Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 10:13:45 -0500, "JimH" wrote: wrote in message groups.com... From today's e-mail: At about 10:20 AM today the Senate passed our Boater Safety Education Bill. The vote was on final passage was: 30 yea-18 nay. Speaking in favor: Jacobsen, Swecker, Rockefeller, Haugen, Spanel Speaking against: Benson, Zarelli, Benton, Hewitt, Schoesler The opposition seemed to come from uninformed Republicans, but regardless the Bill passed. You had to turn a good news story into a political one? If so, how about offering specifics on the bill so we can see why "uninformed Republicans" opposed it? How about listing the party affiliations of those voting for and against it? Oops - the 800 pound gorilla in the closet - POLITICS!!! And the thread goes straight into the crapper. You guys need help - really. When was the last time you got on anyone from the *left* for starting off topic threads and posting *off topic*? Yet I can guarantee you that the vast majority of *OT* posts and responses are made by folks from the left side of the fence. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... From today's e-mail: At about 10:20 AM today the Senate passed our Boater Safety Education Bill. The vote was on final passage was: 30 yea-18 nay. Speaking in favor: Jacobsen, Swecker, Rockefeller, Haugen, Spanel Speaking against: Benson, Zarelli, Benton, Hewitt, Schoesler The opposition seemed to come from uninformed Republicans, but regardless the Bill passed. Were the Democrats voting against the bill also uniformed, or were they just against the bill for some valid reason? |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
JimH wrote:
Were the Democrats voting against the bill also uniformed, or were they just against the bill for some valid reason? *************** This is not a partisan issue. Don't try to make it one. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... JimH wrote: Were the Democrats voting against the bill also uniformed, or were they just against the bill for some valid reason? *************** This is not a partisan issue. Don't try to make it one. *You* already did. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is not a partisan issue. Don't try to make it one.
*You* already did. *************** How? By passing along an email noting the passage of the bill through one of our two state houses? By failing to doctor the email to delete the author's comment that those opposed seemed to be Republicans who were not well informed about the bill? Do you think the author meant that all Republicans are always "uniformed", on all issues? That would be a ridiculous, borderline paranoid conclusion. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On 16 Mar 2005 18:28:16 -0800, wrote: From today's e-mail: At about 10:20 AM today the Senate passed our Boater Safety Education Bill. The vote was on final passage was: 30 yea-18 nay. Speaking in favor: Jacobsen, Swecker, Rockefeller, Haugen, Spanel Speaking against: Benson, Zarelli, Benton, Hewitt, Schoesler The opposition seemed to come from uninformed Republicans, but regardless the Bill passed. Next step. Pass this bill in the House. We are not done yet. Today we got thrown a life-ring. Great potential for a good discussion of appropriate measures to keep our waterways safe. Good post to start with. Why the pass on his attempt to pass this as a non-partisan post? You got on me earlier for questioning it. Why the pass? Fair question Tom. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Somewhat off topic, Locust trees available in Wash, State. | Boat Building | |||
OT--Not again! More Chinese money buying our politicians. | General | |||
OT--Great headlines everywhere | General |