Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Tom Ruta" wrote in message
... On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 08:02:41 -0500, "NetSock" wrote: ... I don't think what you call "semi-displacement" hulls are any more dangerous than other hulls at a given speed. Compared to what? A supercharged jon boat? Put me in a V at 60+ please. Compared to other vees. I've been 82 mph in a blown Malibu, and it was quite stable...in fact, it felt very secure. I'd love to see GPS proof of that. It was in fact on a GPSR. Most passes were about 74-78 mph (2 average men aboard), but as fuel lightened the load, we had one good pass with the wind on glass, of 82. This is exactly what high-performance boaters try to minimize...wetted surface. Maybe that's why my buddies Malibu seemed so "solid"...it had a good plant in the water, however, that engine would easily break 100 in a "trimable" hull. He should have added a set of Bennett tabs. I cant see how tabs can help a fixed-prop inboard. And I'm 90% sure the Malibu Corvette had a "ride plate"...not adjustable tabs. -- It's just about going fast...that's all... http://home.insight.rr.com/cgreen/ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
restore salvaged performance sport fish? | General | |||
Performance data | General |