Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#41
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim Carter" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message nk.net... Nearly 18% of Chinese exports go to the US. Since we're discussing the effect that Chinese aggression against Taiwan would have, then it's safe to say that China would lose the following trade partners in the event of a war with Taiwan: US, Japan, and Taiwan. Together, those three countries make up 3 of China's top 5 trade partners...and almost 44% of China's total exports. It's also likely that China would lose the following as trade partners: Hong Kong, S. Korea, and Germany. That'd account for 70% of China's trade. Keep in mind, that this says nothing about the effect that our corporations would have in pulling their factories out China. I do think your calculations are very incorrect. If the PRC would be taking Taiwan back into the fold, they don't lose Taiwan as a trading partner, then gain it. Japan would not be lost as a trading partner for China as Japan has too much to lose with their trade with China to worry about the little bit with Taiwan. Also, the Japanese people are opposed to any war and their government would topple if there was any hint of an impending war. The exact same can be said of Germany as well as the rest of the European Economic Community. Where have you been when you are mentioning Hong Kong in your calculations? Hong Kong "is" a part of the PRC and has been since July 1, 1997. The American corporations pulling out of China would have almost no effect as they would be immediately replaced by corporations from The European Economic Community, Brazil and from Japan. This is the silliest statement of your post. Who would the EU, Brazilian, and Japanese Corporations sell their products to if the US quit doing business with China? First of all, overnight, China would lose almost 20% of its export business. There'd be a huge surplus of goods with nobody to sell them to. Secondly, the EU and Brazil have unemployment rates that are around 10%. (Germany's is up over 12%) Suppose the EU and Brazil rushed to fill the void left by American companies. How high would that push the current rate? 15% unemployment? 20%? As Henry Ford pointed out, you have to pay your workers enough that they can afford to buy your product. The Chinese don't; consequently, they must rely on export. Who will they export to? Not the US. And not the EU because the EU will have too many unemployed people to purchase the goods. If the US pulled out of the Chinese economy, we'd be hurt, particularly in the short term...but they'd be devastated to a point from which they'd never recover. |
#42
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "NOYB" wrote in message ink.net... This is the silliest statement of your post. Who would the EU, Brazilian, and Japanese Corporations sell their products to if the US quit doing business with China? Why, China of course. First of all, overnight, China would lose almost 20% of its export business. There'd be a huge surplus of goods with nobody to sell them to. These goods would be immediately rerouted to other nations who could and would immediately purchase them at a discount. Secondly, the EU and Brazil have unemployment rates that are around 10%. (Germany's is up over 12%) Suppose the EU and Brazil rushed to fill the void left by American companies. How high would that push the current rate? Your knowledge of international trade needs to be upgraded. The trade with China and the increased prescence of the European Economic Community and Brazil into China would reduce the unemployment rate in those countries NOT increase it. 15% unemployment? 20%? As Henry Ford pointed out, you have to pay your workers enough that they can afford to buy your product. The Chinese don't; consequently, they must rely on export. Now you are really showing you have limited knowledge of China. It has the fastest growing economy in the world and it has the largest consumer base in the world. Who will they export to? Not the US. True..... And not the EU because the EU will have too many unemployed people to purchase the goods. Not true. Read again the trade figures for the EU If the US pulled out of the Chinese economy, we'd be hurt, particularly in the short term... True...... but they'd be devastated to a point from which they'd never recover. China would not be devastated at all if the US pulled out of the Chinese economy. The US would be replaced by others that are willing to participate in Global Trade. Jim Carter |
#43
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "DSK" wrote in message .. . Y'know, I really really *don't* want to find out by trying it... if you're smart, you wouldn't either... NOYB wrote: Of course I don't want to find out by trying it. Good. Let's both hope that the loudest voices in the Bush/Cheney cabinet are at least as smart as you are... ... But it's important to debate the hypotheticals. If you don't have your head stuck way way deep in the sand, sure. ... And my best guess is that we'd have a recession that would compare to the Carter years...and China would have a depression that would dwarf even our Great Depression. I think you've got it backwards. If our currency crashed, we'd be in the same shape as the Weimar Republic (look it up)... maybe worse. BTW take a look at some of the percentages here http://en.ce.cn/Markets/Currencies/2..._2411132.shtml This is the drop in the dollar caused merely by the slowing down of the rate at which the Chinese are buying up our debt, not even selling off any. BTW this article mentions the increase in Chinese cash holdings as over $500 billion, I'm pretty sure that figure is for all foreign exchange reserves...not just US. " Statistics from the US Treasury Department show Chinese mainland holdings of treasury securities totalled US$174.7bn at the end of September, up from US$172.3bn at the end of August. " what percent of our GDP does that represent hmm? A bit more than 3% nyet? 4.26% US GDP= 11.734 trillion=11,734 billion 500 billion/11,734 billion=4.26% Either way... Were'd you get the "7 times our annual GDP" number from?!?!? BTW here's an interesting little bid'ness article http://www.morganstanley.com/GEFdata...i.html#anchor3 Get the facts, NOBBY, get the facts. Yes, definitely get the facts, Doug. China's US Treasury holdings are less than 5% of our annual GDP...not "7 times our annual GDP" as you claimed. |
#44
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "NOYB" wrote in message ink.net... Perhaps we can just make ICBM jammers and deflectors rather than missiles that will blow them out of the air? A launch coming over the polar ice caps would be forced down before it hit our northern border. There's not much worth saving north of Chicago anyhow. So says the mayor of Swampville Florida |
#45
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim Carter" wrote in message ... As I said before. Your opinions are too narrow minded and your grasp of Global Politics is lacking. Jim Carter The facts have never gotten into the way of NOYB's fantasies before. |
#46
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Don White" wrote in message ... "Jim Carter" wrote in message ... As I said before. Your opinions are too narrow minded and your grasp of Global Politics is lacking. Jim Carter The facts have never gotten into the way of NOYB's fantasies before. 2 posts, 2 insults. What have you ever contributed to this NG besides insults and personal attacks Don? |
#47
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim Carter" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message ink.net... This is the silliest statement of your post. Who would the EU, Brazilian, and Japanese Corporations sell their products to if the US quit doing business with China? Why, China of course. The Chinese have no money to buy the things that the US manufacturers are producing. Despite having more than four times our population, there's still a $30 billion trade deficit between our countries. China should be buying 4 times as much from us as we're buying from them, yet they're buying less than half as much. First of all, overnight, China would lose almost 20% of its export business. There'd be a huge surplus of goods with nobody to sell them to. These goods would be immediately rerouted to other nations who could and would immediately purchase them at a discount. The other nations are already in economic hardship with record unemployment right now. You're advocating EU, Brazilian, and Japanese companies moving to China, which would only drive up the unemployment rate even higher. Unemployed people don't buy very much. Secondly, the EU and Brazil have unemployment rates that are around 10%. (Germany's is up over 12%) Suppose the EU and Brazil rushed to fill the void left by American companies. How high would that push the current rate? Your knowledge of international trade needs to be upgraded. The trade with China and the increased prescence of the European Economic Community and Brazil into China would reduce the unemployment rate in those countries NOT increase it. You're trying to tell me that when a German corporation moves its factory to China, that reduces the unemployment rate in Germany? You may want to rethink that. 15% unemployment? 20%? As Henry Ford pointed out, you have to pay your workers enough that they can afford to buy your product. The Chinese don't; consequently, they must rely on export. Now you are really showing you have limited knowledge of China. It has the fastest growing economy in the world and it has the largest consumer base in the world. China's economy may or may not be the fastest growing. we're now realizing that the Chinese may be concealing their true economic numbers (like they did with the SARS outbreak): http://www.latimes.com/business/la-f...ck=2&cset=true Who will they export to? Not the US. True..... And not the EU because the EU will have too many unemployed people to purchase the goods. Not true. Read again the trade figures for the EU I read them. China exports 15% more to the US than to all of the EU countries combined: http://www.chinaembassy.org.in/eng/zgbd/t172961.htm Germany, the Netherlands, the UK, and France are the only EU countries to make a list of China's top 10 trade partners...and they place 5th, 6th, 7th, and 10th respectively on that list. Combined, they import $28.955 billion from China...which is $25 billion *less* than what the US imports alone from China. http://www.uschina.org/statistics/fo...rade_2004.html If the US pulled out of the Chinese economy, we'd be hurt, particularly in the short term... True...... but they'd be devastated to a point from which they'd never recover. China would not be devastated at all if the US pulled out of the Chinese economy. The US would be replaced by others that are willing to participate in Global Trade. Not a chance. As the US economy goes, so goes the World economy...but we're better at bouncing back. |
#48
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Don White" wrote in message ... "Jim Carter" wrote in message ... As I said before. Your opinions are too narrow minded and your grasp of Global Politics is lacking. Jim Carter The facts have never gotten into the way of NOYB's fantasies before. The funny thing is, Don, that once we start arguing facts, I always post the links to prove my point...and my opposition moves on to another thread. |
#49
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "JimH" wrote in message ... 2 posts, 2 insults. What have you ever contributed to this NG besides insults and personal attacks Don? I try to balance out your crap Jimmy. |
#50
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
''''' Bush needs China's contribution to any solution to the N. Korean
problem. Maybe. "'"'"' kanter,,, as a lead puppet of krause's,, you have said some stupid,, stupid ,,, embarrassing statements at times,, this one actually surprises me. I am not sure if krause will be happy with it though,,, "Doug Kanter" wrote in message news ![]() Bush needs China's contribution to any solution to the N. Korean problem. Maybe. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Today's Laugh from Howdy Dubya... | General | |||
( OT ) Why Won't Dubya Apologize? | General |