Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Doug Kanter
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"John H" wrote in message
...


Of course, one may ask, "What is 'due process of law'?"


One may also ask how long we will put up with people interfering in family
decisions. If you had communicated to your wife what that woman told her
husband, but you had not put it in writing yet, and you were in her
condition, your wife would be going through this exact same bull****. And
that's EXACTLY what it is.


"...nor shall any state deprive any person of life..."

*You* don't know what she said, if anything, to her husband. Apparently 19
Florida judges couldn't figure it out for sure, unless the last one is
always
right.

Almost half the Democrats who voted in the House voted *for* the measure.
Why
are there no complaints against them?


The party affiliation of those who voted for it is irrelevant. It is an
intrusion.


  #2   Report Post  
John H
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 13:44:08 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
.. .


Of course, one may ask, "What is 'due process of law'?"

One may also ask how long we will put up with people interfering in family
decisions. If you had communicated to your wife what that woman told her
husband, but you had not put it in writing yet, and you were in her
condition, your wife would be going through this exact same bull****. And
that's EXACTLY what it is.


"...nor shall any state deprive any person of life..."

*You* don't know what she said, if anything, to her husband. Apparently 19
Florida judges couldn't figure it out for sure, unless the last one is
always
right.

Almost half the Democrats who voted in the House voted *for* the measure.
Why
are there no complaints against them?


The party affiliation of those who voted for it is irrelevant. It is an
intrusion.

When Jimcomma started this, he stated, "Now President George W.
Bush, Rep. Tom DeLay (R-TX) and Sen. Bill Frist (R-TN) are using the
tragic case of Schiavo..."

I assumed you agreed with his position.

My question to you would be, "Why should Scott Peterson get a Supreme Court
hearing, and Schiavo not? Apparently some judges felt their was enough doubt
about the husbands motives and her desires to rule for leaving the feeding tube
in place.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
OT (not political) Terri will soon be gone JimH General 17 March 20th 05 01:24 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:21 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017