On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 06:57:54 -0500, Jeff Rigby wrote:


So Bush is going to increase the national debt by several trillion with
his
special interests (war on Terror, education) where did the other 43
trillion in debt come from? Democrats who are not traditionally fiscally
responsible. And Jim you want to replace Bush with WHAT? A Democrat.

Where the federal debt is concerned, Republicans are #1.

http://zfacts.com/p/318.html

Jeff Rigby wrote:

"Jim," wrote in message
...

The Bush administration and the Republican Party seem to have lost all
capacity for financial self-control, turning their backs on the GOP's
historical record of responsible fiscal management.


pointed out, "The federal government's obligations, current liabilities,

and unfunded fiscal commitments are over $43 trillion and rising. . . .
Yes, that's trillions with 12 zeros rather than billions with nine zeros."


So Bush is going to increase the national debt by several trillion with his
special interests (war on Terror, education) where did the other 43 trillion
in debt come from? Democrats who are not traditionally fiscally
responsible. And Jim you want to replace Bush with WHAT? A Democrat.



Well i seem to recall that Clinton (a democrat) ran a surplus for a
couple of years.

HarryKrause wrote:

Jeff Rigby wrote:

"Jim," wrote in message
...

The Bush administration and the Republican Party seem to have lost all
capacity for financial self-control, turning their backs on the GOP's
historical record of responsible fiscal management.



pointed out, "The federal government's obligations, current liabilities,

and unfunded fiscal commitments are over $43 trillion and rising. . . .
Yes, that's trillions with 12 zeros rather than billions with nine
zeros."


So Bush is going to increase the national debt by several trillion
with his
special interests (war on Terror, education) where did the other 43
trillion
in debt come from? Democrats who are not traditionally fiscally
responsible. And Jim you want to replace Bush with WHAT? A Democrat.



Ahh, well, so what if Bush is spending like a drunken sailor...I mean,
it doesn't matter, right?

Apparently so long as a republican is in office, he can do no wrong.

On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 13:59:16 +0000, Jim, wrote:


Well i seem to recall that Clinton (a democrat) ran a surplus for a couple
of years.

Since WWII, Reagan and the two Bushes are the only Presidents to add to
the Gross Federal Debt.

http://zfacts.com/p/480.html

On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 23:51:41 -0500, " Tuuk" wrote:

There you go again krause,,

entering someone into the bozo bin,,, turns out this means you will read,
print, re-read, then get the little woman to read (the law student, 20 years
your junior).

Ain't it the truth!

--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 23:51:41 -0500, " Tuuk"
wrote:

There you go again krause,,

entering someone into the bozo bin,,, turns out this means you will read,
print, re-read, then get the little woman to read (the law student, 20
years
your junior).

Ain't it the truth!

--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

Indeed. I see his responses to posts I make when someone comments on them.
He seems infatuated with those who he says he killfiles. Makes sense, eh?

"JimH" wrote in message
...

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 23:51:41 -0500, " Tuuk"
wrote:

There you go again krause,,

entering someone into the bozo bin,,, turns out this means you will read,
print, re-read, then get the little woman to read (the law student, 20
years
your junior).

Ain't it the truth!

--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

Indeed. I see his responses to posts I make when someone comments on
them. He seems infatuated with those who he says he killfiles. Makes
sense, eh?

And he whines about others supposedly changing ID's yet he does it
constantly because he has been killfiled by so many people.

On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 08:23:12 -0500, thunder wrote:

On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 06:57:54 -0500, Jeff Rigby wrote:


So Bush is going to increase the national debt by several trillion with
his
special interests (war on Terror, education) where did the other 43
trillion in debt come from? Democrats who are not traditionally fiscally
responsible. And Jim you want to replace Bush with WHAT? A Democrat.

Where the federal debt is concerned, Republicans are #1.

http://zfacts.com/p/318.html

This chart hides whatever the GDP was doing at the same time. If the GDP was
decreasing, and the debt remained constant, the chart would show an increase in
the percent of GDP. It is a typical liberal manner of showing data.

Find a chart with *both* numbers tracked. Then one can see what actually
occurred.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 09:31:11 -0500, "JimH" wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 23:51:41 -0500, " Tuuk"
wrote:

There you go again krause,,

entering someone into the bozo bin,,, turns out this means you will read,
print, re-read, then get the little woman to read (the law student, 20
years
your junior).

Ain't it the truth!

--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

Indeed. I see his responses to posts I make when someone comments on them.
He seems infatuated with those who he says he killfiles. Makes sense, eh?


I wonder how much he charges for a ticket to his killfile (if he has one). I'd
like to sign up.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

John H wrote:
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 08:23:12 -0500, thunder wrote:


On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 06:57:54 -0500, Jeff Rigby wrote:



So Bush is going to increase the national debt by several trillion with
his
special interests (war on Terror, education) where did the other 43
trillion in debt come from? Democrats who are not traditionally fiscally
responsible. And Jim you want to replace Bush with WHAT? A Democrat.

Where the federal debt is concerned, Republicans are #1.

http://zfacts.com/p/318.html


This chart hides whatever the GDP was doing at the same time. If the GDP was
decreasing, and the debt remained constant, the chart would show an increase in
the percent of GDP. It is a typical liberal manner of showing data.

Find a chart with *both* numbers tracked. Then one can see what actually
occurred.

John -- rather than just challenging the data provided, why don't *YOU*
provide data to refute the argument. You're not in a classroom here!