ture%20067.jpg

http://mplate.com/images/Beer/Picture%20036.jpg


Many places still refer to it as Labatt's



http://www.dutyfree.ca/cgi-bin/produ...3&which_com=88

http://www.oldtownaa.com/drinks.html

http://www.handlebarchicago.com/menu.php



http://www.bevmo.com/productinfo.asp...2250&area=beer


Asslicker's attempted flame for Labatt's is just more proof that

he
is "King
of the NG idiots"

ALL are pre-1973, as I've said over and over. Because it USED TO

BE
Labatt's doesn't mean it is now. Jeesh......


http://www.zutroy.com/stuff/neverend/


It is getting pretty comical..........this from the person that

claims that
schnapps is "whiskey"

BTW.....the vendor websites are all current........it is just as

liekly to
be advertised as Labatt's as Labatt.........asslicker once again is

too dumb
to realize that he is ****ing in the wind.

And they are WRONG. Look at the bottle, Fritz, how in the hell plain
can it be???????? Go to the COMPANY'S WEBSITE...are THEY WRONG???????
It couldn't be more simple, I thought even YOU would get it. It's been
Labatt Blue since 1973. Again, do you think that it would be correct to
call a 2005 Nissan a Datsun?


JimH March 30th 05 06:09 PM


wrote in message
oups.com...

P.Fritz wrote:
"JimH" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
ups.com...

P.Fritz wrote:
"JimH" wrote in message
...

"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

Calif Bill wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message
...

"basskisser" wrote in message
Well, Fritz's problem is the fact that he feels out of

place.
He
just
doesn't have the ability to post anything of any value to
anyone,
so
his station in life is to stalk me and call me childish
names,
etc.
Bill's problem is he just doesn't know what he's talking
about
most of
the time. I've contributed that to senility, and he's

never
disagreed
with that.

I guess if they stay away from giving 'boating advice' we

can
consider
them
harmless.




You were a teacher? Damn, I pity the students you had in

class.
You
are
getting almost as stupid as basskisser.

Calling ME stupid, and you can't even get Labatt

correct!!!!!!!
Oh, and
HOW much does concrete weigh? Oh, and those speeding tickets

where
they
take your vehicle? Just about everything that you've posted

here
that
is of any relevance, I've shown you don't know what you are
talking
about. Did you take a look at the web sites I posted? Did you

see
ANYTHING that said "Labatt's"???????


http://www.mylifeisbeer.com/beer/bot...topics/230.jpg

http://www.labattblue.com/blue/images/lda_usa_main.jpg

You are right and you are wrong.

Now drop it already.

And few more

http://www.beerhistory.com/gallery/h...cklabatt.shtml

http://www.breweriana.com/misc/taplabatts223.html

http://members.fortunecity.com/robsc...abatt_blue.htm

http://ilmot.co.uk/LabattsLager.html

http://mplate.com/images/Olympics/Me...ture%20342.jpg

http://mplate.com/images/Olympics/Me...ture%20067.jpg

http://mplate.com/images/Beer/Picture%20036.jpg


Many places still refer to it as Labatt's



http://www.dutyfree.ca/cgi-bin/produ...3&which_com=88

http://www.oldtownaa.com/drinks.html

http://www.handlebarchicago.com/menu.php



http://www.bevmo.com/productinfo.asp...2250&area=beer


Asslicker's attempted flame for Labatt's is just more proof that

he
is "King
of the NG idiots"

ALL are pre-1973, as I've said over and over. Because it USED TO

BE
Labatt's doesn't mean it is now. Jeesh......


http://www.zutroy.com/stuff/neverend/


It is getting pretty comical..........this from the person that

claims that
schnapps is "whiskey"

BTW.....the vendor websites are all current........it is just as

liekly to
be advertised as Labatt's as Labatt.........asslicker once again is

too dumb
to realize that he is ****ing in the wind.

And they are WRONG. Look at the bottle, Fritz, how in the hell plain
can it be???????? Go to the COMPANY'S WEBSITE...are THEY WRONG???????
It couldn't be more simple, I thought even YOU would get it. It's been
Labatt Blue since 1973. Again, do you think that it would be correct to
call a 2005 Nissan a Datsun?


http://www.zutroy.com/stuff/neverend/



[email protected] March 30th 05 06:11 PM


P.Fritz wrote:
"John H" wrote in message
...
On 30 Mar 2005 05:50:58 -0800, wrote:


Calif Bill wrote:
Possessive "s"

It's NOT "Labatt's". Look at the companies website! Do you contend

that
the owners of the company don't know what they are talking about?
Using your analogy, because Labatt was Labatt's 32 YEARS AGO, then

it
would also be correct to call a Nissan a Datsun?????? Again, just
because people still say "Labatt's" doesn't make it correct. Hell,

it's
so damned simple all you need to do is look on the label. Report

back
to me what it says, okay?


basskisser, do you remember this post of yours?


You forgot the one where he claimed that schnapps was a whiskey.


I proved my point, and you, as usual, couldn't defend YOUR stance, so
again resorted to childish, sissy like name calling. You fortify my
point about you every day, and don't even realize it!!!!

.........or
'cow down'

Again, I can't help it if you've never lived in an area where that is a
phrase heard a LOT. A band from northeastern PA that's made it semi-big
time even has it in a song.

Asslicker once again proves he is the "King of the NG idiots"

Fritz once again proves by name calling that he is the most childish,
petty, person here. His problem is his ego has been crushed by his
divorce, and his inablility to raise a kid. So, in real life being the
wall-flower, scared of everything type, he hides behind a newsgroup and
calls names, thinking that people will respect him more. How sad and
pathetic. I do, however like the way that he fortifies my assertions
about him on a daily basis, and he doesn't even realize it!


P.Fritz March 30th 05 06:18 PM


"JimH" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...

P.Fritz wrote:
"JimH" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
ups.com...

P.Fritz wrote:
"JimH" wrote in message
...

"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

Calif Bill wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message
...

"basskisser" wrote in message
Well, Fritz's problem is the fact that he feels out of

place.
He
just
doesn't have the ability to post anything of any value to
anyone,
so
his station in life is to stalk me and call me childish
names,
etc.
Bill's problem is he just doesn't know what he's talking
about
most of
the time. I've contributed that to senility, and he's

never
disagreed
with that.

I guess if they stay away from giving 'boating advice' we

can
consider
them
harmless.




You were a teacher? Damn, I pity the students you had in

class.
You
are
getting almost as stupid as basskisser.

Calling ME stupid, and you can't even get Labatt

correct!!!!!!!
Oh, and
HOW much does concrete weigh? Oh, and those speeding tickets

where
they
take your vehicle? Just about everything that you've posted

here
that
is of any relevance, I've shown you don't know what you are
talking
about. Did you take a look at the web sites I posted? Did you

see
ANYTHING that said "Labatt's"???????


http://www.mylifeisbeer.com/beer/bot...topics/230.jpg

http://www.labattblue.com/blue/images/lda_usa_main.jpg

You are right and you are wrong.

Now drop it already.

And few more

http://www.beerhistory.com/gallery/h...cklabatt.shtml

http://www.breweriana.com/misc/taplabatts223.html

http://members.fortunecity.com/robsc...abatt_blue.htm

http://ilmot.co.uk/LabattsLager.html

http://mplate.com/images/Olympics/Me...ture%20342.jpg

http://mplate.com/images/Olympics/Me...ture%20067.jpg

http://mplate.com/images/Beer/Picture%20036.jpg


Many places still refer to it as Labatt's



http://www.dutyfree.ca/cgi-bin/produ...3&which_com=88

http://www.oldtownaa.com/drinks.html

http://www.handlebarchicago.com/menu.php



http://www.bevmo.com/productinfo.asp...2250&area=beer


Asslicker's attempted flame for Labatt's is just more proof that

he
is "King
of the NG idiots"

ALL are pre-1973, as I've said over and over. Because it USED TO

BE
Labatt's doesn't mean it is now. Jeesh......


http://www.zutroy.com/stuff/neverend/

It is getting pretty comical..........this from the person that

claims that
schnapps is "whiskey"

BTW.....the vendor websites are all current........it is just as

liekly to
be advertised as Labatt's as Labatt.........asslicker once again is

too dumb
to realize that he is ****ing in the wind.

And they are WRONG. Look at the bottle, Fritz, how in the hell plain
can it be???????? Go to the COMPANY'S WEBSITE...are THEY WRONG???????
It couldn't be more simple, I thought even YOU would get it. It's been
Labatt Blue since 1973. Again, do you think that it would be correct to
call a 2005 Nissan a Datsun?


http://www.zutroy.com/stuff/neverend/


ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMMMMMMMMMMM MMMMMMMM

once again asslicker wonders what that sound way above his head is.







John H March 30th 05 06:29 PM

On 30 Mar 2005 09:01:59 -0800, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 30 Mar 2005 05:50:58 -0800,
wrote:

The further away a subject is, the less depth of field there is.


**********************

Did you know what you were talking about when you said that?
--
John H

Absolutely! And a clue for you, don't get distance vs. depth of field
confused with depth of field for different focal lengths.


Here, go learn something:

http://www.wrotniak.net/photo/dof/

Extract:
************************************************** *******
Basic facts

The extent of the depth of field depends on what we understand as "acceptably
sharp" in the definition above. If we are willing to accept more unsharpness,
the depth of field will extend more. For sharpness-critical applications, it
will be very shallow.

Depth of field increases as the lens is closed down (i.e., the F-number
increases).

Depth of field is greater for short focal lengths than for long ones. This
difference is quite dramatic.

Depth of field increases with the subject distance.
************************************************** ************

You weren't discussing focal lengths or aperture.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

John H March 30th 05 06:37 PM

On 30 Mar 2005 09:11:42 -0800, wrote:


Fritz once again proves by name calling that he is the most childish,
petty, person here. His problem is his ego has been crushed by his
divorce, and his inablility to raise a kid. So, in real life being the
wall-flower, scared of everything type, he hides behind a newsgroup and
calls names, thinking that people will respect him more. How sad and
pathetic. I do, however like the way that he fortifies my assertions
about him on a daily basis, and he doesn't even realize it!



Speaking of name-calling, basskisser, do you remember this famous post?

**************************************
On 2 Mar 2005 12:07:35 -0800,
wrote:


And all of the conservatives here are lying ****ing pigs, just like
you, liar.

********************************

That was a jewel.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

P.Fritz March 30th 05 06:42 PM


"John H" wrote in message
...
On 30 Mar 2005 09:01:59 -0800, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 30 Mar 2005 05:50:58 -0800,
wrote:

The further away a subject is, the less depth of field there is.

**********************

Did you know what you were talking about when you said that?
--
John H

Absolutely! And a clue for you, don't get distance vs. depth of field
confused with depth of field for different focal lengths.


Here, go learn something:

http://www.wrotniak.net/photo/dof/

Extract:
************************************************** *******
Basic facts

The extent of the depth of field depends on what we understand as
"acceptably
sharp" in the definition above. If we are willing to accept more
unsharpness,
the depth of field will extend more. For sharpness-critical applications,
it
will be very shallow.

Depth of field increases as the lens is closed down (i.e., the F-number
increases).

Depth of field is greater for short focal lengths than for long ones. This
difference is quite dramatic.

Depth of field increases with the subject distance.
************************************************** ************

You weren't discussing focal lengths or aperture.



That is a typical asslicker debate technique...........he tries to
generalize a specific, and or narrows a generalization to try to prove his
point and discredit yours.............

and then he wonders why he hold the title of "King of the NG idiots"


--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."





All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:49 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com