BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   Oil at $56/barrel (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/29299-oil-%2456-barrel.html)

John H March 25th 05 07:01 PM

On 25 Mar 2005 09:43:36 -0800, "basskisser" wrote:


John H wrote:
On 25 Mar 2005 05:02:12 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 Mar 2005 05:18:41 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


John H wrote:
On 23 Mar 2005 11:10:21 -0800, "basskisser"


wrote:


Calif Bill wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message

roups.com...

Calif Bill wrote:
Well, my Chevron stock has doubled in value and I also

get
a
nice
dividend.
Helps with the fuel bills.

Well, I'll ask again. Do you honestly think that if you

pay
MORE
for
gas, that that somehow equates to more money from oil

stock?
You
DO
know that stock value and the price at the pump have very
little
in
common, don't you?


Back to basskisser, EH? Lots of your side has been saying

the
price
is run
up to get more profit. Well, more profit, means more

dividends
and
price of
stock goes up. Simple.

Lots of my "side"? What is my side, Bill? Hmm, so, now, you

are
saying
that because you pay more at the pump, you'll MAKE money????
Here's
a
little simple point for you, Bill. Because the price at the

pump
goes
up, doesn't mean a damned thing to the end profit. It's the

price
of
CRUDE that's went up. Therefore, Chevron paid more for the

crude,
passed that to the pump. Profits did nothing. Let's simplify

it.
Say
a
grocer sells tomatoes for 10 cents a piece, and they cost him

5
cents.
His supplier starts charging 7 cents, he passes that to you,

by
charging you 12 cents. His profit hasn't changed.

Wrong idea. The grocer has a profit margin of 100%. So, when

the
price goes to 7
cents, he raises the price to *14* cents. He's now making an
additional two
cents profit.
--
John H

Have you ever heard of supply and demand? IF he raises the price

of
the
tomatoes too high, no one will buy them, then the "stock" would
go....DOWN.....

You were the one who provided the example. I just corrected your
reasoning.

You "corrected" nothing, John. You simply gave a different scenario,
and it is flawed. The consumer won't stand for an infinite rise in
prices.


Waffling. That's what that's called.
--
John H


Waffling??? ANYBODY who would stand for an infinite rise in the price
of ANYTHING would be just plain dumb. Would you?


Good. You're back to your old self again.

NO ONE could AFFORD an infinite rise in the price of ANYTHING! Therefore, the
comment is INANE!
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

P.Fritz March 25th 05 07:21 PM


"John H" wrote in message
...
On 25 Mar 2005 09:43:36 -0800, "basskisser" wrote:




Good. You're back to your old self again.

NO ONE could AFFORD an infinite rise in the price of ANYTHING! Therefore,
the
comment is INANE!
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."



INANE is asslicker's middle name.



JimH March 25th 05 11:32 PM


"JimH" wrote in message
...
Oil now at $56/barrel with $2.20/gallon prices at the street pumps.

http://tinyurl.com/3jzt2

How much will it be at the docks?

A good year to be without a boat. I do feel your pain. ;-)


Any updates on prices at the docks?

We are paying $2.20 at the street.



basskisser March 28th 05 02:06 PM


P.Fritz wrote:
"John H" wrote in message
...
On 25 Mar 2005 09:43:36 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:




Good. You're back to your old self again.

NO ONE could AFFORD an infinite rise in the price of ANYTHING!

Therefore,
the
comment is INANE!
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."



INANE is asslicker's middle name.


Speaking of inane, I see that you still don't have the mental capacity
to post anything of any substance, and instead, resort to childish name
calling. Quite typical of someone mentally unable to participate on
topic.


basskisser March 28th 05 02:07 PM


John H wrote:
On 25 Mar 2005 09:43:36 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:


John H wrote:
On 25 Mar 2005 05:02:12 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:


John H wrote:
On 24 Mar 2005 05:18:41 -0800, "basskisser"


wrote:


John H wrote:
On 23 Mar 2005 11:10:21 -0800, "basskisser"


wrote:


Calif Bill wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message

roups.com...

Calif Bill wrote:
Well, my Chevron stock has doubled in value and I

also
get
a
nice
dividend.
Helps with the fuel bills.

Well, I'll ask again. Do you honestly think that if you

pay
MORE
for
gas, that that somehow equates to more money from oil

stock?
You
DO
know that stock value and the price at the pump have

very
little
in
common, don't you?


Back to basskisser, EH? Lots of your side has been

saying
the
price
is run
up to get more profit. Well, more profit, means more

dividends
and
price of
stock goes up. Simple.

Lots of my "side"? What is my side, Bill? Hmm, so, now, you

are
saying
that because you pay more at the pump, you'll MAKE

money????
Here's
a
little simple point for you, Bill. Because the price at the

pump
goes
up, doesn't mean a damned thing to the end profit. It's the

price
of
CRUDE that's went up. Therefore, Chevron paid more for the

crude,
passed that to the pump. Profits did nothing. Let's

simplify
it.
Say
a
grocer sells tomatoes for 10 cents a piece, and they cost

him
5
cents.
His supplier starts charging 7 cents, he passes that to

you,
by
charging you 12 cents. His profit hasn't changed.

Wrong idea. The grocer has a profit margin of 100%. So, when

the
price goes to 7
cents, he raises the price to *14* cents. He's now making an
additional two
cents profit.
--
John H

Have you ever heard of supply and demand? IF he raises the

price
of
the
tomatoes too high, no one will buy them, then the "stock"

would
go....DOWN.....

You were the one who provided the example. I just corrected

your
reasoning.

You "corrected" nothing, John. You simply gave a different

scenario,
and it is flawed. The consumer won't stand for an infinite rise

in
prices.

Waffling. That's what that's called.
--
John H


Waffling??? ANYBODY who would stand for an infinite rise in the

price
of ANYTHING would be just plain dumb. Would you?


Good. You're back to your old self again.

NO ONE could AFFORD an infinite rise in the price of ANYTHING!

Therefore, the
comment is INANE!
--
John H

Great, I'm glad that you realize your error.


basskisser March 28th 05 02:09 PM


JimH wrote:
"JimH" wrote in message
...
Oil now at $56/barrel with $2.20/gallon prices at the street pumps.

http://tinyurl.com/3jzt2

How much will it be at the docks?

A good year to be without a boat. I do feel your pain. ;-)


Any updates on prices at the docks?

We are paying $2.20 at the street.


$2.00 here.



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:49 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com